NYPD caught editing Wikipedia pages on Bell, Garner, Diallo

Hotlantan

Beep beep. Who's got the keys to the Jeep? VROOM!
OG Investor
Edits to Wikipedia pages on Bell, Garner, Diallo traced to 1 Police Plaza
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/artic...ages-bell-garner-diallo-traced-1-police-plaza

Computers operating on the New York Police Department’s computer network at its 1 Police Plaza headquarters have been used to alter Wikipedia pages containing details of alleged police brutality, a review by Capital has revealed.

“The matter is under internal review,” an NYPD spokeswoman, Det. Cheryl Crispin, wrote in an email to Capital after examples of the changes were presented to the NYPD.

The edits and changes were linked to the NYPD through a series of Internet Protocol addresses, or IP addresses, which can be publicly tracked by various websites. (Here, for example, is one website that shows a number of IP addresses registered to the NYPD.) IP addresses can locate where a computer is when it connects to the Internet.

Computer users identified by Capital as working on the NYPD headquarters' network have edited and attempted to delete Wikipedia entries for several well-known victims of police altercations, including entries for Eric Garner, Sean Bell, and Amadou Diallo.

Capital identified 85 NYPD addresses that have edited Wikipedia, although it is unclear how many users were involved, as computers on the NYPD network can operate on the department’s range of IP addresses.

NYPD IP addresses have also been used to edit entries on stop-and-frisk, NYPD scandals, and prominent figures in the city’s political and police leadership.

There are more than 15,000 IP addresses registered to the NYPD, which employs 50,000 people, including uniformed officers and civilians. Notable Wikipedia activity was linked to about a dozen of those NYPD IP addresses.

On the evening of Dec. 3, hours after a Staten Island grand jury ruled not to indict NYPD Officer Daniel Pantaleo in the death of Eric Garner, a user on the 1 Police Plaza network made multiple edits, visible here and here, to the “Death of Eric Garner” Wikipedia entry. The edits, all concerning the actions of Eric Garner and the police officers involved in the confrontation, are as follows:

REST OF THE STORY:
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/artic...ages-bell-garner-diallo-traced-1-police-plaza
 
Free and open internet... Thank God... Now we need to put a face to the person who made those edits
 
I aint surprised at all..

since when did the devil play fair??


this devious deception is what devils do!


the only people shocked are people that think

satans demons dont exist...
 
Let them.

Anyone who trusts Wikipedia as a credible source of information is a fool anyway.

Would you trust slip of paper tacked to a telephone pole for investments with guaranteed returns?

Would you trust a phone number and name scribbled on a bathroom stall as a credible source of information "For a good time?"

The moment someone opens up a discussion or response (in the case of non-technical data) with "...well, Wikipedia says." or "The Wikipedia entry on this", I immediate glaze over and roll my eyes.
 
Let them.

Anyone who trusts Wikipedia as a credible source of information is a fool anyway.

Would you trust slip of paper tacked to a telephone pole for investments with guaranteed returns?

Would you trust a phone number and name scribbled on a bathroom stall as a credible source of information "For a good time?"

The moment someone opens up a discussion or response (in the case of non-technical data) with "...well, Wikipedia says." or "The Wikipedia entry on this", I immediate glaze over and roll my eyes.

ATTEMPT to MISDIRECT THIS THREAD. troll watch.









.
 
Last edited:
Let them.

Anyone who trusts Wikipedia as a credible source of information is a fool anyway.

Would you trust slip of paper tacked to a telephone pole for investments with guaranteed returns?

Would you trust a phone number and name scribbled on a bathroom stall as a credible source of information "For a good time?"

The moment someone opens up a discussion or response (in the case of non-technical data) with "...well, Wikipedia says." or "The Wikipedia entry on this", I immediate glaze over and roll my eyes.


would you trust an education system that tries to tell you

a man discovered a land with people already on it??


with all wikipedias faults its more reliable than the shit

they try to teach I mean train us in their memory I mean education

system...

pigs are feeling the heat and instead of tryin to adapt and evolve into

more compassionate, professional officers..

they just want to cover up their pig shit.. and they got fuckin

mountains of that shit to cover up..


not to mention they are doing this on tax payers time!

they are really a waste of time and money....


we need our own armed safety patrols... that report

to the people...and supported by the people...


we also need our own court systems, this clown circus court

shit we give all our respect to, been played out and non effective

in our quest for economic and as well as civil rights...
 
Damn! I wonder how many other negative stories they've altered. This is not new to them...someone just caught them.
 
I've gotta say that while I enjoy using Wikipedia as a reference tool, I've never completely trusted what I find on it. Any source material is questionable at best. If ANYONE can just go to a page & edit it, then you have to take it with a grain of salt.

So; if this story is true, I look at it no differently than I look at any other Wikipedia article I've read.

Not to be taken as gospel...:dunno:
 
I've gotta say that while I enjoy using Wikipedia as a reference tool, I've never completely trusted what I find on it. Any source material is questionable at best. If ANYONE can just go to a page & edit it, then you have to take it with a grain of salt.

So; if this story is true, I look at it no differently than I look at any other Wikipedia article I've read.

Not to be taken as gospel...:dunno:

You are right bruh but to a simpleton wikipedia is the gospel. Hell encyclopedia Britannica was/is the authority for generations
 
Damn! I wonder how many other negative stories they've altered. This is not new to them...someone just caught them.
 
ATTEMPT to MISDIRECT THIS THREAD. troll watch.


Not at all.
You're upset and shocked that crooked institution changed the recounting of an event on a site that is known for being manipulated and replete with entries that are full of holes, partial truths if not outright false information?

Sir, you can't be serious?

Until I see Wikipedia use as supporting evidence in a court of law, or Wikipedia used as part of the collegiate level research paper or trial, I put very little faith and credibility that site.

I consider Wikipedia as something that exists in a space between a rough reference source + a work of fiction + entertainment.

Use it at your own peril. I've seen people get destroyed during dissertations or candidate evals because they used Wikipedia and built their foundational arguments and facts based on what they read on there.






.[/QUOTE]

Them 15 days almost up family :yes:

d[/I]

And then what? Do you think before you write?
Is their a finite number of accounts on this site.


Third or fourth time you've come at me sideways. Only a matter of time before I bite back.
 
Last edited:
Not at all.
You're upset and shocked that crooked institution changed the recounting of an event on a site that is known for being manipulated and replete with entries that are full of holes, partial truths if not outright false information?

Sir, you can't be serious?

Until I see Wikipedia use as supporting evidence in a court of law, or Wikipedia used as part of the collegiate level research paper or trial, I put very little faith and credibility that site.

I consider Wikipedia as something that exists in a space between a rough reference source + a work of fiction + entertainment.

Use it at your own peril. I've seen people get destroyed during dissertations or candidate evals because they used Wikipedia and built their foundational arguments and facts based on what they read on there.






.



And then what? Do you think before you write?
Is their a finite number of accounts on this site.


Third or fourth time you've come at me sideways. Only a matter of time before I bite back.[/QUOTE]

:lol:














:popcorn:










:popcorn:
 
Back
Top