IRON MAN 3 Set Work Begins; Working Title Revealed

Man you don't know what you talking about.


First off, there was only one 90's Batman movie and that was in 1993 with Batman Returns. The first was an 80's movie in 1989 with Batman - duh.

And these two movies were not corny! They were campy, surrealist dark - kinda like if Dali and Poe had a baby but told Mary Shelly to be the nanny...quality stuff.:yes:

Batman and Robin and Batman Forever? :confused:
 
Why do they have to be compared to the 90s films? The Iron Man and Nolan's Batman films are all made within years of each other, using modern special effects. Why are you using the 90s Batman films to compare against Iron Man when the Nolan series is still current, just like Iron Man? You have to have a valid argument why the earlier Batman series should be used instead of Nolan's films.

My main point in saying that the Iron Man films are better compared with the earlier (late 80's/early-mid 90's) Batman series is that this is the first venture to do Iron Man on film, while this is the second (or third if you count the old movies based off the Adam West series) series of Batman flicks. And yes, those 80's/90's Batman films were corny. I liked the first one...partly cuz Jack Nicholson did a great joker, partly cuz I like Michael Keaton in general, and partly cuz I was like 11....but corny none the less. The earlier Batman films were more family friendly movies, which is what the Iron Man series is intended to be. The Christopher Nolan series (which I acknowledged before is fantastic) is darker and more mature....but they can afford to do that now because Batman has been done so many times on screen already....they HAD to do that. For the first go at it on screen, I thought the first 2 Iron Man films were about as good as a fan could expect. And when you think about it in context to the build up to the Avengers and the expansion and crossover of the Marvel Universe on screen, they are superb.
 
My main point in saying that the Iron Man films are better compared with the earlier (late 80's/early-mid 90's) Batman series is that this is the first venture to do Iron Man on film, while this is the second (or third if you count the old movies based off the Adam West series) series of Batman flicks. And yes, those 80's/90's Batman films were corny. I liked the first one...partly cuz Jack Nicholson did a great joker, partly cuz I like Michael Keaton in general, and partly cuz I was like 11....but corny none the less. The earlier Batman films were more family friendly movies, which is what the Iron Man series is intended to be. The Christopher Nolan series (which I acknowledged before is fantastic) is darker and more mature....but they can afford to do that now because Batman has been done so many times on screen already....they HAD to do that. For the first go at it on screen, I thought the first 2 Iron Man films were about as good as a fan could expect. And when you think about it in context to the build up to the Avengers and the expansion and crossover of the Marvel Universe on screen, they are superb.

I agree with this, though I don't see the first two Batman films as corny.
 
TDK was too long, very boring, badly lit, had nonsensical and illegible action scenes, uninteresting pointless dialogue, an uncharacteristically love struck Bruce Wayne, a homely leading lady, and an anticlimactic ending.

it was VERY mundane, not EPIC in the least.

the first Iron Man story had me BELIEVING that tech suit was REAL. it was AMAZINGLY fun, fast, dramatic AND entertaining.

This, the Joker made the movie.

Loved the first Iron Man, the second one, not so much :smh:
 
Lets keep it real , the first 2 weren't that good,there only good for watching one time

They should limit the tony Starks scenes and have more iron man

:hmm:



TDK was too long, very boring, badly lit, had nonsensical and illegible action scenes, uninteresting pointless dialogue, an uncharacteristically love struck Bruce Wayne, a homely leading lady, and an anticlimactic ending.

it was VERY mundane, not EPIC in the least.

the first Iron Man story had me BELIEVING that tech suit was REAL. it was AMAZINGLY fun, fast, dramatic AND entertaining.


Except for how good the first IM movie was, I can't disagree with either of these two posts strong enough.
 
Except for how good the first IM movie was, I can't disagree with either of these two posts strong enough.

I honestly don't see why so many people felt the first Iron Man film was that good. It was an ok film, but I felt like I saw it all before. I think I only saw Iron Man once. I never felt the reason to revisit it. The Batman films (89, 92, 05, 08) are a different story altogether, as I have watched and re-watched those films numerous times over the years.

Downey does a great Stark (better than Bale does Wayne) though.
 
