Nicki Minaj publicly questions vaccination, gets aired out by Joy Ann Reid and media

You niggas need to check the sources before you start believing shit. :hmm:

Brighteon
con5.png

pseudo5.png

MBFCVeryLow.png


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • We rate Brighteon a right-biased Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy website that also publishes pseudoscience. This source is associated with Natural News, one of the most discredited sources on the internet.

Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUSDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: VERY-LOW
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
Source? It's a video website. Just like YouTube.

Just not censored. You blame YouTube for all videos posted?

You spent more time negating a site then taking the time to watch what was stated.

Cool
 
You don't know that. Literally anyone can submit a report with zero proof.



He very clearly caveated his statement with a "none that we know of" so unless you can prove that he was aware of the completely unverified reports on VAERS, it was not a lie.
Brother you are so pressed to explain to me that Vaers aren’t validated reports. Fine, I agree. It’s the governments job to either validate or invalidate them. What is the point of setting up a database and then not following up on the claims.

Doesn’t this whole thing smell fishy to you?
 
Brother you are so pressed to explain to me that Vaers aren’t validated reports. Fine, I agree. It’s the governments job to either validate or invalidate them. What is the point of setting up a database and then not following up on the claims.

Doesn’t this whole thing smell fishy to you?
The problem is you keep assuming that they aren't validating or invalidating the claims. Dr. Fauci told you it isn't true.
Yet do you believe him?
 
Heed the info from a KNOWN conspiracy/pseudoscience website? You're an unmitigated moron. :lol: :lol: :lol:
You fact checked it with a biased ass bullshit site, but I'm the moron. Why didnt you first check the site you getting that from?

 
Sad to see folks out here trashing Nicki. She's a rapper for fuck sake. Not a school teacher, lawyer or politician. Oh well. Maybe she will learn to STFU.
 
Since when has it been required that human society has to have a degree in whatever just to have an opinion.I need answers i think its more than just Nicki Minaj thats needs to STFU and learn.
 
Rappers have more influence than those you mentioned.

Influence and usability doesn't predicate intelligence of the useful. Like I said she's a rapper. Someone who makes a living talking shit over hot beats. She's no Lauren Hill, Queen Latifa or MC Lyte either.
 
The problem is you keep assuming that they aren't validating or invalidating the claims. Dr. Fauci told you it isn't true.
Yet do you believe him?
So how many of the Vaers claims have been validated? Where can we see the list of whether the claim has been validated or not?

You clearly state that the claims in Vaers are unconfirmed. Where can we see confirmed side effects?
 
You fact checked it with a biased ass bullshit site, but I'm the moron. Why didnt you first check the site you getting that from?

 
Sad to see folks out here trashing Nicki. She's a rapper for fuck sake. Not a school teacher, lawyer or politician. Oh well. Maybe she will learn to STFU.

Why should she STFU? Oh, and I addressed your question you were prepared to say I was "lying" about. Don't run from it.
 
So how many of the Vaers claims have been validated? Where can we see the list of whether the claim has been validated or not?

You clearly state that the claims in Vaers are unconfirmed. Where can we see confirmed side effects?
I notice you didn't answer if you believe Dr. Fauci or not?

No, I stated that the reports in VAERS is the raw data and that there is no conclusion in that data. Therfore you can not use such data to substantiate Nicki's claim about her cousin. You want to know why? Because VAERS is not were conclusions are reported. Just reporting of possible side effects from the vaccine (whether verified or not). So that means a person who hasn't even been vaccinated could claim to have side effects from the vaccine.
 
I notice you didn't answer if you believe Dr. Fauci or not?

No, I stated that the reports in VAERS is the raw data and that there is no conclusion in that data. Therfore you can not use such data to substantiate Nicki's claim about her cousin. You want to know why? Because VAERS is not were conclusions are reported. Just reporting of possible side effects from the vaccine (whether verified or not). So that means a person who hasn't even been vaccinated could claim to have side effects from the vaccine.
No I don't believe Fauci, nor should I. If he has data, he should release it. I'm not interested in hearing what he has to say about the data - because data speaks for itself. If the vaccine is safe, release the data from all the studies that prove it.

