OH SHIT DWIGHT HOWARD request Trade to the Nets!!!!!!!!!

:confused:
Either you are joking... or you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.... or how to read...

Of course they are SUBJECT to approval by the League (not David Stern acting unilaterally) because like I said, they must fall under the NBA rules and guidelines... this is a review process... not an opportunity for David Stern to block trades he doesn't "like"

...come on bruh... think about it... if David Stern had that kind of power why would they need a CBA?think man think... Why lose money and fans in a lockout?? He would just manipulate the league as he sees fit... end of story... and tell everybody get back to work

If you don't understand that then... peace god... cause ain't no saving you



this is ... i dunno.... it's sad bro... so have you come to grips with the reality that there was NEVER a trade.... just rumors... or are you gonna keep living in a international russin mafia fantasy of a grand conspiracy to acquire Dwight Howard??

:roflmao3:

Yeah league approval..who do you think the "league" is comprised of? The "league" is David Stern and the owners. Stern is employed by the OWNERS....what part of that don't you get? When it is described in the Rule book as SUBJECT TO LEAGUE APPROVAL The league is Stern and the owners. He doesn't use the tactic because in most cases owners would not agree. He can't make them totally unhappy or they could ultimately fire him. The majority of the owners agreed on this that's why it happened. Why do you think the ONLY OWNERS who are speaking out are the ones who were involved?...... He doesn't have unilateral power because he has to basically OK the moves with the owners... Again what part of that don't you get? Did you think league approval meant the players? Come on man.

Coaches, and some owners wanted the Gasol to LA trade vetoed but there wasn't enough owner support.
 
Yeah league approval..who do you think the "league" is comprised of? The "league" is David Stern and the owners. Stern is employed by the OWNERS....what part of that don't you get? When it is described in the Rule book as SUBJECT TO LEAGUE APPROVAL The league is Stern and the owners. He doesn't use the tactic because in most cases owners would not agree. He can't make them totally unhappy or they could ultimately fire him. The majority of the owners agreed on this that's why it happened. Why do you think the ONLY OWNERS who are speaking out are the ones who were involved?...... He doesn't have unilateral power because he has to basically OK the moves with the owners... Again what part of that don't you get? Did you think league approval meant the players? Come on man.

Coaches, and some owners wanted the Gasol to LA trade vetoed but there wasn't enough owner support.

You are out of pocket... sticking your nose in the conversation without understanding what is being said...fall back... take a deep breath... read the replies then then contribute something that is worthy of reading please... otherwise I won't respond to your crazy talk any further...

no hard feelings... but fall waaaaaaaaaaaaaay back right quick
peace
 
You are out of pocket... sticking your nose in the conversation without understanding what is being said...fall back... take a deep breath... read the replies then then contribute something that is worthy of reading please... otherwise I won't respond to your crazy talk any further...

no hard feelings... but fall waaaaaaaaaaaaaay back right quick
peace

LOL...This dude said out of pocket... :lol::lol: Clearly understood what was being said. You've said plenty times over the past 2 days that people are acting like Stern has this unilateral power and can veto what he wants. You acknowledged that trades are subject to league approval. The league in that text is comprised of Stern and the owners. Not one owner who was not involved in the trade, spoke up in defense of it. The owners wanted it stopped, Stern works for them....he wanted it stopped....with no opposition from his employers he has the power to veto any trade..

You were wrong, accept that...and get out of here with that "Higher road" bullshit bruh.
 
http://m.bleacherreport.com/article...do-magic-acquire-andre-iguodala-or-josh-smith

According to this article the magic are making some moves to keep Dwight and Dwight wants to stay maybe we will see I guess

"Howard’s demands are interesting because he could have an alternative motive behind them. He ‘s not stupid, he knows the chances of Orlando landing either player are small. By making these demands he shields himself from criticism when he leaves Orlando. The last thing Howard wants is to be hated by fans league-wide, similar to the LeBron James situation."


let it go man..he's gone..time to start thinking about the future..
 
