Naacp bigotry

Gunner

Potential Star
Registered
It takes one to know one.


<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t_xCeItxbQY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t_xCeItxbQY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 
<font size="3">
Shirley Sherrod is an officer or member
of the board of directors the NAACP ???

</font size>


Shirley+Sherrod+-+FLAG+Family+Farm+Champion-mini.JPG


Former board member of the Farmers
Legal Action Group (FLAG). Shirley has
been a long time champion of black
farmers through her work with the
Federation of Southern Cooperatives
Land Assistance Fund and the Southern
Rural Black Women's Initiative. <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">Shirley
left the board because of her new
position as Georgia's head of the USDA
Rural Development office.
</span> She is
pictured here with her "Family Farm
Champion" award.

Sunday, October 18, 2009

QueEx
 
http://biggovernment.com/

NAACP Awards racist



Context is everything.
In this piece you will see video evidence of racism coming from a federal appointee and NAACP award recipient and in another clip from the same event a perfect rationalization for why the Tea Party needs to exist.
But first the context:
For the past week, Americans who consider themselves aligned with the Tea Party movement have suffered the indignity of being falsely labeled racist by the NAACP and their pro-bono publicity managers, the main stream media. The constant calls to “repudiate the racists from your ranks” have not only been insulting, but have also served to force a false standard upon America’s fastest-growing and most vibrant political movement that no other group could ever live up to nor would ever be asked to live up to.
While the media has chosen to do the Democratic Party’s bidding in allowing for the NAACP to negatively and falsely brand the millions strong, loosely affiliated tea party phenomenon as “racist”, the moral indignation over race and racism has taken center stage in a summer of economic and political discontent. The NAACP, an undeniable weapon in the Democratic Party’s arsenal, was more than happy to exploit this nation’s sensitive racial schism for possible political gain. The Democratic Party and the NAACP, needless to say, are playing with fire. From the beginning of the Tea Party movement, the Left, its aiders and abettors at MSNBC, the NY Times and other reliable left of center propaganda venues, raised race as the driving force behind the movement, even though the evidence was never there. MSNBC even egregiously cut off a black protester’s head in a photograph of a man carrying a gun to a rally in order to discuss that anti-black racism was rearing its head in America. But it got even more blatant when Congressmen Andre Carson and John Lewis and other Congressional Black Caucus members staged a walk through the Tea Party crowd in front of the capitol the day before the health care vote. They claimed they were threatened by a violent mob and were subjected to the vile N word slur fifteen times. With the unpopularity of the toxic health care bill that the majority of Americans did not want, the Democrats needed a November strategy. Neutralizing the growing Tea Party movement with charges of racism was clearly its post-health care reform vote priority. What they did not expect was that new media would successfully challenge the propaganda of the old media and the Congressmen’s racial smear. First, my $100,000 video challenge for any evidence of racism was met with crickets. The CBC, looking for a fight, and taking to the airwaves to accuse the Tea Party of racism made a 180 degree turn and went into hiding when challenged on the truthfulness of the outrageous allegations. From camera hogs to ostriches in snap of a finger. When the media chose to ignore that Representatives Lewis and Carson’s story was falling apart, we dug deeper. We found four videos from the moment Rep. Carson claimed the racist Tea Party incident occurred. The four videos, which include audio, show beyond a reasonable doubt that the incident was a manufactured lie. That lie that was supposed to be the centerpiece in the Democratic strategy to destroy the Tea Party. The videos had been available on YouTube almost immediately after the incident occurred and could have been found by any reporter interested in investigating the truthfulness of Rep. Carson’s claim. While the media ignored these newsworthy revelations, the CBC remained in hiding and ignored a letter in good faith from the Tea Party Federation repudiating all forms of racism, but also asking for the CBC’s help in investigating the Capitol Hill incident. The silence from the CBC was deafening. The NAACP and the Congressional Black Caucus do not want racial harmony. They want political victory, and the race card is their Strativarius. Three months later, the NAACP decided to “double-down” on the fabricated “”Tea Party/racism” narrative and has the gall to include the disproved Capitol Hill “N Word” non-incident as their formal condemnation of the Tea Party. Simply by snapping its figures, the mainstream media again parroted lies. The Tea Party was guilty until it proved itself innocent. A most un-American and, dare I say, culturally Marxist construct. In fact, it’s worse. The media that provided the left a platform to accuse the Tea Party, all the while refusing to air any exculpatory evidence. Again, the mainstream media inserts itself as the number one weapon in the progressive weapons stash. Political correctness, as the Duke Lacrosse case exemplified, trumps all in PC America and her afflicted media. But the new media will not be silenced. It will not allow for the main stream media to propagate hateful and hurtful lies in order to save the Democratic Party from the toxic choices it has made over the past few years. And by bringing up race, and demanding a zero tolerance of racism, the left, and the NAACP in particular, has opened itself up for scrutiny. We are in possession of a video from in which Shirley Sherrod, USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development, speaks at the NAACP Freedom Fund dinner in Georgia. In her meandering speech to what appears to be an all-black audience, this federally appointed executive bureaucrat lays out in stark detail, that her federal duties are managed through the prism of race and class distinctions. In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn’t do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from “one of his own kind”. She refers him to a white lawyer. Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups’ racial tolerance.
 
