Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Bump
im gonna point out inconsistencies in the bible
- Thread starter Jesuschrist
- Start date
As everyone will one day find out, it is not all lies. In order for the best and longest deception to hold, the truth must be mixed in with lies and distortions. If I told you that you were merely human, that would be both a truth and a lie. Adam was indeed the "first" man, but Adam was indeed the first man seeing as how that is the definition of the name. Not every Angel is good and not every Devil is evil.
Amen and amen... most of the cats that are going to reply agree with the anti bible stance so why even post.
Just preaching to the choir... forgive the pun.
Let me call you out on your bullshit...... You say that a day is really a thousand years...... REally??? I call bullshit, and nothing but a sorry ass attempt to retrofit the bullshit story to make it a little bit more plausible...
Problem is, that I have yet to see where in the Bible or anywhere where they even mentioned that it could be a thousand years prior to the last 50 years, when strong evidence emerged to debunk the myth..
But to be a sport I am going to play along with the thousand year day, and destroy that myth also..
Ok let look at day six in creation where land animals and people were created. Even with a thousand year time table this suggest that both dinasaur and man was created with in a thousand years from each other.... And with you clarifying what real man is, in your words Homo-sapiens you have inadvertently stamped your bullshit... Because the first Homo-sapiens didn't first appear until about 200,000 years ago putting the dinasaurs at no longer than 201,000 years ago..
(See where I am going with this) Too bad you are off by over 64 million years.... Unless you want to retrofit what a year is, perhaps you can claim a year is really 20 million years..
Anyways your dumb ass logic is only clever to dumb people who don't know shit about carbon 14 decay, how it works and how it is accurate in dating the time in which life form existed...
Problem is, that I have yet to see where in the Bible or anywhere where they even mentioned that it could be a thousand years prior to the last 50 years, when strong evidence emerged to debunk the myth..
But to be a sport I am going to play along with the thousand year day, and destroy that myth also..
Ok let look at day six in creation where land animals and people were created. Even with a thousand year time table this suggest that both dinasaur and man was created with in a thousand years from each other.... And with you clarifying what real man is, in your words Homo-sapiens you have inadvertently stamped your bullshit... Because the first Homo-sapiens didn't first appear until about 200,000 years ago putting the dinasaurs at no longer than 201,000 years ago..
(See where I am going with this) Too bad you are off by over 64 million years.... Unless you want to retrofit what a year is, perhaps you can claim a year is really 20 million years..
Anyways your dumb ass logic is only clever to dumb people who don't know shit about carbon 14 decay, how it works and how it is accurate in dating the time in which life form existed...
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Let me call you out on your bullshit...... You say that a day is really a thousand years...... REally??? I call bullshit, and nothing but a sorry ass attempt to retrofit the bullshit story to make it a little bit more plausible...
Problem is, that I have yet to see where in the Bible or anywhere where they even mentioned that it could be a thousand years prior to the last 50 years, when strong evidence emerged to debunk the myth..
But to be a sport I am going to play along with the thousand year day, and destroy that myth also..
Ok let look at day six in creation where land animals and people were created. Even with a thousand year time table this suggest that both dinasaur and man was created with in a thousand years from each other.... And with you clarifying what real man is, in your words Homo-sapiens you have inadvertently stamped your bullshit... Because the first Homo-sapiens didn't first appear until about 200,000 years ago putting the dinasaurs at no longer than 201,000 years ago..
(See where I am going with this) Too bad you are off by over 64 million years.... Unless you want to retrofit what a year is, perhaps you can claim a year is really 20 million years..
Anyways your dumb ass logic is only clever to dumb people who don't know shit about carbon 14 decay, how it works and how it is accurate in dating the time in which life form existed...
2 peter 3:8
Psalms 90:4
You haven't seen it cuz I are an atheist.
And you don't own a Bible.
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Wait right here IM bout to go run and google
Let me call you out on your bullshit...... You say that a day is really a thousand years...... REally??? I call bullshit, and nothing but a sorry ass attempt to retrofit the bullshit story to make it a little bit more plausible...
Problem is, that I have yet to see where in the Bible or anywhere where they even mentioned that it could be a thousand years prior to the last 50 years, when strong evidence emerged to debunk the myth..
But to be a sport I am going to play along with the thousand year day, and destroy that myth also..