Yeah league approval..who do you think the "league" is comprised of? The "league" is David Stern and the owners. Stern is employed by the OWNERS....what part of that don't you get? When it is described in the Rule book as SUBJECT TO LEAGUE APPROVAL The league is Stern and the owners. He doesn't use the tactic because in most cases owners would not agree. He can't make them totally unhappy or they could ultimately fire him. The majority of the owners agreed on this that's why it happened. Why do you think the ONLY OWNERS who are speaking out are the ones who were involved?...... He doesn't have unilateral power because he has to basically OK the moves with the owners... Again what part of that don't you get? Did you think league approval meant the players? Come on man.

Coaches, and some owners wanted the Gasol to LA trade vetoed but there wasn't enough owner support.


LOL...This dude said out of pocket... :lol::lol: Clearly understood what was being said. You've said plenty times over the past 2 days that people are acting like Stern has this unilateral power and can veto what he wants. You acknowledged that trades are subject to league approval. The league in that text is comprised of Stern and the owners. Not one owner who was not involved in the trade, spoke up in defense of it. The owners wanted it stopped, Stern works for them....he wanted it stopped....with no opposition from his employers he has the power to veto any trade..

You were wrong, accept that...and get out of here with that "Higher road" bullshit bruh.
:confused:
What are you talking about?
...Do you even know what you are talking about?
Did the owners involved speak out or not?
What trade are you constantly referring to... the CHRIS PAUL trade??
You do realize that the NBA owns Chris Paul's team ....don't you??
You do realize that you agree with me that stern cannot kill trades unilaterally and in act does work for the owners... so he CANNOT veto what he wants.. just because he wants to...

Last time trying to explain this to you man... just like a ref cannot call a foul because he "wants" to and is SUPPOSED to be bound by NBA Rules and Guidelines in the calls he makes... David Stern cannot kill a deal unless it violates the NBA rules and regulations... wait for it.. UNLESS... it is his team as is the case with the Hornets... I can't help you if you don't understand that...

peace
 
:confused:
What are you talking about?
...Do you even know what you are talking about?
Did the owners involved speak out or not?
What trade are you constantly referring to... the CHRIS PAUL trade??
You do realize that the NBA owns Chris Paul's team ....don't you??
You do realize that you agree with me that stern cannot kill trades unilaterally and in act does work for the owners... so he CANNOT veto what he wants.. just because he wants to...

Last time trying to explain this to you man... just like a ref cannot call a foul because he "wants" to and is SUPPOSED to be bound by NBA Rules and Guidelines in the calls he makes... David Stern cannot kill a deal unless it violates the NBA rules and regulations... wait for it.. UNLESS... it is his team as is the case with the Hornets... I can't help you if you don't understand that...

peace

Those 2 sentences say the same thing. "Why do you think the only owners speaking out are the ones involved?"...Speaking up as in DEFENSE of the trade...

"Not one owner that was NOT involved spoke up"-Again which means in defense of the trade.

David Stern can veto any trade he wants, but the problem is the owners would railroad him out of a damn job. It doesn't have to violate any rules or regulations. Not one. The Kings and Hornets deal was protested by one owner...and they let it ride. I honestly think that even if the league didn't own the Hornets they would have gotten vetoed. Cause in his "official" statement it's sad that it was better that he remain in NO...he explained it as his commissioner power NOT owner power. He could have clearly just said "As the league owns the Hornets, we do not like the deal"...That sounds far more justified than "Basketball Reasons"..Even though we all know it was owner backlash...he still explained it as commissioner...Notice his statement..

That it was decided FREE FROM THE INFLUENCE OF THE OWNERS......Gilberts email didn't come till 10pm...he had already vetoed it by then.

Why would he explain it as commissioner if he could have easily justified by saying we own it?....
 
So the nets r looking pretty fucked up bout now... Thought Howard was in the bag ....nets bout to get super desperate....
 
Those 2 sentences say the same thing. "Why do you think the only owners speaking out are the ones involved?"...Speaking up as in DEFENSE of the trade...

"Not one owner that was NOT involved spoke up"-Again which means in defense of the trade.

