My "Un-American" List

[Lamarr]

I get my information from any and all sources.

OK, allow me to point you to www.campaignforliberty.com check out some of those articles

 

[thoughtone]

OK, allow me to point you to www.campaignforliberty.com check out some of those articles

Noted. Now why don't you enter some of those threads and comment on where I post the actions of corporations.

 

[Lamarr]

Noted. Now why don't you enter some of those threads and comment on where I post the actions of corporations.

we have a "fundamental" disagreement with the 'role of govt' in business activities. We may agree that China-Mart, Exxon, & B of A aren't beneficial to the people but our analysis and solutions are completely opposite. its a typical argument and my pops and I have the same type dialog, I think he hates Reagan & Bush more than you !

 

[thoughtone]

we have a "fundamental" disagreement with the 'role of govt' in business activities. We may agree that China-Mart, Exxon, & B of A aren't beneficial to the people but our analysis and solutions are completely opposite. its a typical argument and my pops and I have the same type dialog, I think he hates Reagan & Bush more than you !

we have a "fundamental" disagreement with the 'role of govt' in business activities.

No shit.

its a typical argument and my pops and I have the same type dialog, I think he hates Reagan & Bush more than you

The difference between you and your dad is that he experienced it, you get your interpretations from Ron Paul.

Your view of history starts at the Clinton administration, my view and evidently, your dad's encompasses everything.

 

[Lamarr]

You get your interpretations from Ron Paul.

wrong, I think for myself! But the man makes a helluva lot of sense in regards to the economy. My background is finance and he was the only one that made any sense.

Your view of history starts at the Clinton administration, my view and evidently, your dad's encompasses everything.

yeah, Bill was the first politician I voted for but I felt betrayed when he signed NAFTA. I grew up in Detroit so the repercussions of such a trade policy were noticed quickly. Perot challenged the merits of NAFTA, only to be ridiculed (my interest in 3rd parties rose). Now that we see the disastrous effects, We must admit Perot's assessment was correct. He was demonized and ridiculed by the media, thats when I started questioning the motives of the media. There's an agenda behind every story they choose to air, in this case, NAFTA was a stepping stone towards "Globalism".

In a nutshell, my enemy aint a Repub or a Dem but its the man behind the curtain pulling all the strings. Behind any debate between a Repub or Dem, there lies a point of view that was not created by a special interest

 

[thoughtone]

bump

 

[actinanass]

No shit.



The difference between you and your dad is that he experienced it, you get your interpretations from Ron Paul.

Your view of history starts at the Clinton administration, my view and evidently, your dad's encompasses everything.

wrong, I think for myself! But the man makes a helluva lot of sense in regards to the economy. My background is finance and he was the only one that made any sense.



yeah, Bill was the first politician I voted for but I felt betrayed when he signed NAFTA. I grew up in Detroit so the repercussions of such a trade policy were noticed quickly. Perot challenged the merits of NAFTA, only to be ridiculed (my interest in 3rd parties rose). Now that we see the disastrous effects, We must admit Perot's assessment was correct. He was demonized and ridiculed by the media, thats when I started questioning the motives of the media. There's an agenda behind every story they choose to air, in this case, NAFTA was a stepping stone towards "Globalism".

In a nutshell, my enemy aint a Repub or a Dem but its the man behind the curtain pulling all the strings. Behind any debate between a Repub or Dem, there lies a point of view that was not created by a special interest

I've noticed something about Thought *and much of the left for that matter*. When he's threaten in a debate, he likes to throw out names of controversial figures, in order to discredit the person he is debating with ARGUMENT. This is standard practice of the left.

I guess this proves that the left is really that SHALLOW.

 

[thoughtone]

I've noticed something about Thought *and much of the left for that matter*. When he's threaten in a debate, he likes to throw out names of controversial figures, in order to discredit the person he is debating with ARGUMENT. This is standard practice of the left.

I guess this proves that the left is really that SHALLOW.

I guess you want me to get a video instead and alter it like you right wingers do.