Oath Keepers leader and 10 others charged with 'seditious conspiracy' related to US Capitol attack

The estranged wife of indicted leader of Oath Keepers tells CNN he is a 'dangerous man' and 'complete sociopath'


52943567-10403951-Rhodes_ex_wife_Tasha_Adams_appeared_on_CNN_on_Friday_to_blast_hi-a-9_1642198233728.jpg
 
You're surprised by this?
I always expect atleast one "good negro" to be a part of the white supremacist movement. White supremacist need their tools and some black folk are willing to be helpful.


dakjgizuiaijhoo.jpg


Right on! ( Forgive my old school phrase ) Funny thing is that the one thing white racists hate to be called is a racist. Apparently no white racists exist and these "colored" folk make it easy for them to say that.
 
Because I said black folk fought for the confederacy I am lower than Candace Owens? You got me fucked up, I don't like the shit, but this is the same type of shit going on now, fuck coons honoring a lost cause. I wanted to expose that shit when I was doing this shit professionally. Motherfucker, I am a Garveyite. Born and bread and ready to move the fuck on and live my African dream, but I also wanted to tell the story how it was. There are newspaper articles in several southern newspapers during the war that discussed the use of black soldier and propagated it. Do you realize there was a group of black slave owners in Louisiana and Mississippi that was ready for the war and they supported it with their money? And the regiments in New Orleans that were created by rich black residents of New Orleans were filled with black men. It was more than 35 people. Go look that shit up in the archives. Again, I did not research this shit because I thought it was something to be proud of, I wanted to exposed the madness of this shit. It just lets you know that money will bring out the strangest shit. Those rich black folk wanted to keep what they had and supported the people they believed that could help them keep it. There were also a few white people that opposed the war. They did it because they knew they had it good in the Union and knew they would lose everything they had if they fought. You know what, they were right.

First off, don't DM me again... Post it here, or don't say it at all. Only Camille and the other women on this board can DM me - and they can only do that if they giving up at least two of three holes for me to fuck. Be a man and talk to another man publically. FOH

Let me repeat: Yes, Louisana created two "Regiments" - but only a handful of "Creole" men turned out AND when the US Army showed up a few months later, they immediately switched sides and then Louisiana's Creole and Black populations jumped to join The United States by the thousands. Do not allow yourself to be manipulated so that KKKrackas can lie and twist the truth. Black people hated the Confederacy and either escaped to US lines or were forced to serve. While the creation of the Louisiana regiments is documented, the South never stood up those two units becuase they got very few volunteered. And to assume that the Creoles of south Louisiana were supporters of racism is a myth. They joined to get military experience and were never going to be trusted.

I will not be going to the archives on this subject. I can tell you for a fact that Shelby Foote, who worked on the three volumes of "The Civil War: A Narrative" for 20 years, writing more than two million wordsi never mentioned it, nor did Harry Hansen in his book "The Civil War: A History". Foot became famous after appearing in Ken Burns' PBS documentary. I can tell you this because I've recently read both books, which were completed in the 1970s. Only in the Internet age do we start hearing about Black Confederates. Why?The Confederacy had to expend a lot of men and machines to watch the Black population - men who could have been on the front lines. That don't sound like support.

Let me deal with this sshit now: In recent years they've spread the idea that there were "Black slave owners". They leave off the rest: The Black slave owners were people who were forced to "buy" family and other people so that they could set them free. KKKrakas use one part of a legal record to justify their treachery and no self-respecting Black man could fall for that.

You've swallowed Lost Cause Ideology hook line and sinker. No Garveyite would believe that shit. So yes, (per your DM) That makes you lower than Candace Owens.

Lastly, just to prove the treachery of KKKrakas and the idiocy of a Black man believing that bullshit, here is a fact: The first Black man to serve in Congress, Joseph Rainey, did "serve" in the Confederate Army. That is true. He was an educated free man who was conscripted/re-enslaved in North Carolina to serve in horrific conditions to create trenchworks and berms for the defence of Wilmington. But at the first opportunity he escaped and likely spied for the United States against the Confederacy. Does that make him a Confederate? He returned to the US and North Carolina and became a Republican and got elected. Whenever he spoke in Congress the rest of the North Carolina delegation would leave the room.

Tell you what, have a read: "Ta-Nehisi Coates on the myth of Black Confederate Soldiers" https://www.theatlantic.com/enterta...the-myth-of-black-confederate-soldiers/21370/

Every Black Man should remember Fort Pillow.
 
