Media WTF?: Shake-up at WaPo The opinion editor is out as Bezos says op-eds must defend 'free markets' and 'personal liberties'

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Shake-up at WaPo: The opinion editor is out as Bezos says op-eds must defend 'free markets' and 'personal liberties'​

Story by insider@insider.com (Geoff Weiss,Lucia Moses)
• 14h



Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post. Getty Images

Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post. Getty Images© Getty Images
  • Jeff Bezos unveiled sweeping changes to The Washington Post's opinion pages.
  • Coverage will now center on two pillars: personal liberties and free markets.
  • The Post's opinion editor is leaving and the shift prompted criticism from some insiders.
Jeff Bezos unveiled sweeping changes to The Washington Post's opinion page in a note to staff that he also shared on X.

US PUMA Sale - US PUMA - PUMA USA


us.puma.comUS PUMA Sale - US PUMA - PUMA USA

Ad

"We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets," Bezos wrote. "We'll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others."

Bezos, who owns the Post, said there's no longer a need for "a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views" because of the internet.

As part of the overhaul, Bezos said that opinion editor David Shipley is stepping away from the paper, and that the search is on for a replacement.

Will Lewis, publisher and CEO of the Post, echoed Bezos' sentiments in his own staff memo.

"This is not about siding with any political party," Lewis wrote in a memo shared with Business Insider. "This is about being crystal clear about what we stand for as a newspaper."

While newspaper owners generally set the direction of opinion pages, the shift prompted some fierce criticism.

Shop PUMA Footwear


us.puma.comShop PUMA Footwear

Ad

Martin Baron, who was executive editor of the Post from 2013 to 2021, emailed BI that he was "sad and disgusted" by Bezos' action, calling it counter to his history of standing up for editorial independence at the Post while Baron was there.

"Bezos argues for personal liberties. But his news organization now will forbid views other than his own in its opinion section," Baron wrote. "It was only weeks ago that The Post described itself as providing coverage for 'all of America.' Now its opinion pages will be open to only some of America, those who think exactly as he does."

The Post's chief economics reporter, Jeff Stein, wrote on X that the move was a"massive encroachment by Jeff Bezos into The Washington Post's opinion section."

"Makes clear dissenting views will not be published or tolerated there," he wrote.

A current Post staffer on the news side told BI that there was "a lot of tension in the newsroom that we're next."

PUMA USA - PUMA Shoe - PUMA Shoes


us.puma.comPUMA USA - PUMA Shoe - PUMA Shoes

Ad

"Top editors are reminding us that so far there hasn't been any interference in the newsroom," this person said.

The current staffer also said Bezos's heavy-handed messaging felt like a first, likening it to "a proclamation coming down from high." They asked for anonymity in discussing internal matters; their identity is known to BI.

Post executive editor Matt Murray sent a note to staff, which was viewed by BI, saying Bezos's changes applied only to the opinion section and that the "independent and unbiased work of The Post's newsroom remains unchanged."

"We will continue to pursue engaging, impactful journalism without fear or favor," he added.

This new shake-up comes after a series of controversies at the Post.

In October, the Post made waves when it opted not to endorse a candidate in the presidential election — a decision that the Post reported came from Bezos himself.


Following a year of internal turmoil, hundreds of Post staffers sent Bezos a letter in January asking him to intervene after integrity and transparency issues — far beyond the endorsement controversy, the letter said — had precipitated staff departures.

The Los Angeles Times has also been roiled by controversy after its billionaire owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong, became more involved in the paper's opinion section. Before the presidential election, he stopped the paper from endorsing then-VP Kamala Harris. He also said the paper had moved too far to the left and called for a more balanced approach to covering President Donald Trump.

In his second term, Trump has put greater pressure on the mainstream US news media. His administration has opened investigations into news organizations and thwarted some outlets' access to covering events.

Here's the note that Bezos shared with staff in full:


I'm writing to let you know about a change coming to our opinion pages.

We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets. We'll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.

There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, might have seen it as a service to bring to the reader's doorstep every morning a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views. Today, the internet does that job.

I am of America and for America, and proud to be so. Our country did not get here by being typical. And a big part of America's success has been freedom in the economic realm and everywhere else. Freedom is ethical — it minimizes coercion — and practical — it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.