Ok let look at day six in creation where land animals and people were created. Even with a thousand year time table this suggest that both dinasaur and man was created with in a thousand years from each other.... And with you clarifying what real man is, in your words Homo-sapiens you have inadvertently stamped your bullshit... Because the first Homo-sapiens didn't first appear until about 200,000 years ago putting the dinasaurs at no longer than 201,000 years ago..
(See where I am going with this) Too bad you are off by over 64 million years.... Unless you want to retrofit what a year is, perhaps you can claim a year is really 20 million years..
Anyways your dumb ass logic is only clever to dumb people who don't know shit about carbon 14 decay, how it works and how it is accurate in dating the time in which life form existed...
Wow really?
Lets face it, at this point, you only have a few options and lets face it, they are all poor.....
You can challenge the validity of carbon-14 dating, an argument that would get you no where, besides I seriiously doubt you posseses the expertiese to even challenge it..
You can try to discount the existence of dinosaurs and said the devil planted them,
Or you can claim the earth faster back then and that a year was equivalent of a 100 years today. But you already established that days was slower and besides that argument is batshit, especially when you start factoring things like the moons orbit and the effect a faster earth would have on life on this planet..
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Yes.
Here is part of your problem.
The Bible is a book of past present and future
How far back in the past do you want to go.....how detailed of a present do you need....how far in the future do you want to go.
Do you want to know the creation of zenzantrapus and every other sub human.......
Do you want all those volumes of books.....do you want 879768655 years in the future......
s
Dude how lost are you? I pointed out in read how you said you are a atheist and instead of seeing and correcting your mistake, you come up with this bullshit....
Wow you really have you head deep in your ass, dont you..
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Retro-fitting your argument based on google.. Good luck with that, because unlike you, before I type shit down I do my research...
Lets face it, at this point, you only have a few options and lets face it, they are all poor.....
You can challenge the validity of carbon-14 dating, an argument that would get you no where, besides I seriiously doubt you posseses the expertiese to even challenge it..
You can try to discount the existence of dinosaurs and said the devil planted them,
Or you can claim the earth faster back then and that a year was equivalent of a 100 years today. But you already established that days was slower and besides that argument is batshit, especially when you start factoring things like the moons orbit and the effect a faster earth would have on life on this planet..
You think there aren't holes in your arguement......and I was joking......how would I google everything you said.....it isn't specific enough for google.
Anyways the sun is burning and getting smaller as Ed speak. Which means in the past the sun would have been bigger.....which means the gravitational pull would have been stronger. Meaning the earth would have been too close to the sun at some point if you wanna go the science route. I can kill I with science easily..... science proves God does exist
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Dude how lost are you? I pointed out in read how you said you are a atheist and instead of seeing and correcting your mistake, you come up with this bullshit....
Wow you really have you head deep in your ass, dont you..
Thrde arguement points for you. Want a cookie
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
http://www.oldearth.org/yom_hebrew.htm
Had to refreshing my memory. Don't worry bout reading it O'Neill milk this for you...
Let us start with the Hebrew word for day which is used in Genesis which is yom
And let us begin by seeing if yom means a 24 hour period
Had to refreshing my memory. Don't worry bout reading it O'Neill milk this for you...
Let us start with the Hebrew word for day which is used in Genesis which is yom
And let us begin by seeing if yom means a 24 hour period
Before I pull up the figures, let me ask you how much bigger you think the sum was less than a million years ago, and how far do you think the earth was at that same period of time...
The mistake you made is that you stamped a date with your argument, and there is plenty of data to challenge the date given... But a assure you that the % of the sun size and the earth orbit difference is very miniscule probably a few mins difference at best..
Now if you want to go back 4 billion years then perhaps your argument would have some weight to it..
Look I gave you the one day = a thousand year argument (something I know is bullshit, and nothing more than retro-fitting a bullshit story) but even with that your story is off by over 63 millions years.
For the sake of argument I allowed you to warp time giving a thousand year per day, and you still getting owned, shit what more do you want? Want me to also ignore carbon 14 dating and the evidence of dinosaurs.. Ha you would like that, wouldn't you...
Look I believe in God, not religion, and God gave all creatures gifts, he gave the fish the ability to swim, the birds ability to fly, the bee the ability to make honey, the snake the ability to make venom, gods gift to man is our ability to think and reason. So by failing to reason and think on your own, you are direct violation of gods law for man....
God give us the ability to see through bullshit, but unless you are willing to listen to his real plan for us, you are no different than the dumb ass mother fuckers who drank the Kool aid for Jim Jones..... All faith and no brains...