I honestly don't see why so many people felt the first Iron Man film was that good. It was an ok film, but I felt like I saw it all before. I think I only saw Iron Man once. I never felt the reason to revisit it. The Batman films (89, 92, 05, 08) are a different story altogether, as I have watched and re-watched those films numerous times over the years.

Downey does a great Stark (better than Bale does Wayne) though.

I don't knock Bale as Wayne but Downey's Stark goes up there with Reeves' Superman and Stewart's Professor X as dead on.

I thought it was excellent movie, frankly. Good pacing, good updating for the origin that kept it true to the spirit of the book and the armor looked great.
On the other hand, I thought TDK was the best Batman movie of them all and the only one worth rewatching multiple times.

When you're talking about comic book superhero movies, if you're over 20, you probably have seen it all before. It's in the delivery and I thought IM (the first more than the second one) delivered and showed that Marvel could make movies that can crossover and hold onto hardcore fans (as opposed to all the Iron Man cartoons that suck).
 
they could work mandarin in right. The avengers movie is going to have all sorts of far fetched shit in it that could explain a green chinese guy with magical rings :lol:
 
my only complain of IM2 was, he wasnt iron man enough... he was only iron man TWICE in the whole film. 1. during the confrontation at the race track and 2. during the climax of the film.

im not counting the scene when he was drunk at his party. :hmm:
 
Mandarin needs to be the next villain, but Marvel has been antsy because they don't want to make the character offensive to the Asian community.

isnt there a Ultimate version of Mandarin..? since the MCU(marvel cinematic universe) is based off the Ultimate line..
 
:hmm:



TDK was too long, very boring, badly lit, had nonsensical and illegible action scenes, uninteresting pointless dialogue, an uncharacteristically love struck Bruce Wayne, a homely leading lady, and an anticlimactic ending.

it was VERY mundane, not EPIC in the least.

the first Iron Man story had me BELIEVING that tech suit was REAL. it was AMAZINGLY fun, fast, dramatic AND entertaining.

:smh:
 
I don't know what you're talking about. I've never seen or heard of these movies before in life.

Like I said before, on that Whitney crack. And living under a rock

I honestly don't see why so many people felt the first Iron Man film was that good. It was an ok film, but I felt like I saw it all before. I think I only saw Iron Man once. I never felt the reason to revisit it. The Batman films (89, 92, 05, 08) are a different story altogether, as I have watched and re-watched those films numerous times over the years.

Downey does a great Stark (better than Bale does Wayne) though.

The 1st Iron Man was awesome, I don't see why YOU don't see that. But since you think Danny Davito as the Penguin and Arnold Schwarzenegger as Mr. Ice were epic roles, that explains a lot. :yes:

I won't even get started on Val Kilmer.

:smh:
 
Iron man 1 > dark knight

Fuck yall

Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using Tapatalk

i never like that dark knight shit either shit was too long and drawn out for me, i dont see why niggaz like that shit as much as they do
 
Like I said before, on that Whitney crack. And living under a rock

:hmm:

I have never done, nor will I ever do crack.


You sir on the other hand...


29366343.EasternBoxTurtle2.jpg
 
That's because it was an origin story. WTF were you expecting if you already knew the origin from the comics? If you just aren't an Iron Man fan then...

I like Iron Man a lot, but this argument is weak, especially considering that Iron Man 2 was a much weaker movie. And both Batmans were better.
 
Like I said before, on that Whitney crack. And living under a rock



The 1st Iron Man was awesome, I don't see why YOU don't see that. But since you think Danny Davito as the Penguin and Arnold Schwarzenegger as Mr. Ice were epic roles, that explains a lot. :yes:

I won't even get started on Val Kilmer.

:smh:
I never mentioned anything about Devito or Arnold. Though I will say I thoroughly enjoyed Batman Returns. I mentioned the TDK as being epic, but if you read that as Batman Returns and Batman and Robin, then my friend you really have more serious problems than trying to prove to me that Iron Man was a a better film.

what did you expect ????

I would expect for those who would reply to one of my posts to read the entire (2 page thread) to see that I was being sarcastic.
 
Back
Top