First off, don't DM me again... Post it here, or don't say it at all. Only Camille and the other women on this board can DM me - and they can only do that if they giving up at least two of three holes for me to fuck. Be a man and talk to another man publically. FOH

Let me repeat: Yes, Louisana created two "Regiments" - but only a handful of "Creole" men turned out AND when the US Army showed up a few months later, they immediately switched sides and then Louisiana's Creole and Black populations jumped to join The United States by the thousands. Do not allow yourself to be manipulated so that KKKrackas can lie and twist the truth. Black people hated the Confederacy and either escaped to US lines or were forced to serve. While the creation of the Louisiana regiments is documented, the South never stood up those two units becuase they got very few volunteered. And to assume that the Creoles of south Louisiana were supporters of racism is a myth. They joined to get military experience and were never going to be trusted.

I will not be going to the archives on this subject. I can tell you for a fact that Shelby Foote, who worked on the three volumes of "The Civil War: A Narrative" for 20 years, writing more than two million wordsi never mentioned it, nor did Harry Hansen in his book "The Civil War: A History". Foot became famous after appearing in Ken Burns' PBS documentary. I can tell you this because I've recently read both books, which were completed in the 1970s. Only in the Internet age do we start hearing about Black Confederates. Why?The Confederacy had to expend a lot of men and machines to watch the Black population - men who could have been on the front lines. That don't sound like support.

Let me deal with this sshit now: In recent years they've spread the idea that there were "Black slave owners". They leave off the rest: The Black slave owners were people who were forced to "buy" family and other people so that they could set them free. KKKrakas use one part of a legal record to justify their treachery and no self-respecting Black man could fall for that.

You've swallowed Lost Cause Ideology hook line and sinker. No Garveyite would believe that shit. So yes, (per your DM) That makes you lower than Candace Owens.

Lastly, just to prove the treachery of KKKrakas and the idiocy of a Black man believing that bullshit, here is a fact: The first Black man to serve in Congress, Joseph Rainey, did "serve" in the Confederate Army. That is true. He was an educated free man who was conscripted/re-enslaved in North Carolina to serve in horrific conditions to create trenchworks and berms for the defence of Wilmington. But at the first opportunity he escaped and likely spied for the United States against the Confederacy. Does that make him a Confederate? He returned to the US and North Carolina and became a Republican and got elected. Whenever he spoke in Congress the rest of the North Carolina delegation would leave the room.

Tell you what, have a read: "Ta-Nehisi Coates on the myth of Black Confederate Soldiers" https://www.theatlantic.com/enterta...the-myth-of-black-confederate-soldiers/21370/

Every Black Man should remember Fort Pillow.

Damn nice response. Great lesson on MLK Day. Saving this
 
Bitch made, I am all man and I said what I said in the email. I am a Graveyite, which in my book is a Pan-Africanist. As a Pan Afircanist, I tell the truth. Further, I wrote the shit to expose the past when I learned about African American Confederate soldiers. Frankly, there were some and they fought for the confederates. Most who fought, fought against their will, but you had some who fought because they wanted to keep the South intact. Again, there were families of African Americans who were slave owners. This is known throughout African American historical circles. One brother was William Johnson, the Barber of Natchez. He owned over 10 slaves and had a plantation. Look that shit up. He wasn't the only one, there were African Americans in a several Southern states who were slaveowners and they knew about one another. To add to this shit, I didn't look that shit up as a graduate student to celebrate African American slaveowners. I look that shit up to expose the hypocrisy of it. How could we, but that time is no different then this time period. You will always have a motherfucker that will sell out the whole for money. Last, if you ain't a Garveyite then you can't tell me what a Garveyite will do. I will expose the truth and show you we weren't and still ain't a monolith. We are not one, but if we work at it, we can be. Oh, forgot, Shelby Foote is a got damn plagarist and a racist. I don't follow his bullshit.
 
Last edited:
Damn nice response. Great lesson on MLK Day. Saving this
You can save it, but it is wrong. The African American journey in America is very complexed. He is speaking off of emotions, what he don't want us to look like. I am telling you fact, what the fuck happened. We don't have time for sanitized narratives. If we had some fuck niggahs in our troops then we had some, but that is the greatest thing about the past. We can learn from that shit.
 
You can save it, but it is wrong. The African American journey in America is very complexed. He is speaking off of emotions, what he don't want us to look like. I am telling you fact, what the fuck happened. We don't have time for sanitized narratives. If we had some fuck niggahs in our troops then we had some, but that is the greatest thing about the past. We can learn from that shit.

Both of you are speaking the truth, historically speaking. Blacks owned slaves 1) to buy families 2) to work their land. The land owners were primarily in the 1600s and 1700s. In regards to blacks in the Confederate army, it is true their were blacks in the confederate army. By large most were "coerced" into that. While there may have been a few sambos that willingly fought, most had no choice.

You're both touching the elephant and giving two different descriptions. Shake and be friends.
 