I offered David Shipley, whom I greatly admire, the opportunity to lead this new chapter. I suggested to him that if the answer wasn't "hell yes," then it had to be "no." After careful consideration, David decided to step away. This is a significant shift, it won't be easy, and it will require 100% commitment — I respect his decision. We'll be searching for a new Opinion Editor to own this new direction.

I'm confident that free markets and personal liberties are right for America. I also believe these viewpoints are underserved in the current market of ideas and news opinion. I'm excited for us together to fill that void.

Jeff
 

Washington Post Columnist Slams Trump As ‘The Real Threat’ After Bezos’ Op-Ed Overhaul​

Dana Milbank called the president “the single greatest threat to ‘personal liberties and free markets,’" referring to the Post opinion section's new focus.

Nina Golgowski

By Nina Golgowski
Feb 28, 2025, 12:59 PM EST



2_th.jpg

In a blistering op-ed, President Donald Trump was slammed as “the real threat” to “personal liberties and free markets” by a Washington Post columnist after the paper’s owner, Jeff Bezos, said the publication would reject any content that opposes these two principles in its opinion section.

“If we as a newspaper, and we as a country, are to defend his twin pillars, then we must redouble our fight against the single greatest threat to ‘personal liberties and free markets’ in the United States today: President Donald Trump,” wrote Dana Milbank in an op-ed published Friday. “The rapidly spreading authoritarianism coming from this administration threatens all of our freedoms.”
Advertisement

Milbank elaborated by dissecting Trump’s trade wars, his challenges to legal immigration, his politicizing of law enforcement and the military, and his cherry-picking of which media outlets receive White House access as a few examples of the president’s violation of Bezos’ protected “pillars.”

Donald Trump's rapidly spreading authoritarianism ... threatens all of our freedoms, Milbank wrote.


Donald Trump's "rapidly spreading authoritarianism ... threatens all of our freedoms," Milbank wrote.
The Washington Post via Getty Images
“The consequences of Trump’s illiberal actions can already be seen. Inflation has accelerated. Jobless claims jumped more than expected. Consumer confidence has slid. The stock market has been volatile. Trump’s approval numbers have inched downward,” wrote Milbank.



Bezos, in announcing his overhaul of The Post’s opinion section in a letter to the paper’s staff, argued that the themes of personal liberties and free markets “are underserved in the current market of ideas and news opinion” and that a “broad-based opinion section” is no longer needed since diversifying viewpoints can be found elsewhere on the web.
His directive led The Post’s opinion editor, David Shipley, to resign.
Bezos and Trump reportedly had dinner together mere hours after Bezos announced the changes at The Post.
Since purchasing the paper in 2013, the billionaire Trump donor and Amazon founder has drummed up controversy over his editorial decisions. Last October, Bezos ended The Post’s tradition of endorsing presidential candidates, and last month, opinion cartoonist Ann Telnaes resigned after one of her cartoons critical of Bezos was killed.
Advertisement

Journalist Gene Weingarten, who spent two decades as a Post columnist, said in a Substack post Thursday that he’s heard of at least one Post writer having their work rejected in the wake of Bezo’s announcement this week.
Post media critic Erik Wemple had told colleagues that he would write about Bezos’ order, which Weingarten said is part of his job. But according to some Post staffers, Wemple’s finished column was rejected for publication, Weingarten wrote.

The next four years will change America forever. But HuffPost won't back down when it comes to providing free and impartial journalism.
For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience to qualifying contributors who support our fearless newsroom. We hope you'll join us.

“It was described to me by someone who saw it as ‘more mystified and saddened than outraged or appalled,’” Weingarten wrote of Wemple’s submitted work. “I have been told another respected opinions columnist has also submitted a piece on the same subject. Let’s watch and see what happens.”
 

The Volokh Conspiracy

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
About The Volokh Conspiracy
Donald Trump

How Trump Imperils Free Markets and Personal Liberties

Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank provides a helpful summary, with a little help from me.​

