Juicero The $400 WIFI enabled Juicier.... WTF is this shit..

fonzerrillii

BGOL Elite Poster
Platinum Member
$400 for this... You are out of your GAWD damn mind.



And this crap was $700 dollars when it was a start-up.



So basically if you were going to invest... I would invest in the Cold Press Juice packets. Now that is a good idea.

 
:smh:

I don't really juice enough to justify the cost, but if I was gonna drop that kinda dough, it'd be on an Omega and not this piece of shit.
 
this is a juice company that tricked silicon valley into thinking it was a tech startup via this useless machine.

the "smart" guys in the valley dumped $100m into this bullshit before they realized the machine is useless & u can just squeeze the packs.

Hard-pressed Juicero boss defends $400 IoT juicer after squeezing $120m from investors
Crushed CEO says critics are comparing apples with oranges
simpsonsjuice.jpg

21 Apr 2017 at 05:02, Shaun Nichols
Meet this week's bonkers startup Juicero – the San Francisco maker of a $400 fruit juicer that's bagged $120m in funding from investors.

The internet-connected gizmo has been dubbed the "Keurig for juice." Juicero founder Doug Evans went as far as comparing himself to Steve Jobs.

There's just one little problem with Juicero's "high-tech" machine: it is no better than a pair of human hands.

The idea is that you buy and place sealed bags of cut-up fruit and veg in the bulky contraption, which uses, allegedly, four tons of force to crush the produce into a liquid drink. Or, alternatively, you can skip that mechanical nonsense and just squeeze the fruit bags by hand into a glass and get the same result.

On Thursday, seemingly fed up with days of people sniggering at his company's expense, Juicero CEO Jeff Dunn realized there was nothing else for it. He slapped a pack of Silicon Valley Kool-Aid in one of his juicers, gulped down its gloopy cyber-sap secretion, and started typing:

Last summer when Juicero’s Board and Doug asked me to join Juicero as CEO, it was driven by the recognition that we were launching a totally new long-term approach which would require a tremendous effort to innovate, improve and scale. Juicero’s mission is to make it dramatically easier and more enjoyable to consume more fresh, raw fruits and vegetables, and that’s a really tough nut to crack. It seems simple, but despite everything we’ve done to-date as a food community, we’ve barely moved the needle.

What I love about Juicero is that our team is attacking this issue in a way unlike anything I’ve ever seen. It’s incredible to come to work everyday alongside hardware and software engineers, food scientists, designers, farmer partners, and all our other team members who are committed to building a new way of delivering raw, plant-based nutrition. What we’re building is long-term in nature and requires us to innovate each part of our system — from Press, to Produce Pack, to how we source organic produce directly from farms, to how we deliver the produce to consumers’ doorsteps. It’s hard work and not perfect yet by any measure — getting this right is a process of testing, learning and iterating.

So when I saw this week’s headlines about hacking and hand-squeezing Produce Packs, I had a one overriding thought: ”We know hacking consumer products is nothing new. But how can we better demonstrate the incredible value we know our connected system delivers?”

The value of Juicero is more than a glass of cold-pressed juice. Much more. The value is in how easy it is for a frazzled dad to do something good for himself while getting the kids ready for school, without having to prep ingredients and clean a juicer.

The sum of the system — the Press, Produce Packs and App — working together is what enables a great experience. However, you won’t experience that value by hand-squeezing Produce Packs, which to be clear, contain nothing but fresh, raw, organic chopped produce, not juice. What you will get with hand-squeezed hacks is a mediocre (and maybe very messy) experience that you won’t want to repeat once, let alone every day.

I’m committed to engaging the community in conversation about how we best serve our customers with raw, plant-based nutrition. You can reach me at jeffdunn@juicero.com, so please share your thoughts. I look forward to reading them.

Congratulations for making it this far. You've earned some organic plant-based nutrition, aka a beer. What nobody has bothered to explain is why any of this is preferable to just walking to the fridge and grabbing a bottle of Odwalla. ®

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/21/juicero_boss_defends_juice_startup/
 
Pressing the juice out gives you dramatically better tasting juice then grinding it out? And how is buying pre-cut vegetables healther than cutting them up when you need them?
 
A really good blender is $100...that means I have $300 left over to buy fruits and vegetables.

The really fucked up thing is that this Juicer... only uses their packets and the packets cost 5 to 7 dollars a piece.... and it looks like you get only a Cup of juice for the packet.

It would be cheaper to save up and buy your own Juice Bar.
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/4634c39c-b304-3ce6-a7a8-00d721ea63c5/juicero-offering-refunds-to.html


Juicero offering refunds to all customers after people realize $400 juicer is totally
unnecessary

Juicero is offering all of its customers the option to return their juicer for a full refund within the next 30 days, even if they bought it as far back as when the product launched a year ago.

The offer comes after Bloomberg published a story yesterday pointing out that the packs of pre-cut fruits and vegetables that Juicero’s very expensive juicer was designed to press don’t actually need to be placed in the juicer — it turns out, they can be squeezed by hand.