I say "Blame it on HUMAN NATURE."

She's just like the genius "Founding Fathers" who in all their knowledge and ability to document the rules of law for this new land, couldn't get past their own knowledge, experience andhuman imperfection. "ALL men are created equal..." has no other meaning; except when enslaving Africans is part of making America what it neds to succeed.

Her experience prior to getting the USDA job showed her how the government didn't help Black farmers in need, and also didn't help POOR white farmers in need. She was dealing within her scope of vision. No racism - more like humanism that she eventually rose above.

******************************************************************

Shirley Sherrod, USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development, speaks at the NAACP Freedom Fund dinner in Georgia. In her meandering speech to what appears to be an all-black audience, this federally appointed executive bureaucrat lays out in stark detail, that her federal duties are managed through the prism of race and class distinctions. In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn’t do everything she can for him, because he is white.
 
Last edited:
The incident of protesters calling Congressmen epithets was never disproven.


<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IJsNmlhz6Yo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IJsNmlhz6Yo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

http://biggovernment.com/



Here is a quick reminder of our thorough debunking of the phantom racial epithets including video footage from five separate angles and perspectives at the very moment the racial slurs were supposed to have been yelled.

So it has come to this. The charges first leveled by Rep. Andre Carson that fifteen protestors yelled racial slurs fifteen times at he and Rep. John Lewis have become part of the agenda of the nation’s oldest and most respected civil rights organization. This proves Mark Twain’s famous adage, “ A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”
Here is the route this lie took on its travel around the world:
Rep Carson tells reporters the infamous tale.
It’s repeated endlessly by members of the media eager to paint the Tea Party as racist.
Terrified GOP leadership rush to condemn the Tea Party for their racist behavior (how’d all that bending over backwards for the Congressional Black Caucus work out for you Mr. Steele?)
Then, slowly the truth put on its shoes:
Andrew Breitbart offers $100,000 to be donated to the United Negro College Fund for any video proof of the racial epithet
Videos begin to surface showing the moment Carson described and (lo and behold) there is no evidence of the slur and the scene on the video does not match his description

The Washington Post Ombudsman writes: “The incidents are weeks old, but it’s worth assigning Post reporters to find the truth. “
Would have been nice to assign reporters to find the truth before all thos stories hit your pages, don’t you think Washington Post?
Last week, when pressed to give details or to answer the new charges of lack of evidence of the racial slurs, Rep. Barbara Lee, Chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus merely responded: “We hope to move forward”.
For the NAACP to take on this resolution and declare a war of words with the Tea Party movement over these dubious charges is irresponsible and deplorable. They will tell you that they trust the word of Rep. John Lewis. They will say that to deny this episode is to call John Lewis a liar. But, in reality, John Lewis has never gone on record or been quoted in print stating that he heard these racial slurs. Only a spokesperson from his office has said so.
The report of racial slurs has come from one man: Rep. Andre Carson
If the NAACP is going to condemn an entire political movement as racist they had better have a lot more to go on than the claims of a 2-year congressman from Indiana who inherited his grandmother’s seat after she died (Louis Farrakhan spoke at her funeral, by the way). But, that is what they are doing.
They know that this move will create a vociferous response of outraged indignation from Tea Party members across the country. It seems that they to wish to further divide the country and drive wedges between political adversaries who have honest disagreements over political positions.
It’s ironic that as they paint an entire movement as beyond contempt, they don’t recognize that they, in fact are the ones hurling invective by blindly characterizing a group using their own pre-conceived notions and based on lies put forth by politicians hoping to retain power by pitting one race against the other.
It’s ironic and it’s an outrage.
 
That didn't disprove anything. Saying Carson or Lewis can't prove someone called them racial epithets doesn't mean no one did.

And who is biggovernment.com? They're bias is evident even without the casual throwing in of Minister Farrakhan.
 
The incident of protesters calling Congressmen epithets was never disproven.


I must have been raining that day. Funny, no rain clouds.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OmP4Gb2pEsY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OmP4Gb2pEsY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 
That didn't disprove anything. Saying Carson or Lewis can't prove someone called them racial epithets doesn't mean no one did.

