NYT: A Voice of Hate in America’s Heartland (Your friendly neighborhood white supremacist)

My people hate to hear this and I hate to say this but all the progress we made socially is because we SHAMED these white folk.

That is it.

They didn't care about enslaving us raping us dehumanizing us disinfranchising us murdering us.

The system was built and created PRECISELY for that.

We shamed them humiliated them exposed their hypocrisy there lack of compassion lack of ethics lack of humanity lack of soul

They ain't see the light have an epiphany or some come to Jesus moment

They were just exposed as monsters and for some reason?

THAT is the worst thing you can do to your oppressors.

So any and all attempt to normalize excuse explain hatred?

Is a direct center mass shot at us as a people.




shaming is a tactic

shaming is not a strategy

use shaming to dehumanize your target so that when you destroy your target people will understand

shaming by itself accomplishes nothing if there is no follow through
 
shaming is a tactic

shaming is not a strategy

use shaming to dehumanize your target so that when you destroy your target people will understand

shaming by itself accomplishes nothing if there is no follow through

You are correct

But the whole civil rights movement was based on that...

Shaming those who dared yo call US sub human.

They got all the government money weapons military food water resource entertainment and numbers.

I don't think we fly appreciate what our elders sacrificed for us and the magnitude of the opposition.

Like Haiti vs the French...

It was am incredible achievement

And much like the Haitians?

they continue to punish us for every damn day.
 
you are describing the role of the editor

I will ask again, does this editor have power?

I was referring specifically to this particular editor and what he SHOULD and COULD have done.

He made a choice. And it is his job and within his power.

You would need to ask him why he chose this course of action.
 
You are correct

But the whole civil rights movement was based on that...

Shaming those who dared yo call US sub human.

They got all the government money weapons military food water resource entertainment and numbers.

I don't think we fly appreciate what our elders sacrificed for us and the magnitude of the opposition.

Like Haiti vs the French...

It was am incredible achievement

And much like the Haitians?

they continue to punish us for every damn day.




i don't know where you get this passive view

In fact Malcolm X would call them devils then proceed to espouse self defense including the use of force

It made it easier to have black men step up and physically protect themselves

As i said shaming is just a tactic

That alone doesn't change anything

The painting of blacks as sub-human was a tactic with a purpose, to ensure that the wealth from slavery was retained and justified

shaming without some action = nought
 
25-45 year old CACs are losing it more than previous generations of CACs because it is hitting them that will almost certainly live a shittier life than their parents. CACs are conditioned to think that they should be able to be a B-/C+ HS student and then make low to mid 6 six figures by 45-50 without a degree. Historically, even a mildly retarded CAC has been guaranteed a middle class lifestyle. Now that it is no longer the case, they are spiraling out of control more than normal. Personally, I couldn't be happier and encourage all of us to do everything to get our situations together (physically, mentally, financially). It kills CACs when I am out with my wife happy, fit and doing what we want with a big ass smile on our faces. On a side note, look at these CACs :smh::smh::puke:

I love this epidemic.
KILL WHITEY!

I'm sure in the 80s when crack was deemed as a "Black Issue"
they didn't give a fuck.
I dont either​
 
I was referring specifically to this particular editor and what he SHOULD and COULD have done.

He made a choice. And it is his job and within his power.

You would need to ask him why he chose this course of action.


As I said we don't know that he actually has power

another example

O was president

He had to do something about the crack cocaine sentencing disparity

What did he do?

He moved a ball a little bit

i.e. lack of power


and he was the president


another example

current president can curse people out on twitter, O had to have a beer summit

Not because you occupy an office means you have power

We have a lot of toothless bulldogs in high places
 
I love this epidemic.
KILL WHITEY!

I'm sure in the 80s when crack was deemed as a "Black Issue"
they didn't give a fuck.
I dont either​




yes but your tax dollars is being used to open treatment centers etc


so it is affecting your pocket

vs weed and crack response was jail
 
GeneralColin.png
 
As I said we don't know that he actually has power

another example

O was president

He had to do something about the crack cocaine sentencing disparity

What did he do?

He moved a ball a little bit

i.e. lack of power


and he was the president


another example

current president can curse people out on twitter, O had to have a beer summit

Not because you occupy an office means you have power

We have a lot of toothless bulldogs in high places

I understand.

NYT HISTORICALLY don't do this

but times have changed

you got dudes we THOUGHT were stand up like Jon Stewart copping pleas for his white friends who voted for Trump.

SO maybe he is just giving his AUDIENCE what they want

a reason to to feel OK with being racist sexist bigoted pieces of sh*t
 
i don't know where you get this passive view

In fact Malcolm X would call them devils then proceed to espouse self defense including the use of force

It made it easier to have black men step up and physically protect themselves

As i said shaming is just a tactic

That alone doesn't change anything

The painting of blacks as sub-human was a tactic with a purpose, to ensure that the wealth from slavery was retained and justified

shaming without some action = nought

I agree with you 100%

I'm not saying that ACTION is not needed

I agree ACTON must follow but even the ACTION

is to a point

Cause if they reacted FULLY to the action?

Its over.

It does fo hand in hand

but as we seen in RECENT events?

They have NO QUALMS in killing us (never really have) and now are finding REASONS to assuage themselves of any guilt and/or culpability when doing so.
 
Back
Top