While Juicero’s product was always going to be unnecessary insofar as it was a ridiculous, Wi-Fi-connected, luxury juicer, the fact that it isn’t even needed to create the juice makes the product truly unnecessary.

Juicero’s CEO, Jeff Dunn, who over took the position in November, posted a response on Medium today arguing that “The value of Juicero is more than a glass of cold-pressed juice. Much more.”


He goes on to outline two scenarios where Juicero would be valuable. One involves someone drinking juice, the other involves someone getting a notification to remind them to drink juice before their juice packs expire and their internet-connected juicer refuses to press them.

To prove that Juicero isn’t just selling packages of juice, and is really putting fruits and vegetables in its packages, Dunn also posted this video of what it looks like when you tear into one:
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/4634c39c-b304-3ce6-a7a8-00d721ea63c5/juicero-offering-refunds-to.html


Juicero offering refunds to all customers after people realize $400 juicer is totally
unnecessary

Juicero is offering all of its customers the option to return their juicer for a full refund within the next 30 days, even if they bought it as far back as when the product launched a year ago.

The offer comes after Bloomberg published a story yesterday pointing out that the packs of pre-cut fruits and vegetables that Juicero’s very expensive juicer was designed to press don’t actually need to be placed in the juicer — it turns out, they can be squeezed by hand.


While Juicero’s product was always going to be unnecessary insofar as it was a ridiculous, Wi-Fi-connected, luxury juicer, the fact that it isn’t even needed to create the juice makes the product truly unnecessary.

Juicero’s CEO, Jeff Dunn, who over took the position in November, posted a response on Medium today arguing that “The value of Juicero is more than a glass of cold-pressed juice. Much more.”


He goes on to outline two scenarios where Juicero would be valuable. One involves someone drinking juice, the other involves someone getting a notification to remind them to drink juice before their juice packs expire and their internet-connected juicer refuses to press them.

To prove that Juicero isn’t just selling packages of juice, and is really putting fruits and vegetables in its packages, Dunn also posted this video of what it looks like when you tear into one:

:lol::roflmao2::roflmao2::roflmao3:
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/4634c39c-b304-3ce6-a7a8-00d721ea63c5/juicero-offering-refunds-to.html


Juicero offering refunds to all customers after people realize $400 juicer is totally
unnecessary

Juicero is offering all of its customers the option to return their juicer for a full refund within the next 30 days, even if they bought it as far back as when the product launched a year ago.

The offer comes after Bloomberg published a story yesterday pointing out that the packs of pre-cut fruits and vegetables that Juicero’s very expensive juicer was designed to press don’t actually need to be placed in the juicer — it turns out, they can be squeezed by hand.


While Juicero’s product was always going to be unnecessary insofar as it was a ridiculous, Wi-Fi-connected, luxury juicer, the fact that it isn’t even needed to create the juice makes the product truly unnecessary.

Juicero’s CEO, Jeff Dunn, who over took the position in November, posted a response on Medium today arguing that “The value of Juicero is more than a glass of cold-pressed juice. Much more.”


He goes on to outline two scenarios where Juicero would be valuable. One involves someone drinking juice, the other involves someone getting a notification to remind them to drink juice before their juice packs expire and their internet-connected juicer refuses to press them.

To prove that Juicero isn’t just selling packages of juice, and is really putting fruits and vegetables in its packages, Dunn also posted this video of what it looks like when you tear into one:

Oh SHIT....:lol::lol::lol:
 
Would have loved to see this shit on Shark Tank. They can be dicks but they would have had a field day ripping this shit apart!
 
Silicon Valley’s $400 Juicer May Be Feeling the Squeeze
Two investors in Juicero were surprised to learn the startup’s juice packs could be squeezed by hand without using its high-tech machine.
by
Ellen Huet
and
Olivia Zaleski
April 19, 2017, 4:00 AM CDT

One of the most lavishly funded gadget startups in Silicon Valley last year was Juicero Inc. It makes a juice machine. The product was an unlikely pick for top technology investors, but they were drawn to the idea of an internet-connected device that transforms single-serving packets of chopped fruits and vegetables into a refreshing and healthy beverage.

Doug Evans, the company’s founder, would compare himself with Steve Jobs in his pursuit of juicing perfection. He declared that his juice press wields four tons of force—“enough to lift two Teslas,” he said. Google’s venture capital arm and other backers poured about $120 million into the startup. Juicero sells the machine for $400, plus the cost of individual juice packs delivered weekly. Tech blogs have dubbed it a “Keurig for juice.”

But after the product hit the market, some investors were surprised to discover a much cheaper alternative: You can squeeze the Juicero bags with your bare hands. Two backers said the final device was bulkier than what was originally pitched and that they were puzzled to find that customers could achieve similar results without it. Bloomberg performed its own press test, pitting a Juicero machine against a reporter’s grip. The experiment found that squeezing the bag yields nearly the same amount of juice just as quickly—and in some cases, faster—than using the device.