And who is biggovernment.com? They're bias is evident even without the casual throwing in of Minister Farrakhan.

Andrew Breitbart owns Big Government. Breitbart Tv etc.

And the video of R Kelly pissing on a minor is not real.:D

Dave if you showed up a the LA Lakers practice does that make you a Laker?

If the Black Panthers showed up at an Obama fundraiser does that automatically means he support their hate?

Didn't Obama disown Reverend Wright even thought he sat there for twenty years? So with your line of thought am I right to infer that Obama believes all that Jeremiah Wright says?

It was announced yesterday that the tea party booted out some idiot for his remarks. They are policing themselves. They were right to boot him out. Hate of any kind should not be tolerated.

Peace
 
Racism, Nationalism, Tribalism and the Caste system: What they've done to the world in the last 100 years

Some Statistics and Facts

Despite the "progress" in culture, science and technology, racism, tribalism, nationalism, colonialism and the caste system have been mainly responsible for the death of over 62 million human beings in the last 100 years. These numbers, however, do not tell the full story since no numbers are available for the colonial period. And one really cannot imagine the misery of so many millions who suffered through it although they were not killed. Today there are about 22 million refugees in our world who were forced to abandon their homes essentially because of nationalistic wars.

Here are some frightening statistics that should leave no doubt in anyone's mind about the destructive nature of all of these diseased ideologies:

The Colonialism-1500s-late 20th century

Colonialism was such a powerful force that by 1900, for instance, 90.4 percent of Africa was under European colonial control. This was a political-economic phenomenon that began in the 1500s whereby various European nations "discovered", conquered, and exploited large areas of the world.

The last century began with almost all countries of the world enslaved under Europian colonial control whose effects are still felt in the shape of neo colonialism and the exploitative power of the few nations of the world. Slavery became a science in the colonial era in which tens of millions of people were killed or enslaved because of their race and color.

National and Racial Wars:

1. The nationalism based wars of Europe resulted in World War I (1914-1918). Over 8 million were killed and over 21 million wounded.

2. World War II (1939-1945) killed 52 million worldwide.

This was marked by the rise of Germany's fascist dictator Hitler and his Nazi party. Over 20 countries took part in World War II and suffered not only death, but also destruction of homes and infrastructures. The Nazi genocide against a number of groups: Jews, Gypsies and non-whites to name just a few were a clear example of racism.

Racism of the last century:

Racism is defined as the belief that one race of people are superior to another because of the race they are born into. The virus of racism may exist in the hearts and minds of millions around the world but when racism is acted upon, especially by a group of people, things don't just become dangerous, they become deadly.

Here are two specific instances, which come to mind in relation to racism-related conflicts and casualties:

1. South Africa's apartheid era (1948-1994)

With the enactment of apartheid laws in South Africa in 1948, racial discrimination was institutionalized in the country.

Race laws touched every aspect of social life, including a prohibition of marriage between non-whites and whites, and allowing for "white-only'' jobs.

In 1950, the Population Registration Act required that all South Africans be racially classified into one of three categories: white, black, or colored (of mixed decent and Asians).

Initially, the aim of apartheid was to maintain white domination while extending racial separation. Starting in the 1960's, a plan of "Grand Apartheid'' was executed. This put emphasis on territorial separation of the three groups and police repression.

All blacks had to carry "pass books'' with their fingerprints, photo and information on access to non-black areas.

All political rights, including the right to vote, held by an African were restricted to the designated homeland. They would be citizens of their homeland, but lose citizenship to their country: South Africa and any right to be involved with the South African Parliament. This body was in complete control of all of the homelands.

In 1993 a new constitution gave blacks and other racial groups the right to vote, and all-race national elections in 1994 produced a coalition government with a black majority.

While this indicated the end of legislated apartheid, it did not eradicate apartheid's social and economic effects.

2. The treatment and tragedies of African-Americans

African-Americans, even today, over 30 years after the civil rights movement, are oppressed in many ways.

-African-Americans numbered about 34.2 million in 1997, making up 12.8 Percent of the total U.S. population, according to tabulations released by the Commerce Department's Census Bureau (Feb. 7, 2000)

-The income of 2.1 million African-American families (26 percent) was below the poverty level.

-Incidents of racial hate crime reported to the police, by bias motivation in 1998 was 4,468. The highest number was reported by African-Americans: 2,901.

-Between 1975 and 1997, African-Americans had the highest unemployment rate.

-African-Americans aged 12 and up are the most victimized group in America. 41.7 over 1,000 of them are victims of violent crimes, compared with whites (36.3 over 1,000). This does not include murder.

