Number of black owned businesses growing

Observer2k4

Potential Star
Registered
By Jim Hopkins, USA TODAY Thu Aug 18, 7:46 AM ET

Cherie Ransom struggled to find work after Bethlehem Steel went bust in 2001, zapping her accounting job near Buffalo during the recession.

Ransom moved home to Virginia, but full-time permanent jobs were elusive, and some employers said she was overqualified. Ransom started a bookkeeping service from her Virginia Beach home, focusing on small-business customers.

Now, Ransom, 35, says she has enough work to consider hiring her first employee. "I was so busy last year, it was crazy," she says.

Her business is one of about 375,000 started by African-Americans from 1997 to 2002, new Census data show. That was surprising growth, given that African-Americans trailed Asians and Hispanics five years before, the last time the Census tracked the numbers.

The 45% jump in black-owned firms, to 1.2 million, was the highest growth rate among the largest minority groups, the Census says.

Virtually all that growth among black-owned companies was in mom-and-pop firms, often started at home. Annual revenue averaged $21,000. Few had paid employees.

Other minority groups also owed big gains primarily to growth in tiny start-ups. There are "clearly challenges ahead" in creating a sizable number of big minority-owned companies with multimillion-dollar revenues, says Betsy Zeidman, an expert on new markets at the Milken Institute, a think tank in Santa Monica, Calif.

Economists will spend years debating why black business ownership grew so much. The figures might be revised as the Census analyzes them further. Yet, clues emerge in government labor statistics and in interviews with new black entrepreneurs:

•Job losses. Compared with other groups, a bigger share of African-Americans lost jobs from 2001 to 2002 after the recession. That forced some laid-off workers to start companies.

Black employment fell 0.9%, vs. a 0.4% loss for whites, a USA TODAY analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data show. Asian-American employment rose 0.6%. Employment among Hispanics, who can be of any race, jumped 2.5% as their population swelled.

Ransom, hunting work in Virginia Beach, got a list of newly opened small companies from a chamber of commerce. She blanketed them with flyers advertising her skills and asking if they had a bookkeeper. A trickle of phone calls led to a handful of clients. Ransom supplemented her income with a part-time temporary accounting job. She now has four clients and several others she handles on an occasional basis. That's enough to support herself and spur a possible move to commercial office space. Adding an employee would land her in the more select group of African-American businesses, the nearly 95,000 with paid workers.

•Lower start-up costs. Technology boomed as the Internet took off and PCs and cell phones got more powerful and less expensive.

Lenders targeted more niche markets, including minority business owners. EBay and other Web sites made it a snap to buy second-hand goods cheap.

Near Cleveland, Ted Jordan spent $6,000 buying PCs and other gear for his two companies, a corporate computer trainer and a kids' computer camp. "Computers come so cheap," he says.

Jordan, 45, and his wife, Greer, 40, had dreamed of self-employment. The chance came in 1998 when his last employer, Sun Microsystems, wanted him to take a job he didn't like. "I said, 'Maybe this is the time.' "

North of Chicago, Robert Smith, 31, started a public-relations firm in 1998 from his kitchen table to advise companies chasing minority customers, especially African-Americans and Hispanics.

He first used computers at the public library, opening free e-mail accounts. Next, he bought used PCs for $450, then added a cell phone and a $700 photocopier.

He started Robert Smith & Associates in Rockton, Ill., when he couldn't find a job in his field, paralegal work. He began a child-support collection agency in 1996. While promoting that, he discovered he had a gift for publicity. "I was bitten by the bug," he says.

Smith expects at least $500,000 in revenue this year.

Pipeline to big business

The rise in African-American entrepreneurship comes as big companies and government agencies beef up supplier networks with more minority-owned companies.

In the auto industry, for example, "There is no American car made that does not have parts made by African-American-owned businesses," says Earl Graves Sr., founder of Black Enterprise magazine and a DaimlerChrysler board member. He says incoming Chrysler CEO Thomas LaSorda "is a proponent of doing business with African-Americans in particular and minorities in general."

