History channel shows Hannibal as a Black man. Whites go crazy cry revisionism.

see why I dont waste anytime with sources and timelines

first you say, where are your sources..

so I provide a source..

Now its..

Why do YOU believe that source..?

you just cant make this shit up!!!!
 
1- yes

3- dude you don't know how many times and when north africa was invaded by Savage germanic tribes

Google that bitch for your time line.

Wait. So the Moors who invaded in the 700s were the same fucking group during Hannibals time and helped civilize Europe during the dark ages and then they fell of the earth? What german tribes invaded North Africa after the moors civilized Europe? When did the berbers of North Africa not become the same people as before?

It's on you to prove we have north African roots. All the slave trading information points to West Africa. Genetic information points to West Africa. You have provided no proof whatsoever of any connection of our people to the Berbers. None. If your ancestors were here during slavery, you aren't a berber.

Funny that Berber DNA is in areas of South America due to the Portugal and Spanish connection. Remember, the Berbers were part of the moors who invaded their area. Descendants of slaves basically got your precious Berber DNA from cacs. :eek: And you've admitted that the ancient Berbers of Hanibbals's time were the same ones who invaded Europe.


You going to have to pick one to ride with. Either you claim Hannibal, which can't be proven either way, so that's the safest bet. Or you somehow show that the Berbers of North Africa went a dramatic genetic change in the last 500 years, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Checkmate. You're finished. Done. It's over. It's a :itsawrap: Stop claiming North Africa.

Source:

Mendizabal, I.; Sandoval, K.; Berniell-Lee, G.; Calafell, F.; Salas, A.; Martinez-Fuentes, A.; Comas, D. (2008). "Genetic origin, admixture, and asymmetry in maternal and paternal human lineages in Cuba". BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 213. PMC 2492877. PMID 18644108. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-213. edit "The presence of chromosomes of North African origin (E3b1b-M81; Cruciani et al., 2004) can also be explained by a Portuguese-mediated influx, since this haplogroup reaches a frequency of 5.6 percent in Portugal (Beleza et al., 2006), quite similar to the frequency found in Rio de Janeiro (5.4 percent) among European contributors"

Oh. And where the proof of recent German admixture in North Africa? :popcorn:
 
dude I dont know where to begin, your logic

is just crazy talk...

Let me just pull something random..

First you ask me when did germanic tribes invade NORTH AFRICA...

I said a century or so after Hannibals ...


Hannibal died in 247 b.c...

in 429 the vandals attacked north africa...

when did I say anything about them attacking carthage,

you just make up any shit to be right about something....

you make statements then forget what you said or read what you want to be right...

you say...

and I will repeat, your goddamn source implied that "negroes" and "Egyptians" were distinct from each other!! So what is it? You want to believe the source or not? I find it highly ironic that, of the few sources you have shown, you never use a Black or African scholar as a source.


I wont use an african scholar because yall need europeans to say shit for it to be true..

the fact is, african americans are ancient berbers..

by those racsit crackers admitting we were the moors, or of egyptian heritiage would tie us to a land or country and the purpose of that document was to remove us from any such connection..

but history itself proves no matter how much they attempted to cover that up, it will be revealed...

If you cant understand that, then its time not to take your opinions on this subject seriously...

its historical fact Berbers were of Egyptian, and North African heritage..


this subject is just too deep for you to handle

obviously....

you need books and sources and have no reasoning skills whatsoever to fall back on..

if you did, you wouldnt ask such brain dead questions.
 
Last edited:
No one is denying that the Moors of Spain were Arabs and Berbers. And both of the definitions YOU used reference the "Muslim population" and "Muslim inhabitants...during the Middle Ages." You are claiming that:
  1. "Moors" existed during the time of Hannibal;
  2. that he himself was a "Moor,";
  3. that Moors and Berbers are the same people;
  4. that Black Americans are descended from these people.
The only claim here that can be proven is #3, but there is a 1,000-year historical gap that you aren't aware of. You have no concept of time.



