Obama & Latinos - The Next Stage of the Race

Makkonnen

The Quizatz Haderach
BGOL Investor
How do you think Obama will fair in the west among latinos? Its a group that is figured to be in HillBill's pocket. Will a prominent latino politician or activist help Barack endear himself to mexican-americans? I think that if Barack can break down a few sentences in spanish ala W Bush he can snag enough latino votes to counter HillBill.

I'm interested in seeing this black brown love so many latinos have told me about.


What's your take? News stories about this?
 
<font size="4">

Nevada Debate: Latino support for Barack Obama

</font size>
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OXJif-cGFYI&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OXJif-cGFYI&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
 
<font size="6 "><center>
The Black-Brown Divide</font size></center>



wrodriquez_0204.jpg



TIME
By GREGORY RODRIGUEZ
Saturday, Jan. 26, 2008

I imagine he said it as if he were confessing a deep, dark secret. And, of course (wink, wink), he had no idea his little confession would make the rounds. But when Sergio Bendixen, Hillary Clinton's pollster and resident Latino expert, told the New Yorker after her win in New Hampshire that "the Hispanic voter--and I want to say this very carefully--has not shown a lot of willingness or affinity to support black candidates," he started a firestorm of innuendo that has begun to shape how the media are covering the race for the Democratic presidential nomination in the heavily Hispanic Western states.

After the Jan. 19 Nevada caucuses, in which Latino voters supported Senator Clinton by a ratio of nearly 3 to 1, some journalists literally borrowed Bendixen's analysis word for word before going on to speculate about Barack Obama's political fortunes in such delegate-rich states as California and Texas. Ignoring the possibility that Nevada's Latino voters actually preferred Clinton or, at the very least, had fond memories of her husband's presidency, more than a few pundits jumped on the idea that Latino voters simply didn't like the fact that her opponent was African American.

The only problem with this new conventional wisdom is that it's wrong. "It's one of those unqualified stereotypes about Latinos that people embrace even though there's not a bit of data to support it," says political scientist Fernando Guerra of Loyola Marymount University, an expert on Latino voting patterns. "Here in Los Angeles, all three black members of Congress represent heavily Latino districts and couldn't survive without significant Latino support."

Latino Votes Have Helped Elect Black Candidates
Nationwide, no fewer than eight black House members--including New York's Charles Rangel and Texas' Al Green--represent districts that are more than 25% Latino and must therefore depend heavily on Latino votes. And there are other examples. University of Washington political scientist Matt Barreto has begun compiling a list of black big-city mayors who have received large-scale Latino support over the past several decades. In 1983, Harold Washington pulled 80% of the Latino vote in Chicago. David Dinkins won 73% in New York City's mayoral race in 1989. And Denver's Wellington Webb garnered more than 70% in 1991, as did Ron Kirk in Dallas in 1995 and again in 1997 and '99. If he had gone back further, Barreto could have added longtime Los Angeles mayor Tom Bradley, who won a majority of Latino votes in all four of his re-election campaigns between 1977 and 1989.

Latinos Are Not Monolithic
Are these political scientists arguing that race is irrelevant to Latino voters? Not at all. Hispanics, coming from many countries, are hardly monolithic; but all things being equal, Latino voters would probably prefer to support a Latino candidate over a non-Latino candidate, and a white candidate over a black candidate. That's largely because they are less familiar with black politicians, as there are fewer big-name black candidates than white ones, and because, stereotypes not withstanding, many Latinos don't live anywhere near African Americans. California, for example, which has the largest Latino population in the country, is only 6% black. Furthermore, in politics, things are never equal.

Its About Context
"It's all about context," says Rodolfo de la Garza, a political-science professor at Columbia University. "It always depends on who else is running. Would Latino Democrats vote for a black candidate over a white Republican? Hell, yes. How about over a Latino Republican? I'm very sure they would." Guerra says name recognition and the role of mediating entities such as unions, political parties and Latino elected officials are also important. For a well-known black politician or incumbent, there is little problem winning Latino voters. But when the candidate is not well-known, it helps to be endorsed by mediating institutions that people trust. Part of Obama's problem in Nevada was that, apart from the late endorsement by the Culinary Workers' Union, he didn't have a lot of that institutional support. And though he has begun to build those relationships in California--including the endorsement of the Latina head of the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor--he may not have enough time to attain the kind of recognition among Latino voters that Clinton enjoys.

But if there's one thing we're learning in this historic year, it's that voters are even less easy to pigeonhole than candidates.

Rodriguez is author of Mongrels, Bastards, Orphans, and Vagabonds: Mexican Immigration and the Future of Race in America


http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1707221,00.html
 
<font size="6"><center>

Black-Brown Divide</font size>
<font size="4">
Author and race expert Earl Hutchinson says
simmering tensions between African-Americans
and Latinos could have a huge impact on the '08 race.</font size></center>


080125_TomBradley_wide-horizontal.jpg

The 'Bradley Effect': Los Angeles City Councilman Tom Bradley greeted supporters in 1973


By Jamie Reno | Newsweek Web Exclusive
Jan 26, 2008 | Updated: 11:22 a.m. ET Jan 26, 2008

Race didn't figure to be a front-burner issue in the 2008 presidential primary campaign. That is, until Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama verbally sparred over remarks Clinton made about Martin Luther King Jr. and President Lyndon Johnson. Now racial issues are starting to simmer along the campaign trail, and the flames could be turned up as the pols head deeper into the Southern and Southwestern states. The candidates quickly tried to tone down any discussion of race and gender, but political analyst and author Earl Hutchinson, whose latest book, "The Ethnic Presidency: How Race Decides the Race to the White House," comes out next month, suggests that race is always an issue in presidential politics, be it covert or overt, and that there's a much more significant racial subtext to the current race than many may realize.

Hutchinson, who believes the shortage of white votes for Barack Obama in Nevada is more indicative of what will happen in the fall than the support he got from whites in Iowa, cites the "Bradley Effect," the label for the alleged penchant of many white voters to lie to pollsters when they tell them that race isn't a consideration when they vote. The term derives from the 1982 election involving former Los Angeles mayor Tom Bradley, which showed that a smaller percentage of white voters actually voted for Bradley, an African-American, than had said they planned to vote for him.

Hutchinson believes this effect is even more pronounced among Hispanics. He writes at length in his new book that the tensions in this country between blacks and Latinos are alive and well. NEWSWEEK's Jamie Reno talked to Hutchinson about how those tensions could affect the Obama candidacy and the overall election. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: In your new book you look at how racial issues came into play in political races dating as far back as the 1964 election of Lyndon Johnson, who signed the Civil Rights Act that year. What were some of your findings?

Earl Hutchinson: I found that, one way or another, racial and ethnic factors are a constant undercurrent of the American political debate. I also found that, historically, even winning African-American candidates often get little support from Latino voters. Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley, for example, who was elected five times, was largely ignored by the Latino vote. Lee Brown ran for mayor of Houston in 2001, and in a runoff he got less than 30 percent of the Latino vote. There is a long history here that is hard to overcome.

How do you think this will play out in the 2008 presidential election?
If you look at the Western states—California, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona—there are some 1,000 delegates, and in each of these states the Latino population is in double digits. The tensions between blacks and Latinos and negative perceptions that have marred relations between these groups for so long unfortunately still resonate, and I believe there will still be reluctance among many Latinos to vote for an African-American candidate. It can be devastating for Obama and good for Hillary Clinton, especially given the fact that the Latino vote is growing and could be a much more significant factor, depending on the turnout.

In a CNN poll released on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, nearly three out of four whites said they believe America is ready for a black president. Isn't that a positive sign that race is less a factor than it once was?
White voters have shown they are perhaps ready to vote for an African-American candidate. The Bradley Effect may not be as significant now. That remains to be seen. But the rules of political engagement fall apart when you talk about black and Latino candidates. I do not believe Latino voters will vote even for a candidate like Obama who is an appealing, well-financed liberal Democrat. It doesn't bode well. At the end of day I expect the Latino vote nationwide to be 60 to 65 percent for Clinton. If Obama gets 30 percent he should count his blessings.

