The add-on HD-DVD drive is only for movies, thus you don't need to include it in the price of the 360. But since we're on the subject, I know I'm not the only one who notices the short gameplay on many 360 games, even the big titles. Microsoft preached and preached that Blu-Ray is unnecessary and DVD9 is still the best solution, with the right compression. However, I think there may be more to it than they care to divulge to the little people. Sony claims that Blu-Ray is for games and they stand by this very firmly. Looking at the graphical prowess of Gears of War and then looking at its dissapointing game length and overal scope, does anyone else see DVDs being used up more than Microsoft thought possible so soon? You obviously can't have such incredible graphics with high poly counts and high res textures, HD resolution at that, and still fit a lonog game onto a DVD. Hideo Kojima, one of the best the industry has and the creator of Metal Gear Solid, said that he had to scrap much content from Metal Gear Solid 3, to fit onto the DVD9. We already know San Andreas barely fit on a DVD9 and GTA has never been known for its graphics. Lets say hypothetically that Microsoft got called up by a big name developer one day and got hit with the 'oh shit effect' when it is brought to their attention that DVD just ain't cuttin it. What do they do now? Make games on HD-DVD and exclude the millions of 360 owners who do not have the attachment, or go with Blu-Ray, like they said they would if it wins and put money in the pocket of their nemesis Sony in the process?