And the Vaers report DOES offer credence to Nicki's report about her cousin. She claims that she "heard" a story of a man who claimed to have swollen testicles after getting the shot. Everyone said that she's lying and spreading misinformation. But at least 64 people in the United States claim to have had the same thing happen. The response is not "oh it's only on Vaers which is unproven. The correct response would be, if they did look into those claims they could say "We looked into reports of testicular swelling and determined that this was not cause by the vaccine but by XYZ." They didn't say that. They made it seem like the claim was ridiculous. It isn;'t a ridiculous claim when at least 64 people are saying the same thing.

The data that they released so far show that Covid is far less deadly than the media is putting on, and that the vaccine offers far less protection that they are telling us. And there is no official data publicly released (to my knowledge) on side effects - which is completely unacceptable.

When I say we're in a world of mass psychosis this is what I mean. Under normal circumstances you would never blindly take the word of a government official, or a Pharma company. People would ask them to prove what they say.

We're living in a world where anyone that asks them to "prove it" is called an anti-vaxxer.
 
You know you're talking to the wrong one, right? It's firmly established on this board that I bring THE DATA to buttress my arguments. Here's a start. Let me know if want some more.

Black Republicans
I have studied voting patterns of African-Americans, Cape Verdeans and West Indians in four cities: Boston, Chicago, Miami and New York City.​
I discovered that while these populations are mostly Democratic, foreign-born black communities in all four cities are more willing than African-Americans to put aside partisan differences and vote Republican.​
Haitians, in particular, lean in a more conservative direction than African-Americans and other Caribbean communities. My research found that Haitian voters in Boston, Chicago, Miami and New York City are more likely to identify as moderate or conservative than African-Americans.​
Haitians are also more likely to be members of the Republican Party and to run for office as Republicans. The first and only Haitian-American in Congress, Mia Love of Utah’s 4th district, is a Republican.​
In Florida, almost 4 percent of the Haitian-born population is Republican, according to University of Florida political scientist Daniel Smith. Just under 20 percent of Florida’s Haitian Americans are Democrats. Many others are not registered voters in the U.S., though they may remain active in Haitian politics.​
After the election, Haitian-American activist Ezili Danto suggested that many Haitian Floridians had supported Trump in part to demonstrate that they won’t always vote Democratic.​
Many Haitians also believed the corruption allegations that had been leveled against the Clinton Foundation, whose work in Haiti after the 2010 earthquake left it with a bad reputation on the island.​




:eek2::eek2::eek2: GATE UP!!! :eek2::eek2::eek2:

WTF? Did you throw all West Indians under the bus because Haitians are more commonly Republicans? If so that's the type of mental indolence I see exercised daily here and abroad why I rarely take many of you seriously. That you consider that as a plausible and logical response is another indictment of your intelligence level. Prior to JFK the majority of African Americans voted Republican since Lincoln. You act as though there has been more than 2 viable options for the past 300 or so years.

There are more than 16 countries in the Caribbean and 700 islands. The first and only openly Haitian republican I ever met was in Florida in 2009. I don't recall his name but he was a good worker. He was one of maybe 60 Haitians I knew in that part of Florida and he was the only one I ever heard rep republicans. The others who did talk politics was repping democrats. Still I would never use that experience to judge all Haitians. Much more lump all Haitians into the republican party.

Again like I said prove those stats for West Indians. Haiti is a nation in what is now called the West Indies. Don't big yourself to me and pass off half ass work. Haiti is not all West Indians. You're still lying as far as I'm concerned. Prove me wrong.
 
Brother you are so pressed to explain to me that Vaers aren’t validated reports. Fine, I agree. It’s the governments job to either validate or invalidate them. What is the point of setting up a database and then not following up on the claims.

Doesn’t this whole thing smell fishy to you?

No, VAERS predates covid. It was created in 1990, long before anti vaxers and Russian bots would have cared about it. Now it has claims that the vaccines have caused gunshot wounds as adverse reactions.

The problem with what you are doing is that you are not simply asking questions, you are repeatedly accusing people of trying to cover something up such how many people are really dying or having severe reactions to the vaccines.

It's not what you know, it's what you can prove, and you haven't proven it. Whenever people are asked to provide proof of claims like this, they either refer to VAERS, some right wing blog, some hole in the wall website, or just straight up misinterpreted the data or misquote what someone said.
 
Back
Top