Keri Hilson getting killed for Trump tweet: Is she right though ???

[Allister]

Seems she's harkening back to when she made all those tweets and snide posts about Beyonce and ended up getting herself blacklisted from the music industry. She probably thinks this is what happened to her, although, most of what happened to her came from over value in herself, and she's been paying for it ever since.

 

[hocjo2626]

Another smart dumbass that wants to sound profound.

 

[ZuluSam]

She is not kinda right, sorta right or in any way constitutionally right. Full Stop. (as they say now) The 1st amendment protects against infringement by the government. That is all. So in a 1st amendment analysis, the first question is who is abridging the speech? Is it a governmental entity? If the answer is no, then shut the fuck up or suffer the consequences.

 

[Mr. Bitches]

did she say anything when Farrakhan was banned by Twitter?

^^^^ if not she can take a stfu pill!!!

 

[pookie]

There is a difference between an “opinion“ and an outright call for destruction by the so called leader of the USA.

Her perspective is not taking into account that this man's words incited violence and terrorism resulting in the deaths of at least 6 people and they are trying to prevent more mayhem.

A complete moron, this is another case of a celebrity trying to sound deep & thought provoking but failed. She also know what she's doing typing this shit knowing it would grab attention.

‘And I bet if you explained all this her she’d still stick with her original opinion..smh

 

[BrownTurd]

She is right tho

 

[RoomService]

did she say anything when Farrakhan was banned by Twitter?

Thank you!

 

[lionelzeus]

I can't stand these fake deep motherfuckers smh. Idiot this has nothing to do with freedom of speech.
That's like saying yelling fire in a movie theater and causing mass panic is freedom of speech and should go unpunished.

 

[Dr. Truth]

Bitch is an idiot

 

[Hotlantan]

When it comes to deep political thought Cherry Hilson >>> Keri Hilson

 

[mariano42]

Twitter isn't protected under the first amendment I believe.

 

[durham]

Stupid shit. This is about impeding any additional violence. This bitch is dense.

 

[peterlongshort]

For those saying she's right.
those citizens going missing or getting put in jail after criticizing the Chinese government? THAT is suppression of free speech.

Everyone seems to understand that there is certain material that you can get banned for posting HERE ON BGOL because, in the end- this site is HNIC's and he gets to make the rules. And everyone is cool with that.

Is HNIC taking your free speech away? Of course not. He can't arrest you and you are free to go to other websites and post all the bullshit you want.- as long as you don't break their rules.

In that same way, Twitter gets to make its own rules, and when a user breaks them- it is twitter's prerogative to suspend or ban that user. If the user also broke google's rules, amazon's rules, instagram's tik-tok's ect ect .. and even fucking pinterest's ..whelp

it is what it is, but it what it ain't is suppression of free speech.

in fact there is likely a first amendment issue with forcing a private company to carry a government message.

She is not kinda right, sorta right or in any way constitutionally right. Full Stop. (as they say now) The 1st amendment protects against infringement by the government. That is all. So in a 1st amendment analysis, the first question is who is abridging the speech? Is it a governmental entity? If the answer is no, then shut the fuck up or suffer the consequences.

This is why you have antitrust laws. The first amendment argument is a red herring. These companies have too much power.

 

[crossovernegro]

Just a hot chick that doesn't understand that freedom of speech and the freedom to say whatever you want on somebody else's platform aren't the same thing

 

[D24OHA]

What does ‘hands off’ mean? Amazon has made a killing off of the pandemic.

He doesn't tell the WP what to write about and what not to write about.....

Yes he's in the business of making money.....but even the post has criticized Whole Foods and discussed Bezo's alleged affair.....


But you can bet any money Faux news has strict orders against criticizing Murdock

 

[D24OHA]

When it comes to deep political thought Cherry Hilson >>> Keri Hilson

Zod loves Cheri Hilson.....not sure Keri knows his teachings...

 

[footloose]

 

[footloose]

Stupid shit. This is about impeding any additional violence. This bitch is dense.

Exactly like screaming fire in a crowded building. Also illegal

 

[knightmelodic]

Exactly like screaming fire in a crowded building. Also illegal

Beat me to it.

What the fuck happened to civics class in school?

 

[vahustler21757]

Dumb Broad thinks Twitter is a right.........smfh @ the stupidity

 

[55th View]

This shit is so misguided, it doesn't deserve true analysis. She's wrong and my hope is that at least 95% of the people in this thread understand why.

 

[KunningLinguist]

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences of speech.....

That said Keri is beautiful but she must’ve failed civics in high school

 

[cincitystudios]

That bisch sooo fine... I'd tell her, turn that twitter off baby

 

[BrownTurd]

If and when they start blocking BLM, would you have the same stance? That is what she is saying.

If something pop off and we as a culture get busy are you cool with being censored?

 

[Coldchi]

dumb bitch doesnt know what she's talking about.
freedom of speech refers to the govt limiting what u can say........not private companies.
i think she needs to shut the fuck up until she knows the facts about what freedom of speech really is.

 

[TENT]

She is not right. I hope you read the thread and realized this.

She is right tho

 

[King Mob]

She's wrong for the application of the first amendment, already stated in the thread, not for the "anger" that made it a trending topic today.

 

[TENT]

If BLM was even a thing to block. They dont need Twitter to speak.
They can make their own platform to speak if they really want to!

If and when they start blocking BLM, would you have the same stance? That is what she is saying.

If something pop off and we as a culture get busy are you cool with being censored?

 

[TENT]

This whore didn't go to school.

Beat me to it.

What the fuck happened to civics class in school?

 

[TENT]

You can't be hot if you dont have an ass. Bitch is average.

Just a hot chick that doesn't understand that freedom of speech and the freedom to say whatever you want on somebody else's platform aren't the same thing

 

[BrownTurd]

If BLM was even a thing to block. They dont need Twitter to speak.
They can make their own platform to speak if they really want to!

She was saying if people pulled their apps, blocked their servers and other things. This is what she was speaking about. Would you feel the same way if big tech did this to a black movement?

 

[TENT]

Whew!!!!!!!! Brother Footloose. I love it! Excellent post. Right on time.

 

[TENT]

Bitches like her stay single and stay beaten.

 

[Pworld297]

There is a difference between an “opinion“ and an outright call for destruction by the so called leader of the USA.

And this is what they don't get, they be inciting violence and try to claim they just giving their opinion.. Fuck outta here!

 

[gutsdabeast]

She was saying if people pulled their apps, blocked their servers and other things. This is what she was speaking about. Would you feel the same way if big tech did this to a black movement?

Is BLM violating their (the platforms) terms of service?