https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dental_amalgam_controversy
This discussion of the
dental amalgam controversy outlines the debate over whether
dental amalgam (the mercury alloy in
dental fillings) should be used. Supporters claim that it is safe, effective and long-lasting while critics argue that claims have been made since the 1840s that amalgam is unsafe because it may cause
mercury poisoning and other
toxicity.
[1][2][3]
Supporters of amalgam fillings point out that it is safe, durable,
[4] relatively inexpensive, and easy to use.
[5] On average, amalgam lasts twice as long as
resin composites, takes less time to place, is tolerant of saliva or blood contamination during placement (unlike composites), and is often about 20-30% less expensive.
[6] Consumer Reports has suggested that many who claim dental amalgam is not safe are "prospecting for disease" and using pseudoscience to scare patients into more lucrative treatment options.
[7]
Those opposed to amalgam use suggest that modern composites are improving in strength.
[8] In addition to their claims of possible health and ethical issues, opponents of dental amalgam fillings claim amalgam fillings contribute to mercury contamination of the environment. The
World Health Organization (WHO) reports that health care facilities, including dental offices, account for as much as 5% of total waste water mercury emissions.
[9] The WHO also points out that amalgam separators, installed in the waste water lines of many dental offices, dramatically decrease the release of mercury into the public sewer system.
[9] In the United States, most dental practices are prohibited from disposing amalgam waste down the drain.
[10] Critics also point to cremation of dental fillings as an additional source of air pollution, contributing about 1% of total global emissions.
[11]
The World Health Organization recommends a global phase out of dental mercury as in the WHO’s 2009 report on “Future Use of Materials For Dental Restorations
[12]”.
It is the position of the EU, Sweden, and Norway That Amalgam is Dangerous. EU has banned
[13] mercury amalgam fillings for all children and pregnant women. With the plan to phase it out completely. Some states are already at record low levels: amalgam use is 0% in Sweden, 3% in Finland, 5% in Denmark and less than 10% in the Netherlands. Several other countries such as Germany and the United Kingdom have restricted or warned against amalgam use in children or pregnant. The FDA does not recommend amalgam fillings for children below the age of 6.
It is the position of the
FDI World Dental Federation[14] as well as numerous dental associations and dental public health agencies worldwide
[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] that amalgam restorations are safe and effective. Numerous other organizations have also publicly declared the safety and effectiveness of amalgam. These include the
Mayo clinic,
[22] the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
[23] Health Canada,
[24] Alzheimer's Association,
[25] American Academy of Pediatrics,
[26] Autism Society of America,
[27] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
[28] National Multiple Sclerosis Society,
[29] New England Journal of Medicine,
[30] International Journal of Dentistry,
[31] National Council Against Health Fraud,
[32] The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research NIDCR,
[33] American Cancer Society,
[34] Lupus Foundation of America,
[35] the
American College of Medical Toxicology,
[36] the
American Academy of Clinical Toxicology,
[36] Consumer Reports[7] Prevention,[37] and
WebMD.
[38]
