http://www.yahoo.com/s/805393
And what's so bad about extinction? (See Mr. Tyson at the one minute mark.)
And what's so bad about extinction? (See Mr. Tyson at the one minute mark.)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
costanza said:And what's so bad about extinction?
An they will leave, my black ass, and Neil deGrasse Tyson's black ass on this shit hole of the Solar System they created.
You know how much Shuckin and shuffling being black, you'd have to do to get on that shuttle!
Fucking space Coon!
But I invite such a scenario, let them take all their asses on, and don't come back.
Bye bitches!
Just saying... 100 years from now, I will be "extinct." In a few billion years (not exactly), the sun will die and life will be impossible. So extinction is in a way inevitable. What does it matter to us if it's 200 years from now, 600 years, a few thousand, or at the very end?
costanza said:Why would it be so important for the race to live on via Mars, the Moon, or elsewhere?
not according to Michio Kaku. IF our civilization tranfroms to a type 1 society sky is the limit. From there our civilization can from type 2 or even type 3 societies and keep in mind that these type of societies, especially type 2 are to be considered immortals and can move their societies to other planets if threaten from a supernova. check it out. his video was posted a week ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHbnM_42mQE&feature=related
You are thinking extremely too far into the future. By that time our species may have destroyed themselves through warfare or has become a space faring species that has created vast colonies throughout the known universe. Death is inevitable, extinction is not. Especially if you have the means and methods to procreate your race. And if you continue to view time on a linear path genetics would have come an extremely long way by then and it's hard to imagine how sophisticated our knowledge of genetics would be by then, (100 years from now and more) for better or worse.
Not only do we have to worry about the sun dying in a few billion years but our solar system is going collide with Andromeda in a few billion years as well![]()
Because every life form we're familiar with no matter how basic is driven by the need to survive. It's not that complicated.
Ah space Coons
the new American frontier
Haven't checked the video as of this reply, but I get what you're saying. I understand that our perception is not all that there may be.not according to Michio Kaku. IF our civilization tranfroms to a type 1 society sky is the limit. From there our civilization can from type 2 or even type 3 societies and keep in mind that these type of societies, especially type 2 are to be considered immortals and can move their societies to other planets if threaten from a supernova. check it out. his video was posted a week ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHbnM_42mQE&feature=related
Just saying... 100 years from now, I will be "extinct." In a few billion years (not exactly), the sun will die and life will be impossible. So extinction is in a way inevitable. What does it matter to us if it's 200 years from now, 600 years, a few thousand, or at the very end?
Why would it be so important for the race to live on via Mars, the Moon, or elsewhere?
I also have to ask what need there is to survive. That's why I brought up the Sun; the clock seems as if it will run out eventually no matter what. .
costanza said:We won't survive and apparently there is no need to
200 years ago we didn't have electricity. Now look at us. Shit, by the time 3000 rolls around, people are gonna be fighting the gov for the right to fuck some alien bitch they met.
Haven't checked the video as of this reply, but I get what you're saying. I understand that our perception is not all that there may be.
But this "Deep Impact" scenario about the need for human life to survive, even beyond Earth, is commonly accepted and promoted based on our conventional understanding of life. I'm challenging it on that basis. People seem to see extinction as a bad thing with our current understanding of the world and more primitive past ones... I don't see the rationale.
taz said:Man that shit made me LOL in real life...
And for Smoke...
FUCK DEM DUDES......![]()
Are you serious? You know what I mean, whether or not I phrased it to your liking or not. God damn, I hate when people do that. Either say something worthwhile or shut the fuck up.
Damn.
That need would likely come from a sky high population that would grow exponentially over the next few years causing natural resources to become depleted (barring no global epidemic, global catastrophe, or war).
Seriously, is life rough right now for you.
And I'm not understanding your rationale. What species knowingly wants to go extinct???
Message to all intelligent life forms in the universe.
A homicidal war mongering species of super advanced apes are going to be colonizing a world near you.
![]()
"OOOOH SNAP YO....."
But before you were talking about every species having a need to survive on an instinctual level, a need to propetuate the species. I don't see how that is a real "need" from the standpoint of someone who will be dead in 100 years and the inhabitant of a planet which eventually will reveal that inclination to be an impossibility.
costanza said:Life doesn't have to be rough to make you question its meaning. .
costanza said:You sound like you're thinking along the lines of the stereotypical atheist who "can't believe" because he or she "got mad/is mad" at God
And I'm not understanding your rationale. What species knowingly wants to go extinct???
What dudes? The Space Coons who will be tap dancing during Minstrel shows on Space Stations?
None, but that's not really a fair question as most species don't seem to have a conceptualization of extinction.
Well I should of worded my comment differently. I meant intelligent life forms who are aware of the concept of life.
[qutoe=costanza]
We, on the other hand, have an ego-fueled fantasy that humans are going to exist forever and that the entire universe revolves around us when
costanza said:more than 99% of all species ever to live are now extinct.
No seems like my reptilian pic didnt appear. I was wondering when you were gonna post one.
![]()
They warming us up Smoke![]()
I think you're basing a lot of your opinions on how 'I would think' and not considering the motives of other people.
You have people (most notably geneticist) who are trying to unlock the secret to prolonging life. You also have people who are not selfishly thinking about life from a perspective of right now, but the lives of their children and grandchildren in the future.
Both of those are examples of people actively thinking about the perpetuation of themselves and their line.
People have different motives and not everyone thinks the same.
I didn't take your comment as if you were questioning life's meaning, I took it as if you had no aspirations in living life.
That is the last thing that crossed my mind. I was wondering if your psychological well being was still in balance, not whether or not you and God got entangled in fisticuffs.
it's good to hear that you're all right![]()
I feel like you're generalizing here. Not all humans feel this way. Now it may seem that the people who are firmly planted in our governments or hold a high position of power feel this way. I don't agree that this equates to the rest of the population.
Yep, and yet life still finds a way.
Understood.
I have a sister who I love very much and I'm sure I'll have kids who I'll love, but looking six generations down the line, I don't really feel any connection to those people. They, in most cases, won't have any knowledge of (let alone regard for) their ancestors so many centuries removed.
I'm not a selfish person and I care about people all across this Earth... Because of that, it's hard for me to be anymore invested in a lineage that I'll never see anymore than I am the future human population in general.
costanza said:If I only have one life to live, I'm going for it... But 600 years from now??? I just don't see the tragedy in the human species fading from the scene one day.
Yea, the egyptians did have weak batteries whose uses are disputed.
not the egyptians.. they just copied the batteries.. Those were the middle easterners.
Egyptians had filamented lights.. Thats HELLA advanced...
Think where lighting would be now, if that had carried over.
The dark ages literally were dark.
Religious right wing pressure and superstition killed many of the ancient advances.
Take Europe for instance. the romans had the most advanced methods of using water. They had working showers, toilets, saunas, fountains etc. Then Christians came along and called them heathens for wanting to be clean.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet
taz said:Space is gonna be GREAT.. until some right wing nut comes along and does what right wing nuts do.![]()
Understood.
I have a sister who I love very much and I'm sure I'll have kids who I'll love, but looking six generations down the line, I don't really feel any connection to those people. They, in most cases, won't have any knowledge of (let alone regard for) their ancestors so many centuries removed.
I'm not a selfish person and I care about people all across this Earth... Because of that, it's hard for me to be anymore invested in a lineage that I'll never see anymore than I am the future human population in general.