But Obama has an aggressive Latino outreach and has lately picked up a number of significant endorsements from prominent Latino leaders, especially in California. Isn't he making inroads?
Endorsements don't mean much. Did he get the endorsement of culinary workers in Nevada? Yes, but it didn't mean anything. The leadership, the elected officials on the ground, are one thing, but getting the rank-and-file support of the members of a union is a different matter. I knew that the predominantly Hispanic culinary workers in Nevada would not support Obama.

Obama seems particularly interested in capturing younger Latino voters. Do you not think he will do well even among the younger, more educated and energized Latino electorate?
I hear that, as well, but it has yet to be determined. Don't get me wrong: he will get some Latino support, but I am talking about who will get the majority of support. Younger, better-educated Latinos I would expect will support Obama more than the older voters, but not to the extent that Obama will win a majority of Latino voters or even anything close to it.

You cite a recent poll by New America Media, a consortium of ethnic media groups in San Francisco, that suggests hostilities still exist between African-Americans and Latinos. It's a loaded question, but what are some of the causes of this allegedly lingering tension?
Competition. We're talking about two largely poor, working-class groups in a shrinking economy, unskilled and semiskilled folks rubbing shoulders in neighborhoods that are in transition, with declining social services from health care to education. When you've got competing ethnic groups at the bottom level, you're gong to have friction because of the jockeying just to preserve their niche.

What are some of the political issues on which Latino and African-American communities can come together?
Education, health care and the justice system are just a few. In this election the ethnic vote plays a crucial role in terms of the issues candidates confront. They have to talk about these issues, as well as immigration. But there is some resentment among African-Americans because of the perception that illegal Hispanic immigrants are taking jobs from black Americans. People are looking at the candidates to give them answers on these issues. This election is like no other. The voting demographics have changed radically in so many states. Much is at stake, and it will set a tone on immigration and these other issues that I've mentioned that affect these groups for years to come.

As an African-American, you've worked to bring blacks and Latinos together, at least in Los Angeles. What more can we do to cross this cultural divide?
Dialogue is essential. I've engaged Latino community activists in several areas. Hate crimes, for example, which historically have been black against white, are now being committed by Latinos against blacks and blacks against Latinos. There are an increasing number of physical confrontations between blacks and Latinos in the schools, in the jails. I've created dialogues with activists in an effort to bring down some of the misconceptions across the board, but unfortunately these dialogues are still too few and far in between.

Why is that?
Leadership. There simply is not enough leadership, which is essential for black and Latino leaders to come together. Hopefully that will start at the top with the next president. On a local level, the fight to save Martin Luther King Jr. Hospital in Los Angeles is an example of the two groups coming together for a common cause. Hot-button issues like that, where you see the two groups standing together in front of the TV camera and encouraging people to unite and work together, are encouraging. But we need more community meetings, demonstrations, marches. We need to see more people of both cultures going to city council and board of supervisor meetings, to get more active politically. This is when people get to know each other; this is what makes it all more personal. And yes, all politics are personal.

© 2008 Newsweek, Inc.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/104725
 
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/01/ted_kennedy_end.html
Ted Kennedy endorsing Obama
Posted by James F. Smith January 27, 2008 12:29 PM

By Susan Milligan
Globe staff

WASHINGTON -- Senator Edward M. Kennedy will endorse Barack Obama for president tomorrow, breaking his year-long neutrality to send a powerful signal of where the legendary Massachusetts Democrat sees the party going -- and who he thinks is best to lead it.

Kennedy confidantes told the Globe today that the Bay State's senior senator will appear with Obama and Kennedy's niece, Caroline Kennedy, at a morning rally at American University in Washington tomorrow to announce his support.

That will be a potentially significant boost for Obama as he heads into a series of critical primaries on Super Tuesday, Feb. 5.

Kennedy believes Obama can ``transcend race'' and bring unity to the country, a Kennedy associate told the Globe. Kennedy was also impressed by Obama's deep involvement last year in the bipartisan effort to craft legislation on immigration reform, a politically touchy subject the other presidential candidates avoided, the associate said.

The coveted endorsement is a huge blow to New York Senator Hillary Clinton, who is both a senatorial colleague and a friend of the Kennedy family. In a campaign where Clinton has trumpeted her experience over Obama's call for hope and change, the endorsement by one of the most experienced and respected Democrats in the Senate is a particularly dramatic coup for Obama.

"The America of Jack and Bobby Kennedy touched all of us. Through all of these decades, the one who kept that flame alive was Ted Kennedy,'' said Representative Bill Delahunt, A Quincy Democrat who is also backing Obama. ``So having him pass on the torch [to Obama] is of incredible significance. It's historic.''

Obama's landslide win in South Carolina yesterday gives Obama and Clinton two wins each in the primary campaign, and puts the two senators in a fierce battle for delegates on Feb. 5, when 22 states will hold Democratic primaries and caucuses.

While polls show Clinton ahead in some large states, including her home state of New York and delegate-rich California, the Kennedy endorsement gives Obama a stamp of approval among key constituencies in the Democratic party that could make Super Tuesday more competitive.

Kennedy plans to campaign actively for Obama, an aide said, and will focus particularly among Hispanics and labor union members, who are important voting blocks in several Feb. 5 states, including California, New York, New Jersey, Arizona and New Mexico.
Check, as in the checkmate soon come
The Massachusetts senator was key in helping his colleague, Senator John F. Kerry, score a comeback win in Iowa in 2004, sending Kerry on a path to the nomination. Kennedy campaigned on his own and released several senior members of his staff to work for Kerry.
 
CONGRESSMAN XAVIER BECERRA ENDORSES BARACK OBAMA
By Newswire Services
January 27, 2008
Says Obama will unite Americans to tackle challenges facing nation.

LOS ANGELES, CA – Congressman Xavier Becerra has endorsed Barack Obama for President, citing his ability to unite Americans to lead our country in a new direction. Becerra serves on the powerful House Ways and Means Committee and as the Assistant to the Speaker of the House is the highest ranking Latino in the House.

"Senator Obama is the most qualified candidate to lead our country in a new direction," said Congressman Becerra. "Throughout his 20 years in public service, Barack Obama has united and inspired people from all walks of life and from all parties to bring change we can believe in. As war rages abroad and Americans worry about what the struggling economy means for their families, we need a leader who will tell us not what we want to hear but what we need to hear about the challenges we face. Barack Obama is our strongest candidate for president because of his great crossover appeal that spans parties and regions and his unique ability to rally the American people behind a common purpose."



"Congressman Becerra has spent his career taking on the special interests to put the American Dream back in reach for working families, and I´m grateful for his endorsement," said Senator Obama. "Xavier Becerra knows that to get things done, we must reach across the aisle and bring people of all parties together to find common ground. Xavier Becerra´s inspiring story demonstrates what is possible in America, and he will be a great help in our effort to build a broad coalition to solve the complex challenges that lie ahead."

Congressman Becerra represents the 31st Congressional District of California in the city of Los Angeles. Becerra is the son of working-class immigrants and was the first in his family to graduate from college. On the Ways and Means Committee, Becerra has worked to restore fairness and balance to the economy and to strengthen Social Security for women and minorities. Becerra is a former chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.
 
Another Perspective on The California Latino Vote

latimes.com
http://www.latimes.com/news/columnists/la-oe-rodriguez28jan28,0,4826977.column
From the Los Angeles Times
Clinton's Latino spin
The Clinton campaign's assertion that Latinos historically haven't voted for black candidates is divisive -- and false.
Gregory Rodriguez


January 28, 2008

If a Hillary Clinton campaign official told a reporter that white voters never support black candidates, would the media have swallowed the message whole? What if a campaign pollster began whispering that Jews don't have an "affinity" for African American politicians? Would the pundits have accepted the premise unquestioningly?

