Marvel wins rights to Spider-Man and X-Men

hardcore_legend

Behind the Boards
BGOL Investor
NEW YORK (AP) — Spider-Man, X-Men, Iron Man and The Incredible Hulk can save the world from evil through superhuman feats, but it took a federal judge Thursday to decide who legally owns the rights to their lucrative characters.
U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon ruled that they and other Marvel Worldwide Inc. superheroes will remain the property of the company, despite claims by heirs to the artist who played a key role in creating them that they are entitled to the copyrights.
The Manhattan judge cited statements made by artist Jack Kirby before his 1994 death to support her finding that his creations must remain Marvel's property.
She noted that he said in a 1986 affidavit that he did his work at a time when it was common practice that vested ownership of his creations belonged to the company that paid him to draw. She said he also signed a written agreement in the spring of 1972, well after the creation of the characters, admitting that he was not entitled to retain ownership of the work.
Marvel filed a federal lawsuit in January 2010 seeking to invalidate 45 notices sent by Kirby's heirs to try to terminate Marvel's copyrights, effective on dates ranging from 2014 through 2019. The comics were published between 1958 and 1963. Those at issue in the case included The Fantastic Four, The Incredible Hulk, The Mighty Thor, Spider-Man, Iron Man, The X-Men, The Avengers, Ant-Man, Nick Fury and The Rawhide Kid.
Marvel had said the work was done "for hire," a legal term that would render the heirs' claims invalid. McMahon said the plain language of contracts she reviewed made it clear that all of Kirby's work for publications owned by Marvel was work for hire. She said the 1909 copyright law that applies to the case presumed that Marvel was considered the author and owner of Kirby's creations because the characters were made at Marvel's expense.
 
you know how companies are, although it was stupid Kirby probably didn't understand fully what he was signing

No. He understood full well when it came to the 70's.

Originally, he did the works and Marvel kept his originals.

He had to fight to get those. Years later he did get. They came just in time because he was in dire straights and sold those to keep his house afloat.

When the 70's came many artist fought and some did win but Kirby was in DIRE STRAIGHTS. Marvel knew this. The conference and interviews they held on his behalf were a ruse. Another artist told him so and but he had to sign to get $ right there and then to support his family.
 
fuuuck Stan Lee -
tired of seeing his lying ass in these crappy movies and seeing interviews where he takes sole credit for what was really another mans insperation and work- Kirby not only designed the chachters he created much of the early plots.
 
eh, i don't feel bad for them at all...kirb should get more open credit for his work tho

...it's sad that some people think Stan Lee did so much on his own...
 
Back
Top