As more corporate customers do business with minority start-ups, Zeidman says, the firms and their owners prosper. "They become more a part of the mainstream. It's creating opportunity," she says.
 
Black people are finally saying fuck you to the jobs sector and starting their own businesses. Two things jump out, $21,000 in annual revenue and mom & pops businesses, no mention of organizing the community or outsourcing to Africa, those are 2 things that must be done if we want to build real wealth and avoid permanent underclass status.
 
Greed said:
cant do everything at once nittie.

You could if you were organized. That's why it is vital that somebody come up with a plan for organizing our community. There should be organizations dealing with these issues 24/7. The maddening part about it is all it calls for is developing a portable management system that could be implemented in different communities, like a business franchise, what's really sad about it is civil rights organizations already have branches in almost every city, all they would have to do is change their mission statement and be about business instead of civil rights, matter of fact they could do both.
 
It's a system that's flexible, mobile, modular that can be implemented in a community without having to build a hugh infrastructure. Like I said it's something like a modern business franchise. For instance, if you owned a franchise in say ATL it would have communication, political, and business startup models, a complete system for organizing a given community.
 
Do you mean a national organization, with local chapters adherent to models set out by the national ???

QueEx
 
QueEx said:
Do you mean a national organization, with local chapters adherent to models set out by the national ???

QueEx


In a sense, naturally there would have to be a central authority that created the model and administers it, and you would want the local chapters to adhere to the model, but they would have to have the freedom to tailor their organization to a particular community.
 
QueEx said:
Then, whats left is the MESSAGE. What is it ???

QueEx

You right again, there would have to be a unifying message, but like I said earlier the system would have to be flexible because the communities are different, I can't think of a central message that would resonate in every minority community. It would be up to the organizers to find the right message for their community but there should be a headquarters they can turn to for help.
 
Actually, before the message don't you think "goals" and "objectives" would be an earlier order of business ??? You know, what we want to accomplish, how we expect to get there, etc. Typically, messages are but a reflection (part of the means to get there) of the goals and objectives.

QueEx
 
QueEx said:
Actually, before the message don't you think "goals" and "objectives" would be an earlier order of business ??? You know, what we want to accomplish, how we expect to get there, etc. Typically, messages are but a reflection (part of the means to get there) of the goals and objectives.

QueEx


We already covered this we agreed there would have to be a central authority covering these bases.
 
After about 18 years of working for other companies, Gerald Taylor, like any budding entrepreneur, decided it was time to start his own business.

Ten years later, it appears he made the right decision.

Taylor started Division 7 Waterproofing and Concrete Restoration Inc. in 1995 with $6,000 in his pocket. Last year, the company generated $1.3 million in revenue and found itself at the forefront of a growing national trend.

In July, the U.S. Census Bureau released preliminary estimates from its 2002 Survey of Business Owners, indicating that minority groups and women are increasing business ownership at a much faster rate than the national average.

U.S. Small Business Administration loans to minorities increased 27 percent in 2005 compared with the same period in 2004. Loans to women increased nearly 50 percent, followed closely by loans to black business owners, which were up 46 percent.

"These newly released census estimates and our own loan figures validate what I see in the communities I've visited all across the country," SBA Administrator Hector V. Barreto said in a press release. "Minority and women entrepreneurs are leading the way in business growth and are making important contributions to our nation's economic strength."

Taylor's journey to becoming the owner of a successful business, ranked among The Jacksonville Business Journal's 50 largest minority-owned area businesses, began at the bottom.

"I started as a laborer and came through the ranks, first as leadman, then to foreman with one company," Taylor said. He left that company to work for Jacksonville's Pinnacle Roofing Contractors Inc., where he started its waterproofing division. "In the first year I was there, I generated $1.5 million in work and I said, 'Wow. I can do that for myself.' "

Today, Division 7, which offers damp-proofing, waterproofing, concrete and stucco repair and painting services, is the only minority-owned waterproofing company in Florida.