A few weeks ago, Sergio Bendixen, a Clinton pollster and Latino expert, publicly articulated what campaign officials appear to have been whispering for months. In an interview with Ryan Lizza of the New Yorker, Bendixen explained that "the Hispanic voter -- and I want to say this very carefully -- has not shown a lot of willingness or affinity to support black candidates."

The spin worked. For the last several weeks, it's been on the airwaves (Tucker Carlson, "Hardball," NPR), generally tossed off as if it were conventional wisdom. And it has shown up in sources as far afield as Agence France-Presse and the London Daily Telegraph, which wrote about a "voting bloc traditionally reluctant to support black candidates."

The spin also helped shape the analysis of the Jan. 19 Nevada caucus, in which Clinton won the support of Latino voters by a margin of better than 2 to 1. Forget the possibility that Nevada's Latino voters may have actually preferred Clinton or, at the very least, had a fondness for her husband; pundits embraced the idea that Latino voters simply didn't like the fact that her opponent was black.

But was Bendixen's blanket statement true? Far from it, and the evidence is overwhelming enough to make you wonder why in the world the Clinton campaign would want to portray Latino voters as too unrelentingly racist to vote for Barack Obama.

University of Washington political scientist Matt Barreto has compiled a list of black big-city mayors who have received broad Latino support over the last several decades. In 1983, Harold Washington pulled 80% of the Latino vote in Chicago. David Dinkins won 73% in New York in 1989. And Denver's Wellington Webb garnered more than 70% in 1991, as did Ron Kirk in Dallas in 1995 and then again in 1997 and 1999.

He could have also added that longtime Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley won a healthy chunk of the Latino vote in 1973 and then the clear majority in his mayoral reelection campaigns of 1977, 1981, 1985 and 1989.

Here in L.A., all three black members of Congress represent heavily Latino districts and ultimately couldn't survive without significant Latino support. Five other black House members represent districts that are more than 25% Latino -- including New York's Charles Rangel and Texan Al Green -- and are also heavily dependent on Latino voters.

So, given all this evidence, why did this notion get repeated so nonchalantly? For one, despite the focus on demographic changes in America, journalists' ignorance of the aspirations of Latino America is pretty remarkable. They just don't know much about the biggest minority in the nation. And two, no Latino organizations function in the way that, say, the Anti-Defamation League does for Jewish Americans. In other words, you can pretty much say whatever you want about Latinos without suffering any political repercussions.

Unlike merely "exuberant" supporters, whose mushy grasp of facts Clinton has explained by saying they can sometimes be "uncontrollable," pollsters such as Bendixen most certainly work -- and speak -- at the whim and in the pay of the candidate.

So what would the Clinton campaign have to gain from spreading this misinformation? It helps undermine one of Obama's central selling points, that he can build bridges and unite Americans of all types, and it jibes with the Clinton strategy of pigeon-holing Obama as the "black candidate." (Witness Bill Clinton's statement last week that his wife might lose South Carolina because of Obama's growing black support.)

But the social costs of the Clintons' strategy might end up being higher than the country is willing to pay. According to Stanford Law professor Richard Thompson Ford, who just published "The Race Card: How Bluffing About Bias Makes Race Relations Worse," such political stunts can be "self-fulfilling prophecies."

"It could make black voters more hostile to Latinos," he said. "And Latinos who hear it might think that they somehow ought to be at odds with blacks. These kinds of statements generate interracial tensions."

At the Democratic presidential debate in Nevada, Tim Russert asked Clinton whether the New Yorker quote represented the view of her campaign. "No, he was making a historical statement," she said. "And, obviously, what we're trying to do is bring America together so that everybody feels like they're involved and they have a stake in the future."

Really?

grodriguez@latimescolumnists.com


If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.com/archives.
TMS Reprints
Article licensing and reprint options


Copyright 2008 Los Angeles Times | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Home Delivery | Advertise | Archives | Contact | Site Map | Help

partners: KTLA Hoy
 
<font size="5"><center>Latinos may hold key
to Super Tuesday for Democrats</font size></center>


By Margaret Talev and Kevin Yamamura | McClatchy Newspapers
Posted on Saturday, February 2, 2008

WASHINGTON — An independent group that supports Democrat Barack Obama late last year began showing a provocative ad over the Internet and to Latino organizations around Southern California.

The three-installment political soap opera chronicled a fictional Latino family that becomes politically active and supports Obama after an undocumented cousin is deported. A young black man named Rayshawn confronts a black Obama organizer for welcoming the Latinos. "What I don't understand is why you have to congratulate them," he says. "Whose side are you on, man? Every day there's fewer of us and more of them, and there's only so many jobs."

The fictional organizer reasons that blacks and Latinos are struggling with the same problems, such as poor schools and health care, and says, "The only way we will solve them is if we band together."

That kind of Kumbaya moment may be more elusive in real life.

If the racial politics between Obama and New York Sen. Hillary Clinton seemed striking in South Carolina's Jan. 26 Democratic presidential primary, wait until Super Tuesday.

The Latino vote is bigger than the black vote, especially in delegate-rich California, where Clinton benefits from her reputation as an advocate for expanding health care and from her husband's record. President Clinton won 71 percent of California's Latino vote in 1992 and 85 percent in 1996, according to the William C. Velasquez Institute, a policy organization in San Antonio.

Latino voters could be key in several of the 24 states that will be in play on Tuesday. They are about a fourth of the eligible voters in California, 37 percent in New Mexico, 17 percent in Arizona, 12 percent in Colorado, 11 percent in New York, 10 percent in New Jersey and 8 percent in Illinois. Nationally, there are about 18 million eligible Hispanic voters, or one in nine voters overall.

Meanwhile, primaries in some major cities, including Los Angeles, New York and Chicago, could test longstanding cultural and economic tensions between blacks and Latinos — a reality that the Obama ad addressed.

"Part of the tension we see, especially in Los Angeles, whether in gangs or prisons, in housing markets or competing for jobs, spills over when there are African-American and Latino candidates vying against each other, or even in a race like this, where there's an African-American against a name who conjures up good times," said Jaime Regalado, the executive director of the Pat Brown Institute of Public Affairs at California State University, Los Angeles.

Clinton has Latinos' support in national polls — 59 percent of Latino Democratic voters in a Pew Hispanic Center survey last fall and about the same amount in exit polls from the Nevada caucuses and the Florida primary. She also has the endorsements of many important Latino leaders and of the United Farm Workers.

If Latinos turn out in large numbers, Super Tuesday could give Clinton the edge she's seeking against Obama in the race for the Democratic nomination.

But Obama, an African-American who pulled about 80 percent of the black vote in South Carolina, also is fighting for Latino support.

The Illinois senator aims to build on his rout of Clinton in South Carolina and his endorsement by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., and a beloved figure among many Latinos for his support of organized labor, social programs and liberal immigration policies. Kennedy is campaigning for Obama in New Mexico and California, and he's featured in campaign ads.

In addition, for weeks Obama has been using the slogan, "Yes, we can," a translation of "Si, se puede!," the rallying cry for farmworkers' organizing efforts that's become a motto of Latino political rallies. He's also running ads targeting Latinos and has won some Latino congressional endorsements.

Obama also has been citing his experience as a former community organizer in Chicago.

After winning South Carolina, he said, "When I hear the cynical talk that blacks and whites and Latinos can't join together and work together, I'm reminded of the Latino brothers and sisters I organized with and stood with and fought with side-by-side for jobs and justice on the streets of Chicago."

At Thursday night's debate in California, Obama denounced a suggestion that Latinos are taking jobs from African-Americans as "scapegoating that I do not believe in."