Yes, like you. So I will ask again, why do you believe the source when it says that "Negro" includes the "ancient Berbers" but does not include the "Moors?" Evidently, your source makes a distinction between the Berbers and the Moors. You believe the first sentence of your source but do not believe the second sentence. If the second sentence is not to be believed, then why should the first sentence be believed? If the "cracker" who wrote it was so intent on hiding our history and origins, why would he keep "the ancient Berbers" in there?



This opens up a whole new debate. So is this the ultimate point you are trying to make? That the majority of black people were already here PRIOR to the Middle Passage?


Are YOU familiar with etymology? That's not the origin of the word "Moor"; that's the contemporary meaning. The word "Moor" comes from the Greek word mauros, which means "black." Ironically, if you knew what you were talking about, you could use that to support some of the bullshit you're saying.



The Vandals and Goths overran Rome ABOUT 500 YEARS AFTER THE LAST PUNIC WARS! And they didn't overrun Carthage!!



And I will repeat, your goddamn source implied that "negroes" and "Egyptians" were distinct from each other!! So what is it? You want to believe the source or not? I find it highly ironic that, of the few sources you have shown, you never use a Black or African scholar as a source.



Jesus Christ. This nigga done gone back to Pangaea!! So black people were walking the Earth when all the continents were one?

Since you can drop these word salad posts (or copied-and-pasted posts), why not drop a historical timeline?

He does not do well with sources. That's what happens when you make things up and rely on psuedo history. You can't find anything to back up your claims. Just more psuedo history who don't even use horses OR who make fantastic plays on language translations to back their claims.
 
Wait. So the Moors who invaded in the 700s were the same fucking group during Hannibals time and helped civilize Europe during the dark ages and then they fell of the earth? What german tribes invaded North Africa after the moors civilized Europe? When did the berbers of North Africa not become the same people as before?

It's on you to prove we have north African roots. All the slave trading information points to West Africa. Genetic information points to West Africa. You have provided no proof whatsoever of any connection of our people to the Berbers. None. If your ancestors were here during slavery, you aren't a berber.

Funny that Berber DNA is in areas of South America due to the Portugal and Spanish connection. Remember, the Berbers were part of the moors who invaded their area. Descendants of slaves basically got your precious Berber DNA from cacs. :eek: And you've admitted that the ancient Berbers of Hanibbals's time were the same ones who invaded Europe.


You going to have to pick one to ride with. Either you claim Hannibal, which can't be proven either way, so that's the safest bet. Or you somehow show that the Berbers of North Africa went a dramatic genetic change in the last 500 years, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Checkmate. You're finished. Done. It's over. It's a :itsawrap: Stop claiming North Africa.

Source:

Mendizabal, I.; Sandoval, K.; Berniell-Lee, G.; Calafell, F.; Salas, A.; Martinez-Fuentes, A.; Comas, D. (2008). "Genetic origin, admixture, and asymmetry in maternal and paternal human lineages in Cuba". BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 213. PMC 2492877. PMID 18644108. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-213. edit "The presence of chromosomes of North African origin (E3b1b-M81; Cruciani et al., 2004) can also be explained by a Portuguese-mediated influx, since this haplogroup reaches a frequency of 5.6 percent in Portugal (Beleza et al., 2006), quite similar to the frequency found in Rio de Janeiro (5.4 percent) among European contributors"

Oh. And where the proof of recent German admixture in North Africa? :popcorn:

lol,

try again,

We were native to this land son, we are the original Olmecs...

us so called black americans were in brazil way before any savage cac invasion...

oh man your arguments are so weak....


Wait. So the Moors who invaded in the 700s were the same fucking group during Hannibals time and helped civilize Europe during the dark ages and then they fell of the earth? What german tribes invaded North Africa after the moors civilized Europe? When did the berbers of North Africa not become the same people as before?

un fuckin beliveable,

you just pull shit out your ass, so you can argue with yourself.

how in the could they be the SAME people...

They were black africans yes, but not the exact same fuckin people,

thats like saying was the black panthers of the sixties the same people that fought with nat turner..

Yes they were all moorish americans but not the exact same people..

wtf??

yall just like to pull words out your ass and say I said them...

VA tells me when did germanic tribes invade north africa..

then he goes but they never invade carthage..

who the fuck said anything about them invading carthage...