Though many factors contribute to establishing a small business, Taylor and his wife, Susan, office manager for the company, agreed that reputation was instrumental in the company's succes
 
Taylor started Division 7 Waterproofing and Concrete Restoration Inc. in 1995 with $6,000 in his pocket. Last year, the company generated $1.3 million in revenue and found itself at the forefront of a growing national trend.


This ain't chump change, but it is peanuts compared to the profits that can be made if our communities organized and kept our dollars in our community. Not even talking about how much money could be made if we developed and outsourced to African businesses. Let's keep this real and talk about HUD money earmarked for minority communities, if this money came to the communities it was earmarked for, ghettoes would disappear in a few short years. We have got to get away from the idea of a central authority solving our problems. Things won't get better for us until local leaders start dealing with local problems that is what empowerment is all about.
 
The next step is combining these businesses so they have staying power. One of the issues pointed out in several books is that the way most of our businesses are set up, once the owner dies or retires, the business folds. We need entities built to last.
 
<font size="5"><center>
Black-Owned Businesses Increasing</font size>

<font size="4">With Emphasis on Health and Social Services</font size></center>

Black Press USA
by Whitney Teal
Special to the NNPA from
the Howard University News Service

WASHINGTON (NNPA) - The number of private companies owned by African-Americans is on the rise.

According to the 2002 Survey of Business Owners, the most recent by the U.S. Census Bureau, businesses owned by Black people now number more than 1 million, more than doubling over a decade.

Black business proprietors have experienced an approximate 45 percent gain since the last Survey in 1997 and an increase of about 92 percent since the 1992 survey 10 years prior.

"[African-Americans] are now pooling resources and beginning to understand the power of networking [and] how to market and promote their companies," says Bonnie Rose-Goree, CEO of the Atlanta Black Business Association.
But, while the number of businesses has increased, the percentage of the market that African-Americans currently occupy has barely increased. In the 1997 survey Black-owned businesses represented about 4 percent of the total number of businesses. In 2002, the number was 5 percent. By comparison, Latino-owned businesses represent almost 7 percent of the total number while Asian-American-owned companies own about 5 percent.

Economic justice advocates applaud the progress.

CEO and President of National Urban League Marc Morial said, ''Though the percentage of Black-owned businesses in the nation is less than half the percentage of African-Americans in the general population, the bottom line is that more blacks are their own bosses, and that is a good thing.''

Also, what has not changed in recent years is the type of businesses that African-Americans own. In 1997, over half of all Black-owned companies were service related, i.e. beauty salons or auto repair shops. Much of the same was reported for 2002, with health care and social assistance service-related businesses as the most common industry for Black entrepreneurs. The second most common type was ''other industries,'' which includes personal service companies, automotive companies, and all other service-related businesses outside of healthcare.

Why this concentration on health and social assistance? Rose-Goree says that the need-based nature of these companies prompts Black consumers to look to Black-owned businesses.

''When there is a need, we (African-American consumers) can freely go with another African-American company,'' Government contracts comprise ''more than half'' of all of the company's clients due to the percentage of the federal budget that is allotted to minority, disabled and Veteran entrepreneurs.

As for the future of Black entrepreneurs, experts see immense potential. Kyle Moffett, president of the Black business directory www.usebobo.com, believes that African-American consumers are the key to success for Black business owners. ''There is an awareness of self that has been mounting,?Moffett says. "The number of consumers that want to know where the Black businesses are in their area is increasing.''

http://www.blackpressusa.com/News/Article.asp?SID=3&Title=Hot+Stories&NewsID=12503
 
A Year of Shopping Only at Black Businesses
Impractical? Damn right. But Maggie Anderson and her family gave it a whirl.

By Tim McDonnell | Tue Feb. 14, 2012 4:00 AM PST

In 2008, Maggie Anderson was doing pretty well. She had a successful career in business consulting, a loving husband and two lovely daughters, a nice house in a trendy Chicago suburb, and attended the same church as the Obamas*. But looking around at her mostly white neighbors, she couldn't shake the guilty feeling that she'd left the black community behind. A simple solution, she decided, would be to spend more money in the impoverished neighborhoods on Chicago's West Side. "The whole point," she said, "was, 'You know what, we care about the West Side. We need to help those people, those are our people, and we need to do what we can to make a difference there.' So we thought, instead of buying groceries here in Oak Park we could go buy groceries on the West Side. And it was not that simple at all."