Clinton said that an African-American had told her the night before that he no longer could find construction jobs because illegal Latinos got them all, and she voiced sympathy, blaming unscrupulous employers, and said the answer is comprehensive immigration changes. Each candidate, in short, reached to the other's base in this ethnic divide with his or her answer.

Obama also backs driver's licenses for illegal immigrants, which Clinton doesn't. And he's vowed in his first year in office to pursue immigration changes that would ease the path to legalization for illegal immigrants.

Elsa Gomez, 38, a Santa Ana, Calif., tax accountant whose father once worked as a seasonal guest worker, voted for President Clinton, but she said she plans to back Obama in the primary because, "He is a minority. He understands issues important to minorities."

But Albert M. Camarillo, a Stanford University professor and expert on Mexican American history, said that Hillary Clinton taps into Latinos' nostalgia for the 1990s, a prosperous period for California Latinos when they were galvanized politically against Republicans' anti-immigrant policies.

"You have a younger generation that is less tied to the Clinton legacy, but for their parents, I think it's really hard for Obama to make inroads," he said.

Even among younger Latino voters, Clinton "has a whole legacy," said Angelica Reyes, a 30-year-old financial educator from Santa Cruz, Calif. "A lot of people don't know Barack. She has that legacy with the Latino community. She has the legacy of the Clintons and the name recognition, and that is really hard to compete with."

ON THE WEB

To view the 3-part soap-opera ad, go to: www.votehope2008.com/novelas.php

(Yamamura reports in California for The Sacramento Bee.)

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/election2008/story/26097.html
 
<font size="4">The 3-part soap-opera ad:</font size>

<div class="padded">
<p><font size="4">Welcome to the home page for <em>Tu Voz, Tu Voto, </em>Vote Hope's</font size>
original series of short political films inspired by the wildly popular <em>telenovela</em>
genre of Latin American soap operas. This three-episode series of short films, in English
and Spanish, follows the journey of the Ortiz family and their burgeoning support for
Presidential candidate Barack Obama. Watch each episode below to learn more, pass this
page on to your friends and family members, and <a href="http://www.votehope2008.org/addmyvote.php">
<strong>pledge your vote for Obama!</strong></a>

<h2>Episode 1: La Marcha</h2>

In this first episode, meet the Ortiz family. Like millions of California Latino
families, they marched for immigrant rights, but an elder member of the family
persuades them to think about how their vote can make an even bigger
difference:

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EW4L6O06ltw&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EW4L6O06ltw&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>


<h2>Episode 2: Amigos</h2>

Gaby Ortiz and the rest of the family confront the realities of the
immigration issue when they learn one of their cousins has been
deported. See how Gaby resolves to make change now, even as
she feels discouraged and confused by the news:

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tD7ceoOPSEc&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tD7ceoOPSEc&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>


<h2>Episode 3: About us</h2>

As the Ortiz family steps up their activism for Barack Obama, they help
others see how supporting Barack Obama is part of working toward multi-
racial unity, and thus real change in America:

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FwPGY4wUr1s&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FwPGY4wUr1s&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
</div>

`
 
<font size="4">
2008 Election Polls - Friday, February 01
</font size>


Race: Alabama Republican Primary

Poll: SurveyUSA
Result
McCain 40,
Huckabee 31,
Romney 21,
Paul 5
Spread: McCain +9​


Race: Alabama Democratic Primary


poll: SurveyUSA

Result
Clinton 47,
Obama 47
Spread: Tie​

Race: Alabama Republican Primary

Poll: InsiderAdvantage
Result
McCain 37,
Huckabee 35,
Romney 14,
Paul 5
Spread: McCain +2​


Race: Alabama Democratic Primary

Poll: InsiderAdvantage
Result
Clinton 46,
Obama 40
Spread: Clinton +6​


Race: Massachusetts Democratic Primary

Poll: SurveyUSA
Result
Clinton 57,
Obama 33
Spread: Clinton +24​


Race: Massachusetts Republican Primary

Poll: SurveyUSA
Result
Romney 57,
McCain 34,
Huckabee 3,
Paul 3
Spread: Romney +23​


Race: New Jersey Democratic Primary

Poll: Rasmussen
Result
Clinton 49,
Obama 37
Spread: Clinton +12​


Race: New Jersey Republican Primary

Poll: Rasmussen
Result
McCain 43,
Romney 29,
Huckabee 7,
Paul 6
Spread: McCain +14​


Race: General Election: McCain vs. Clinton

Poll: FOX News
Result
McCain 45,
Clinton 44,
Und 10
Spread: McCain +1​


Race: New York Republican Primary

Poll: SurveyUSA
Result
McCain 55,
Romney 21,
Huckabee 7,
Paul 4
Spread: McCain +34​


Race: New York Democratic Primary

Poll: SurveyUSA
Result
Clinton 54,
Obama 38
Spread: Clinton +16​


Race: New Jersey Republican Primary

Poll: SurveyUSA
Result
McCain 48,
Romney 25,
Huckabee 9,
Paul 7
McCain +23​
Spread:


Race: New Jersey Democratic Primary

Poll: SurveyUSA
Result
Clinton 51,
Obama 39
Clinton +12​
Spread:


Race: Connecticut Democratic Primary

Poll: SurveyUSA
Result
Clinton 44,
Obama 48
Spread: Obama +4​


Race: Connecticut Republican Primary

Poll: SurveyUSA
Result
McCain 53,
Romney 31,
Huckabee 6,
Paul 5
Spread: McCain +22​


Race: Republican Presidential Nomination (Nation-wide)
Poll: FOX News
Result
McCain 48,
Romney 20,
Huckabee 19,
Paul 5
Spread: McCain +28


Race: Democratic Presidential Nomination (Nation-wide)
Poll: FOX News
Result
Clinton 47,
Obama 37
Spread: Clinton +10


Race: General Election: McCain vs. Obama
Poll: FOX News
Result
McCain 43,
Obama 44,
Und 13
Spread: Obama +1


Race: New Jersey Democratic Primary
Poll: GQR (D)
Result
Clinton 44,
Obama 38
Spread: Clinton +6


Race: General Election: Romney vs. Clinton
Poll: FOX News
Result:
Romney 36,
Clinton 50,
Und 14
Spread: Clinton +14


Race: General Election: Romney vs. Obama
Poll: FOX News
Result
Romney 33,
Obama 51,
Und 16
Spread: Obama +18


Race: Missouri Republican Primary

Poll: SurveyUSA
Result
McCain 34,
Huckabee 28,
Romney 30,
Paul 5
Spread: McCain +4​


Race: Missouri Democratic Primary

Poll:SurveyUSA
Result
Clinton 48,
Obama 44
Spread: Clinton +4​

Race: Massachusetts Republican Primary

Poll: Rasmussen
Result
Romney 55,
McCain 23,
Huckabee 8,
Paul 4
Spread: Romney +32​


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/latestpolls/index.html
 
http://laopinion.com/editorial/index_en.html

La Opinion is LA's largest latino newspaper

The Democratic choice is Barack Obama



The Democratic Party arrives at the California primary with a historic choice between two extraordinary candidates. We believe that of the two, Senator Barack Obama represents fundamental change in a campaign in which "change" has become a central theme. Obama’s approach to immigration and his inspiring vision are what the country need to break through the current feeling of political malaise.

There is no doubt that Senator Hillary Clinton would be an excellent president if elected. She is capable, competent, disciplined, and hard working. She has shown herself to be a talented legislator and is on the right side of the major issues. Her plan for universal health care is one example of the courageous initiatives she has proposed as a candidate. And it would be wonderful to elect the country&*#39;s first woman president.

