oh she did get backlash..
is it thirsty to post a half-naked picture of yourself online? Of course. But this is 2016, who really gives a shit if someone is proud of their body and posts it. A lot of people judged Kim for it, though, because patronizing Kim Kardashian is a form of social currency these days—it’s easy to do and doesn’t cost you anything. She offends certain prudish sensibilities, and engenders pearl-clutching amongst the judgmental Twitterati. These offendees apparently include Bette Midler, Chloe Grace Moretz, and Piers Morgan, who took it upon themselves to throw some online shade at Kim for posting said revealing photo.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...dler-chloe-grace-moretz-and-piers-morgan.html
here's the lesson they learned..NEVER ENGAGE IN SOCIAL MEDIA WITH A SHAME IMPAIRED BITCH WITH NOTHING TO LOSE
Kim can do this shit ALL DAY... its all spectacle that makes her machine work. Any other famous for being famous person usually gets 2-3 years MAX out of it..remember tila teqila? hoops? snooky? shit paris hilton herself... NO ONE is checkin for them bitches today. Kim on the other hand has cracked the code and managed too extend what SHOULD have been 2 -3 years for her into more than a decade. And her shit isn't fading..she getting STRONGER with it.. so talking shit about her doesn't phase her it HELPS her.
Funny, seems like Trump has the same formula down.
Bette Midler's tweet