The problem, Anderson realized, was that most businesses in predominantly black neighborhoods weren't owned by African Americans; most of the money spent in those concerns would leave the community come closing time. So she persuaded her family to embark on a far more challenging mission: For a full year, they would attempt to spend their cash exclusively at black-owned businesses.

The ensuing adventure, dubbed The Empowerment Experiment [1] and chronicled in Anderson's book Our Black Year [2] (coauthored by Chicago Tribune reporter Ted Gregory), took them from gritty corner stores at the epicenter of urban decay to Texas megachurches to the boardrooms of the nation's most powerful trade organizations. By the end, the Andersons emerged from the maw of racial-economic inequality with powerful insights into how black Americans might better wield their collective $913 billion buying power to improve their communities. I spoke with Anderson, whose book comes out this week, about the backlash she encountered, economic segregation in the black community, and the near-impossibility of finding black-made products at Walmart.

Mother Jones: So how have you been shopping since you finished the book?

Maggie Anderson: I like to tell people it's not like a diet. It's not like you lose your 20 pounds and then you go out and get a sloppy pizza. So we are totally engrossed in our new lifestyle. For example, just a couple months ago we needed pest control. We were throwing a party here and maybe about three days before I was in the kitchen and saw 10 unidentified flying objects in my kitchen. I spent a good 20 minutes to find a local, black-owned pest control company. And I called and it was a fantastic experience and haven't seen a bug in the house since. If we ever need something new like that, we do an exhaustive search to at least investigate the possibility of giving that business to an African American entrepreneur. So that's number one, the little things like that. But it's not as painstaking as it was during the experiment, [when] every little bit of money we spent, even for last-minute items, had to be black-owned.

MJ: If you had to ballpark it, what would you estimate is the percent of your income spent at black businesses?

MA: I would say a conservative number would be 55 percent.

MJ: What surprised you about the experiment?

MA: Oh, the worst thing was what we learned about economies in black neighborhoods. We assumed, just like other little ethnic enclaves like Little Italy or Greek Town or Chinatown, that for predominantly black neighborhoods all the black businesses there would be owned by the local people. But easily over 90 percent of the businesses on the West Side—and it's the same way all over the country—are owned by people who are not black and do not live in that community. So it's not a "buy local" thing, because these folks set up shop in the black community, sell their wares, make their money, hardly ever employ the local people there—and they put the steel bar over the door, pack up at 6:30, get in their car, drive to their suburb, and take that money with them. And that was the whole reason that these communities suffer the way they do: The everyday exit of the wealth in those neighborhoods directly leads to social crises there.

So I'm literally walking around and talking to people, "Is there a black-owned restaurant, or a black-owned dry cleaner?" and folks are looking at me like I'm insane. And if I didn't know this, I'm sure that folks outside the black community don't have this as part of their reality or part of their picture for black America. When we talk about black people, the black situation, problems in the black community, you know, we start with, "Black kids are least likely to graduate from school; black unemployment is four times higher than the national average," all these numbers. But why can't we include that over 90 percent of businesses in the black community are not owned by black people or local residents? If we were to add that to the conversation, maybe folks would say, "Oh, well no wonder things are so bad there," and start thinking about things in a different way instead of allowing those awful numbers to be a reflection of our propensities. Why is it that my people are just supposed to be the perpetual consumer class, and everyone else is supposed to benefit from our money?

MJ: So you had trouble finding black businesses to patronize in black neighborhoods. Is this a problem for all blacks? Only low-income black people? All Americans?

MA: Good question. I would say it's the black community's problem that we don't have as many businesses as we have. The main message that I want to get out with Our Black Year is that we have to be more accountable. This economic problem is something that should be of concern for all Americans, but the problem is our problem. And it happened, I daresay, mostly because we abandoned our businesses. But I think all Americans should feel ashamed to know that there used to be 6,400 black-owned grocery stores, representing that melting pot or patchwork that is America, and now there are only three. Until equality is reflected in the economy, America hasn't reached its ideal.