She has garnered significant Latino support from such influential and high profile national leaders as Raúl Yzaguirre, Henry Cisneros and Antonio Villaraigosa. She has worked tirelessly over many years to represent the best interests of Latinos and her personal commitment has been well-documented throughout this campaign.

Yet, this is a historic moment and tremendous skills and experience are not enough to inspire a feeling of renewal in our country after eight long years of George W. Bush.

As well, we were disappointed with her calculated opposition to driver’s licenses for the undocumented, which contrasts markedly from the forceful argument in support made by Obama. We understand that this is an extremely controversial issue but we believe there is only one right position and it is that of the senator from Illinois. And, while both senators support comprehensive immigration reform, only Obama has committed to bringing forward new legislation during his first year in office.

It is this commitment to the immigration issue which drove Obama to condemn the malicious lies made during the immigration debate, to understand the need for driver’s licenses, and to defend the rights of undocumented students by co-authoring the DREAM Act. The senator has demonstrated character by maintaining his position despite the hostile political climate.

At the same time, there are not huge differences between the two Democractic candidates on most of the major issues. Thus, vision makes the difference! Obama offers an inclusive message of hope that addresses our country&*#39;s historic moment. He has a conciliatory style that can reverse the vicious cycle of rancor which has dominated Washington over these past decades and has paralyzed its ability to come together on major decisións.

We need a leader today that can inspire and unite America again around its greatest possibilities. Barack Obama is the right leader for the time. We know that he is not as well known among our community and while he has the support of Maria Elena Durazo, Senator Gil Cedillo and others he comes to the Latino community with less name recognition. Nevertheless, it is Obama who deserves our support.

By deciding between a woman or an African American as their presidencial nominee, the Democrats are making history. Barack Obama has the sensibilities of a man from humble beginnings raised in a multicultural home. He is the best option for a truly visionary change.
 
<font size="5"><center>Obama Takes San Juan</font size></center>

Washington Post
By Alec MacGillis
May 24, 2008


SAN JUAN, P.R. -- Hillary Clinton is heavily favored to win next weekend's Puerto Rica primary, but for one afternoon at least, Barack Obama today owned Old San Juan.

Puerto Rican police and Secret Service blocked off the lovely stucco-lined streets and squares high above the seaside battlements of the island's original Spanish settlement so that Obama could lead supporters in a "caminata," the traditional parade held by candidates running for office. With the Caribbean gleaming before him, Obama stepped up on a stone wall to greeted hundreds of assembled supporters and gawkers who'd waited their turn to make it through the metal detectors set up around the old town's perimeter.

"Hola, Puerto Rico! How's everybody doing today?" he shouted. He recounted his meeting earlier in the day with some Puerto Rican war veterans at a local university, said that the goals of his candicacy applied equally to the island the mainland, and pledged that as president he would do everything he could to allow Puerto Ricans to decide the future status of their island, which has been mired in a commonwealth vs. statehouse vs. independence debate for years. And he encouraged all to vote on June 1. "If we do well in Puerto Rico, there is no reason I will not be announcing that I am the Democratic nominee for president of the United States of America!"

A few moments later, he was off, walking slowly up the main drag above the fort walls in a scene of barely controlled chaos: hundreds of supporters dancing behind him, others reaching to shake his hand from behind barriers along the sidewalk, island and national media shooting video from a slow-moving truck and rushing ahead of him on foot as the ample, and highly anxious, security forces shouted for all to keep moving. Over it all, a sound truck blared a jouncy song written in the candidate's honor: "Obama la esperanza y el futuro...Un amigo presidente porque respeta nuestra gente." ("Obama the hope and the future/A friend president because he respects our people.")

Nearing the end of the short route, Obama broke into a few dance steps, driving the crowd even crazier. "This was a great caminata," he declared at the end. "We have great support here in Puerto Rico. The most important support is not the support from the elected officials or support from the powerful, it's the support from the people, and that is what we have shown here today."

And then he was off in the black SUVs, leaving the dazed and sun-baked supporters and reporters in his wake. One resident, Julia Delgado, said she would definitely vote for Obama next week, because she thought he was most likely to bring about the stronger economy that would allow the island to develop more on its own and grow less dependent on the mainland, without necessarily declaring full independence.

But the 54-year-old substance abuse counselor was not so impressed with the caminata, as high-spirited as it was. A real caminata, she noted, goes much longer than a few blocks. "A caminata in Puerto Rico goes everywhere," she said. "There's too much security here. What do they think we are, terrorists?"

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/05/24/obama_takes_san_juan_2.html
 
<font size="5"><center>
Obama's Latin policies in play</font size>
<font size="4">
A tug of war is in progress within the Barack Obama
campaign to influence the direction of his Hispanic
and Latin American agenda.</font size></center>


Miami Herald
BY ANDRES OPPENHEIMER
aoppenheimer@MiamiHerald.com
Sat, Jul. 19, 2008

There is a fierce behind-the-scenes battle for influence over presumptive Democratic candidate Barack Obama's Hispanic and Latin American agenda, and some Democratic strategists say that its outcome could determine the result of the November elections.

Some Obama backers in South Florida, in particular, are especially miffed at what they see as excessive power by labor-union-tied, left-leaning Mexican-American leaders at Obama's Chicago headquarters over the campaign's nationwide Hispanic and Latin American policy strategies.

In a confidential July 4 memo sent to 25 prominent South Florida Hispanics, former Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre -- well respected in nationwide Democratic circles -- called for creation of a ''South Florida Hispanic policy advisory group'' to counterbalance what he perceives as excessive micro-management of state campaigns by Obama's Chicago headquarters.

In an interview with The Miami Herald, Ferre stated that in an effort to win Florida -- which may be the key swing state in which Hispanics may decide the election -- his group would also try to steer the Obama campaign away from criticism of the North American Free Trade Agreement with Mexico, and the pending free-trade deal with Colombia.

Obama's stands against NAFTA and the free-trade deal with Colombia have been applauded in some Midwestern industrialized states that have lost factories to Mexico, but are supported by Florida's business community and many of the state's Hispanics.

Similarly, Obama's support for farm subsidies has been welcomed in U.S. farm states but is decried as unfair by virtually all Latin American countries and many U.S. Latinos.

Ferre's memo was written shortly after the Obama campaign appointed Cuauhtemoc ''Temo'' Figueroa, a Mexican American with a labor-union background, as head of its national Hispanic vote-getting effort in Obama's Chicago headquarters. Figueroa, whose parents were farm-worker organizers, was a top official of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

''In the inner circle of candidate Obama's campaign there is no one who has deep knowledge or shown interest in Latin America or Hispanics in the United States,'' Ferre wrote in his memo.

Senior Obama foreign-policy advisor Tony Lake ''has never shown major knowledge or interest in Latin America,'' he wrote.


ACCESS TO OBAMA

He stated that while top Latino leaders such as New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, former Clinton Transportation Secretary Federico Peña and U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., have direct access to Obama, ``that is very different than BEING in the inner circle of the Obama campaign.''

''My experience with how the Obama campaign handled the delegate vote on June 1 in Puerto Rico was disastrous,'' Ferre wrote. ``The principal decision makers, operatives and advertisements were all made in or through Chicago. The result is that [Sen. Hillary] Clinton got almost 70 percent of the vote in Puerto Rico.''

Simon Ferro, a former Florida Democratic Party chairman and U.S. ambassador to Panama who was one the recipients of Ferre's memo, said he agrees that the Obama campaign should give a greater role to South Florida Democrats.

''They have to empower more local Democrats and give them more ownership of the campaign,'' Ferro said. ``You want to make the local people know that they are involved in a material way. I'm sure it will happen, but I haven't seen it yet.''

Spokesmen for the Obama campaign readily concede that the campaign will focus on four key swing states that happen to have huge Hispanic populations -- New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado and Florida. And of the four, Florida carries the largest number of electoral votes and may decide the general election, they say.