Nationalism continued to play the killing role throughout the last century

Countries, which fought colonialism, fought it on the basis of nationalism learned from the colonial masters. The result is the perpetuation of tragedies based on this idealogy. Muslim countries also suffered through this phase of delayed nationalism.

Here there are several examples:

1. The destruction of the Ottoman Khilafa because of Arab and Turkish nationalism-1924

This fervent Turkish nationalism under the leadership of Mustafa Kemal came into power in Ankara (Turkey's capital today). The Ottoman empire's last Sultan, Mohammed VI, fled in 1922 after the Sultanate had been abolished. Every member of the Ottoman empire was expelled from the country two years later. Turkey was proclaimed a republic, with Ataturk as its first president.

Arab nationalism affected the fall of the Caliphate with the view that Arabs, not Turks should be rulers. This nationalism conveniently exploited by the Lawrence of Arabia, led to a push to wrest control from the Turks of the Ummah's leadership hence expediting the end of Khilafa for the first time in the 1300-year history of Islam.

2. India attacks and still controls Kashmir since 1947. One Indian soldier for every seven Kashmiris is used to further India's nationalist claim on Kashmir. More than a million refugees, three wars, and hundreds of thousands have been killed as a result.

3. Israel's Zionism expelled Palestinians from their land (1948). Palestinians still constitute the largest refugee population of the world.

4. Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan)-1971

Bangladesh was once East Pakistan, following partition from India in 1947. But after seething under a number of grievances against West Pakistan (which is the Pakistan today) war erupted and the fight for separation from West Pakistan began.

As many as 300,000 people were thought to have lost their lives in this civil war.

5. Iran-Iraq war of the 1980's was a nationalistic war which killed 1 million people.

6. 1992-1995-the genocide of Bosnians at the hands of Serb nationalism resulted in 200, 000 killed 2 million refugees.

7. 1997-1999- expulsion of approximately one million Albanian Kosovars from Kosova.

8. Chechnya is suffering right now through the fifth genocide by Russians in last one hundred years along with the Tatars.

9. Over a million Iraqis have been killed as a result of the 1991 Gulf war and the continuing US sanctions against Iraq reaching the genocidal proportions.

The Untouchables of India

The least challenged racism remains that of Indian Caste system. Indo-Aryans started the Caste system in India after they conquered it, to preserve their racial purity in India. Now the Caste system is a part of Hinduism. The Hindu religious name for the Caste system is Verna, which literally means color system. Darker-skinned people, Dravidians, who were defeated by Aryans, became outcaste or Untouchables of the Verna system.

The following list gives a broad idea of what untouchabilty means:
Denial or restriction of access to public facilities, such as well, schools, roads, post offices, and courts.
Denial or restriction of access to temples where their presence might pollute the deity as well as the higher caste worshippers, and from resthouses, tanks, and shrines connected to temples. Untouchables... are forbidden to learn the vedas (the earliest and most sacred books of orthodox Hinduism).
Exclusion from any honorable, and most profitable, employment and relegation to dirty or menial occupations.
Residential segregation...by requiring them to remain outside the village.
Denial of access to services such as those provided by barbers, laundrymen, restaurants, shops, and theaters or requiring the use of separate utensils and facilities within such places.
Restrictions on style of life, especially in the use of goods indicating comfort or luxury. Riding on horseback, use of bicycles, umbrellas, footwear, the wearing of gold and sliver ornaments, the use of palanquins to carry bridegrooms...
Requirements of deference in forms of address, language, sitting and standing in presence of higher castes.
Restrictions on movement. Untouchables might not be allowed on roads and streets within prescribed distance of the houses or persons of higher castes.
Liability to unremunerated labor for the higher castes and to the performance of menial services for them. (Marc Galanter, Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), P. 15.

According to the Indian census of 1980, there were 200 million "Untouchables" of the lowest Castes. These 200 to 300 Castes are subjected to very inhuman treatment based on practices advocated in the Hindu religious manual Manu Smriti. The life, property and honor of Untouchables still remains threatened by the higher Castes.

Pollution and purification are key concepts in the Caste system. They are based on Hindu beliefs that each Caste group can maintain its status by restricting contact with the "polluting" effects of the lower Castes and by regulating its contact with objects thought to be inherently impure.

Caste members customarily marry only members of their own Caste. There are about 3,000 Castes and more than 25,000 sub-Castes in India, some with only several hundred members and others with millions.

The tragedy is that with the rise of Hindu religious nationalism nowadays, the Caste system is regaining its power, shaken a bit by modernization. Most wealth and power is by and large in the hands of the top three percent of Castes in India."