MJ: Within the black community, your experiment got a mixed reaction. In fact, one of the biggest threats to the project came from Ebony, a black-owned magazine that went after you for trying to call it The Ebony Experiment. Were you surprised by how hard it was to sell your project to certain elements of the black community?

MA: We're very surprised. It breaks my heart every time we go to an established, influential black business owner or black organization and we still get that: "Oh, that's nice, buy black, good for you," pat on the back kind of thing. That hurts. The second reaction we get that hurts is this fear, for lack of a better word, from black folks at the NAACP, or National Urban League, who make the assumption that if they say anything that has specifically to do with our community—if they say "black" and not "minority"—that it will look like we're trying to be exclusive, be racist, take down a corporation, or something militant like that.

MJ: Actually, lots of people accused you of racism. How did you cope with that?

MA: It was awful. And especially when I think about in terms of how I grew up, who I am, it's the farthest thing from the truth. I speak to diverse groups all the time, but when you're giving a speech you get to go through your whole thing. If you're just meeting someone, how do you go up to them and say, "I'm a patriotic American just like you, but for a year I decided I'm only gonna support black businesses and no one else," and not expect them to say what everyone else says: "Well, what if I did that?" So I say the black community is suffering economically, and I thought it would be great for my family to do our best to spend money with those businesses owners that employ from our community. There's a different pitch.

MJ: You spent a lot of time driving to faraway black-owned gas stations or fast-food franchises to buy gift cards to spend at non-black-owned franchises closer to home. Is it practical to ask people who are less well off than yourself to do that?

MA: I'm not going around saying, "You need to go out and do the same thing!" I do tell folks, "I want you to at least try it for two weeks." And it's not just because I want them to get into supporting our businesses. I tell people, "Go out there and drive really far, and then I want you to feel the sacrifice and feel the sense of empowerment that you get from making that sacrifice." No, it is not practical to live the way we did. But I encourage everyone to immediately get 10 subscriptions to black-owned media, immediately get an account at a community-owned bank, immediately look for the basic services—like an alarm company, just check to see if there's a black-owned alarm company in your community. There are. Plenty of them. For your spas, for your getaways, there are tons of black-owned hotels people don't know about. If you practice 10 of my top 20 tips, you can get up to 30 or 40 percent of your spending.

Correction: The original version of this article stated that the Andersons lived in the same neighborhood as the Obamas. However, the Andersons live in Oak Park, while the Obamas lived in Hyde Park.

MJ: You talk a lot about the idea of economic enfranchisement. Is that another way of framing this problem you're addressing?

MA: I think it is. When we first did this it was 2008, and we were very happy with what was going on with Barack Obama, and celebrities were involved, people wearing T-shirts and high-fiving in the streets. And we thought, what if black America were that excited about their economic empowerment? What if they were running up and down the streets saying, "Did you support a black business today?" What if they were that high-fivey, or if celebrities were behind our economic empowerment in the same way? I did not realize how absolutely left out of this economy I was until I went into a Walmart one day and looked for products made by black companies. I asked for the manager, and he happened to be black. I asked if there was any way I could have a list of their diverse suppliers, or the products that really showcase their supplier and vendor diversity. He said, "Let me talk to some folks and I'll see."

A week later I came back to see him, and he had made some calls for me. He said "No, we don't have a list," but he said he'd help me find them. And he took me straight to the ethnic hair care part of the beauty supply aisle. First of all, it was like a mile long—the Oak Park Walmart is always full of black people, so there's a huge ethnic hair-care part there. So I said, "Okay, this is just the first stop, right? You're going to take me to other places, right? I mean, black people can do other things. You're going to take me to shoelaces or rulers or hamster wheels; you're going to show me something else." And he said, "No, this is it." He showed me two products. It's like, Jesus, I'm here in Walmart, great American institution. Here I am, suburban mom, trying to go shopping—this is just as American as it can get—and I want to support a black business at my big American retailer, and he's showing me two products! How am I even a part of this?