But Obama spokesmen caution that the Latino vote outreach team led by Figueroa has no connection with the campaign's Latin America policy team, which is led by foreign-policy experts such as Washington-based Dan Restrepo and Florida resident Frank Sanchez.

''Temo'' Figueroa does not participate in Latin America policy meetings, Sanchez said. In addition, the campaign has appointed a Cuban American from Miami, Carlos Odio, as his deputy, he said.

The Obama campaign is just starting to build its Florida organization. Unlike the situation in most other states, it had not done so previously because -- under a rule from the Democratic National Committee that punished the state for trying to anticipate the vote -- there had not been a primary election in the state.

''We just opened our office in Tampa three days ago,'' Sanchez said Friday. ``In terms of staff, we are still putting that together, but we hope to have that in place within the next two weeks. Admittedly, we are playing catch-up, but you are going to see a Latino outreach the likes of which no presidential campaign has ever seen.''

Over the next two weeks, the Obama campaign will hire 300 paid staffers in Florida and enlist hundreds of volunteers, campaign officials say. Among the newly enlisted, well-known South Florida Democrats are pollster Sergio Bendixen, who will be a senior Hispanic strategist for Obama's national Hispanic campaign, and former U.S. Ambassador to the Organization of American States Luis Lauredo, who will join the group of campaign spokesmen on Latin American issues.

Comparatively, Republicans for several months have had a national network of informal Latin American advisors, most of them Floridians.


McCAIN ADVISOR

Asked in a recent interview about his top Latin American advisor, likely Republican candidate Sen. John McCain cited his top foreign-policy aide, Randy Scheunemann.

Asked in an interview last week whom he relies on for advice on Latin American issues, Scheunemann mentioned Florida legislators Lincoln and Mario Diaz-Balart, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Sen. Mel Martinez, former State Department Latin American chief Otto Reich and former congressional staffer Stephen Vermillion.

''My fear was that, as in previous Democratic campaigns, we would have a pan-Hispanic message that would be essentially aimed at Mexican Americans,'' said Freddy Balsera, an Obama campaign spokesman in Miami. ``But the Florida Hispanic message will be specific to Florida Hispanics, based on issues, experience and motivations that move Hispanics in this state.''

Told about the Obama campaign plans for Florida, Ferre said he is not ruling out a quick correction: ``They are very intelligent people. They may have realized that they don't have a handle of the Latin community, and that the only way to do it is at the local level.''

My opinion: Don't be surprised if, in coming weeks, you see a shift to the center in theObama campaign's Latin American rhetoric, including a less strident opposition to the Mexico and Colombia free trade agreements, and a more persistent criticism of Cuba and Venezuela's authoritarian regimes. Suddenly, Florida is at the center of the Obama campaign's strategy to win the White House, and will play a key role in it.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/campaign-2008/story/610762.html
 
Poll: 'Sharp reversal' for Obama with Latino voters

art.obamamccain.gi.jpg


Poll: 'Sharp reversal' for Obama with Latino voters

Posted: 09:15 AM ET

From CNN Political Producer Ed Hornick
A new poll out Thursday shows strong support for Sen. Barack Obama among Latinos.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — A new poll released Thursday shows overwhelming support from Latinos for Sen. Barack Obama over Sen. John McCain.

Obama's approval rating with registered Latino voters, the nationwide Pew Hispanic Center poll found, is at 66 percent versus 23 percent favoring McCain.


Obama's "strong showing in this survey represents a sharp reversal in his fortunes from the primaries, when Obama lost the Latino vote to Hillary Clinton by a margin of nearly 2-to-1," according to Pew Hispanic Center associate director Mark Hugo Lopez.

Obama's favorability among Latinos is slightly up from a Gallup Poll summary of surveys taken in May, which showed Obama with 62 percent of Latino voters nationwide, compared with 29 percent for McCain.

"He now appears to be even more popular than Hillary Clinton among Latinos," Lopez said.
 
Re: Poll: 'Sharp reversal' for Obama with Latino voters

Great news Bro; thanks for the Latino update.

QueEx
 
Re: Poll: 'Sharp reversal' for Obama with Latino voters

salonlogo_p.gif


<font size="6"><center>¡Viva Obama!</font size><font size="4">
In Denver, a group of Latino voters show why
they may hold the key to power for Democrats in the West.</font size></center>


By Mike Madden

Aug. 26, 2008 | DENVER -- If Barack Obama is really going to redraw the political map this year, this isn't a bad place to start. Colorado's nine electoral votes have gone blue in only one of the last 10 elections, but they look within Obama's reach now according to recent polling. The same goes for nearby Nevada (with five votes) and New Mexico (also five). If John McCain weren't from Arizona, its 10 votes might be up for grabs, too.

Latino voters are a big reason that Democrats may find new electoral power in the West. In all the Southwestern states Obama is targeting, Latinos make up at least 12 percent of the eligible voters; in New Mexico, the Hispanic vote is a staggering 37 percent of the electorate. (Latinos are now the largest and fastest-growing minority group in the country, making up an estimated 15 percent of the U.S. population, though only about 9 percent of the electorate.) Recent polls show Obama beating McCain nearly 2 to 1 among Latinos. Obama's chances of winning, if he can't carry the Southern states and can't turn Ohio blue again, could well come down to how successful his outreach to the Latino community is here and in neighboring states.

No wonder the Democratic convention kicked off Monday with an invocation by Polly Baca, a former Colorado state senator and an activist on behalf of Latinos, then jumped to remarks by the Congressional Hispanic Caucus leaders, before delegates headed off to (among other parties) a massive gala sponsored by all the major Latino civil rights groups later in the evening. Obama's campaign is running radio, TV, print and online ads in Spanish, opening field offices to reach out to Latino voters, and sending prominent surrogates like New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson to talk to Latino communities. "The Democratic Party has woken up to this emerging and critical opportunity," said Simon Rosenberg, head of NDN, a progressive think tank that's been pushing Democrats to look West for years.

In a focus group here Monday morning for the Annenberg Center for Public Policy, run by Democratic pollster Peter Hart, the nature of that opportunity was on display. Annenberg convened 12 Latino voters from around the Denver area and asked them to speak about the election for two hours. Of the 12, five supported Obama, three supported John McCain, and four were undecided -- but two of the undecided voters said they were leaning toward Obama. The issues they said were important to them were the same issues that pollsters are finding matter to most Americans: ending the war in Iraq, turning around the economy, and improving access to affordable healthcare.

Hillary Clinton pounded Obama among Latino voters in primary after primary all spring, and some pundits wondered then if tension between blacks and Hispanics was a reason. But the voters in the focus group -- even the McCain supporters -- said they weren't worried at all that Obama would favor one racial group over another. "What I do see with Obama is that from his background -- minority, black, blah blah blah, everything -- I can relate to that," said Vaneska Mayor, 33, a chemist from Thornton, Colo., who grew up in Puerto Rico. "Because I'm not rich, and I'm a woman, and I'm a Latina, and my mom forced me to learn English even though I didn't want to, so I could have a better life."

For many of the voters, the biggest change an Obama presidency might bring about would be in the country's racial attitudes. "We have always been governed by older white people," said Paloma Gamarra, 34, a data analyst from Boulder, who was for Obama. Electing Obama would be "just like electing somebody who's poor like me or had to clean restrooms like me."

The debate over immigration reform in the last few years had left these voters a little, well, bitter, as Obama might say. "I think politicians tend to use us [Latinos] as a card for them to kind of stick out there," said Alex Moreno, 36, a window washer from Arvada, Colo.

"Sometimes they're like, 'Hey, here's all these opportunities,' and then they say, 'No, this year you guys are going to be the bad guys,'" said Adrian Romero, 35, the only person at the focus group who didn't vote in 2004 (but who says he'll vote for Obama this fall).