Tribalism

Tribalism also remains a source of death and destruction. There are two notable examples from this century

1. Rwanda (Central Africa)-1994

Over a period of 100 days, beginning April 6, 1994, up to 800,000 members of the Tutsi tribe were killed by another tribe, Hutus.

Hutus used clubs and machetes to kill. As many as 10,000 were murdered each day.

2. Afghanistan-1989-present-1.2 million killed due to civil war, 2 million permanently disabled.

When the last of the colonial empires, the former Soviet Union, invaded Afghanistan in 1979, most Afghans were united in their fight against this oppressor.

However, with the withdrawal of the former Soviet Union from Afghanistan in 1989, things have worsened with bitter warfare amongst the country's various tribes.

The Taliban group controls the capital of Kabul and approximately two-thirds of the country including the predominantely ethnic Pashtun areas in southern Afghanistan. Opposing factions have their stronghold in the ethnically diverse north.

May Allah help human beings live in peace with each other. Ameen.


Racism cannot be compared to any event, ideology or era in history. It really is indescribable calling it evil is a understatement. To think that a few sick minds in Europe unleashed this on the world is just amazing, unbelieveable.
 
Andrew Breitbart owns Big Government. Breitbart Tv etc.

And the video of R Kelly pissing on a minor is not real.:D

Dave if you showed up a the LA Lakers practice does that make you a Laker?

If the Black Panthers showed up at an Obama fundraiser does that automatically means he support their hate?

Didn't Obama disown Reverend Wright even thought he sat there for twenty years? So with your line of thought am I right to infer that Obama believes all that Jeremiah Wright says?

It was announced yesterday that the tea party booted out some idiot for his remarks. They are policing themselves. They were right to boot him out. Hate of any kind should not be tolerated.

Peace


Whoa there, G. Don't pretend like the Tea Party organizations had been doing that before the recent NAACP controversy. They weren't.

Obama did exactly what the NAACP is demanding of the Tea Parties, make a stand when one of your leaders/high profile members make outrageous public statements. Up until very, very recently they weren't doing that at all.
 
There are some fuckin fools on this site,
1. Why does a US congress man have to prove that he was spat upon and cussed or disrespected then there were many people around. He doesn’t have tape so it didn’t happen?
2. Whites have been known to do racist shit for hundreds of years.... just look in today’s paper.
3.Funny how so many whites are fed up with the country going in the wrong direction under a black man who has the responsibility of running this shit for 18 months. The former president couldn’t do any wrong not one cock sucker from the tea party showed up.
4. The stupid thing is in this new world order it’s not going to matter if you are black or white because its about class now... the haves and the have not, rich or poor. Do some reading
People died for trying to make this country better white and black. The NAACP has had white members and still does. They have received funding from and through white originations and institutions.
Do your home work before opening your mouth and make yourself look unintelligent.
Now back to some black pussy
 
There are some fuckin fools on this site,
1. Why does a US congress man have to prove that he was spat upon and cussed or disrespected then there were many people around. He doesn’t have tape so it didn’t happen?
2. Whites have been known to do racist shit for hundreds of years.... just look in today’s paper.
3.Funny how so many whites are fed up with the country going in the wrong direction under a black man who has the responsibility of running this shit for 18 months. The former president couldn’t do any wrong not one cock sucker from the tea party showed up.
4. The stupid thing is in this new world order it’s not going to matter if you are black or white because its about class now... the haves and the have not, rich or poor. Do some reading
People died for trying to make this country better white and black. The NAACP has had white members and still does. They have received funding from and through white originations and institutions.
Do your home work before opening your mouth and make yourself look unintelligent.
Now back to some black pussy


I'm going to disagree with you on one small point: it's always been about class. "Race" isn't real and has been an artificial construct created to divide and distract the working classes. It's always been about rich and poor.
 
and now for the REST of the story...

Thanks to Andrew Breitbart there'smore. Somebody needs to look closely at this dude.


******************************************************************
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/07/20/agriculture.employee.naacp/index.html?video=true&hpt=T2


Conservative website publisher Andrew Breitbart originally posted the video, which was quickly picked up by Fox News. The video claims Sherrod's remarks were delivered March 27 to an NAACP Freedom Fund banquet, but it is not clear that is the case, nor is it clear where the event was held or how many people were in attendance.

******************************************************************

(CNN) -- A black Agriculture Department employee who resigned after a video clip showed her talking about a white farmer said Tuesday her remarks were taken out of context.

Shirley Sherrod, the department's former state director of rural development for Georgia, told CNN on Tuesday the incident she discusses in the clip took place more than two decades ago -- and she recounted it to an audience to make the point that people should move beyond race.

