History channel shows Hannibal as a Black man. Whites go crazy cry revisionism.

You aint shut shit down..

Africans were NATIVE to the AMERICAs... why you tryin to limit it to just North...

Its all in the Jesuit missinary letters...

one of the few things they forgot to cover up......


you sure give yourself a lot of unjustified pats on the back....

Quick question. If a bitch accuses you of fathering a child, will you use DNA evidence to get you out of that jam?
 
Quick question. If a bitch accuses you of fathering a child, will you use DNA evidence to get you out of that jam?


LOL,

I wouldnt be in that situation because I dont fuck bitches raw..

Are you comparing Black History that euro cacs cover up, to fuckin bitches...??

The fact remains that we have proof of black folks being in the americas.

Through Jesuit missionary letters.....

so I have no idea what the fuck you think you proved...
 
I think you think that bringing up the Etruscan is bringing up something that no one here really knows about. But I do. The theory that they are black is a far fetched one that simply is not convincing. What ever issue we have concerning their origin (and there are some questions) that does not believe we must no accept every fringe idea! I fact I wonder why you show interest in them? I know about them through my interest in Roman history. But I think you probably know about them because of some fringe book that tries to that a slight question we have in history and overlays some Afrocentric theme to trace civilization back to blacks etc...

People are always "name dropping" stuff like this and assuming the other guy has no idea and will assume you must know because hey, who talks about the Etruscans??! Well I happen to so...

I mean we don't know the exact origins of the Rus people either. Perhaps they were black too...? I mean you posted :
orgins of the Etruscans the ORIGINAL greeks before those sexually confused fucks came in on the scene then stole and perverted everything they got from the mystery schools of egypt...

Really? I can imagine take a class on ancient Mediterranean civilization and approaching the professor with that. It would be like going to medical school and demanding to know how to balance the patient's humours and asking where the leeches were...

This stuff is about as convincing as the "history" that the holy grail was brought to England by Joesph of Arimathea.

blah blah blah blah..

Here is some Etruscan art...
Etruscan_Antefix_4.JPG


Oh yea that nose is a typical roman cac nose..

Etruscan_Antefix.JPG


oh yea those lips are that of a euro greek...


Etruscan_relief.jpg


oh there that Nose again....

Ok come on drown us in some more words!!!!
 
First. YOU quoted wiki yourself to prove your point a few posts ago(!). (Clearly you didn't read it because it didn't by the way) so now wiki is no good??
I'm picking on you on this one - not because it was Wiki - but because the sourcing on it was thin...
if you noticed, the wiki article on Carthage references the wiki on Barcas
which has one source and it conflicts with the source cited in the wiki on Hamilcar.

none of my questions are insincere...

What I learned (eons ago) but am unable to cite right now because of access - is that the Barcas were not of the ruling class, and even though Hamilcar did good on the Iberian conquests there were multiple times the senate of Carthage sabotaged him through lack of support and repeated this again during Hannibal's campaign - IIRC the lack of support was due to a rivalry based on class warfare in the senate and a desire by a faction to trade and be friendly with Rome

Second. EVERY ancient source describes the Barcids as part of the royalty. I doubt you have read any of them. Sorry but it seems you haven't. I have.
And not for this conversation. I have no actual interest in Hannibals race. Really I don't. If he was black cool. But there is little evidence to support this
But I know my Roman history. I don't think you do. I can tell by these arguments of yours.
I think you are very interested in race identity pride but not so much in history
please recommend 2 books for me to read on this. - especially anything on the politics of Carthaginian senate during the first 2 Punic Wars

Yes these are pictures from my actual library. Yes I have read all these books on Roman History. I think you are just frantically looking things up for this conversation in order to bolster your arguments and have very little actual knowledge about Roman history.

This time you picked the wrong opponent.

I know my Roman history. As you can see it's my hobby.
I am sure there are many things about which you know more than I do; this is NOT one of them
no argument there...

nice collection
 
That description doesn't make him black either.