David Stern can veto any trade he wants, but the problem is the owners would railroad him out of a damn job. It doesn't have to violate any rules or regulations. Not one. The Kings and Hornets deal was protested by one owner...and they let it ride. I honestly think that even if the league didn't own the Hornets they would have gotten vetoed. Cause in his "official" statement it's sad that it was better that he remain in NO...he explained it as his commissioner power NOT owner power. He could have clearly just said "As the league owns the Hornets, we do not like the deal"...That sounds far more justified than "Basketball Reasons"..Even though we all know it was owner backlash...he still explained it as commissioner...Notice his statement..

That it was decided FREE FROM THE INFLUENCE OF THE OWNERS......Gilberts email didn't come till 10pm...he had already vetoed it by then.

Why would he explain it as commissioner if he could have easily justified by saying we own it?....
you in the Dwight Howard thread talking about the Chris Paul trade... and using that as an example as to Stern'sveto power ... then you said the kings and hornet's trade... like I said off the jump... you outta pocket... read the thread FIRST before you try sticking your nose in the conversation

this is me giving up on you :smh:
 
Last edited:
So the nets r looking pretty fucked up bout now... Thought Howard was in the bag ....nets bout to get super desperate....

Knew you were hating why are we going to get desperate???

We can keep our cap space and sign him in the off season


again homie you let ur true feelings come out.

Knicks sign tyson chandler i say good signing. Dwight says he want to go to the nets you find any reason why it can't happen going so far to say we paying farmer 14 million. :lol::lol:

DavidBaumann33 David Baumann
No tampering charges right now, Magic CEO Alex Martins just said. Pic: yfrog.com/nulledoyj
 
Knew you were hating why are we going to get desperate???

We can keep our cap space and sign him in the off season


again homie you let ur true feelings come out.

Knicks sign tyson chandler i say good signing. Dwight says he want to go to the nets you find any reason why it can't happen going so far to say we paying farmer 14 million. :lol::lol:

Go to netsarescorching.com nets fans are saying the same thing. The nets are a desperate franchise. Plus last night u said Dwight was a done deal. Now he may end up a rocket or even a laker and if he does the nets may not get a shot at him. Plus u kept saying they save orl money but ur dude David Aldridge said orl doesn't like the nets offer. Like I said last brook Lopez is simply not enough for a star of Howard's caliber and orl isn't looking at the money they want a competitive team. U argued against it but who's looking more correct at this moment?

It ain't hate it's fact, orl would be dumb to just accept brook Lopez and low first rounders just to save some money and lose their star when they can get better deals from the lakers or rockets.
 
Broussard just said on espn the meeting did take place, the magic are investigating and will file tampering charges against the nets. This has the nets scared and they are moving forward after nene .

6:24 p.m. -- New Magic president Alex Martins told the media that the team has not filed a tampering charge against the Nets. The NBA confirms this as well. But Martins did leave it open as a possiblility.

745pm Aldridge just read a nets statement saying billy king did not meet with Dwight Howard . They did not say proky didn't and they didn't say king didn't meet with a member of Dwight's people. The magic are also are aggressively investigating tampering charges if PROVEN THEY WILL FILE TAMPERING CHARGES.

Also the magic WILL NOT BE DICTATED TOO.

Also Howard flip flops between staying and going and he hasn't told them he wants to leave.


Now broussard said they WILL.
 
Last edited:
ChrisMannixSI Chris Mannix
Fegan says the Orlando gave Howard permission to talk to three teams. New Jersey was one of them.

Tampering charge....gone....Man too much bullshit and deception, get this shit over with...
 
Tampering charge....gone....Man too much bullshit and deception, get this shit over with...

exactly it was a ploy.

Howard made his choice it was the Nets

which is why the Nets haven't done anything.

Orlando gives his agent permission to talk to teams???

then say TAMPERING.

and accuse the team Howard says I want to go there.

they were hoping Stern would block the trade or when the nets save their cap space stop them from signing howard during free agency.