Your crew of mental midgets are running out of mind tricks

if you are going to quote me, quote me directly....

in the meantime get over teh fact

African Americans are the Ancient Berbers that came to this land thousands of years ago...

cac History covers up our Olmec existence..

but lets not deal with that, you guys are simply not ready....
 
He does not do well with sources. That's what happens when you make things up and rely on psuedo history. You can't find anything to back up your claims. Just more psuedo history who don't even use horses OR who make fantastic plays on language translations to back their claims.

yea just jibber jabber amongst yourselves..

the fact remains...

African Americans are the Ancient Berbers Berbers were an Afro Asiatic people

Hannibal was Afro Asiatic..

do the math you blabbering whores!!!
 
lol,

try again,

We were native to this land son, we are the original Olmecs...

us so called black americans were in brazil way before any savage cac invasion...

oh man your arguments are so weak....


Wait. So the Moors who invaded in the 700s were the same fucking group during Hannibals time and helped civilize Europe during the dark ages and then they fell of the earth? What german tribes invaded North Africa after the moors civilized Europe? When did the berbers of North Africa not become the same people as before?

un fuckin beliveable,

you just pull shit out your ass, so you can argue with yourself.

how in the could they be the SAME people...

They were black africans yes, but not the exact same fuckin people,

thats like saying was the black panthers of the sixties the same people that fought with nat turner..

Yes they were all moorish americans but not the exact same people..

wtf??

yall just like to pull words out your ass and say I said them...

VA tells me when did germanic tribes invade north africa..

then he goes but they never invade carthage..

who the fuck said anything about them invading carthage...


Your crew of mental midgets are running out of mind tricks

if you are going to quote me, quote me directly....

in the meantime get over teh fact

African Americans are the Ancient Berbers that came to this land thousands of years ago...

cac History covers up our Olmec existence..

but lets not deal with that, you guys are simply not ready....

Wow. So you are that desperate now? So now we went through genetic changes from Nat Turner to the panthers to now? Sorry, the DNA evidence I fucking posted doesn't support that shit. You are swinging for air now. Where is the recent germanic admixture to the berbers you wish to claim? Just post proof. You want to be a berber so bad, why ? :confused:

As for your culture jacking of native Americans.

Sorry, no evidence whatsoever of us being NATIVE to the Americans. Stop culture jacking from everyone but West Africa. Let Native Americans have their own identity. Haven't they been through enough fuckery. Once again, I'll post more evidence.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...n-closely-related-indigenous-Australians.html

'About 2 per cent of the ancestry of Amazonians today comes from this Australasian lineage that's not present in the same way elsewhere in the Americas.'

The researchers, whose work is published in the journal Nature, analysed the DNA from 21 Native American populations in Central and South America.

They also collected and analysed DNA from nine populations in Brazil before comparing it to the genomes of people from 200 non-American populations.


They found the Tupí-speaking Suruí people who first came into contact with the modern world in 1969, the Karitiana tribe, who live in western Amazon, and the Ge-speaking Xavante people in Eastern Brazil, all had genetic links to indigenous Australians.

The researchers say the genetic signals do not match any population known to have contributed to Native American ancestry and the geographic pattern cannot be explained by post-colonial European, African or Polynesian mixture with Native Americans.

Where is the information dating to an ANCIENT presence in the Americas. POST the shit. Sorry, noses and lips don't cut it. Let me guess. The Aboriginal Australians were too dumb to figure out how to braid their heads so any of them in the Americas had to learn from Africans, right?

You basically acting like the cacs did when they say they discovered america and made west Asian(Jesus) a nordic. :smh: Just jacking cultures.
 
Wow. So you are that desperate now? So now we went through genetic changes from Nat Turner to the panthers to now? Sorry, the DNA evidence I fucking posted doesn't support that shit. You are swinging for air now. Where is the recent germanic admixture to the berbers you wish to claim? Just post proof. You want to be a berber so bad, why ? :confused:

As for your culture jacking of native Americans.

