Thats the point I was trying to get across on this thread.
http://www.bgol.us/board/showthread.php?t=489496
They should have never picked up Artest should have kept Ariza.
I made that point right after the Lakers signed Artest and everybody was ready to hand over this years NBA championship to the Lakers.
Some of yall was calling me crazy and a hater, what yall have to say now?Well If the Lakers sign Artest, I would definitely go hard after Ariza, if I were the Celtics or Cavs, personally I think the Lakers become a more stagnant team with Artest as opposed to Ariza, and Ariza presence alone will open up a lot more lanes, on a team with other scores.
The reason why I say this, is because Artest is productive level as the number two or one option is high, the more shots he takes the more involvement level he has, however when he is the third or four option, he tends to daydream on the court, with out a certain amount of touches Artest is a less disciplined player. Ariza on the other hand always plays at a high level of hustle, no matter how little touches he gets, he is also a more consistent outside shooter that does not need to hog the ball to be acurate, plus he is faster, quicker, gets up and drives to the hole better than Artest.
Don't believe me, check out Artest output level with and with out, McGrady.
http://www.bgol.us/board/showthread.php?t=398866&highlight=ron+artest&page=4