I agree about the tribes. But there are some who don't even realize that there are native(speaking before any recorded history) cacs in north Africa. People who predate the pyramids. Mutts if you will.
true....
 
Milk monsters :roflmao3:
they love them dairy products...cow growth hormone
i dont fuck with the milk no mo, just silk

on another note, i got upset with my wife today. she takes the kids to the pool today. before walking out the door, she had a lil can of spray on sunscreen. i'm like wtf they need that for? she was like the news had advisories. I had to remind her we have natural sunscreen...melanin
am i trippin? do you guys use sunscreen? my pops is a doc and i am a NP. we have never used sunscreen (and i grew up in SoCal)
 
please recommend 2 books for me to read on this. - especially anything on the politics of Carthaginian senate during the first 2 Punic Wars
I have never seen and book dealing with just that specifically. Perhaps someone has published a paper. But it would probably be pretty obscure. But but it will be covered in away that intersect with the Punic Wars in the Histories as written by Livy and Plutarch. If you haven't read these you should and not just the Punic War sections. They are the source for most of what we know about this period. Other more modern works are usually simply analyzing these works - with added archeological evidence of course.

But also seek out the excellent lectures here

http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/history/the-mysterious-etruscans.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/peloponnesian-war.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/emperors-of-rome.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/cour...technology-from-catapult-to-the-pantheon.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/history-of-ancient-rome.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/great-battles-of-the-ancient-world.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/history/ancient-history-classical/world-of-byzantium.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/rome-and-the-barbarians.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/ancient-empires-before-alexander.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/cour...ted-history-of-the-ancient-mediterranean.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/history/pompeii-daily-life-in-an-ancient-roman-city.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/the-persian-empire.html


The lecture are usual sets of 36 in blocks of 30 minutes each so about 17 hours each.

I watched all these and they are very good!

They are pretty expensive so you might want to check torrents for them you will find most on Kickass.
 
blah blah blah blah..

Here is some Etruscan art...
Etruscan_Antefix_4.JPG


Oh yea that nose is a typical roman cac nose..

Etruscan_Antefix.JPG


oh yea those lips are that of a euro greek...


Etruscan_relief.jpg


oh there that Nose again....

Ok come on drown us in some more words!!!!
I'm curious, you keep bring up the Etruscans. Have you ACTUALLY READ Livy's accounts of early Rome? or Plutarch's Lives? Please be honest...


Also if you are ACTUALLY interested in the Etruscans I recommend these lectures
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/history/the-mysterious-etruscans.html
 
they love them dairy products...cow growth hormone
i dont fuck with the milk no mo, just silk

on another note, i got upset with my wife today. she takes the kids to the pool today. before walking out the door, she had a lil can of spray on sunscreen. i'm like wtf they need that for? she was like the news had advisories. I had to remind her we have natural sunscreen...melanin
am i trippin? do you guys use sunscreen? my pops is a doc and i am a NP. we have never used sunscreen (and i grew up in SoCal)

Hell to the muthafuckin NAW I dont use sun screen..

Us melanin rich folk NEEEEEED to be in the sun to asorb that cosmic energy from a spiritual perspective but from a medical perspective

we NEED to be exposed to the Sun for Vit D.... so sunscreen is a big fuckin no no for me, though I would use aloe gel if Im out sun bathing for four hours or more...

and thats only the natural clear 99.9999 percent pure aloe... not that green or blue colored shit...

us melanin rich folk Must get sunlight... scientific fact!!!

we need laws passed so we have time and right to get sufficient sunlight especially if we live in places like new york city...

rights to beaches before they get crowded with cacs who really shouldnt be out there burnin and damaging their recessive skin..

so yes your wife needs to read up on proper "melanin" care....
 
yup how Im able to see through the mountains of bullshit

to uncover the truth!!!

like the euro romans/greels were obsessed with young naked boys....

bunch of faggots...
yup how Im able to see through the mountains of bullshit

to uncover the truth!!!

like the euro romans/greels were obsessed with young naked boys....

bunch of faggots...
HAHAHAHHA You got me. Great job!!!
 