Sorry, no evidence whatsoever of us being NATIVE to the Americans. Stop culture jacking from everyone but West Africa. Let Native Americans have their own identity. Haven't they been through enough fuckery. Once again, I'll post more evidence.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...n-closely-related-indigenous-Australians.html

'About 2 per cent of the ancestry of Amazonians today comes from this Australasian lineage that's not present in the same way elsewhere in the Americas.'

The researchers, whose work is published in the journal Nature, analysed the DNA from 21 Native American populations in Central and South America.

They also collected and analysed DNA from nine populations in Brazil before comparing it to the genomes of people from 200 non-American populations.


They found the Tupí-speaking Suruí people who first came into contact with the modern world in 1969, the Karitiana tribe, who live in western Amazon, and the Ge-speaking Xavante people in Eastern Brazil, all had genetic links to indigenous Australians.

The researchers say the genetic signals do not match any population known to have contributed to Native American ancestry and the geographic pattern cannot be explained by post-colonial European, African or Polynesian mixture with Native Americans.

Where is the information dating to an ANCIENT presence in the Americas. POST the shit. Sorry, noses and lips don't cut it. Let me guess. The Aboriginal Australians were too dumb to figure out how to braid their heads so any of them in the Americas had to learn from Africans, right?

You basically acting like the cacs did when they say they discovered america and made west Asian(Jesus) a nordic. :smh: Just jacking cultures.

are you saying there were no blacks in brazil before columbus..??
 
are you saying there were no blacks in brazil before columbus..??

I can't say that there weren't, but there is no evidence that there were. Some extinct tribe and others have been traced back to Polynesia. They did the Easter Island heads. Where is the evidence for an ancient African presence?
 
dude I dont know where to begin, you logic

is just crazy talk...

Let me just pull something random..

First you ask me when did germanic tribes invade NORTH AFRICA...

I said a century or so after Hannibals ...


Hannibal died in 247 b.c...

in 429 the vandals attacked north africa...

when did I say anything about them attacking carthage,

First of all, Hannibal died in 181 B.C.. The Vandal invasion was 600 years later!! And Carthage is in North Africa, so it would logically follow that the Vandals attacked Carthage, right? Hell, I'll even help YOU out and post a map with a source!! But I realize something about you. You won't produce a timeline because you have no conception of time and you don't understand B.C. vs A.D.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandals#/media/File:Invasions_of_the_Roman_Empire_1.png

you just make up any shit to be right about something....

you make statements then forget what you said or read what you want to be right...

you say...

and I will repeat, your goddamn source implied that "negroes" and "Egyptians" were distinct from each other!! So what is it? You want to believe the source or not? I find it highly ironic that, of the few sources you have shown, you never use a Black or African scholar as a source.


I wont use an african scholar because yall need europeans to say shit for it to be true..

No, you won't use an African scholar because you haven't read or studied anything to back up the shit you say.

the fact is, african americans are ancient berbers..

by those racsit crackers admitting we were the moors, or of egyptian heritiage would tie us to a land or country and the purpose of that document was to remove us from any such connection..

but history itself proves no matter how much they attempted to cover that up, it will be revealed...

If you cant understand that, then its time not to take your opinions on this subject seriously...

its historical fact Berbers were of Egyptian, and North African heritage..

So why would they leave "the ancient Berbers" in the South Carolina law you like to cite?

Freddy, what is your level of education? Did you graduate high school? Since I produced the necessary "hand-proof," answer that question for me. Even better, what started you on your journey to find the true origins of black people?
 
I can't say that there weren't, but there is no evidence that there were. Some extinct tribe and others have been traced back to Polynesia. They did the Easter Island heads. Where is the evidence for an ancient African presence?

We have been here waay before cristobal colon,

do you really think dna science is fool proof in determning historical race and culture evidence...?
 
We have been here waay before cristobal colon,

do you really think dna science is fool proof in determning historical race and culture evidence...?

Not foolproof, but why does it seem to uncover everything but your claims that 'we' were everywhere? Cacs concede out of Africa thanks to dna(even your Asian source had to finally admit it). They concede nordics(blonde and blue eye cacs, not the old ones) are new thanks to dna. They talk about neanderthal admixture thanks to dna. All of these you willingly except, but when it doesn't turn out the way you want, you act like a chick on the Maury show who wants to keep bringing in cats for DNA tests.

