Who cares it's not like he has a security clearance or hangs at the WH, just another crazy politician's kid.
JAN 6 COMMITTEE FINAL PUBLIC HEARING MONDAY 12/19- They're making a list & Liz is checking it twice, criminal referrals on the way, MERRY XMAS BITCHES
- Thread starter lightbright
- Start date
Who cares it's not like he has a security clearance or hangs at the WH, just another crazy politician's kid.
I don't think shit is on. Good luck trying to get his orange ass to testify. But that did make my day!
The best way to get his dumbass in there to talk, would have been if one of them had looked directly into the camera and told Trump that the ratings would be higher than the Moon Landing if he came in.
All you got to do is stroke his ego and that ignorant mofo is jelly in your hands.
At the job we have a slang term for that.... "fondling"..... tell a motherfucker anything that he likes to hear to get him to do what you wanted him to do, to get your agenda accomplished
What is interesting about today’s hearing was that they focused on how much advanced notice law enforcement had on what was too go down.
Mofos were all over the internet talking shit and making threats against politicians and whoever they thought was in their way.
If my Black Ass made one threat anywhere on the internet against the Government right now, within a hour the police will be kicking in my front door with a “No Knock Warrant”, guns drawn with dogs and MRAPS.
By the time the sun went down, I would be sitting in Guantanamo Bay before I knew what happened.
Mofos were all over the internet talking shit and making threats against politicians and whoever they thought was in their way.
If my Black Ass made one threat anywhere on the internet against the Government right now, within a hour the police will be kicking in my front door with a “No Knock Warrant”, guns drawn with dogs and MRAPS.
By the time the sun went down, I would be sitting in Guantanamo Bay before I knew what happened.
Pelosi is cool as hell under pressure. I know folks wanted her out of power, but she is one of my favs. She always had Obama's back when he was in office and held the House together in all those votes and when Trump tried to shut down the government and get dems to cave.
Pelosi was calling everybody and she was calm
^^^^^^
Speaker of the House Pelosi (D) was looking like a leader during the insurrection.
When Sen. Josh Hawley (R) was running like a little bitch during the insurrection.
Who on this forum says Republicans are better than Democrats?
HaHa!!!
Pelosi said in new Jan. 6 video she wanted to 'punch' Trump out
The House speaker said she wanted Trump to come to the Capitol so that she could "punch him out." She added, "And I’m going to go to jail, and I’m going to be happy.”
By Rebecca Shabad
Oct. 14, 2022, 6:53 AM PDT
www.nbcnews.com
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said on the day of the attack on the U.S. Capitol that she hoped then-President Donald Trump would come to the complex so that she could "punch him out."
Pelosi's daughter, documentary filmmaker Alexandra Pelosi, captured the moment and many others on Jan. 6 in footage shot for HBO and first obtained by CNN. It aired a few hours after the House select committee investigating the attack played other clips from the footage during its ninth hearing Thursday.
"Tell him if he comes here, we’re going to the White House," the speaker jokes, reacting to Trump's speech at the White House ellipse earlier in the day.
Another clip shows Pelosi speaking to her staff as a crowd began to amass at the Capitol. In it, Pelosi's chief of staff, Terri McCullough, informs the speaker that the Secret Service had "dissuaded" Trump from coming to Capitol Hill to join his supporters.
"They told him they don't have the resources to protect him here," McCullough says. "So at the moment, he is not coming, but that could change."
"I hope he comes," Pelosi responds. "I want to punch him out. This is my moment. I’ve been waiting for this. For trespassing on the Capitol grounds. I want to punch him out, and I’m going to go to jail, and I’m going to be happy."
The video aired by CNN showed other clips, similar to those played during the hearing, featuring Pelosi and other congressional leaders as they scrambled to get help as the Capitol was under siege.
The montage presented during the hearing showed congressional leaders pleading for help from governors, the acting secretary of defense and the acting attorney general as rioters attacked the Capitol.