In fact, polls show much of the public, regardless of race, is sick of the immigration system being broken, and angry that Washington can't seem to get its act together to fix it. But Democratic activists say they think the politics of the issue are tilting away from border-security reactionaries, such as Rep. Tom Tancredo, and toward Democratic candidates who favor broad reforms that include letting undocumented immigrants apply for legal status. "If Democrats lean into the issue and define themselves, they will win against Republican demagoguery, because they're for a pragmatic solution that will do something about the problem," said Frank Sharry, a longtime advocate for immigrants' rights, at a panel Monday afternoon sponsored by NDN.

Partly because of the immigration battles -- and the rise in raids, imprisonment and deportation of immigrants by the Bush administration -- Latino civil rights groups have mobilized 1.4 million new applications for citizenship since January 2007. Janet Murguia, the head of the National Council of La Raza, told Salon she expects about 90 percent of the new citizens to vote. Only 9.7 million Hispanics voted in 2004; if Murguia's predictions are right, that number could go up by 10 percent just from new citizens alone, even without the massive voter registration drives Obama's campaign is running in key states. Democratic operatives and Latino activists alike seem confident the Hispanic vote will go heavily for Obama. Murguia, a former Clinton administration aide, said she was sure the Latinos who backed Clinton would stick with the Democratic ticket even though Clinton lost.

Of course, a couple of years ago, that would have come as a shock. Not only had George Bush won two terms in office in part because of an aggressive outreach to Latinos (complete with halting attempts to speak a sort of pidgin Spanish), but McCain had also been the leading sponsor of immigration-reform legislation. But nativist sentiment in the Republican base led McCain to back away from the issue during the GOP primaries; he now says the United States needs to secure its borders before dealing with legalization for undocumented workers.

McCain is running his own ads in Spanish, trying to restore his image in the Latino community. But the voters in the Annenberg focus group didn't give McCain much credit for his attempts to find a solution on the issue, perhaps due to broader disillusionment among Latinos with the Republican Party. Yet there was substantial worry among them that Obama might have a tough time winning the White House.

"I mean, I'm going to vote for him, but I don't see it happening," said Moreno, the window washer. "There's too many close-minded people here in the United States that are going to put [race] as an issue. They're just going to be so close-minded that they're going to say, 'No, I'm not going to have a black person as president.'" Dwayne Chavez, 43, a blood-bank technician from Aurora, Colo., who voted for Bush four years ago but changed his registration from Republican to independent, and who said he'd probably vote for Obama, held similar feelings. "We're breaking the glass ceiling here, and I don't think America's ready for that glass ceiling to be broken," Chavez said.

If Obama wants to prove them wrong, he may need their votes -- and the votes of other Latinos -- to do it.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/08/26/latino_vote/
 
Re: Poll: 'Sharp reversal' for Obama with Latino voters

good news
clearly a story msm won't touch now that Obama is getting support
 
Re: Poll: 'Sharp reversal' for Obama with Latino voters

<font size="5"><center>
GOP hopes to capitalize on Latino
disappointment with Obama</font size></center>



McClatchy Newspapers
By Rob Hotakainen
February 15, 2010


WASHINGTON — As one of the first Latinos in the nation to endorse Barack Obama, Democratic state Sen. Gilbert Cedillo of Los Angeles campaigned hard for the president, but he's disappointed now.

The reason: Obama has yet to do anything on a comprehensive overhaul of immigration laws, as he promised to do when he ran for president.

"I think he's in danger of breaking the spirit of solidarity and hope," Cedillo said. "More than a broken promise, it's the danger of breaking people's sense of hope in the Latino community."

While the president carried the Latino vote by large margins 15 months ago, many Republicans are out to capitalize on Latino dissatisfaction with Obama and Washington's Democratic leaders. They think that could help them immensely in the 2010 elections.

Republican candidates will gain ground from Latinos once Latinos realize "that what the Democrats offer is just a bunch of empty promises," said Hector Barajas, a communications consultant for the California State Senate Republican Caucus.

He noted that the president spent only about 10 seconds on immigration at the very end of his State of the Union speech last month. Barajas said the issue had been particularly hot on Spanish talk radio ever since Obama gave that speech.

"It's what didn't happen," Barajas said. "I mean, he spent more time talking about gays in the military than he did about providing some immigration reform plan."

The White House said that it remained committed to passing a comprehensive overhaul of immigration laws.

White House spokesman Adam Abrams said the president wanted to sign a bill that strengthened border enforcement and cracked down on employers "who exploit undocumented workers to undercut American workers." He also said the president wanted to resolve the status of 12 million people who were in the U.S. illegally, "that they should have to register, pay a penalty for breaking the law and meet other obligations of legal immigrants such as paying taxes, or leave the country."

"The president told members of both parties that if they can fashion a plan to deal with these problems, he is eager to work with them to get it done," Abrams said.

Jaime Regalado, the executive director of the Pat Brown Institute, a nonprofit public-policy center at California State University, Los Angeles, said that Democrats, particularly the president, faced "a scary situation."

"It's really a colossal hassle for the administration, that there is so much impatience from so many groups — including Latinos — that are hellbent on having an immigration reform package in 2010, an election year," he said. "It's difficult in any season in any year, but this is a very precarious year for Obama."

Regalado said Republicans were exploiting the issue "with good reason," because it was a no-win situation for Democrats: They lose votes from Latinos if they don't come up with a comprehensive solution to immigration, or they lose votes from more conservative members of their base if they do.

"It's fraught with political peril," he said. "There's no question about that."

Cedillo, who campaigned for Obama in California, Texas and Nevada and debated on his behalf on Spanish radio, said the president and Democratic leaders needed to show Latinos that they were committed to them "not only during the campaign, but after the election."

He predicted that Latinos will provide the determining vote in every upcoming presidential election. Obama was hugely popular among Latinos, receiving 75 percent of the more than 10 million votes they cast in the 2008 presidential election.

Latinos are gearing up to be big players this fall. Earlier this month, a report by America's Voice, a group that backs new comprehensive immigration policies, said that immigration could be the deciding factor in as many as 40 congressional races in November.

Noting the electoral strength of Latinos, Cedillo said: "I would be concerned if I was the White House, if I was a member of Congress."

Immigration has taken a back seat to a host of tough issues for Obama, including two wars, the struggling economy and a yearlong effort to get Congress to pass a health care overhaul. The president's defenders say that it would be politically impossible to add the volatile issue of immigration to the mix right now.

Cedillo doesn't buy that argument. He said the president knew that he'd be dealing with other big issues when he made the promises to the Latino community during the campaign.

"Those were the conditions that he was campaigning under," Cedillo said. "It's not like those were surprises. ... I was so proud of him, at how firm and clear he was in those presidential debates. He really provided leadership."

Barajas said Latinos recognized that it had been a tough year for Obama and an immigration plan might not be fully implemented immediately, but he said there wasn't even a plan for proceeding, let alone introducing legislation.

"I think the Democratic Party needs to wake up and realize that you can only fool the Latino community for so long," Barajas said. "There's a great sense of frustration, there's a great sense of anger and there's a big letdown" that will drive more Latinos to the Republican Party.

Regalado said he didn't believe that Democrats would switch to the Republican Party in big numbers. "What it does threaten is that Latinos stay home" on Election Day, he said.


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/85128.html
 
Obama looking to give new life to immigration reform
In an effort to advance a bill through Congress before midterm elections, the president meets with two senators who have spent months trying to craft legislation.
March 04, 2010|By Peter Nicholas


Reporting from Washington — Despite steep odds, the White House has discussed prospects for reviving a major overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, a commitment that President Obama has postponed once already.

Obama took up the issue privately with his staff Monday in a bid to advance a bill through Congress before lawmakers become too distracted by approaching midterm elections.
Advertisement

In the session, Obama and members of his Domestic Policy Council outlined ways to resuscitate the effort in a White House meeting with two senators -- Democrat Charles E. Schumer of New York and Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina -- who have spent months trying to craft a bill.