Can't have it both ways.
 
First of all, Hannibal died in 181 B.C.. The Vandal invasion was 600 years later!! And Carthage is in North Africa, so it would logically follow that the Vandals attacked Carthage, right? Hell, I'll even help YOU out and post a map with a source!! But I realize something about you. You won't produce a timeline because you have no conception of time and you don't understand B.C. vs A.D.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandals#/media/File:Invasions_of_the_Roman_Empire_1.png



No, you won't use an African scholar because you haven't read or studied anything to back up the shit you say.



So why would they leave "the ancient Berbers" in the South Carolina law you like to cite?

Freddy, what is your level of education? Did you graduate high school? Since I produced the necessary "hand-proof," answer that question for me. Even better, what started you on your journey to find the true origins of black people?

Graduated high school regents diploma that meant something back in the early ninties..lol..

and yes I have some college but quit because I hated being in class rooms and landed a good paying job in the financial district...

I got intrested in real black history after reading J.A Rogers in high school..
Africas gift to America... it was on and popping since then..

Im not really responding to debate you dudes, Im just putting informaton out there, for people to do their own research..

most of my people have no idea we are indigenous to this country..

It cool to debate but I notice most folks get all worked up and angry which is why I dont take it seriously...

even when Im cursing folks out Im laughin my ass off..

I know what I know, and there is much much much too much more I dont know..

but what I do know is My people are indigenous to this land as well as having orgins in africa...

and how much effort is put out there to push this we were only slaves narrative...

when the original slave was the white man...

but thats another topic for another time..
 
Not foolproof, but why does it seem to uncover everything but your claims that 'we' were everywhere? Cacs concede out of Africa thanks to dna(even your Asian source had to finally admit it). They concede nordics(blonde and blue eye cacs, not the old ones) are new thanks to dna. They talk about neanderthal admixture thanks to dna. All of these you willingly except, but when it doesn't turn out the way you want, you act like a chick on the Maury show who wants to keep bringing in cats for DNA tests.

Can't have it both ways.

caucasions and africansa are two different species,

caucasions are closer to apes and monkies..

of course you got a lot of black folks passing for caucasion...

but the real caucasian in closer to the ape man aka neanderthal...
 
Not foolproof, but why does it seem to uncover everything but your claims that 'we' were everywhere? Cacs concede out of Africa thanks to dna(even your Asian source had to finally admit it). They concede nordics(blonde and blue eye cacs, not the old ones) are new thanks to dna. They talk about neanderthal admixture thanks to dna. All of these you willingly except, but when it doesn't turn out the way you want, you act like a chick on the Maury show who wants to keep bringing in cats for DNA tests.

Can't have it both ways.
Wrong. He doesn't believe in DNA lol
 
caucasions and africansa are two different species,

caucasions are closer to apes and monkies..

of course you got a lot of black folks passing for caucasion...

but the real caucasian in closer to the ape man aka neanderthal...
Now you've reallygone full retard.


You already said they came from us and we are the original dumbass.
 
First of all, Hannibal died in 181 B.C.. The Vandal invasion was 600 years later!! And Carthage is in North Africa, so it would logically follow that the Vandals attacked Carthage, right? Hell, I'll even help YOU out and post a map with a source!! But I realize something about you. You won't produce a timeline because you have no conception of time and you don't understand B.C. vs A.D.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandals#/media/File:Invasions_of_the_Roman_Empire_1.png



No, you won't use an African scholar because you haven't read or studied anything to back up the shit you say.



So why would they leave "the ancient Berbers" in the South Carolina law you like to cite?

Freddy, what is your level of education? Did you graduate high school? Since I produced the necessary "hand-proof," answer that question for me. Even better, what started you on your journey to find the true origins of black people?
Now you've reallygone full retard.


You already said they came from us and we are the original dumbass.

Whatever cheerleader charlie

At least the other two have an argument

Weak and discombobulated

But they try

You h
Just show up with your mini skirt ppm poms and weak insults

Show me where I said they came from us you little lying ass slore

We mixed our genetics which helper them to live longer lives but they never came from us ok you lil slore bitch
 
Now you've reallygone full retard.