I have never seen and book dealing with just that specifically. Perhaps someone has published a paper. But it would probably be pretty obscure. But but it will be covered in away that intersect with the Punic Wars in the Histories as written by Livy and Plutarch. If you haven't read these you should and not just the Punic War sections. They are the source for most of what we know about this period. Other more modern works are usually simply analyzing these works - with added archeological evidence of course.

But also seek out the excellent lectures here

http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/history/the-mysterious-etruscans.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/peloponnesian-war.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/emperors-of-rome.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/cour...technology-from-catapult-to-the-pantheon.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/history-of-ancient-rome.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/great-battles-of-the-ancient-world.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/history/ancient-history-classical/world-of-byzantium.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/rome-and-the-barbarians.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/ancient-empires-before-alexander.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/cour...ted-history-of-the-ancient-mediterranean.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/history/pompeii-daily-life-in-an-ancient-roman-city.html
http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/the-persian-empire.html


The lecture are usual sets of 36 in blocks of 30 minutes each so about 17 hours each.

I watched all these and they are very good!

They are pretty expensive so you might want to check torrents for them you will find most on Kickass.
thanks
 
First. YOU quoted wiki yourself to prove your point a few posts ago(!). (Clearly you didn't read it because it didn't by the way) so now wiki is no good??

Second. EVERY ancient source describes the Barcids as part of the royalty. I doubt you have read any of them. Sorry but it seems you haven't. I have.
And not for this conversation. I have no actual interest in Hannibals race. Really I don't. If he was black cool. But there is little evidence to support this
But I know my Roman history. I don't think you do. I can tell by these arguments of yours.
I think you are very interested in race identity pride but not so much in history

Yes these are pictures from my actual library. Yes I have read all these books on Roman History. I think you are just frantically looking things up for this conversation in order to bolster your arguments and have very little actual knowledge about Roman history.

This time you picked the wrong opponent.

I know my Roman history. As you can see it's my hobby.
I am sure there are many things about which you know more than I do; this is NOT one of them

And yes I included a picture with my (very) Black hand so you can't scream that I'm a CAC with an agenda.
You can try to argue with me in this field if you want but you cannot BS me. Not on THIS topic!

Man, you made a mistake by even debating with ViCiouS, just as I did in another thread. That guy believes what he wants to believe, regardless of the evidence presented to him. In fact, he will even present evidence and cite Wikipedia entries that actually prove your points and discredit his, and will still try to argue from his misguided position.

Damn. You're killing it. That's the problem these days those. Cats keep passing the same books around in their circles. It's like that ancient aliens shit. Some of the Moors books are the worst. They will use 19th century paintings to talk about history in the 700s.

This is why I'm not exactly a fan of a lot of this Hidden Colors-type shit. You have people with no scholarly training or even respect for certain disciplines and methods basically preaching rhetoric. I was on a Facebook page where a guy tried to argue that Hannibal was black. When he was informed that Hannibal was of Phoenician descent, and the Phoenicians were from the Levant, he claimed that the Phoenicians were Moors, so they were black too. When informed that Carthage and the time of Hannibal predated the Moors and Islam by 1000 years, he went in on some "Moorish is a nationality" bullshit and that it has nothing to do with Islam. Just willful ignorance. Arguing with motherfuckers like that will only give you a headache.
 
Man, you made a mistake by even debating with ViCiouS, just as I did in another thread. That guy believes what he wants to believe, regardless of the evidence presented to him. In fact, he will even present evidence and cite Wikipedia entries that actually prove your points and discredit his, and will still try to argue from his misguided position.