"I’m going to call up the effing secretary of DoD," then-Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in the montage, referring to the Department of Defense, while sitting with Pelosi in an undisclosed room at 3 p.m. The two Democratic leaders were seen calling then-acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller on Schumer’s flip phone, requesting a “massive” response.
The video at the hearing also showed Pelosi speaking to Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam in which she wondered if he could deploy his state’s National Guard troops to the Capitol. She told Northam that House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., was making the same request of Maryland's Gov. Larry Hogan. Schumer and Pelosi were also seen on the phone with acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen asking for him to get Trump to call off his supporters.
“Why don’t you get the president to tell them to leave the Capitol, Mr. Attorney General, in your law enforcement responsibility — a public statement they should all leave?” Schumer said.
The footage also showed Pelosi speaking to Vice President Mike Pence by phone two separate times that day about how they could resume the certification of the 2020 election results.
Eventually, members returned to the Capitol at at little after 7 p.m. to finish the process.
Pelosi and Trump had a highly strained relationship throughout his presidency, which included the moment in 2019 when she and other Democratic leaders walked out of a White House meeting with Trump after he had what Pelosi described as a "meltdown." At the end of Trump's third State of the Union address in 2020, Pelosi famously ripped up a copy of his address.
SoH Nancy Pelosi (D) Says She Will ‘Punch’ Trump And Happily ‘Go To Jail’ In New Capitol Jan. 6th Footage
The House speaker said she wanted Trump to come to the Capitol so that she could "punch him out." She added, "And I’m going to go to jail, and I’m going to be happy.”
By Rebecca Shabad
Oct. 14, 2022, 6:53 AM PDT
Pelosi said in new Jan. 6 video she wanted to 'punch' Trump out
The House speaker said she wanted Trump to come to the Capitol so that she could "punch him out." She added, "And I’m going to go to jail, and I’m going to be happy.”
www.nbcnews.com
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said on the day of the attack on the U.S. Capitol that she hoped then-President Donald Trump would come to the complex so that she could "punch him out."
Pelosi's daughter, documentary filmmaker Alexandra Pelosi, captured the moment and many others on Jan. 6 in footage shot for HBO and first obtained by CNN. It aired a few hours after the House select committee investigating the attack played other clips from the footage during its ninth hearing Thursday.
"Tell him if he comes here, we’re going to the White House," the speaker jokes, reacting to Trump's speech at the White House ellipse earlier in the day.
Another clip shows Pelosi speaking to her staff as a crowd began to amass at the Capitol. In it, Pelosi's chief of staff, Terri McCullough, informs the speaker that the Secret Service had "dissuaded" Trump from coming to Capitol Hill to join his supporters.
"They told him they don't have the resources to protect him here," McCullough says. "So at the moment, he is not coming, but that could change."
"I hope he comes," Pelosi responds. "I want to punch him out. This is my moment. I’ve been waiting for this. For trespassing on the Capitol grounds. I want to punch him out, and I’m going to go to jail, and I’m going to be happy."
The video aired by CNN showed other clips, similar to those played during the hearing, featuring Pelosi and other congressional leaders as they scrambled to get help as the Capitol was under siege.
The montage presented during the hearing showed congressional leaders pleading for help from governors, the acting secretary of defense and the acting attorney general as rioters attacked the Capitol.
"I’m going to call up the effing secretary of DoD," then-Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in the montage, referring to the Department of Defense, while sitting with Pelosi in an undisclosed room at 3 p.m. The two Democratic leaders were seen calling then-acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller on Schumer’s flip phone, requesting a “massive” response.
The video at the hearing also showed Pelosi speaking to Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam in which she wondered if he could deploy his state’s National Guard troops to the Capitol. She told Northam that House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., was making the same request of Maryland's Gov. Larry Hogan. Schumer and Pelosi were also seen on the phone with acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen asking for him to get Trump to call off his supporters.