"I was speaking to that group, like I've done many groups, and I tell them about a time when I thought the issue was race and race only," Sherrod told CNN's "American Morning" from her home in Albany, Georgia. The incident took place in 1986, while she worked for a nonprofit and before she worked for the USDA, she said. "I was telling the story of how working with him helped me to see the issue is not about race. It's about those who have versus those who do not have."
 
Last edited:
and now for the REST of the story...

Thanks to Andrew Breitbart there'smore. Somebody needs to look closely at this dude.


******************************************************************
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/07/20/agriculture.employee.naacp/index.html?video=true&hpt=T2


Conservative website publisher Andrew Breitbart originally posted the video, which was quickly picked up by Fox News. The video claims Sherrod's remarks were delivered March 27 to an NAACP Freedom Fund banquet, but it is not clear that is the case, nor is it clear where the event was held or how many people were in attendance.

******************************************************************

(CNN) -- A black Agriculture Department employee who resigned after a video clip showed her talking about a white farmer said Tuesday her remarks were taken out of context.

Shirley Sherrod, the department's former state director of rural development for Georgia, told CNN on Tuesday the incident she discusses in the clip took place more than two decades ago -- and she recounted it to an audience to make the point that people should move beyond race.

"I was speaking to that group, like I've done many groups, and I tell them about a time when I thought the issue was race and race only," Sherrod told CNN's "American Morning" from her home in Albany, Georgia. The incident took place in 1986, while she worked for a nonprofit and before she worked for the USDA, she said. "I was telling the story of how working with him helped me to see the issue is not about race. It's about those who have versus those who do not have."


The plot thickens. Fox and Breitbart are renowned for showing purposely out of context video (see ACORN) to further their agenda and with no real media outlets willing to do the work of checking out the story completely, their lies become truth.
 
and now for the REST of the story...

Thanks to Andrew Breitbart there'smore. Somebody needs to look closely at this dude.


******************************************************************
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/07/20/agriculture.employee.naacp/index.html?video=true&hpt=T2


Conservative website publisher Andrew Breitbart originally posted the video, which was quickly picked up by Fox News. The video claims Sherrod's remarks were delivered March 27 to an NAACP Freedom Fund banquet, but it is not clear that is the case, nor is it clear where the event was held or how many people were in attendance.

******************************************************************

(CNN) -- A black Agriculture Department employee who resigned after a video clip showed her talking about a white farmer said Tuesday her remarks were taken out of context.

Shirley Sherrod, the department's former state director of rural development for Georgia, told CNN on Tuesday the incident she discusses in the clip took place more than two decades ago -- and she recounted it to an audience to make the point that people should move beyond race.

"I was speaking to that group, like I've done many groups, and I tell them about a time when I thought the issue was race and race only," Sherrod told CNN's "American Morning" from her home in Albany, Georgia. The incident took place in 1986, while she worked for a nonprofit and before she worked for the USDA, she said. "I was telling the story of how working with him helped me to see the issue is not about race. It's about those who have versus those who do not have."


R Kelly was taken out of context as well!!
:hmm:
 
u either know nothing about the naacp or are just ignorant about the true terms of racism

Man u racism chasers are coming out of the wood works.

Come on dude the NAACP is irrelevant.
What have the done in the past twenty years?

I know that the NAACP originally had conservative white founders as well as WEB Dubois, whom was asked to leave due to his radical views.

James Weldon Johnson ( a black republican ) was responsible for "Lift every voice and sing".

What do you know?
 
I'm going to disagree with you on one small point: it's always been about class. "Race" isn't real and has been an artificial construct created to divide and distract the working classes. It's always been about rich and poor.


Mr. Dave you are so right. One of my favorite professors drove that home to me back in college. I'm of the opinion that if we went to the men and women who sat down at a diner and were spat upon, slapped and had dogs bite into their flesh in the name of equal rights; and say we are still catching hell. They would be ashamed of us. I of the notion that We are better than that!

If I can make Bill Gates another Billion you think he's not going to hire me because I'm black.
 
Hey man, I have no opinion one way or the other on the Naacp... but your original post is a fail, because it's directed at the NAACP and not the individual woman or her employer at the time, the USDA. The action/inaction she spoke of took place in the mid 80's, and unless I'm missing something, she was not acting as an agent of the NAACP at the time, correct? ...and when she was speaking to the audience recounting the event, was she an officer of the NAACP? It sounds like at around the 2:01 mark, she's saying that the episode taught her that it she had it wrong in her head. So by all means, she and the USDA should be held accountable, but the NAACP? Come on man, that's a stretch.