Juicero declined to comment. A person close to the company said Juicero is aware the packs can be squeezed by hand but that most people would prefer to use the machine because the process is more consistent and less messy. The device also reads a QR code printed on the back of each produce pack and checks the source against an online database to ensure the contents haven’t expired or been recalled, the person said. The expiration date is also printed on the pack.

-999x-999.gif

The creator of Juicero is something of a luminary in the world of juicing. In 2002, Evans helped start Organic Avenue, a chain of juice bars selling cold-press concoctions in glass jars. The New York franchise drew rave reviews from the likes of Gwyneth Paltrow. After working on the business for a decade, Evans sold controlling interest to an investor, who pushed him out. The company lumbered toward bankruptcy as Evans got to work on his next project.

Evans, 50, follows a diet of mostly raw, vegan foods. Technology was a new thing for him, but he picked it up quickly. He said he spent about three years building a dozen prototypes before devising Juicero’s patent-pending press. In an interview with technology website Recode, he likened his work to the invention of a mainstream personal computer by Apple’s Jobs. “There are 400 custom parts in here,” Evans told Recode. “There’s a scanner; there’s a microprocessor; there’s a wireless chip, wireless antenna.”

In fundraising meetings, Evans promised a revolutionary machine capable of squeezing large chunks of fruits and vegetables, said two people who agreed to invest in the company. Evans secured funding in 2014 by showing 3D-printed renderings of the product without a working prototype, said the people, who asked not to be identified because they signed nondisclosure agreements.

Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers joined Alphabet Inc. and others in funding Juicero. Evans’s subscription model had hit on a sweet spot for venture capitalists, said Brian Frank, who invests in food-tech companies through his FTW Ventures fund. The successes of Nespresso and Dollar Shave Club have made VCs eager to chase such deals, he said. “Investors are very intrigued by businesses that combine the one-time sale of hardware that ends up leading to repeat purchases of consumable packages,” said Frank, who doesn’t own Juicero shares.

But after the product’s introduction last year, at least two Juicero investors were taken aback after finding the packs could be squeezed by hand. They also said the machine was much bigger than what Evans had proposed. One of the investors said they were frustrated with how the company didn’t deliver on the original pitch and that their venture firm wouldn’t have met with Evans if he were hawking bags of juice that didn’t require high-priced hardware. Juicero didn’t broadly disclose to investors or employees that packs can be hand squeezed, said four people with knowledge of the matter.

Doug Chertok, a Juicero investor, said he figured it out on his own. “There is no doubt the packs can be squeezed without the machine,” he said. “I’m still a huge fan.” Chertok, whose Vast Ventures is also a backer of popular organic restaurant chain Sweetgreen, said Juicero’s approach to delivering cheap organic produce could be valuable. He said the company is a “platform” for a new model of food delivery, where fresh fruits and veggies are delivered regularly to the home. “Juicero is still figuring out its sweet spot,” he said. “I have no doubt that they’ll be very successful.”

Built on the promise of technology, Juicero was among the top-funded U.S. hardware startups in 2016. But in October, Evans was replaced as chief executive officer by Jeff Dunn, a former president at Coca-Cola Co. A few months later, Juicero dropped the price of the machine to $400 from $700. “It’s very difficult to differentiate yourself in the food and beverage sector,” said Kurt Jetta, who runs retail and consumer data firm Tabs Analytics. “Entrepreneurs may be tempted to have a technology angle when it’s not really there.”

Evans is now chairman of the startup’s board. The company sells produce packs for $5 to $8 but limits sales to owners of Juicero hardware. The products were only available in three states until Tuesday, when the company expanded to 17. Packs can’t be shipped long distances because the contents are perishable.

Juicero has managed to find a niche at high-end hotels and restaurants. Workers from seven businesses that own Juicero machines said they like the product because the disposable packs can be discarded with minimal cleanup. All seven said they didn’t know Juicero packs could be squeezed by hand. In Bloomberg’s squeeze tests, hands did the job quicker, but the device was slightly more thorough. Reporters were able to wring 7.5 ounces of juice in a minute and a half. The machine yielded 8 ounces in about two minutes.

Kippy Williams, owner of Kippy’s Organic Non-Dairy Ice Cream Shop in Los Angeles and Toyko, said she purchased her Juicero late last year for $1,200. (Juicero charges businesses a premium, she said.) Williams, a self-proclaimed health-food evangelist, said she’d like to see the company sell packs by themselves to people who can’t afford the device. “It would be great if they offered people the opportunity to buy the packs and press them by hand,” she said. “I want juice for every man, woman and child.”

http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/i-just-love-this-juicero-story-so-much-1794459898
 
I kept looking for the onion link.
You know right....

18736666-Business-People-Having-Board-Meeting-In-Modern-Office-Stock-Photo.jpg


"A juicer that squeezes packets of juice for you! Now I know you're thinking 'Retarded', 'Redundant', 'I have hands', 'Isn't that what a Capri Sun is?', and 'Bitch you going to get us all fired!', but I'm thinking we're onto something...I'm thinking a paradigm shift.."

one-year-02.jpg


unhappy-fired-business-people-holding-box-office-54252664.jpg


*two cents*
 
Back
Top