“Why don’t you get the president to tell them to leave the Capitol, Mr. Attorney General, in your law enforcement responsibility — a public statement they should all leave?” Schumer said.
The footage also showed Pelosi speaking to Vice President Mike Pence by phone two separate times that day about how they could resume the certification of the 2020 election results.
Eventually, members returned to the Capitol at at little after 7 p.m. to finish the process.
Pelosi and Trump had a highly strained relationship throughout his presidency, which included the moment in 2019 when she and other Democratic leaders walked out of a White House meeting with Trump after he had what Pelosi described as a "meltdown." At the end of Trump's third State of the Union address in 2020, Pelosi famously ripped up a copy of his address.
SoH Nancy Pelosi (D) Says She Will ‘Punch’ Trump And Happily ‘Go To Jail’ In New Capitol Jan. 6th Footage
No matter what occurred that day, the maga voters believe that the democrats' policies are ruining their nation.
Daily Kos
Daily Kos is a progressive news site that fights for democracy by giving our audience information and resources to win elections and impact government. Our coverage is assiduously factual, ethical, and unapologetically liberal. We amplify what we think is important, with the proper context—not...
This will also be a major piece of evidence in the Fani Willis investigation in Georgia
Judge orders more Eastman emails released, citing fraud pushed by Trump
A California-based federal judge ordered a legal adviser to President Trump to turn over records tied to Jan. 6 to the House committee investigating the attack, finding the communications were not protected since they likely were exchanged in furtherance of a crime.
Included in the emails is evidence that Trump pushed ahead in court with voter fraud claims he knew were inaccurate — details certain to be of interest to the House select committee.
Judge David Carter ordered John Eastman, who crafted two memos for the Trump campaign detailing methods to resist certifying President Biden’s victory, to turn over some 33 documents to the House panel.
That includes eight documents the judge said related to crimes of obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy to defraud the United States.
Carter previously found in March that it was more likely than not that Trump committed crimes as part of his plot to stay in power.
Wednesday’s ruling highlights an email among Trump’s lawyers specifically related to conspiracy to defraud.
One email from Eastman notes Trump was told that a December suit filed in Georgia claiming that unregistered voters and dead people voted in the election there may not have accurate numbers — relaying that concern before the campaign escalated the matter to a federal court.
“Although the President signed a verification for [the state court filing] back on Dec. 1, he has since been made aware that some of the allegations (and evidence proffered by the experts) has been inaccurate. For him to sign a new verification with that knowledge (and incorporation by reference) would not be accurate,” Eastman said.
“President Trump and his attorneys ultimately filed the complaint with the same inaccurate numbers without rectifying, clarifying, or otherwise changing them,” Carter wrote. “President Trump, moreover, signed a verification swearing under oath that the incorporated, inaccurate numbers ‘are true and correct’ or ‘believed to be true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.’”
“The emails show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public. The Court finds that these emails are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States.”
The ruling likewise notes that four emails from Eastman and other attorneys “suggest that — irrespective of the merits — the primary goal of filing is to delay or otherwise disrupt the January 6 vote.”
One such email claimed that having litigation before the Supreme Court could aid the campaign’s efforts in Georgia.
“This email, read in context with other documents in this review, make clear that President Trump filed certain lawsuits not to obtain legal relief, but to disrupt or delay the January 6 congressional proceedings through the courts,” Carter wrote.
The ruling from the court — and the emails about Trump’s knowledge ahead of court activity — comes shortly after the House committee held its likely final hearing, dedicating much of its time to share new evidence that Trump knew he lost the 2020 election.
The presentation included new testimony from former aides to Trump, including Alyssa Farah Griffin, the former White House director of strategic communications, who said she entered the Oval Office after the election to hear Trump say, “Can you believe I lost to this effing guy?”