Ilya Somin | 2.28.2025 4:26 PM

Jeff Bezos, owner of the Washington Post, recently said the Post opinion page should be "writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets." This inspired Post columnist Dana Milbank to write a helpful piece outlining some of the many ways in which the new Trump administration threatens those values:
Personal liberties and free markets are part of the American creed. But many readers I've heard from suspect the words are cover for a plan to turn this into a MAGA-friendly outlet.
I don't yet know for sure. But this much is clear: If we as a newspaper, and we as a country, are to defend his twin pillars, then we must redouble our fight against the single greatest threat to "personal liberties and free markets" in the United States today: President Donald Trump…..
Claiming monarchical powers, attacking the free press, starting trade wars, cutting off legal immigration, siding with despots over free countries, politicizing law enforcement and the military, assaulting the judicial system and injecting crony capitalism at the highest levels of government: These are all the very antithesis of "personal liberties and free markets."
Milbank also interviewed me about this issue, and quoted a few things I said:
"I think, and many of us (libertarians) think, that the Trump administration is very bad on these metrics of both economic and personal liberty," [Somin] told me. "The massive trade wars that he's starting right and left go against Econ 101 as well as any libertarian principle. There's the mass deportation and immigration restrictions, which restrict both economic and personal liberty on a massive scale. There's his attacks on the freedom of the press, which are also troubling," as is Trump's "kissing the rear end of dictators like Vladimir Putin."
Somin likes some of Trump's efforts to cut regulations and taxes, but "if you look at the cumulative impact … the horrible things Trump is doing massively outweigh many times over the good that he might do in a few areas."
He rattled off a list of Trump's offenses against personal liberties and free markets. The president, by circumventing Congress's constitutional spending authority, is making the treasury "essentially the personal piggy bank of one man," which is "extremely dangerous from the libertarian point of view." Trump's attempts to cut federal spending and the workforce, though laudable, "are actually pretty piddling, and some of them may even make the federal budgetary and regulatory situation worse" because of their ham-handed implementation. His takeover of independent federal agencies raises libertarian concerns because it puts massive governmental power "concentrated in the hands of one man." His attempts to dictate school curriculums under the guise of abolishing DEI, and his discrimination against transgender people also offend libertarian principles. The GOP budget that passed the House this week with Trump's help "will massively add to the deficit," Somin pointed out, while doing nothing to stop the major entitlement programs, Medicare and Social Security, from "just handing out money to the nonpoor elderly or even the affluent elderly."
Somin said the handing over of taxpayers' personal information to unvetted members of Musk's team violates personal liberties. Trump's attacks on media outlets critical of him are classic "weaponization of government," Somin added, and his packing of the Justice Department and FBI with loyalists is "scary and dangerous." The presence of "cranks like RFK Jr." overseeing health policy will reduce access to medicines and vaccines, which is "just a straightforward violation of libertarian principles." And the president's crackdown on migration is "a severe restriction on both the economic and personal liberty of native-born Americans. People who want to hire immigrants or engage in social relations with them cannot do that if those people are not allowed to enter the country."
The professor was heavily critical of the Biden administration, too, most notably for unilaterally forgiving student loans. But "Trump is worse," Somin said, because "under Biden there was just no equivalent to the massive assault on immigration and trade," nor Trump's attempt "to usurp the entire spending power from Congress." In sum, Trump's approach is "irreconcilable" with the principles of free markets and personal liberties.

I outlined how severe immigration restrictions like those Trump is implementing, threaten liberty in greater detail here. The fundamental problem with Trump's administration is that the modest good he is doing on a few issues is massively outweighed by the immense scale of the harm, which includes massive trade wars with nearly all major trade partners, the most draconian immigration restrictions in modern history (save possibly those in force at the height of Covid), and undermining the Western alliance to the great benefit of authoritarian enemies like Russia and China.



I was, as Milbank notes, highly critical of many Biden policies, such as massive unilateral use of executive power to institute student loan forgiveness, and the abuse of the Covid emergency to perpetuate a nationwide eviction moratorium and bogus public health immigration restrictions. But Trump's assaults on liberty and constitutional government are substantially worse.

I don't agree with every point Milbank makes. For example, while Trump may be wrong to seek a federal takeover of the DC government, it isn't really a matter of personal liberties or free markets. But he's right about the overall picture.

I speak only for myself. But it's worth noting that I'm far from the only libertarian or libertarian-leaning commentator to sound the alarm about the new administration. For example, my Cato Institute colleagues Walter Olson, Alex Nowrasteh, David Bier, Scott Lincicome, Michael Cannon, and Patrick Eddington have also outlined the grave dangers posed by many of the new administration's policies.
 
The Elites are tightening their grip...which is wild because they ran everything...but I guess greed has no limits

Wild to see this happening in real time
 
Back
Top