This is why I'm not exactly a fan of a lot of this Hidden Colors-type shit. You have people with no scholarly training or even respect for certain disciplines and methods basically preaching rhetoric. I was on a Facebook page where a guy tried to argue that Hannibal was black. When he was informed that Hannibal was of Phoenician descent, and the Phoenicians were from the Levant, he claimed that the Phoenicians were Moors, so they were black too. When informed that Carthage and the time of Hannibal predated the Moors and Islam by 1000 years, he went in on some "Moorish is a nationality" bullshit and that it has nothing to do with Islam. Just willful ignorance. Arguing with motherfuckers like that will only give you a headache.
I see this now. I am further convinced of Asimovs' dictum:

Asimov claimed that there was a law of conservation of belief in nonsense. The amount of belief in nonsense is constant. When less people believe in fairies, more people believe in alien abductions.

This Hidden Colors stuff is sadly making people dumber. While not EVERYTHING contained therein is utter horseshit, what IS utter horseshit (and there is a lot of that) is mixed uncritically in. This is because the people involved in making such projects are NOT interested in scholarship; they are interested in winning an argument (particularly - they think - by dazzling their opponent with information). They assume no one REALLY knows this stuff (some of us actually do -sorry) and they will amaze us by dropping historical names and places and assume we will think: "Wow! this dude know his stuff - I never even heard of the Hittites - he must be right!" So a few grains of actual information is presented with some theories proposed by cranks with credentials and titles of dubious origin; unsolved issues are glibly "solved" (see Etruscans) with some outlandish Afrocentic construct, three more unrelated issues are now also "solved" by this method and the whole thing tied in a weird concatenation of conspiracy and wishful thinking and thus presented to show such and such or so and so was black...

Additionally now every fool with an internet connection can furiously google items which he quite frankly doesn't even bother to read ( which is why often they DISPROVE the point they are trying to make) and post them in reply. Often these guys haven't actually done a lick of reading or studying of the subject they are arguing. They just google like mad and post you response they haven't even read and try to bullshit you into thinking they have "studied" all this. "How do you refute Doctor Khunoffi on this theory!!" Ummm... did you even read this shit? looks like you just found this shit on a google search and posted it - Doctor Khunoffi is a vet...

Quite frankly it's like the difference between a scientist and a lawyer. A scientist is a great scientist if he arrives at the truth - he wants to know was is ACTUALLY happening and if he is wrong he is glad to find out so that he won't waste his time and can move on to the next problem. A lawyer is a great lawyer when he can win and argument even when he's wrong - if he can dazzle you with bullshit he's considered even better (sadly). That Hidden Colors stuff is exactly like that. Dudes think when they watch that stuff and win and argument in a barbershop they are brilliant. But take that argument to a proper university they would laugh you out of the class. Oh but THEN its the white CAC's who want to hide black history. It's all a big conspiracy to make the white man feel good and keep the black man down. Trust me: if white men want to feel good they can just say ummm....stop using our light bulbs,refrigerators, and computers...they don't need Hannibal. Oh thats right Hidden Colors 7 will show how the white man stole the light bulb filaments from the ancient Kemetic Moors and that thermodynamics was a result of Moorish Hamitic Kushites seeking to cool regeneration chambers....Alan Turning stole his ideas for the Universal Turning machine from Ancient Egyptian Kemetic scholars who encoded Godel's Incompleteness Theorem in the Sphinx which is why the nose was removed by the white man!

( attach link here with many ancient picture and statues with big lips, mislabeled as being from various parts of the world like Latvia and Bolivia and Micronesia and found only on crank Afrocentric sites... )
 
Last edited:
Trust me: if white men want to feel good the can just say ummm....stop using our light bulbs,refrigerators, and computers...they don't need Hannibal.
As if blacks wernt pivotal in the creation, advancement, or development in any of the three or countless other inventions and technological advances of this society.... Or that whites havent conspired to revise, hide, or corrupt history globally for the last 2000+ years... :lol:

Man, you got to be one of, if not THE most white washed muthafucka breathing air right now. :smh:
 
As if blacks wernt pivotal in the creation, advancement, or development in any of the three or countless other inventions and technological advances of this society.... Or that whites havent conspired to revise, hide, or corrupt history globally for the last 2000+ years... :lol:

Man, you got to be one of, if not THE most white washed muthafucka breathing air right now. :smh:
White washed? Quite the opposite. I have enough pride in my REAL heritage that I don't need to make one up. Nor do I need to pretend other peoples haven't done great things to make myself feel better. The white man has so fucked up your mind you feel you need to "show him"
He has made you feel inferior; not me.