The committee also offered new details about the extent Trump planned to claim he had won the 2020 contest on election night regardless of the results, including testimony from former campaign manager Brad Parscale that he planned to do so as far back as July.
Judge orders more Eastman emails released, citing fraud pushed by Trump | The Hill
Judge orders more Eastman emails released, citing fraud pushed by Trump
A California-based federal judge ordered a legal adviser to President Trump to turn over records tied to Jan. 6 to the House committee investigating the attack, finding the communications were not protected since they likely were exchanged in furtherance of a crime.
Included in the emails is evidence that Trump pushed ahead in court with voter fraud claims he knew were inaccurate — details certain to be of interest to the House select committee.
Judge David Carter ordered John Eastman, who crafted two memos for the Trump campaign detailing methods to resist certifying President Biden’s victory, to turn over some 33 documents to the House panel.
That includes eight documents the judge said related to crimes of obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy to defraud the United States.
Carter previously found in March that it was more likely than not that Trump committed crimes as part of his plot to stay in power.
Wednesday’s ruling highlights an email among Trump’s lawyers specifically related to conspiracy to defraud.
One email from Eastman notes Trump was told that a December suit filed in Georgia claiming that unregistered voters and dead people voted in the election there may not have accurate numbers — relaying that concern before the campaign escalated the matter to a federal court.
“Although the President signed a verification for [the state court filing] back on Dec. 1, he has since been made aware that some of the allegations (and evidence proffered by the experts) has been inaccurate. For him to sign a new verification with that knowledge (and incorporation by reference) would not be accurate,” Eastman said.
“President Trump and his attorneys ultimately filed the complaint with the same inaccurate numbers without rectifying, clarifying, or otherwise changing them,” Carter wrote. “President Trump, moreover, signed a verification swearing under oath that the incorporated, inaccurate numbers ‘are true and correct’ or ‘believed to be true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.’”
“The emails show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public. The Court finds that these emails are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States.”
The ruling likewise notes that four emails from Eastman and other attorneys “suggest that — irrespective of the merits — the primary goal of filing is to delay or otherwise disrupt the January 6 vote.”
One such email claimed that having litigation before the Supreme Court could aid the campaign’s efforts in Georgia.
“This email, read in context with other documents in this review, make clear that President Trump filed certain lawsuits not to obtain legal relief, but to disrupt or delay the January 6 congressional proceedings through the courts,” Carter wrote.
The ruling from the court — and the emails about Trump’s knowledge ahead of court activity — comes shortly after the House committee held its likely final hearing, dedicating much of its time to share new evidence that Trump knew he lost the 2020 election.
The presentation included new testimony from former aides to Trump, including Alyssa Farah Griffin, the former White House director of strategic communications, who said she entered the Oval Office after the election to hear Trump say, “Can you believe I lost to this effing guy?”
The committee also offered new details about the extent Trump planned to claim he had won the 2020 contest on election night regardless of the results, including testimony from former campaign manager Brad Parscale that he planned to do so as far back as July.
Judge orders more Eastman emails released, citing fraud pushed by Trump | The Hill
Trump taps firm to handle his Jan. 6 committee subpoena
The firm, the Dhillon Law Group, has handled litigation for other Jan. 6 select committee witnesses.
While Donald Trump has publicly flirted with the prospect of voluntarily appearing before the select committee, it is unlikely that the panel could force him to appear if he opts to challenge their subpoena.
Former President Donald Trump has hired a firm to engage with the Jan. 6 select committee on its forthcoming subpoena of him, POLITICO has learned.
The firm, The Dhillon Law Group, already represents multiple witnesses who have appeared before the committee, including former national security adviser Michael Flynn, Trump ally Seb Gorka and Women for America First co-founder Amy Kremer. A person familiar with the situation said it is now being tasked with negotiating the terms of the Trump subpoena, which the committee voted to issue last week.
The committee’s chair, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), has not yet issued the document to Trump or his attorneys.
