Is Sarah Palin Committing Treason? Actinanass Address This

[thoughtone]

*still think that shit is in syria .

And OJ thinks he going to find the real murderer!

If all else fails...

 

[Lamarr]

And tell the whole story; GW based his evidence on evidence that his administration fabricated.

I told the story, I said he even had Colin at the UN lyin

Your paraphrase is disingenuous.

perhaps, but you must admit the shit happened quick as hell

(This proves that Obama was the correct choice over Hillary.)

If the end result is the same, Was there really a "Choice"?

 

[actinanass]

And OJ thinks he going to find the real murderer!

If all else fails...

out of all that I said, this is the only thing you can comment on?

 

[QueEx]

What about me? I'm am clearly behind the president and I have issues with this. President Obama, ever since the mid terms has appeared to buy in to the republicans line of we are broke, we don't have the money for this and that, we need to have shared sacrifice. On top of that, he made his presentation to the American people during the campaign that he would not take the same path on foreign conflicts as GW, which was a long line of incorrect, in my opinion, of presidential maneuvers usurping conditional procedures over the last 35 years. Now you justify President Obama's actions by saying that the previous presidents that, from what I may be incorrectly judging, you didn't agree when they were in similar situations. In what case is their the change we can believe in?

I had my mini-rant the other day; today, I'm cooling it. You're right, you've been behind the Prez and as I look back I realize that you might just be one of those Anti-War buffs. LOL - no pun intended. I understand, I think, where the A/W's are coming from and I mean no disrespect to them and their cause. I just feel differently.

I don't look at campaign rhetoric as some kind of absolute promise or a predictor. I think most tend to mean what they say, but there are just too got damn many variables for one answer, or for one promise, etc., to be a "Fit-All". Even them big-ass "Fit-All" drawers/pants that Oprah's character in the Color Purple made, looked like shit and still didn't fit every sized ass, at least not well. LOL.

My point, in the law, as it is in life in general, almost every general rule has an exception; change one small element of the facts and the general rule has to bend, change, be remolded -- to fit that nuance. So, insofar as the President having said he would follow a particular path, for the sake of argument, I'll take him at his word an say, I intend to hold you to it. I know that in reality, however, that given a particular set of facts, the result may be different, and it should. Nuance.


QueEx

 

[QueEx]

P.S.

What about . . . presidential maneuvers usurping conditional procedures over the last 35 years.

All I can say is, this thing may not be as clear as many portray it to be. I wish I had the time to break down in layman's some of what I consider to be complex Constitutional issues, but I just don't or haven't Hopefully I will soon. Then again, maybe they're just complex to me.

QueEx

 

[thoughtone]

out of all that I said, this is the only thing you can comment on?

Only the truly foolish, gullible and or blind Kool-Aid drinkersstill hang on to the *still think that shit is in syria" fantasy!

 

[thoughtone]

I had my mini-rant the other day; today, I'm cooling it. You're right, you've been behind the Prez and as I look back I realize that you might just be one of those Anti-War buffs. LOL - no pun intended. I understand, I think, where the A/W's are coming from and I mean no disrespect to them and their cause. I just feel differently.

I don't look at campaign rhetoric as some kind of absolute promise or a predictor. I think most tend to mean what they say, but there are just too got damn many variables for one answer, or for one promise, etc., to be a "Fit-All". Even them big-ass "Fit-All" drawers/pants that Oprah's character in the Color Purple made, looked like shit and still didn't fit every sized ass, at least not well. LOL.

My point, in the law, as it is in life in general, almost every general rule has an exception; change one small element of the facts and the general rule has to bend, change, be remolded -- to fit that nuance. So, insofar as the President having said he would follow a particular path, for the sake of argument, I'll take him at his word an say, I intend to hold you to it. I know that in reality, however, that given a particular set of facts, the result may be different, and it should. Nuance.


QueEx

I'm cooling it. You're right, you've been behind the Prez and as I look back I realize that you might just be one of those Anti-War buffs.

I'm glad you are admitting you are/were blinded by the Obama, first "Black" president hysteria. I am also proud of what he represents. Now he is being judge on what he is doing. It is understandable, especially for those that, up until the second GW rigged election cycle became truly observant of politics. But to quote the words of the Gary Byrd: Every Brother Ain't A Brother...Every Sister Ain't A Sister!

Let's get this clear, I am not a pacifist. In fact, I think more despots need their asses whooped. But to do so Willy Nilly and based on the current political whims of any daily news cycle leads to problems

I don't look at campaign rhetoric as some kind of absolute promise or a predictor

So you are just advocating that it is OK for politicians to lie Ito your face!

My point, in the law, as it is in life in general, almost every general rule has an exception; change one small element of the facts and the general rule has to bend, change, be remolded -- to fit that nuance. So, insofar as the President having said he would follow a particular path, for the sake of argument, I'll take him at his word an say, I intend to hold you to it. I know that in reality, however, that given a particular set of facts, the result may be different, and it should. Nuance.

In all honest, I would have given president Obama the benefit of th doubt a year ago, but since the mid terms. he has appeared to abandoned some of his principles, bowing to the republicans after the mid terms. No person is above law!

 

[QueEx]

I tried.

QueEx

 

[actinanass]

I tried.

QueEx

I know dude. Thoughtone thinks he is the only credible thinker in this world.

He totally dismiss my disagreement with Palin, and harp on an old ass theory I've had since Obama was a state senator.


The old saying goes, when you think you are the smartest person in the room, you usually ain't.