Orlando dirty :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Aight Killa you can have your job back. I been on the wire all day, it snowed like bitch so I had nothing to do. LOL
 
Aight Killa you can have your job back. I been on the wire all day, it snowed like bitch so I had nothing to do. LOL

:lol::lol::lol: you held it down man took my son to the doctor for his 9 month check up and put up Christmas decorations.

Orlando :smh::smh::smh::smh::smh:

Also Stephen A Smith said the Nets are trying to get both nene and Howard. HOW??????
 
sio now no obstacles, time for the nets to sweeten that offer... magic aren't interested in brook and 2/3 picks and a throw-in player.

i wonder if dallas is the 3rd team, they have a big as tpe now due to the chandler move.
nets, houston, dallas? or nets, lakers, houston or dallas?
 
sio now no obstacles, time for the nets to sweeten that offer... magic aren't interested in brook and 2/3 picks and a throw-in player.

i wonder if dallas is the 3rd team, they have a big as tpe now due to the chandler move.
nets, houston, dallas? or nets, lakers, houston or dallas?

Where are you getting that the Magic isn't interested? DA is the same one that claimed no owners said anything about the Paul trade, now he saying different. Cause it's damn sure not on his twitter.... I don't see anything from the Magic saying they aren't interested, it just says they are gonna listen to every offer and choose the best one.
 
sio now no obstacles, time for the nets to sweeten that offer... magic aren't interested in brook and 2/3 picks and a throw-in player.

i wonder if dallas is the 3rd team, they have a big as tpe now due to the chandler move.
nets, houston, dallas? or nets, lakers, houston or dallas?

actually it's Houston and Agent Creed stop it.

If they weren't interested in what the Nets were offering why would they give Dwight permission to talk with them :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

any way Dan Fegan represents nene too.

Nene deal is on hold because what was suppose to happen. Dwight goes to the Nets and Rockets who are chasing after Nene get him.
 
Where are you getting that the Magic isn't interested? DA is the same one that claimed no owners said anything about the Paul trade, now he saying different. Cause it's damn sure not on his twitter.... I don't see anything from the Magic saying they aren't interested, it just says they are gonna listen to every offer and choose the best one.

first result in a google search man

but the Orlando Magic don't seem all that enamored with what the Nets are offering. New Jersey's offer centers around big man Brook Lopez and multiple draft picks, but the Magic aren't interested now, according to David Aldridge of NBA.com

The Magic, the source said, will not allow a repeat of the Shaquille O'Neal departure from Orlando to Los Angeles in 1996, when O'Neal walked as a free agent and the Magic were left with nothing. If the organization ultimately decides it has no choice but to trade Howard, it will do so. But the Magic will decide where he goes. The source said a reported proposed package by the Nets of center Brook Lopez and Draft picks for Howard is not at all interesting to the Magic.

http://www.sbnation.com/2011-nba-fr...ard-trade-rumor-new-jersey-nets-orlando-magic
 
I just find it odd that only DA reported it. My bad.... but to be honest man... who knows, all this source shit is irrelevant.

Sources told us Lebron and Wade were leaning toward the Bulls. Sources told us it was Bulls or Knicks, then Bulls or Cleveland. Sources told us Bosh to Cleveland. Sources told us Paul to NY was a done deal....fuck sources I'm gonna stop believing shit until it's either agents, GMs, or consensus...
 
I just find it odd that only DA reported it.

others prob did too but i just looked him up. brussard is saying a few more players would have to added to make it work under the cap ( I said that last night didn't ? but I was hating right killa? lol) basically the nets would have to gut themselves and that includes marrow to orlando... jordan farmar, lopez and 3 picks ain't cuttin it and is last resort.
 
Okay I get it Nene does a sign and trade and he gets his fifth year with the Magic.

Denver did want Brook for Melo.


Chris Duhon is on the Magic???
 
Magic general manager Otis Smith confirmed to ESPN the Magazine on Friday night that he granted permission to Fegan to speak to the Nets about a deal involving Howard.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

this is Otis Smith dude just sign and trade big baby and sign von wafer. same dude who overpaid lewis.


Hell if he wants this deal lets give it to him
 
Back
Top