But I'll bite..

Show me the "black" connection in the development of the main ideas allowing for computers: The Universal Turing Machine and Electrons and Holes in Semiconductors.

I'd love to see the black roots of the work of Alan Turning and William Shockley.

Please dazzle me with this knowledge...

I can't wait:giggle::giggle:

(the furious googling of previously unknown subjects never given a moments thought prior to this begins! Irrelevant (and unread) links are copied and pasted...!!)
 
Last edited:
White washed? Quite the opposite. I have enough pride in my REAL heritage that I don't need to make one up. Nor do I need to pretend other peoples haven't done great things to make myself feel better. The white man has so fucked up your mind you feel you need to "show him"
He has made you feel inferior; not me.
Nothing says hit dog hollering quite like the edit and insert of a projecting pejorative used to deflect ones feelings of self onto another. The fact that you were so fucking insecure that you felt the need to come back and insert this weak shit tells me everything i need to know about your milk bathing ass. Fucking Eurocentric obsessed Tom.

But I'll bite..

Show me the "black" connection in the development of the main ideas allowing for computers: The Universal Turing Machine and Electrons and Holes in Semiconductors.

I'd love to see the black roots of the work of Alan Turning and William Shockley.

Please dazzle me with this knowledge...

I can't wait:giggle::giggle:

(the furious googling of previously unknown subjects never given a moments thought prior to this begins. Irrelevant links are copied and pasted...)
Ohhhhhhhhhh so now we wanna limit to JUST the computer and JUST the modern day iteration?.... As if the concept wasnt one built on concepts and idea of others predating it. You fucking clown.

Again, you're the biggest white washed breathing my man.

And miss me with your horseshit about pride in self and heritage as you worship a library filled with homo erotic Roman culture and trinkets lining your walls while pretending it all materialized out of thin air and birthed civilization as we know it. Fucking honkey.
 
Nothing says hit dog hollering quite like the edit and insert of a projecting pejorative used to deflect ones feelings of self onto another. The fact that you were so fucking insecure that you felt the need to come back and insert this weak shit tells me everything i need to know about your milk bathing ass. Fucking Eurocentric obsessed Tom.


Ohhhhhhhhhh so now we wanna limit to JUST the computer and JUST the modern day iteration?.... As if the concept wasnt one built on concepts and idea of others predating it. You fucking clown.

Again, you're the biggest white washed breathing my man.

And miss me with your horseshit about pride in self and heritage as you worship a library filled with homo erotic Roman culture and trinkets lining your walls while pretending it all materialized out of thin air and birthed civilization as we know it. Fucking honkey.
You don't have to limit your regression go back as far as you like. Trace it back for us. Stun me with your knowledge. Tie modern computing to some afrocentric theme...

This will be great:yes::yes:
 

Sadly, I've encountered far too many black people who use that Revelations verse as proof Jesus was black. Folks also like to say he 'hid' in Egypt so he's black. :eek: Meanwhile, we have Egyptian depictions of West Asians(non-black people) entering Egypt thousands of years before that. If that isn't good enough, Alexander The Great invaded a few hundred years before Jesus. So basically, anyone in the region could 'hide' in Egypt. Saying Jesus had to be black to 'hide' in Egypt is like saying a person has to be a cac to hide in America.

This is why I'm not exactly a fan of a lot of this Hidden Colors-type shit. You have people with no scholarly training or even respect for certain disciplines and methods basically preaching rhetoric. I was on a Facebook page where a guy tried to argue that Hannibal was black. When he was informed that Hannibal was of Phoenician descent, and the Phoenicians were from the Levant, he claimed that the Phoenicians were Moors, so they were black too. When informed that Carthage and the time of Hannibal predated the Moors and Islam by 1000 years, he went in on some "Moorish is a nationality" bullshit and that it has nothing to do with Islam. Just willful ignorance. Arguing with motherfuckers like that will only give you a headache.