MJ: What does your experiment tell us about differences between blacks in different socioeconomic classes?

MA: When I speak about it, I'm very vocal in saying that this initiative targets middle- and upper-class consumers. Nothing's going to change for us if the wealthier black people don't start spending more money with our businesses. We have the cultural problem too. For a lot of black folks, you "make it" by getting out of the community, by not buying black, by not living or socializing with black people—that's sort of your badge of honor. So we have, in the middle and upper classes, a tougher challenge: the pride issue, not just the spending issue. Poor folks hear about what my family did and they want to throw a parade. Middle- and upper-class folks will talk about it, but I don't see the fire in their eyes. So the disconnect between the two groups is still very palpable.

But in a lot of our events, I see that kind of thing changing: We'll have wine tastings, but we'll have them at the black-owned bed-and-breakfast in the impoverished community we are trying to help. So my folks are face-to-face with their brothers and sisters who are not making a lot of money, who are unemployed, who are in a struggling business. I'm not saying the Empowerment Experiment is going to bridge that gap, but it's very intentional that we are bringing in middle- and upper-class folks. It's not the poor folks' problem—they're living it, they're feeling the impact—it's the middle- and upper-class folks who need to step up.

Source URL: http://www.motherjones.com/media/2012/02/maggie-anderson-our-black-year
 
New ‘Around the Way’ App Locates Black-Owned Businesses

New ‘Around the Way’ App Locates Black-Owned Businesses
April 9, 2013 by EURpublisher02

Finding black-owned businesses in your area just got a lot easier with the launch of new smartphone app, “Around the Way.”

The app, a partnership between the U.S. Black Chambers and developers Around The Way, allows users to locate any of the estimated 1.9 million black-owned businesses in the United States utilizing the GPS feature built into their phones.

U.S. Black Chambers President Ron Busby Sr. said the new app is an extension of the organization’s objectives, which include building a database of African American-owned businesses nationwide.

“This partnership with Around The Way is an important first step,” he said in a statement. “Through the app, supporters of black business can quickly access the location of businesses, no matter where they are in the country.”

“We believe Around The Way provides an important tool in our quest to strengthen black business,” he added.

Members of the U.S. Black Chamber’s 110 affiliate chambers nationwide will get premium listings, including having their locations highlighted on local maps with the USBC logo.

The Around The Way app can be downloaded for free on Android and iPhones. The app uses the GPS technology imbedded in the phone to locate the user, then lists all the black-owned businesses within a 5-mile radius.

“We can’t imagine a more natural evolution, a better way to improve both the awareness of the number of black-owned businesses and increase their bottom lines,” said Busby. “[This is] an excellent app for the black community. America’s black businesses and the consuming public will benefit tremendously – all by clicking an app on their phone!”

http://www.eurweb.com/2013/04/new-around-the-way-app-locates-black-owned-businesses/
 
Race Matters in Funding Small Businesses

Race Matters in Funding Small Businesses
By John Tozzi
April 29, 2013

Black and Hispanic entrepreneurs start their businesses with less money than whites. Minority businesses rely more on the owner’s personal wealth than on outside lenders or investors. These companies are less likely to apply for bank loans for fear of getting turned down. When they do seek credit, black and Hispanic business owners are less likely to be approved than whites, even after controlling for characteristics like credit score or the type of business. The differences persist for years after companies are founded.

These findings, from a new research paper commissioned by the Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy, add to the growing body of evidence that the playing field for entrepreneurs is tilted depending on the color of their skin. “These disparities at startup follow through the operational life of the firm, and they’re not disappearing,” says author Alicia Robb, senior fellow at the Kauffman Foundation. Robb used data from the Kauffman Firm Survey, which followed about 5,000 companies started in 2004 over several years.

The difference begins with America’s wide gap in wealth between whites and Asians on one side and blacks and Hispanics on the other. The median net worth in black households in the U.S. was less than $9,000, compared with $114,000 for whites, in 2004, the year the firms in the survey were started. That gap has widened since the recession.