Both of you are speaking the truth, historically speaking. Blacks owned slaves 1) to buy families 2) to work their land. The land owners were primarily in the 1600s and 1700s. In regards to blacks in the Confederate army, it is true their were blacks in the confederate army. By large most were "coerced" into that. While there may have been a few (more then a few cuz, more then a few) sambos that willingly fought, most had no choice.

You're both touching the elephant and giving two different descriptions. Shake and be friends.
@Gazoo, I am cool bruh, but these young ones can't come in here and portray a sanitized narrative. Then the young blood called me a coon. Then he told me not to DM him because that is only for women. Who the fuck does that. LOL I'm cool, but we are complexed. You can't tell this traumatic story one way. I am glad you are setting the situation straight.
 
@Gazoo, I am cool bruh, but these young ones can't come in here and portray a sanitized narrative. Then the young blood called me a coon. Then he told me not to DM him because that is only for women. Who the fuck does that. LOL I'm cool, but we are complexed. You can't tell this traumatic story one way. I am glad you are setting the situation straight.
Reading Is Fundamental was a great program when it was introduced in the 1970s... You need to check it out, because I never used the word "coon".

Have a good day.
 
Do not forget: the `"Operations Leader" of the Oath Keepers is a Black man...
 
Do not forget: the `"Operations Leader" of the Oath Keepers is a Black man...
oh he's gettin the full monty of charges :roflmao: :roflmao:
 
Yep, there were Blacks in the Confederacy too. Little did they know that if their side had won, they would be immediately returned to a life of servitude and/or a second or third class citizenship (or worse) by any random White person who didn't give a shit about any vow or contract their master had promised them for fighting in the Civil War for the South.
There were no black Confederate Infantrymen, Artillerymen, Cavalry, nor anything related to wielding weaponry and killing white men.
They were as subservient as they were on the Plantations...cooking, cleaning, tending horses, burying the dead, and waiting on CAC Officers. They were General laborers, not soldiers in the fighting sense.
 
I disagree with you. I got into it at a conference over research I found that proved differently. No, there were several black regiments that march from New Orleans and fought for the confederacy. A lot of enslaved brothers were the replacement soldiers for their white confederate owners. White historians try to hide that shit, but the true is real. It was a lot of black slave owners in Louisiana and a few in Mississippi that are historically documented.
New Orleans was quite different from the rest of the South in that the French allowed mullatos to inherit wealth and had more lenient restrictions than the former British colonies had for blacks. If they chose to fight for the Confederacy, it's because they had shit to fight for. It was an act of preservation for them.
Even if you found evidence of black conscripts, that shit was in NO WAY widespread throughout the Confederacy.
 
First off, don't DM me again... Post it here, or don't say it at all. Only Camille and the other women on this board can DM me - and they can only do that if they giving up at least two of three holes for me to fuck. Be a man and talk to another man publically. FOH
:lol:

this mothafukka DM'n folks with his bullshit???

:lol: deranged sumbitches be on BGOL man. :smh:
 
New Orleans was quite different from the rest of the South in that the French allowed mullatos to inherit wealth and had more lenient restrictions than the former British colonies had for blacks. If they chose to fight for the Confederacy, it's because they had shit to fight for. It was an act of preservation for them.
Even if you found evidence of black conscripts, that shit was in NO WAY widespread throughout the Confederacy.
I agree with your statement, I didn't find that is was supercharged, but it was enough to be noticeable. At the time, I was a master level graduate student who found that shit. It had to be known by others.
 
Last edited:
:lol:

this mothafukka DM'n folks with his bullshit???

:lol: deranged sumbitches be on BGOL man. :smh:
Bitch made motherfucker. I told that dude I was not a coon. I am a Pan-Africanist. IF DM a motherfucker about being a true blue motherfucker, then I am guilty, but I don't see the wrong in it. If it is derange, then its no more derange then a motherfucker licking shit out of a bitch ass. I think that is really deranged, but to each its own.
 
Buck read his response closely. There is something going on here. I can't quite put my finger on it, but something's going on. Pan Africanists don't ally with the Confederacy.

his writing style is odd and his obsession with pushing that unverified narrative is telling.

he's not well.
 
They gonna make examples of these cacs...... seditious conspiracy is usualy a very tough case to prove, but thank God these are in modern times and we have the internet and other things.... like stupid cacs that make all kinds of evidence and videos...... and the ones that rat and squeal to save their asses..... crackers are going to get some time.... they continued to plan after Jan 6th.
Well if its anything like insurrection, it shouldn't be too difficult a case. Just like it wasn't against this fellow. :rolleyes:
 
Stewart Rhodes eye patch: What happened to Oath Keepers founder's eye?