There's money in that type of stuff. Feel-good history has been like the religion hustle for some. SOME cacs do the same thing. They pass around bullshit texts saying that Nordics built Egypt, that the real Native Americans were cacs, and other crazy tales. Meanwhile, Native Americans are telling both sides to :angry: "Leave OUR history the fuck alone!!!"

Folks on both sides of feel-good history want to make it seem like all other groups were bumbling fools until (insert group being promoted) showed up. One side will say all Africans lived in mud huts, while the other side will say all cacs were living in caves. It's hilarious.

Debating that Moor shit will make you want to punch yourself in the face. First, cats won't even admit there have been non-black people in areas of North Africa so long they are basically considered native to the region. If they don't admit that, there's no point in continuing. :smh:
 
Sadly, I've encountered far too many black people who use that Revelations verse as proof Jesus was black. Folks also like to say he 'hid' in Egypt so he's black. :eek: Meanwhile, we have Egyptian depictions of West Asians(non-black people) entering Egypt thousands of years before that. If that isn't good enough, Alexander The Great invaded a few hundred years before Jesus. So basically, anyone in the region could 'hide' in Egypt. Saying Jesus had to be black to 'hide' in Egypt is like saying a person has to be a cac to hide in America.



There's money in that type of stuff. Feel-good history has been like the religion hustle for some. SOME cacs do the same thing. They pass around bullshit texts saying that Nordics built Egypt, that the real Native Americans were cacs, and other crazy tales. Meanwhile, Native Americans are telling both sides to :angry: "Leave OUR history the fuck alone!!!"

Folks on both sides of feel-good history want to make it seem like all other groups were bumbling fools until (insert group being promoted) showed up. One side will say all Africans lived in mud huts, while the other side will say all cacs were living in caves. It's hilarious.

Debating that Moor shit will make you want to punch yourself in the face. First, cats won't even admit there have been non-black people in areas of North Africa so long they are basically considered native to the region. If they don't admit that, there's no point in continuing. :smh:

Of course there were non black people the blackamoors were fuckin the shit out the romans and the mixed children ended up

all over north africa and the so called middle east....

They shouldve never attempted to civilize those savage

boy fuckers in europe....
 
Mrfreddygoodbudt: 16613080 said:
Hell to the muthafuckin NAW I dont use sun screen..

Us melanin rich folk NEEEEEED to be in the sun to asorb that cosmic energy from a spiritual perspective but from a medical perspective

we NEED to be exposed to the Sun for Vit D.... so sunscreen is a big fuckin no no for me, though I would use aloe gel if Im out sun bathing for four hours or more...

and thats only the natural clear 99.9999 percent pure aloe... not that green or blue colored shit...

us melanin rich folk Must get sunlight... scientific fact!!!

we need laws passed so we have time and right to get sufficient sunlight especially if we live in places like new york city...

rights to beaches before they get crowded with cacs who really shouldnt be out there burnin and damaging their recessive skin..

so yes your wife needs to read up on proper "melanin" care....

That's bullshit if you don't think black people don't need sunscreen. When I was a kid, my first job at a seafood restaurant took our kitchen crew deep sea fishing. My friend, who is the complexion of Michael Blackson, and I fell asleep on the mast for about two hours. When we woke up, we both were in excruciating pain from being sunburnt. Showers hurt where we were sunburnt, our skin was peeling and we felt sick on the stomach for days.

On land, we take for granted the amount t of shade from direct sunlight or unnatural protection via pollution that filters UV light in cities. Be careful out there. My mother had a small benign patch of cancer on her wrist a few years ago.
 
Last edited:
Of course there were non black people the blackamoors were fuckin the shit out the romans and the mixed children ended up

all over north africa and the so called middle east....

They shouldve never attempted to civilize those savage

boy fuckers in europe....