According to a person familiar with the meeting, the White House may ask Schumer and Graham to at least produce a blueprint that could be turned into legislative language.

The basis of a bill would include a path toward citizenship for the 10.8 million people living in the U.S. illegally. Citizenship would not be granted lightly, the White House said. Undocumented workers would need to register, pay taxes and pay a penalty for violating the law. Failure to comply might result in deportation.

Nick Shapiro, a White House spokesman, said the president's support for an immigration bill, which would also include improved border security, was "unwavering."

Participants in the White House gathering also pointed to an immigration rally set for March 21 in Washington as a way to spotlight the issue and build needed momentum.

Though proponents of an immigration overhaul were pleased that the White House wasn't abandoning the effort, they also wanted Obama to take on a more assertive role, rather than leave it to Congress to work out a compromise.

Immigration is a delicate issue for the White House. After promising to revamp in his first year of office what many see as a fractured system, Obama risks angering a growing, politically potent Latino constituency if he defers the goal until 2011.

But with the healthcare debate still unresolved, Democrats are wary of plunging into another polarizing issue.

"Right now we have a little problem with the 'Chicken Little' mentality: The sky is falling and consequently we can't do anything," Rep. Raul M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.) said in an interview.

Republicans are unlikely to cooperate. On Capitol Hill, Republicans said that partisan tensions had only gotten worse since Obama signaled this week that he would push forward with a healthcare bill, whether he could get GOP votes or not.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said in an interview, "The things you hear from the administration won't be well received."

Schumer, speaking as he walked quickly through the Capitol, said he was having trouble rounding up Republican supporters apart from Graham. "It's tough finding someone, but we're trying," Schumer said.
Advertisement

On Thursday, Schumer met with Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, who oversees the government's immigration efforts, to strategize over potential Republican co-sponsors.

"We're very hopeful we can get a bill done. We have all the pieces in place. We just need a second Republican," Schumer said in a statement.

Among proponents, there is a consensus that a proposal must move by April or early May to have a realistic chance of passing this year. If that deadline slips, Congress' focus is likely to shift to the November elections, making it impossible to take up major legislation.

"There's no question that this is a heavy lift and the window is narrowing," said Janet Murguia, president and chief executive of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino advocacy group.

When it comes to immigration, Obama's strategy echoes that of healthcare. He has deferred heavily to Congress, leaving it up to Schumer and Graham to reach a breakthrough with the idea that he would put his weight behind the resulting compromise.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/04/nation/la-na-immigration5-2010mar05
 
As an American of Afro-Latino decent I know Latinos very well keep thinking they are going to lookout for you African-Americans once they get more political power than you in America you have keep thinking that. Mexicans are your friends they steal Americas jobs drive down wages and than come here illegals and have more right than you :smh:.
 
As an American of Afro-Latino decent, you appear to be a bit conflicted. No?
 
No I am not conflicted, I just want to let African-Americans know once Latinos of Non-African decent get into political power they are not going to look out for you. You see how Latinos of African decent are treated in Latin-America :smh:.
As an American of Afro-Latino decent, you appear to be a bit conflicted. No?
 
No I am not conflicted, I just want to let African-Americans know once Latinos of Non-African decent get into political power they are not going to look out for you.

I hear you, but I read you, as well.

I'm just Curious. Why did you draw the <u>distinction between</u> yourself, "as an American of Afro-Latino decent" and letting us know that you "know Latinos very well" and mine when you said, " keep thinking they are going to lookout for you African-Americans once they get more political power" ? ? ?

Clearly, I understand the point you're trying to make, I just find it odd how you set yourself apart in this thread, as an American of Afro-Latino descent and in another thread you claimed the following:

What we need to do as African-Americans is unite and stop depending on big government . . . [do] we really think they are going to fix Health Care and Obama is going to look out for you than I have a bridge to sell you :lol:. Obama's allegiance is only to his corporate masters who have put him in the position that he is today and not to the American people.

Why do you sometimes claim to be African American and at others an American of Afro-latino descent ??? To me there is little, if any difference, except for the mental part -- that is, what one thinks of him/herself and of everyone one else.

QueEx
 
Whats your point???? I am just trying to let you know how some Latinos of Non-African decent feel about African-Americans what does this have to do with me calling myself an African-American or Afro-Latino??? In America I am African-American right???? Unless you see my name you and not face you call me Latino. I can speak from that point of vies being that I have the best of both world of the Afro/Latino culture, if you saw me in person you would never know I speak spanish.
I hear you, but I read you, as well.

I'm just Curious. Why did you draw the <u>distinction between</u> yourself, "as an American of Afro-Latino decent" and letting us know that you "know Latinos very well" and mine when you said, " keep thinking they are going to lookout for you African-Americans once they get more political power" ? ? ?

Clearly, I understand the point you're trying to make, I just find it odd how you set yourself apart in this thread, as an American of Afro-Latino descent and in another thread you claimed the following:



Why do you sometimes claim to be African American and at others an American of Afro-latino descent ??? To me there is little, if any difference, except for the mental part -- that is, what one thinks of him/herself and of everyone one else.

QueEx
 
Interesting developments

Robert Reich argues that in the future once the unemployment numbers go back up that immigration reform will fix SS.
I think that's hella optimistic.
 

Well, 4 years later and this 2008 headline seems like déjà vu:



<font size="5"><center>
Obama's Latin policies in play</font size>
<font size="4">
A tug of war is in progress within the Barack Obama
campaign to influence the direction of his Hispanic
and Latin American agenda.</font size></center>


Miami Herald
BY ANDRES OPPENHEIMER
aoppenheimer@MiamiHerald.com
Sat, Jul. 19, 2008

There is a fierce behind-the-scenes battle for influence over presumptive Democratic candidate Barack Obama's Hispanic and Latin American agenda, and some Democratic strategists say that its outcome could determine the result of the November elections.



. . . all over again


 
<font size="5"><center>
Obama's Latin policies in play</font size>
<font size="4">
A tug of war is in progress within the Barack Obama
campaign to influence the direction of his Hispanic
and Latin American agenda.</font size></center>




ACCESS TO OBAMA

He stated that while top Latino leaders such as New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, former Clinton Transportation Secretary Federico Peña and U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., have direct access to Obama, ``that is very different than BEING in the inner circle of the Obama campaign.''


Rep. Luis Gutierrez under House ethics review​


IZOeD.AuSt.91.jpg

U.S. Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL) spoke on the second night of the 2012
Democratic National Convention at Time Warner Cable Arena, September 5, 2012​


T
he House Ethics Committee is reviewing the conduct of Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Il., one of Congress's leading advocates for overhauling the nation's immigration laws.

The ethics committee announced Thursday that the Office of Congressional Ethics, which probes allegations of wrongdoing by House members, referred the Gutierrez matter to the committee.

The ethics committee didn't specify the specific allegations against the 60-year-old Democrat from Chicago. USA Today reported that Gutierrez had had a Chicago-based lobbyist, Doug Scofield, working on his congressional staff for years. The paper reported that Scofield was paid thousands of dollars a month as a contractor to work with Gutierrez's staff.

Douglas Rivlin, a Gutierrez spokesman said the matter 'relates to whether a long-standing contract was allowable under House rules.'

'The contract for services was reviewed and approved by the House of Representatives and submitted for renewal each Congress for 10 years,' Rivlin said in a statement. 'It was consistently and properly reported. Rep. Gutierrez cancelled the contract last year.'

In its statement, the ethics committee noted that 'the mere fact of a referral or an extension, and the mandatory disclosure of such an extension and the name of the subject matter, does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred, or reflect any judgment on behalf of the committee.'


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/03/20/221899/rep-luis-gutierrez-under-house.html#storylink=cpy



 
Back
Top