...and by the way, I'm not at all saying that there is or has been no wrong doing within the ranks of the NAACP... I'm just saying that using this chick to try to smear them is a huge fail based soley upon the fact that she wasn't working for the NAACP.



Man u racism chasers are coming out of the wood works.

Come on dude the NAACP is irrelevant.
What have the done in the past twenty years?

I know that the NAACP originally had conservative white founders as well as WEB Dubois, whom was asked to leave due to his radical views.

James Weldon Johnson ( a black republican ) was responsible for "Lift every voice and sing".

What do you know?
 
Hey man, I have no opinion one way or the other on the Naacp... but your original post is a fail, because it's directed at the NAACP and not the individual woman or her employer at the time, the USDA. The action/inaction she spoke of took place in the mid 80's, and unless I'm missing something, she was not acting as an agent of the NAACP at the time, correct? ...and when she was speaking to the audience recounting the event, was she an officer of the NAACP? It sounds like at around the 2:01 mark, she's saying that the episode taught her that it she had it wrong in her head. So by all means, she and the USDA should be held accountable, but the NAACP? Come on man, that's a stretch.

...and by the way, I'm not at all saying that there is or has been no wrong doing within the ranks of the NAACP... I'm just saying that using this chick to try to smear them is a huge fail based soley upon the fact that she wasn't working for the NAACP.

1. They were giving her an award.
2. That was clarified in the second post.
3. Should I roll tape on Julian Bond?
4. Using racist to smear millions of tea party members is a huge fail. If that's the case, then what is your beef. You can't change the evidence because it doesn't fit your train of thought.






NAACP Statement on Resignation of Shirley Sherrod
by Publius
July 19, 2010
(BALTIMORE, MD) NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous issued the following statement today after learning of the resignation of Shirley Sherrod of the United States Department of Agriculture:

“Since our founding in 1909, the NAACP has been a multi-racial, multi-faith organization that– while generally rooted in African American communities– fights to end racial discrimination against all Americans.
We concur with US Agriculture Secretary Vilsack in accepting the resignation of Shirley Sherrod for her remarks at a local NAACP Freedom Fund banquet.
Racism is about the abuse of power. Sherrod had it in her position at USDA. According to her remarks, she mistreated a white farmer in need of assistance because of his race.
We are appalled by her actions, just as we are with abuses of power against farmers of color and female farmers.
Her actions were shameful. While she went on to explain in the story that she ultimately realized her mistake, as well as the common predicament of working people of all races, she gave no indication she had attempted to right the wrong she had done to this man. (more…)
 
Last edited:
and during her speech, she recounted an incident in which she acted wrongly (and admitted as much in her speech) in 1986 or 1987, when whe was not acting as an agent of the organization. Now, did the NAACP know about the incident when they decided to give her the award? If they did, then obviously, that would be bad decision making, but I don't think that's the case. .. How am I changing evidence to suit my train of thought? I changed nothing. Heck, I'm not even defending the NAACP... just pointing out that this is the wrong case to use to smear them. Mark Williams was acting as an agent of his tea party group when he wrote his little Abe Lincoln letter; so the national group correctly repudiated him. This woman was not acting as an agent of the naacp, and they have correctly repudiated her. Both actions are correct.



1. They were giving her an award.
2. That was clarified in the second post.
3. Should I roll tape on Julian Bond?
4. Using racist to smear millions of tea party members is a huge fail. If that's the case, then what is your beef. You can't change the evidence because it doesn't fit your train of thought.






NAACP Statement on Resignation of Shirley Sherrod
by Publius
July 19, 2010
(BALTIMORE, MD) NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous issued the following statement today after learning of the resignation of Shirley Sherrod of the United States Department of Agriculture:

“Since our founding in 1909, the NAACP has been a multi-racial, multi-faith organization that– while generally rooted in African American communities– fights to end racial discrimination against all Americans.
We concur with US Agriculture Secretary Vilsack in accepting the resignation of Shirley Sherrod for her remarks at a local NAACP Freedom Fund banquet.
Racism is about the abuse of power. Sherrod had it in her position at USDA. According to her remarks, she mistreated a white farmer in need of assistance because of his race.
We are appalled by her actions, just as we are with abuses of power against farmers of color and female farmers.
Her actions were shameful. While she went on to explain in the story that she ultimately realized her mistake, as well as the common predicament of working people of all races, she gave no indication she had attempted to right the wrong she had done to this man. (more…)
 
and during her speech, she recounted an incident in which she acted wrongly (and admitted as much in her speech) in 1986 or 1987, when whe was not acting as an agent of the organization. Now, did the NAACP know about the incident when they decided to give her the award? If they did, then obviously, that would be bad decision making, but I don't think that's the case. .. How am I changing evidence to suit my train of thought? I changed nothing. Heck, I'm not even defending the NAACP... just pointing out that this is the wrong case to use to smear them. Mark Williams was acting as an agent of his tea party group when he wrote his little Abe Lincoln letter; so the national group correctly repudiated him. This woman was not acting as an agent of the naacp, and they have correctly repudiated her. Both actions are correct.