Even though you admit to not reading things, you should know that the mixing predates even ancient Sumer. It starts with Neanderthals and humans fucking. Goes on from there with people coming and going. Shit, you can leave the neanderthals out of the equation and just deal with the mixing of the last 5 to 10 thousands years before most the civilization people talk about.
 
Even though you admit to not reading things, you should know that the mixing predates even ancient Sumer. It starts with Neanderthals and humans fucking. Goes on from there with people coming and going. Shit, you can leave the neanderthals out of the equation and just deal with the mixing of the last 5 to 10 thousands years before most the civilization people talk about.

there is no history of cacs going back more than six thousand years...

they are babies in comparison to the original carbonated beings aka the melanin rich aka the "black" race..

thats why they have no history untill we cleaned them up, taught them how to bathe more than once a year... introduced them to bath houses...

which they turned into pedo boy fuckin whorehouses.... aka roman/greek history.. the roman catholic church still carries on the tradition..

fuckin faggot savages......


shouldve left them flea ridden cannibals alone...

and I read a lot, just not going for the cac revised history shit...

the christopher columbus bullshit..

dude do you have any idea how fuckin filthy cac europe was..

how much that shit fuckin STANK to unholy hell...

muthafuckas walkin around with all types of lice and bugs in their hair...

and how they all were cannibals...

they even used cannibalism as a their main source of medicine....

I know the europeans TRUE history son..

not that remix version they try to brainswash us with

in our youth..
 
there is no history of cacs going back more than six thousand years...

they are babies in comparison to the original carbonated beings aka the melanin rich aka the "black" race..

thats why they have no history untill we cleaned them up, taught them how to bathe more than once a year... introduced them to bath houses...

which they turned into pedo boy fuckin whorehouses.... aka roman/greek history.. the roman catholic church still carries on the tradition..

fuckin faggot savages......


shouldve left them flea ridden cannibals alone...

and I read a lot, just not going for the cac revised history shit...

the christopher columbus bullshit..

dude do you have any idea how fuckin filthy cac europe was..

how much that shit fuckin STANK to unholy hell...

muthafuckas walkin around with all types of lice and bugs in their hair...

and how they all were cannibals...

they even used cannibalism as a their main source of medicine....

I know the europeans TRUE history son..

not that remix version they try to brainswash us with

in our youth..

What's fucked up is fools on the other side say some of the same things about sub-saharan Africa. :smh: Say man, what color were the Neanderthals humans fucked?
 
...Folks on both sides of feel-good history want to make it seem like all other groups were bumbling fools until (insert group being promoted) showed up. One side will say all Africans lived in mud huts, while the other side will say all cacs were living in caves.
I don't think making black people feel good about making up their involvement in the Advancement of the world is correct. Even some white historians refute the claims about the origin of the people that created Ancient Egypt wasn't black. What agenda would they have in doing that?

Debating that Moor shit will make you want to punch yourself in the face. First, cats won't even admit there have been non-black people in areas of North Africa so long they are basically considered native to the region. If they don't admit that, there's no point in continuing. :smh:
Well, if that's the case then why still argue with them? What point do you have to prove by continuing to go back and forth?
On the topic of the Moor (specifically the black Moors) so you are saying that Moors didn't play a significant role in helping Europe out of the Dark Ages? If so, then how did Europe rebound? Clearly there's physical evidence that black people play a major role in Europe at that time.
 
What's fucked up is fools on the other side say some of the same things about sub-saharan Africa. :smh: Say man, what color were the Neanderthals humans fucked?

Who cares what fools say... they got pyramids in subsahara

africa.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/21/sudan-meroe-pyramids-spectacular_n_7336552.html

they STILL finding Ancient Kingdoms in the Sudan...

fools will always talks shit with nothing to back it up....

No foolish shit here...

Nubians Lived in the Central Nile Valley
African people from what is now the Sahara began to move toward the Nile in Nubia by around 5000 BC. They brought with them the art of making pottery. Originally herdsmen and hunters of large animals, they eventually became fishermen and farmers. Over time, new people moved into the region from the south, so that Nubia’s population was often a diverse mix of African peoples.