Harmeet Dhillon, the firm’s managing partner, is a national Republican committeewoman from California. She has helmed litigation related to other conservative causes including pushing back on policies that shut down schools, churches and businesses during the Covid pandemic. Dhillon has also been critical of previous select committee and Justice Department grand jury subpoenas to her other clients.
A spokesperson for the select committee declined to comment.
The committee’s vice chair, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), indicated that the subpoena would demand Trump’s testimony and also relevant documents about his involvement in the events that preceded the Jan. 6 attack by a pro-Trump mob on the Capitol. Among the remaining questions is when and how it will be delivered.
“I think we have made it clear … [the subpoena] will be coming,” panel member Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) said Wednesday evening on CNN. “Nothing’s changed on that front. And we will see where we go from here.”
The committee has spent recent months detailing its case that Trump is singularly responsible for the violence that occurred that day, fomenting his supporters’ fury by stoking false claims of election fraud and engineering multiple efforts to subvert Joe Biden’s victory and disrupt the transfer of power.
While Trump has publicly flirted with the prospect of voluntarily appearing before the select committee, it is unlikely that the panel could force him to appear if he opts to challenge their subpoena. Only one former president has been subpoenaed by lawmakers in the last 150 years. That was Harry Truman in 1953, and he declined to appear, citing a potential encroachment on the separation of powers.
Any litigation over the issue could take years to resolve, and the select committee is set to dissolve by Jan. 3, 2023 when the current Congress ends.
Trump taps firm to handle his Jan. 6 committee subpoena - POLITICO
The firm, the Dhillon Law Group, has handled litigation for other Jan. 6 select committee witnesses.
While Donald Trump has publicly flirted with the prospect of voluntarily appearing before the select committee, it is unlikely that the panel could force him to appear if he opts to challenge their subpoena.
Former President Donald Trump has hired a firm to engage with the Jan. 6 select committee on its forthcoming subpoena of him, POLITICO has learned.
The firm, The Dhillon Law Group, already represents multiple witnesses who have appeared before the committee, including former national security adviser Michael Flynn, Trump ally Seb Gorka and Women for America First co-founder Amy Kremer. A person familiar with the situation said it is now being tasked with negotiating the terms of the Trump subpoena, which the committee voted to issue last week.
The committee’s chair, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), has not yet issued the document to Trump or his attorneys.
Harmeet Dhillon, the firm’s managing partner, is a national Republican committeewoman from California. She has helmed litigation related to other conservative causes including pushing back on policies that shut down schools, churches and businesses during the Covid pandemic. Dhillon has also been critical of previous select committee and Justice Department grand jury subpoenas to her other clients.
A spokesperson for the select committee declined to comment.
The committee’s vice chair, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), indicated that the subpoena would demand Trump’s testimony and also relevant documents about his involvement in the events that preceded the Jan. 6 attack by a pro-Trump mob on the Capitol. Among the remaining questions is when and how it will be delivered.
“I think we have made it clear … [the subpoena] will be coming,” panel member Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) said Wednesday evening on CNN. “Nothing’s changed on that front. And we will see where we go from here.”
The committee has spent recent months detailing its case that Trump is singularly responsible for the violence that occurred that day, fomenting his supporters’ fury by stoking false claims of election fraud and engineering multiple efforts to subvert Joe Biden’s victory and disrupt the transfer of power.
While Trump has publicly flirted with the prospect of voluntarily appearing before the select committee, it is unlikely that the panel could force him to appear if he opts to challenge their subpoena. Only one former president has been subpoenaed by lawmakers in the last 150 years. That was Harry Truman in 1953, and he declined to appear, citing a potential encroachment on the separation of powers.
Any litigation over the issue could take years to resolve, and the select committee is set to dissolve by Jan. 3, 2023 when the current Congress ends.
Trump taps firm to handle his Jan. 6 committee subpoena - POLITICO
Similar threads