Inarguably.
 
SHE was discriminated against by the USDA as a farmer, recently settled on a $13 MILLION suit against them with other Black farmers.

HER[/[] father was killed by a white farmer, killer never prosecuted.

Her life is interesting given all the facts that have led up to this.

I got recruited into the NAACP almost a year ago; to help organize the local Freedom Fund Dinner. The speaker (as she was) was given recognition by the local chapter. He's an editorial writer for the local newspaper and a college journalism prof. He spoke with media savvy. Not cautious, just fact based info that formulated his opinions.

She ain't stupid, just not ready for the media sharks - on air and online!
 
Last edited:
Can somebody sue Faux Snooze, Rupert Murdock and all of the other right wing conservative republicans for the harm they have done to the world!

Andrew Breitbart defamed Shirley Sherrod; Brietbart could be in trouble

<iframe src="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/07/20/agriculture.employee.naacp/index.html" width=800 height=1000></iframe>
 
and now for the REST of the story...

Thanks to Andrew Breitbart there'smore. Somebody needs to look closely at this dude.


******************************************************************
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/07/20/agriculture.employee.naacp/index.html?video=true&hpt=T2


Conservative website publisher Andrew Breitbart originally posted the video, which was quickly picked up by Fox News. The video claims Sherrod's remarks were delivered March 27 to an NAACP Freedom Fund banquet, but it is not clear that is the case, nor is it clear where the event was held or how many people were in attendance.

******************************************************************

(CNN) -- A black Agriculture Department employee who resigned after a video clip showed her talking about a white farmer said Tuesday her remarks were taken out of context.

Shirley Sherrod, the department's former state director of rural development for Georgia, told CNN on Tuesday the incident she discusses in the clip took place more than two decades ago -- and she recounted it to an audience to make the point that people should move beyond race.

"I was speaking to that group, like I've done many groups, and I tell them about a time when I thought the issue was race and race only," Sherrod told CNN's "American Morning" from her home in Albany, Georgia. The incident took place in 1986, while she worked for a nonprofit and before she worked for the USDA, she said. "I was telling the story of how working with him helped me to see the issue is not about race. It's about those who have versus those who do not have."



R Kelly was taken out of context as well!!
:hmm:

<font size="3">You rushed to judgment; and you resist rushing to an apology.

This makes it appear that you were more interested in "Gotcha",

than truth.

:confused:

</font size>
 
Have I ever been given a response to Obama's promises and failures?

But because you're cool all of facts were not in.

Translation, "Fixednews and Redstate hasn't said it was a fake."

Like I said, its always pure comedy when CACS cry racism. You've been racists so long you can't tell what it is to know it when you see it.

In English that means, even when you KNOW Fixednews has a long got damn history of distorting the news in general and video tape in particular, you don't ever second guess the information coming from there. It is the same thing they did with Jemimah Wright's video, they, and you, are doing it again with this one.

Whats worse for me is how CNN's lazy ass writers promoted this same bullshit story without checking out the facts or the news organization promoting it, ie Fixednews. CNN is too scared to say " well we know Fixednews is talking about a video and their history says we should check it out because they have a editing problem there" NOTHING! Too fuckin' scared so to me they have only slightly better integrity than does Fixednews which has none.

I can't help but see CNN as those CACS standing around the black man hanging from a tree pointing at the man. Fixednews hung the man and CNN gages the reaction. Fuck CNN and FixedNews.

-VG
 
Have I ever been given a response to Obama's promises and failures?

But because you're cool all of facts were not in.

you're coming out of left field with this one...

Is there any more proof needed to illustrate the right/conservative philosophy? They have to manufacture, lie and misrepresent the positions of those they don't agree with just to justify their very existence. They were frauds during the so called Reagan Revolution and they are frauds today!!!

And don't fool yourselves. racism IS a political position.
 
Have I ever been given a response to Obama's promises and failures?

But because you're cool all of facts were not in.

What, G? You started this thread. With the information available, I thought the NAACP acted appropriately. Since then Breitbart, who I warned you was an unreliable source from the beginning, has been shown to have broadcast edited footage. Since then the NAACP has apologized to her personally and publicly.

Since you want to throw in the Obama tangent

Every President has successes and failures, Obama is no different.
 
Back
Top