You already said they came from us and we are the original dumbass.

What do you mean us....

You never repped how do I know you ain't a closet Trump supporter from storm front

VA hustle can say it and be truthful..


You say it and it's like

Cracker please
 
What do you mean us....

You never repped how do I know you ain't a closet Trump supporter from storm front

VA hustle can say it and be truthful..


You say it and it's like

Cracker please
Weak sauce try again. You keep getting outclassed. To the point where your knly document you can rely on is a white supremacist. Youre way out of your league w your one source bruh
 
Weak sauce try again. You keep getting outclassed. To the point where your knly document you can rely on is a white supremacist. Youre way out of your league w your one source bruh

Out classed..

yea ok.... chauncey the cheerleader.. you maybe
delusional as fuck..

but youre a damn good cheerleader.

go get them pom poms guuuuuuuuurrrrrl!!
 
Graduated high school regents diploma that meant something back in the early ninties..lol..

and yes I have some college but quit because I hated being in class rooms and landed a good paying job in the financial district...

I got intrested in real black history after reading J.A Rogers in high school..
Africas gift to America... it was on and popping since then..

Im not really responding to debate you dudes, Im just putting informaton out there, for people to do their own research..

most of my people have no idea we are indigenous to this country..

It cool to debate but I notice most folks get all worked up and angry which is why I dont take it seriously...

even when Im cursing folks out Im laughin my ass off..

I know what I know, and there is much much much too much more I dont know..

but what I do know is My people are indigenous to this land as well as having orgins in africa...

and how much effort is put out there to push this we were only slaves narrative...

when the original slave was the white man...

but thats another topic for another time..

I figured you had to be trolling to some degree. And you should have mentioned J.A. Rogers early on (along with Ivan Van Sertima, if you're aware of him). At the very least, reference people who have actually researched what you're talking about.
 
I figured you had to be trolling to some degree. And you should have mentioned J.A. Rogers early on (along with Ivan Van Sertima, if you're aware of him). At the very least, reference people who have actually researched what you're talking about.

yea ok,

mrs crabtree...

doesnt change the fact hannibal was
a black african

and african americas are ancient berbers...

both afro asiatics..
 
yea ok,

mrs crabtree...

doesnt change the fact hannibal was
a black african

and african americas are ancient berbers...

both afro asiatics..

OK Miss Ignorant. You believe it so that makes it so. Do you know the difference between BC and AD? And we're not just talking about the first four letters of the alphabet!
 
OK Miss Ignorant. You believe it so that makes it so. Do you know the difference between BC and AD? And we're not just talking about the first four letters of the alphabet!

yes

B e C ause youre A D ICK!

LOL

just jokes dont take it personal

You are going to beleive your white washed history

and Im going to go with the facts..

so we are just gonna have to agree to disagree..

yall just creating arguments then arguing with yourselves..

like I mentioned vandals attacking carthage when I clearly stated north africa....

its like you and gene cisco use the same tactics...

Id give yall one thing,

yall mastered the art of logical fallacies...

just doesnt work with everybody
 
caucasions and africansa are two different species,

caucasions are closer to apes and monkies..

of course you got a lot of black folks passing for caucasion...

but the real caucasian in closer to the ape man aka neanderthal...

So what about the first African 'Chinese'(as you say) who ended up with more neanderthal dna than europeans?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/science/a-new-theory-on-how-neanderthal-dna-spread-in-asia.html

Researchers also have found a peculiar pattern in non-Africans: People in China, Japan and other East Asian countries have about 20 percent more Neanderthal DNA than do Europeans.

It is conceivable that the extinction of the Neanderthals happened later in Asia. If that is true, there might yet be more recent Neanderthal fossils waiting to be discovered there.

Or perhaps Asians interbred with some other group of humans that had interbred with Neanderthals and carried much of their DNA. Later, that group disappeared.

Why were you trying to claim them if they are closer to apes? You don't claim cacs, but will claim the more neanderthal Asians? Why is that?
 
yes

B e C ause youre A D ICK!