God give us the ability to see through bullshit, but unless you are willing to listen to his real plan for us, you are no different than the dumb ass mother fuckers who drank the Kool aid for Jim Jones..... All faith and no brains...
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
You haven't owned shit.
Just found a group of scientist that disagree with the scientist I believe in. I act as if science ain't on my side..... I still haven't talked about Genesis revisited
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
No wrong.Genesis 1:5 God called the Day (upper case d) light.Look I gave you the one day = a thousand year argument (something I know is bullshit, and nothing more than retro-fitting a bullshit story) but even with that your story is off by over 63 millions years.
For the sake of argument I allowed you to warp time giving a thousand year per day, and you still getting owned, shit what more do you want? Want me to also ignore carbon 14 dating and the evidence of dinosaurs.. Ha you would like that, wouldn't you...
Then in Genesis 1:18 day is lowercase....... There is meaning behind that.
Back to the word yom..... Does not designate a specific time period
Unless you are able to explain how man and Dinosours could have existed with in a thousand years of each other (remember they were both created in day 6 and being generous gy allowing you to have the thousand year per day argument), you are still fucked with trying to peg man and dinosaure existing during that period of time..
And based off your real man is really homo-sapian argument, you have stamped the existence of dinosaurs to roughly 200,000 years ago, make that 201,000 years ago (giving you that extra thousand years)..
Too bad there realibale carbon 14 dating pegged the dinosaurs at roughly 64 million years...
So in fact even with giving you that extra thousand years, you are still off by over 63 million years...
And sorry if you were given a math problem and you were of by 63million numbers, well that as close to clear cut ownership as I can imagine, especially after I spotted you a thousand years.....
Tell me you are not so dumb to understand how dumb your argument is..
Look I gave you that thousand year bullshit,, be happy.... But sorry you still got owned...
NOte Day 6: Land animals and people. (if it was a thousand years) meaning all land animals (including dinosaurs) were created in this thousand year period of time...
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Going back and forth with you is not easy. Not cuz you are so intelligent. But because I try to keep all
my posts under four sentences. you are typing paragraphs and pandorahs box while IM using one lines.....
I refuse to write a four page letter to own you.
Fuck all that bullshit, all you have to do is peg man and dinosaurs co-existing in a thousand year period roughly 200,000 years ago.
If not STFU and take your lumps and move on...
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
You think you saying something.....all you have proven is that I don't know everything....not that the creation story is BS
but don't run I haven't asked you my questions yet.....
but don't run I haven't asked you my questions yet.....
BTW, before you do what I know you going to do, don't do it.... Because I know your never going to answer the question, but instead try to change the subject and direct the argument towards something else.. This is what trapped rats do when there is no where else to run...
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Man and dinosaur ok we will deal with it. Bible mentions one. History shows dinosaurs existed even after c.e
The Bible says behold behemoth who has a tail like a cedar
What animal on earth has a tail like a cedar tree......
Anyways let us talk about common dinos
The Bible says behold behemoth who has a tail like a cedar
What animal on earth has a tail like a cedar tree......
Anyways let us talk about common dinos
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Do you know what dinosaurs were called before they were called dinosaurs. They were called dragons
Stick to the point, the bible, said on day 6 all land animals were created, including dinosaurs...... And you said the first man is homo-sapiens who existed 200.000 years ago...
So based on that argument you have to prove that man and dinosause co-existed roughly 201,000 years ago...
All that other shit is equivalent to internet stuttering and mobo jumbo, stupid people say to other stupid people..
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Do what.....ask you questions.....
If I was down typing five page letters I would simply copy and paste from the site I posted. And it would be long......and compost own your ads.....but instead I have to interpret it for you.....
You acting like you atheist be saying some ground breaking earth shattering evidence that rocks the Bible to the core. You ain't saying nothing new just in we ways
Did they live on land and were they animals? If so..... its semantics and doesn't change the argument one bit.... So your back at...
From here its cut/copy and paste.... I rest my case...
Fuzzy_McNut
Banned
Yes they did. Read up about the secret history of the dinosaurs which isn't so secret when you do half research. Marco polo described seeing one and a lot of historians described seeing them.. ancient people made monitor figurine a of them.
And don't know who or what inflated your Shinto the point you feel you are some authority figure to adhere to. Don't believe me you look up the organs I the word dinosaur yourself. I don't need to copy n paste shit when I make such a bold statement as that
Similar threads