Leigh McManus
9 months ago


What’s the story behind Stewart Rhodes’ eye patch? With his right-wing group in the news after one of its members pleaded guilty to charges connected to the storming of the US Capitol in early January, focus has switched to the founder of the Oath Keepers, Stewart Rhodes, and his physical appearance.

What’s the story behind Stewart Rhodes’ eye patch?


So, what happened to Stewart Rhodes’ eye? Why does he wear an eye patch?

Was the apparent injury connected to his involvement with Oath Keepers?

No. The injury dates back to 1993, according to an Atlantic investigation.

The article states that Rhodes, a former firearms instructor, dropped a loaded handgun and it shot him in the face, blinding him in his left eye.

They write that the episode inspired the then 28-year-old to enrol in community college.

Not much else is known about the accident and it rarely appeared in biographies or articles about Rhodes until the Atlantic investigation by author and journalist Mike Giglio.

So there you have it, Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes’ comic book supervillain look actually stems from a serious mishap with a firearm.

Click Above Link For Full Story

IMG_4032-scaled.jpg
 
Nah.

Blacks did not serve in the Confederate Army as combat troops. Blacks were not merely not recruited; service was actively forbidden by the Confederacy for the majority of its existence. Enslaved blacks were sometimes used for camp labor, however.
Some say they did, some say they didn't

Why did slaves fight for the Confederacy?


The reasons the actual soldiers who were African Americans fought for the Confederacy. Some were forced to do so by their owners, either because extra manpower was needed or because the owner could no longer fight and needed the slave to fight on his behalf.


When did the Confederacy allow black soldiers?


March 13, 1865

On March 13, 1865, with the main Rebel armies facing long odds against must larger Union armies, the Confederacy, in a desperate measure, reluctantly approves the use of Black troops. The situation was bleak for the Confederates in the spring of 1865.

Confederacy approves Black soldiers - HISTORY
https://www.history.com › this-day-in-history › confede...


Did black slaves fight for the South?


Though no one knows for sure, the number of slaves who fought and labored for the South was modest, estimated Stauffer. Blacks who shouldered arms for the Confederacy numbered more than 3,000 but fewer than 10,000, he said, among the hundreds of thousands of whites who served.Sep 1, 2011

Black Confederates - Harvard Gazette
 
Some say they did, some say they didn't

Why did slaves fight for the Confederacy?


The reasons the actual soldiers who were African Americans fought for the Confederacy. Some were forced to do so by their owners, either because extra manpower was needed or because the owner could no longer fight and needed the slave to fight on his behalf.


When did the Confederacy allow black soldiers?


March 13, 1865

On March 13, 1865, with the main Rebel armies facing long odds against must larger Union armies, the Confederacy, in a desperate measure, reluctantly approves the use of Black troops. The situation was bleak for the Confederates in the spring of 1865.
Confederacy approves Black soldiers - HISTORY
https://www.history.com › this-day-in-history › confede...


Did black slaves fight for the South?


Though no one knows for sure, the number of slaves who fought and labored for the South was modest, estimated Stauffer. Blacks who shouldered arms for the Confederacy numbered more than 3,000 but fewer than 10,000, he said, among the hundreds of thousands of whites who served.Sep 1, 2011
Black Confederates - Harvard Gazette
You know whats missing from both of these articles?

The names, ranks, regiments, commanding officers, enlistment records and other written, tangible proof of Black soldiers fighting for the Confederacy.

In fact, the second article says theres no real proof to speak of.
 
Some say they did, some say they didn't

Why did slaves fight for the Confederacy?


The reasons the actual soldiers who were African Americans fought for the Confederacy. Some were forced to do so by their owners, either because extra manpower was needed or because the owner could no longer fight and needed the slave to fight on his behalf.


When did the Confederacy allow black soldiers?


March 13, 1865

On March 13, 1865, with the main Rebel armies facing long odds against must larger Union armies, the Confederacy, in a desperate measure, reluctantly approves the use of Black troops. The situation was bleak for the Confederates in the spring of 1865.
Confederacy approves Black soldiers - HISTORY
https://www.history.com › this-day-in-history › confede...


Did black slaves fight for the South?


Though no one knows for sure, the number of slaves who fought and labored for the South was modest, estimated Stauffer. Blacks who shouldered arms for the Confederacy numbered more than 3,000 but fewer than 10,000, he said, among the hundreds of thousands of whites who served.Sep 1, 2011
Black Confederates - Harvard Gazette
Even if so, that amounts to just a handful of conscripts. :dunno:
 
Arab, Alabama? :lol: :lol:
You mean to tell me the good ole boys down there let that name stand as the name of their town?:lol:
They probably ran out he original founders because they likely did have darker skin. Seemed too much like africans.
 
Back
Top