The United States is full of hubris and the hubris is high before a fall 'cause the Winter of the US's discontent is coming.
America trying to fight India, China and Russia is like a male lion taking on three leopards. One on one the leopard doesn't stand a chance but if he ever calls a friend the lion better start looking for an escape route.
The answer is no!! Not even one of them one on one.
The Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Bay of Bigs Invasion, and the War in Afghanistan. LST!
You need booths on the ground to win a war.
ok so one on one will work?Not at the same time.
Is “Rules based order” really a thing?The answer is no.
Military shouldn’t be an option to deal with all 3 & maintain the current rules based order.
Warfare is changing, especially with the additional cyber & space domains. Using non-kinetic capabilities to effect an adversary before they mobilize is upon us.The answer is no!! Not even one of them one on one.
The Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Bay of Bigs Invasion, and the War in Afghanistan. LST!
You need booths on the ground to win a war.
I’ve never read that in doctrine. Where did you read that?Supposedly the US military can take on two Opponents at the same time
In this instance,if no one goes nuclear,then I think we could do two if one is Russia
YesIs “Rules based order” really a thing?
"Rule based order" is the US/Israel tellin' mofos what to do and they listen, it's really no rules except what the US and Israel says and that's it. It's really a "chaos-based order" rooted in a fervent White Supremacy.Is “Rules based order” really a thing?
i never read it either,that's why i used the word supposedlyI’ve never read that in doctrine. Where did you read that?
Then America will win if on their own soil.Fight all three in their countries or on America's soil?
Then America will win if on their own soil.
Supposedly the US military can take on two Opponents at the same time
In this instance,if no one goes nuclear,then I think we could do two if one is Russia
Yep. Ain't no way we are winning 3 wars in different countries at the same time. Nobody has military that big nor the resources.
you mean surpise attack.If the method of crushing them is nuclear yes, but all three have the same ability. The military industrial complex is coming to an end. The fact that they had to pause weapons shipments to Ukraine while Israel tried to attach Iran says it all. Trump is walking stress test for this whole system.
nuclear won’t let us know who wonIf the method of crushing them is nuclear yes, but all three have the same ability. The military industrial complex is coming to an end. The fact that they had to pause weapons shipments to Ukraine while Israel tried to attach Iran says it all. Trump is walking stress test for this whole system.
If the method of crushing them is nuclear yes, but all three have the same ability. The military industrial complex is coming to an end. The fact that they had to pause weapons shipments to Ukraine while Israel tried to attach Iran says it all. Trump is walking stress test for this whole system.
Unfortunately, it's not out of the equation. If y'all understood the atmosphere in these briefings they been giving us for the last few years when it comes to China, shit feels like we going to war soon. My supervisor told me she retired because of it.Bruh, you wanna take nuclear outta the equation. With nuclear no one really wins. Nuclear weapons is equivalent to a kamikaze move. Nuclear/chemical warfare is some scary shit.
Not sure if you saw the last Mission Impossible, but I could see something similar happening where they are waiting to see who fires the first shot.Unfortunately, it's not out of the equation. If y'all understood the atmosphere in these briefings they been giving us for the last few years when it comes to China, shit feels like we going to war soon. My supervisor told me she retired because of it.