LOL

just jokes dont take it personal

You are going to beleive your white washed history

and Im going to go with the facts..

so we are just gonna have to agree to disagree..

yall just creating arguments then arguing with yourselves..

like I mentioned vandals attacking carthage when I clearly stated north africa....

its like you and gene cisco use the same tactics...

Id give yall one thing,

yall mastered the art of logical fallacies...

just doesnt work with everybody
you doing backflips to be a part of some history just because white men told you it was important is the only whitewash going on lol. You're your own cheerleader and you suck at that too
 
yes

B e C ause youre A D ICK!

LOL

just jokes dont take it personal

You are going to beleive your white washed history

and Im going to go with the facts..

so we are just gonna have to agree to disagree..

yall just creating arguments then arguing with yourselves..

like I mentioned vandals attacking carthage when I clearly stated north africa....

its like you and gene cisco use the same tactics...

Id give yall one thing,

yall mastered the art of logical fallacies...

just doesnt work with everybody

So BC and AD are "white-washed history" because you don't understand it? And Carthage IS in North Africa! And the Vandals DID invade Carthage, which they used as a base to attack Rome!

But obviously you don't care. You read a couple of blog posts on theColi and then licked Tariq Rasheed's balls, so now you're an expert on black history? Fuck outta here with your special education GED.
 
Speaking of Neanderthals, what about 'back to Africa' flow? Can't bring up the Neanderthals and ignore that. Well, we can if we cherrypick history with an agenda.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...inent-Europe-3-000-years-ago-populate-it.html

Mota was found in a cave, sitting 6,440ft (1,963 metres) above sea level in southwestern Ethiopia's Gamo highlands.

He was adult male who may have been bound at the time of burial, with stone tools also found in the grave.

He lived in a hunter-gatherer culture.

The man had dark skin, brown eyes, and genetic adaptations for living at high altitudes.

DNA was extracted from the petrous bone, a dense region of the skull excellent for preserving DNA in ancient samples.

Mota is genetically very similar to current inhabitants of the Ethiopian highlands and eastern Africa.

He had no trace of Eurasian ancestry, enabling the researchers to use his genome to better understand the Eurasian genetic component now seen in modern Africans.

They used his genome to determine there was a large migration of western Eurasians into Africa around 3,500 to 4,000 years ago.

This migration from the ancient Near East and Fertile Crescent, roughly corresponding to modern Iraq, Turkey, Iran and Syria(cac land), reshaped the African continent's genetic makeup.


+++++++

And here's the fun part. Remember the source that Mrfreddy posted about near east farmers going to Europe carrying the 'white' gene. Here's more.

By studying the kinds of genes the Stone Age farmers carried to Africa, the scientists also found they were closely related to the same population that had brought agriculture to Europe about 7,000 years ago.

Today, those ancient farmers' closest genetic relatives are found on the island of Sardinia.


This does not mean that there was a huge migration of people from Sardinia to Africa, she adds. Because of their island isolation, Sardinians have remained relatively unadmixed, so the population conserves many of the genetic characteristics of the first Neolithic migrants into Europe.


And what does a Sardinian person looks like? Looks like a dark-skinned cac. Similar to the ones we see in west Asia today. Funny, these dark-cacs neadanderthals who came back to Africa just happen to be from the west Asian(near east) area that is tied to Afro-asiatic languages.

I wonder how Semetic languages made their way from west Asia to Africa? Could it be these migrations of these dark-cacs who freddy already admitted went to Europe 7,000 years ago. :confused: I guess a lot of that 'knowledge' that people were dropping about Semites has to be modified. :lol:
 
So what about the first African 'Chinese'(as you say) who ended up with more neanderthal dna than europeans?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/science/a-new-theory-on-how-neanderthal-dna-spread-in-asia.html

Researchers also have found a peculiar pattern in non-Africans: People in China, Japan and other East Asian countries have about 20 percent more Neanderthal DNA than do Europeans.

It is conceivable that the extinction of the Neanderthals happened later in Asia. If that is true, there might yet be more recent Neanderthal fossils waiting to be discovered there.

Or perhaps Asians interbred with some other group of humans that had interbred with Neanderthals and carried much of their DNA. Later, that group disappeared.

Why were you trying to claim them if they are closer to apes? You don't claim cacs, but will claim the more neanderthal Asians? Why is that?

