LSU takes #1 spot from USC in AP poll
- Thread starter Spectrum
- Start date
Yeah I had to switch to that game quick. My canes are catching a king sized ass whipping 27-0 to the 1-4 UNC Tar Heels...
Last edited:
Thanks for making my point. Again conference schedules are tough for teams that aren't elite.......which is most teams of most conferences.....elite teams go 12-0 or 12-1 for a reason.
Auburn went 13-0 in part for playing THE CITADEL, LOUISIANA MONROE AND LA. TECH. That's three gimmes right there. You toss in OlE MISS, KENTUCKY, MISS STATE, A PRE MCFADDEN ARKANSAS, that's another 4 GIMMIES RIGHT THERE!
In 2001 Oregon was "robbed" of playing Miami for the national championship game because of scheduling issues just like Auburn got "robbed in 2004."
Since 1999 (since you included Tennessee's Nat'l championship --might I add included the infamous CLINT STOERNER FUMBLE),
Oregon, Washington, Standford, Oregon State, Washington State, and USC have all won Pac-10 titles. And outside of this huge dynasty run by USC for the last 5 years, the Pac-10 has been the essence of parity.
This year CAL, OREGON, ARIZONA STATE, UCLA WILL GIVE USC A RUN. I like Arizona State the most out of the 4 challengers.......
An unbiased college football fan
The PAC-10 is garbage. The SEC is the best conference every fukkin year.
USC has no dynasty. Since when does one national championship in 5 years equal a dynasty? Right there you proved that you're both biased and uninformed.
Now the truth of the matter is that they should have a dynasty. The PAC-10 is so bad that USC should coast every year to the BCS championship game. The mere fact that USC doesn't make it to the NC game every year illustrates that they're not as great as ABC/ESPN/DISNEY would have you believe.
Put LSU, Auburn, Florida, or Georgia in the PAC-10.
They'd get fat off of hoecake because the PAC-10 is full of hoe ass teams.
Don't take my word for it--that's America talking son.
Likle I said, stay out of here if you just started watching CFB in 2003. This is no place for you or your kind.
SEC BITCH!!!
And yet USC leads the SEC 11-0 in National Championships!!!
What is your team??? Conferences don't compete against each other... TEAMS DO!!!
(fyi... America said USC was National Champions 11 times including 2003)
USC BITCH!!!
why do you keep typing this bullshit?
anyone with half a fucking brain knows that conferences don't play games.
find another point.
usc HAD a dynasty back in the day; they won several championships and just like now, there was no competition for them in-conference.
again, here's my point: there is more competition top-to-bottom in the SEC whereas, the pac 10 is dominated by usc (and you motherfuckers know it), and the big 10 is dominated by osu and/or michigan (and you motherfuckers know it).
What is your TEAM you asshole????????? I am an indiscriminate Big Ten but I prefer the Buckeyes more than the other Big Ten schools, and I went to the University of Illinois.......Be honest, you went to the University of Alabama..... errrr Birmingham, Or the University of Tennessee errrrr Chattanooga and you just jumped on the SECs coattails
why don't you support the fightin illini?
you know damn well you like the osu buckeyes cause they're the OVERWHELMING dominant team in the big 10.
fair-weather fan, huh?
Damn dawg they took you off the suicide watch list after that loss to Texas 2 years back??
You said something about giving up your newborn if Texas won that National championship then
Anyway, yea the Pac 10's soft on D, year in year out! USC deserves their props but as a conference the Pac 10 CANNOT fuck with the SEC!
STANFORD 24 USC 23
Your squad is garbage bitch!!! Yall lost to a bunch of nerds!!!
LSU BITCH!!!
Similar threads
