Is the media to blame?

Cinamiss

Potential Star
To what extent are journalists, editors, and the owners of media business to blame for the fact that the average American is often uninformed about and uninterested in politics
I think the total influence of the media can be relevant to an individual's decision to invest effort in political matters. Although political policies hold tremendous sway over matters important to many individuals, journalists, editors and owners of the media can have a big effect on the public opinion.

Many Americans are not interested in the charade of politics due to the media effects. A more interesting question is why do people avoid politics? More often than not, the media will use attack journalism by taking political discussions and degenerating them into personal attacks. When people witness the assassination of a person’s character, they are very discouraged. This is why many Americans tend to derive their political opinions from their own personal experiences. Some people can see right through the priming and framing that goes on when political stories that have taken event are presented and they are turned off by this scandalous behavior. Yellow journalism also has a great impact on what many Americans believe. It is perceived that people with big money control politicians, something that some people may not have. These interpreters of news also give the impression that the ideal system of politics lets essentially everyone in a society do their work and live their lives without having to spend undue effort managing the government. Filtering is another tactic media outlets use to influence how Americans view politics and it can tend to make people think that their current situations cannot be changed and their opinions don’t matter.

Taking information from these sources that lead with anterior motives can impose a certain political belief causing by product of theory. Some Americans will follow what the media says the same the same way some people will blindly follow a religion. What it boils down to is many really don’t know where to stand on some issues because they are exposed to an image which is embedded in their heads by the media of conservatives yelling one thing and liberals yelling another and all of the arguments make sense or none of them make sense. This can be very confusing and lead a person to become indecisive on who they should believe which cause people to not side with any political party, but they do hold opinions on taxes, beer prices, speed limits and other things. These things are in fact the result of political decisions and some people may not even realize it.:cool:
<O:p</O:p
 
I think they're primarily responsible for the dumbing down of the American populace and the general electorate. To do real journalism, would take money and the willingness to take on their corporate masters.
 
media is not to blame the people r to blame stop pointing the finger at the media n start pointing it at ur self for not looking up something ur self there r other sources of media out there people should look at.
 
media is not to blame the people r to blame stop pointing the finger at the media n start pointing it at ur self for not looking up something ur self there r other sources of media out there people should look at.

They are absolutely to blame. While there are more sources of media (we're using one), it's the job of journalist to clearly call balls and strikes, truth and lies, so that the public is honestly and completely informed. They have failed in that regard. Having more sources is meaningless if there's no one to say who's lying and who's not.
 
They are absolutely to blame. While there are more sources of media (we're using one), it's the job of journalist to clearly call balls and strikes, truth and lies, so that the public is honestly and completely informed. They have failed in that regard. Having more sources is meaningless if there's no one to say who's lying and who's not.


True

As a part of filtering they all agree on what to and what not to put out as a whole
I forget the term for it
 
True

As a part of filtering they all agree on what to and what not to put out as a whole
I forget the term for it

You see what I'm saying. You posted the article on the Miranda decision but where is it on the major news outlets? Where are the so-called "conservatives" who crow so loudly about protecting the Constitution for that matter?
The oil leak in the Gulf is a major story but the 24 hour newscycle allows for them to focus on more than one thing at a time. Just for the network I watch, MSNBC, if Rachel Maddow is doing her show live from the Gulf and doing a very thorough job of examining the many aspects of it, why do Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews and "Morning Joe" have to dedicate whole shows to it as well in light of all the other things going on? The only other stories getting any play on MSNBC have been the Israel situation and a little bit of the Sestak situation.
 
Having more sources is meaningless if there's no one to say who's lying and who's not.

thats not true its even better now u have the option to pick which one best suites u if people would just stop watching the 10 o'clock local news n go to russiatoday,BBC news or other media it would be better
never trust an american news cast they r paid to give u news that r not important they all have that FCC rules that the public should not know
 
thats not true its even better now u have the option to pick which one best suites u if people would just stop watching the 10 o'clock local news n go to russiatoday,BBC news or other media it would be better
never trust an american news cast they r paid to give u news that r not important they all have that FCC rules that the public should not know

That's the thing and you're backing up my point. Now people go to the source that already confirms what they believe, whether they're truthful or not. I like Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow but if Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh or Wolf Blitzer or even John Steward was outing them as liars and hypocrites on a nightly basis, I'd stop watching because they wouldn't be credible. I've found that I'm in the minority in that regard.

Those sites listed are good but they don't help me with my own local issues, that's what local outlets (tv, radio, internet) are for and tv is still the primary purveyor of information which should make the way networks cover news even more important.

Everyone is ignorant of something, that's human nature. But people have to be able to go somewhere to get honest and complete information. There are still millions of people who don't have easy internet access. There are still millions that don't even have cable (or satellite). They have to get their news from network tv and local newspapers. If they're getting half truths, that's not their fault, it's the fault of the media they use. You don't know what you don't know.
 
Back
Top