Despite starting with less wealth on average, black and Hispanic entrepreneurs rely more on their own money to start their businesses: On average owners and company insiders put up 56 percent of initial capital, with external debt and equity making up the rest. At white-owned businesses, which started with double the capital on average, internal funds made up only 39 percent. (These figures don’t account for differences such as credit score and type of business, which might account for some of the disparity.)

Even after controlling for credit score and type of business, however, Robb found that minority entrepreneurs were more likely than whites to avoid applying for loans because they feared they’d be turned down. This was significant in every year Robb studied, and her paper calls it “perhaps the clearest recent evidence of continued borrowing constraints for black and Hispanic business owners in the United States.”

The fear is justified. Blacks and Hispanics were less likely to have loans approved, even after controlling for credit score and other factors, a disparity that got worse through the financial crisis, Robb found.

It’s not direct evidence of bias (whether deliberate or not) in the financial system, and Robb is careful to note that there are always factors or variables which surveys can’t properly measure. But if the results are right, all else being equal, a white entrepreneur is more likely to get a loan than a black or Hispanic entrepreneur.

Robb also looked at how gender played a role. Like minorities, women entrepreneurs were more likely to be discouraged from borrowing for fear of rejection than men. When they did seek credit, loan applications were generally approved at similar rates as men, except in 2008.

It’s worth remembering that all the data about disparities in funding measure only the companies in business. Researchers call that survivorship bias. The survey doesn’t count the firms that shuttered when they couldn’t get a credit line, or the would-be entrepreneurs who never started companies because they didn’t have and couldn’t get the needed money. The companies in the survey “are actually relatively more successful than firms on average,” Robb says. Counting business failures, she says, “the downside can actually be worse and [it can be] the reason for why other businesses actually close.”

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-04-29/race-matters-to-funding-small-businesses
 
6 Economists Every Entrepreneur Should Know About

6 Economists Every Entrepreneur Should Know About
Cedric Muhammad, Contributor
OP/ED | 1/07/2014 @ 2:32PM

For years I’ve rejected the false choice that entrepreneurs are forced to make when it comes to the subjects of political science and comparative economics. First is the offer to buy in to the notion that there exists no natural connection between the underlying motivations and incentives which inspire entrepreneurs and their political and electoral choices. Second is the assumption, courtesy of academia, that there is no unified way to approach the study of political science, economics and entrepreneurship – that the supposed best route is an introduction from ‘macro-economic’ and ‘micro-economic’ perspectives, with entrepreneurship a purely ‘micro,’ concern.

It has taken me years to arrive at a personal resolution to the inconsistency in the study and practice of these three fields and to feel comfortable in offering it to others for consideration and dialogue.

From the perspective of Western economic thought, I feel six persons are essential to a deeper understanding of the subject of entrepreneurship and where it naturally fits in the political economy. Each of these persons offers overlooked insights, lost, or intentionally diminished, in the dominant ‘Free-Market’ or ‘Statist’ worldviews of the two major political parties (in America) and in the competition between ‘Capitalism’ and ‘Socialism.’

They are Joseph Schumpeter, Frank Knight, Ronald Coase, Ivan H. Light, Reuven Brenner and Jude Wanniski.

Joseph Schumpeter looms large because he broke free of the limiting view that only Capital or Labor produced new wealth or income – that a classless innovator, an entrepreneur, who could arrange capital and labor in new ways could be the center of economic growth and a subsequent redistribution of wealth. His penetration (however briefly) that a creative human being with management ability was what the economic planets of Communism, Socialism and Capitalism orbited around, was a tremendous breakthrough.

Frank Knight matters because his distinction between risk and uncertainty unearthed a more precise definition of profit (“Profits arises out of the inherent absolute unpredictability of things, out of the sheer brute fact that the results of human activity cannot be anticipated and then only in so far as even a probability calculation in regard to them is impossible and meaningless. The receipt of profit in a particular case may be argued to be the result of superior judgment”) which showed that true creativity was democratized, and building upon Schumpeter, that a reward for ‘new’ things could be justified outside of the paradigm of greed or exploitation. If the capacity for ‘superior judgment’ was uniquely held and executed, a ‘profit’ could arise anywhere and be well-deserved.

