Get over what, dumbass?
You really don't understand the law. He was found Not Guilty...but not because it was proven that he didn't do it ....
He was found Not Guilty because there was a "shadow of a doubt" .... .01% of doubt means the Jury must acquit.
But he was found Guilty in Civil court
And in this case, his stupid ass tried to "steal back" his items by force when all he had to do was call a cop to escort him to the hotel room. If he didn't feel comfortable and thought the cops would do nothing because it was him, then he should have had someone else make the call that "Someone in such a such a room is selling highly valueable stolen good."