New Political Party - One World Nazis
- Thread starter Partial_Mathers
- Start date
You seem to have a particular fascination with the word "One" -- especially in the conjunction with the words government, world and order. Nevertheless, what do you think is significant about the One World Nazi Party ???
QueEx
It supposed to see if by doing that it would cause fear, panic and that thing they are known for, TERROR.
What comes next in the thread is how many guns and how organized they are and that it reaches to some seat of power. Bottom line is, they have guns, we have guns. Be a lot of dead people in the streets.
-VG.
Um, no. You seem to have a particular fascination with putting words in my mouth to fit your argument. Did you watch the party platform video on the front page? What did you think?
The phrase New World Order has been used by Woodrow Wilson, Winston Churchill, Bush Sr., Obama, Gordon Brown and many other world leaders. Even China is trying to start up a one world currency. But the One World Government they are proposing is a communist dictatorship ruled by IFI's(International Finance Institutions) and the UN.
With nuclear weapons, bio-weapons water pollution in widespread abundancy, I think there does need to be a one world government, but not one where there are dictators, but a sef-governed, self-productive and innovative human race working together and not for slaving to pay taxes or for illegal wars. I don't know if using the name Nazi is a smart thing for this party if it wants to succeed...it may just be a ploy in which their leaders are trying to get us to trade one prison for another. It has a positive message nonetheless. The site has the number of homeless vets wrong, there's over 400,000, not 200,000.
Dr. Henry Makow reviewed a movie that's just come out that "reveals" Stalin trained the Gestapo. I don't know if it's true or not.
http://www.henrymakow.com/documentary_highlights_nazi_so.html
But it's pretty clear monarchies, socialism and democracies don't work. There needs to be a new revolution in which a new way is found. Democracies will not retake the initiative because the only see things as they used to be, not as they are. I believe the US Constitution is a great start and needs to be kept, but definitely needs to be renewed and added on to. Because what's at stake is either we all progress as a people, or all fall at the hands of a Lilliputian minority of criminally insane politicians/bankers who hold the majority of all wealth and natural resources.
Maybe this is right, maybe not.
Similar threads