Ronald Coase is critical because he argues persuasively that a firm originates as an alternative to a market transaction-based system which requires more cost and effort than when resources are arranged by an ‘Entrepreneur-Coordinator.’ In a stiff challenge to those knee-deep in today’s superficial Libertarian and Conservative rhetoric, Coase helps us understand that companies are like centrally planned economies, as David Henderson has pointed out. Entrepreneurs are revealed to function like socialist dictators by Coase who recognized the autocratic, arbitrary, hierarchical, punitive and disciplinarian functions of the ‘Entrepreneur-Coordinator.’ Business firms will hardly be recognized as democracies after reading a Coase primer. Coase also contributes by making clear that the resources an entrepreneur organizes within a firm are of a highly non-monetary nature – a bit of a nod to the thinking of P.T. Bauer that even the very poor can pool resources together to make investments without the use of money. Not only does this broaden the definition of capital beyond ‘money and machines,’ but it also makes clear that entrepreneurs have value independent of the price mechanism of ‘free markets.’

Ivan Light is enormously valuable because he illuminates how informal custom and cohesion are the base of trust upon which entrepreneurial based-economic development stands. His demonstration of why 19th and 20th Black Americans (as opposed to Chinese and Japanese immigrant communities) struggled to form a sustainable business class is seminal. And his comparison of informal savings traditions across ethnic groups – a base of risk capital far greater than commercial banking loans – is peerless. In his work lies unexplored avenues to understanding why kith and kin deploy savings and form capital more efficiently than either Government or Market during economic contraction.

Reuven Brenner stands alone with his model of why people become entrepreneurs – persons who gamble on novel ideas. His emphasis on how declines in the wealth distribution inspire increased entrepreneurial activity and produce ‘profits’ offers refinements to both Schumpeter and Knight. And his consideration of family as the first source of capital for entrepreneurs, particularly when markets are closed and government bureaucracy are inaccessible, compliments Light’s work. Brenner’s work can help entrepreneurs understand rivalry, competition and cooperation at the individual, company, national and international level far better than academically-revered models like Game Theory. Despite his ability to make mathematical formulas with the elite, Brenner labors to provide clear and precise language anyone can understand. And reference points like patent pools and population size (see his classic History – A Human Gamble for instance) are also presented alongside concepts in order to provide the reader with testable and measurable evidence for broad propositions.

Jude Wanniski was the last great political economist – a person capable of perfectly identifying the nexus point of political and economic forces at any particular time and of assigning greater or lesser weight to the maze of variables in play. Though his simultaneous elevation of the importance of stable money, low taxes, and a reduced government regulatory wedge have been opportunistically appropriated in narrow dogma; for the purposes of entrepreneurs, it was his peerless transformation of supposed root level Left-Right political bias, into a far deeper discussion of Growth vs. Distribution tensions – present in every human society – which is most useful. Persuasively arguing that neither Karl Marx nor Adam Smith (nor their students) resolved this more fundamental debate, Wanniski’s The Way The World Works places the entrepreneur at the center (with the most marginal utility) of a new society where the clearest insights of Marx, Smith and John Maynard Keynes can co-exist and compete – freed from distracting (and mind-numbing) partisanship. Wanniski’s simple and precise definition of ‘capital’ as wealth capable of producing goods and services remains an untapped reservoir with potential to bridge the divide between those who work primarily with 1) their minds 2) their bodies and 3) inanimate technology. Even those with only political rights have a form of ‘capital,’ which can be brought to an exchange, we can now appreciate from his mind.

A study of Schumpeter, Knight, Coase, Light, Brenner and Wanniski certainly does not make one an entrepreneur.

But their thinking can certainly provide encouragement and help an entrepreneur better understand their own motivations and the context in which they operate – enabling them to identify their self-enlightened interests and make better decisions.

Politics, economics and entrepreneurship need not be divided, no matter what the establishment says.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/cedricm...nomists-every-entrepreneur-should-know-about/
 
Back
Top