Those are the ghostly modern day asians

Not the ancient african ones.

As if they are asiatic...

Lol

Too funny

Go on pull some more shit out your butt that's not relative
 
So BC and AD are "white-washed history" because you don't understand it? And Carthage IS in North Africa! And the Vandals DID invade Carthage, which they used as a base to attack Rome!

But obviously you don't care. You read a couple of blog posts on theColi and then licked Tariq Rasheed's balls, so now you're an expert on black history? Fuck outta here with your special education GED.


There you fucking go again with the

Quotes I never quoted.

Since when did I say I don't know what b.c and a.d is

You are just proving my point.

You just make up shit then argue against

The shit you made up.

I said the vandals attacked north africa
.which was your question.

I mentioned nothing of carthage
 
There you fucking go again with the

Quotes I never quoted.

Since when did I say I don't know what b.c and a.d is

You are just proving my point.

You just make up shit then argue against

The shit you made up.

I said the vandals attacked north africa
.which was your question.

I mentioned nothing of carthage

You didn't say it. I said it! You don't know the difference between BC and AD and you have no understanding of history, which is why you can't even create a basic timeline.

In other words, I'm calling you a stupid motherfucker. Get it now?
 
Speaking of Neanderthals, what about 'back to Africa' flow? Can't bring up the Neanderthals and ignore that. Well, we can if we cherrypick history with an agenda.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...inent-Europe-3-000-years-ago-populate-it.html

Mota was found in a cave, sitting 6,440ft (1,963 metres) above sea level in southwestern Ethiopia's Gamo highlands.

He was adult male who may have been bound at the time of burial, with stone tools also found in the grave.

He lived in a hunter-gatherer culture.

The man had dark skin, brown eyes, and genetic adaptations for living at high altitudes.

DNA was extracted from the petrous bone, a dense region of the skull excellent for preserving DNA in ancient samples.

Mota is genetically very similar to current inhabitants of the Ethiopian highlands and eastern Africa.

He had no trace of Eurasian ancestry, enabling the researchers to use his genome to better understand the Eurasian genetic component now seen in modern Africans.

They used his genome to determine there was a large migration of western Eurasians into Africa around 3,500 to 4,000 years ago.

This migration from the ancient Near East and Fertile Crescent, roughly corresponding to modern Iraq, Turkey, Iran and Syria(cac land), reshaped the African continent's genetic makeup.


+++++++

And here's the fun part. Remember the source that Mrfreddy posted about near east farmers going to Europe carrying the 'white' gene. Here's more.

By studying the kinds of genes the Stone Age farmers carried to Africa, the scientists also found they were closely related to the same population that had brought agriculture to Europe about 7,000 years ago.

Today, those ancient farmers' closest genetic relatives are found on the island of Sardinia.


This does not mean that there was a huge migration of people from Sardinia to Africa, she adds. Because of their island isolation, Sardinians have remained relatively unadmixed, so the population conserves many of the genetic characteristics of the first Neolithic migrants into Europe.


And what does a Sardinian person looks like? Looks like a dark-skinned cac. Similar to the ones we see in west Asia today. Funny, these dark-cacs neadanderthals who came back to Africa just happen to be from the west Asian(near east) area that is tied to Afro-asiatic languages.

I wonder how Semetic languages made their way from west Asia to Africa? Could it be these migrations of these dark-cacs who freddy already admitted went to Europe 7,000 years ago. :confused: I guess a lot of that 'knowledge' that people were dropping about Semites has to be modified. :lol:


You're insane semetic languages orgin is in africa. As well

Lawd have mercy you guys are desperate
 
You didn't say it. I said it! You don't know the difference between BC and AD and you have no understanding of history, which is why you can't even create a basic timeline.

In other words, I'm calling you a stupid motherfucker. Get it now?

Lol yeah my intelligence is based on providing you with a time line

You must really think you are important.

Huh big willy .lol

Providing a time line has nothing to do with the fact african Americans are tha ancient berbers aka ancient Hebrews aka the moors.

Sorry but your feeble little opinions ain't even worth a food stamp.

You will get over those facts one day when you grow up.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top