kobe has 3 rings and a mvp.
Not to mention the 10th best scorer (for average) in history and possessor of that rare 25-5-5 (rounded off) career line, only matched by Jordan, West, Robertson and LeBron.
kobe has 3 rings and a mvp.
you niggas are nuts calling pippen overrated. he had to play with michael jordan who took most of the shots, and still was a beast. the bulls would've never won any titles without scottie. he made 1st defensive team mad times, etc... you young niggas don't know shit.
kobe has 3 rings and a mvp.
number of rings in and of itself is inconsequential, in light of steve kerr and robert horry.
and so now tobe has as many MVPs as dirk nowitzki. and half as many as steve nash.
your point?
he may be the best scorer the game has ever seen.
Not to mention the 10th best scorer (for average) in history and possessor of that rare 25-5-5 (rounded off) career line, only matched by Jordan, West, Robertson and LeBron.
but i thought we were talking about top 50 players, which presumably encompasses much more than prolific shooting and binge scoring.
kerr or robert horry have no mvp's
and nash or dirk have no rings
not to mention kobe's post game skills also.
7 All-Defensive teams?
true. yet you suggested that both rings and mvps are acceptable measures or criteria for deserving a place among the top 50 players.
i would submit to you that those accomplishments (especially the championship rings) are not adequate measures of consideration.
would the remaining players from the 50 man roster of greatest players vote Kobe into their same level as accomplishments? yes or no?
and kobe avg 35ppg in 05-06 and 28ppg in 00-01 while shaq was 28ppg that same season. shaq never avg 35ppg.
please mention the post skills. enumerate the post skills.
of course you'd have to ask them. but i can tell you that many of the older players would not and do not. especially those that are assistant coaches at the moment.
and scoring averages are in and of themselves important how?
only 2 men in modern basketball have been able to lead the league in scoring AND win a championship in the same season. michael jordan and shaquille o'neal. both under coach jackson. coincidence?
would kobe be on the 50 greatest player list if they played in there era?
Of course come on Kobe is a top 10 alltime great player. thats a ridiculous question.
did u see the 2000 and 2002 finals?
now when he plays in the triangle he uses his shooting more than his post play.
overrated - james worthy.
i remember when that list came out and the ceremony and i still can't believe he made it. his whole career was getting feeds from Magic on the break and doing that one handed dunk.
LOL...what credit do u give kobe? if any
young man, you are confused. tobe's post skills in 2000 and 2002 were NON-existant. tobe is a better post player today than he was then, and today he is still not noteworthy in the post.
in the triple post, tobe occupies the SF slot much of the time, and from that spot, it is more advantageous for him to hoist bricks from distance.
but since you brought up 2000 and 2002 specifically, please provide specific examples that impressed you. i'd be happy to pull them up and discuss them with you.
that's a common misperception. i give tobe all the credit that he is due. the problem is that people who don't like basketball (but seem to be infatuated with the man) give tobe credit for skills he doesn't actually possess.
for example, tobe has good athleticism, and to this day still uses his usually reliable crutch shot: turnaround jumper along the baseline. as he has gotten older and matured physically, he has actually increased the range from 17' to 23' on that shot.
other than tobe's incredible desire to chuck, there isn't much else that's noteworthy about his game.
so we can throw away all his 50 and 60 point games?
And Jordan's?
And how the fuck the thread starter gonna say Scottie Pippen is the most overrated are you fucking crazy come on he's the greatest perimeter defender of ALLTIME, period.
I hated his punkass but he locked guys straight the fuck up in the 91 Finals MJ was getting murdered by Magic and they switched Pippen on him and changed the whole series.
Pippen is undervalued if anything.
and kobe avg 35ppg in 05-06
i wanted to return to this to again ask you why this individual milestone was important enough for you to single out.
tobe averaged 35.4 ppg in 2005-06. the fakers finished 6th in the west, behind the memphis grizzlies. the fakers finished 3rd in the pacific division, behind the los angeles clippers. the fakers were eliminated by the phoenix suns in the 1st round of the playoffs.
yes, tobe averaged 35.4 ppg during the regular season and 27.9 ppg in the playoffs.
adrian dantley averaged 30+ ppg 4 consecutive seasons. how'd that work out for him? but wait. at least he got out of the 1st round 1 of those seasons.
allen iverson averaged 30+ ppg 4 different seasons. how'd that work out for him? but wait. at least he got out of the 1st round 1 of those seasons.
and do you think kobe is more important to the lakers than pau gasol is?
of course not. the fakers are pau gasol's team without question. just look at the outstanding win loss record since pau gasol's arrival. the fakers never sniffed such success in the first 3.5 seasons of the tobe era.
and it's not a fluke.
take a look at that 2005-06 season again.
pau gasol's memphis grizzlies finished 4th in the western conference ahead of the fakers.
take a look at the 2004-05 season again.
pau gasol's memphis grizzlies finished 8th in the western conference ahead of the fakers.
kobe beat him in the '01 finals.
in 04-05 kobe had no coach jackson with 3 new players.
coach jackson + kobe = 3 peat stack
coach jackson + pau gasol = NBA finals.