Many Nubians lived along the Nile which curved northward through the desert. Farmers grew grains, peas, lentils, dates, and possibly melons. But especially important were their herds of cattle, a measure of wealth and social status. In the deserts, Nubians mined carnelian and gold, as well as other mineral resources. Bartering cattle, gold, carnelian, ivory, animal skins, hardwood, incense, and dates, Nubians traded with the Egyptians, their neighbors to the north, for grain, vegetable oils, wine, beer, linen, and other manufactured goods.

we talking five thousand years B to the muthafucin C

https://oi.uchicago.edu/museum-exhibits/history-ancient-nubia


tell them fools to shut the hell up and read a mrfreddygoodbud post and learn something...


Im still waiting for yall to comment on the Etruscan artwork which clearly shows they were carbon rich, aka melanin rich, aka "black" people...

the Etruscans another major cover up of euro cac history...
fuck what fools say...

Now while the nubians were doing their thing, five thousand years b.c..

show me what were the europeans doing in europe...???

besides pickin fleas out their asses in caves....

to hell what eurocentric history revisionist fools say!!!
 
I don't think making black people feel good about making up their involvement in the Advancement of the world is correct. Even some white historians refute the claims about the origin of the people that created Ancient Egypt wasn't black. What agenda would they have in doing that?

Well, if that's the case then why still argue with them? What point do you have to prove by continuing to go back and forth?
On the topic of the Moor (specifically the black Moors) so you are saying that Moors didn't play a significant role in helping Europe out of the Dark Ages? If so, then how did Europe rebound? Clearly there's physical evidence that black people play a major role in Europe at that time.

The West Asian invasion is what brought all the 'knowledge' people keep wanting to claim. Who were those invaders? They were sand cacs who invaded Africa first. If you want to say Europe rebounded, you then have to say Africa did too. Who brought paper to Africa? What language are a lot of the texts in Timbuktu? So people are cool with the sand cac invasion of Africa as long as they get to claim 'dropping knowledge' to Europeans. They cool with the trans-Saharan slave trade? You do realize sand cacs used Africans do to their heavy lifting, don't you?

And remember, cacs will call other cacs who are just a little darker than them black. Knowing that comes with learning history. To Europeans, sand cacs are black.

People can't have it both ways. If all those sand cacs in Egypt aren't real Egyptians, where did they come from? Did they come from the invasion that predated the Europeans invasion you are trying to claim. If not, then they have always been there, correct?
 
Nothing says hit dog hollering quite like the edit and insert of a projecting pejorative used to deflect ones feelings of self onto another. The fact that you were so fucking insecure that you felt the need to come back and insert this weak shit tells me everything i need to know about your milk bathing ass. Fucking Eurocentric obsessed Tom.


Ohhhhhhhhhh so now we wanna limit to JUST the computer and JUST the modern day iteration?.... As if the concept wasnt one built on concepts and idea of others predating it. You fucking clown.

Again, you're the biggest white washed breathing my man.

And miss me with your horseshit about pride in self and heritage as you worship a library filled with homo erotic Roman culture and trinkets lining your walls while pretending it all materialized out of thin air and birthed civilization as we know it. Fucking honkey.

crackers wasnt doing shit, untill AFTER they enslaved

the God race..

where were all their inventions prior to black folks being enslaved...and forced to work with and for the savage cac??

thats the REAL muthafucka question...
 
Who cares what fools say... they got pyramids in subsahara

africa.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/21/sudan-meroe-pyramids-spectacular_n_7336552.html

they STILL finding Ancient Kingdoms in the Sudan...

fools will always talks shit with nothing to back it up....

No foolish shit here...

Nubians Lived in the Central Nile Valley
African people from what is now the Sahara began to move toward the Nile in Nubia by around 5000 BC. They brought with them the art of making pottery. Originally herdsmen and hunters of large animals, they eventually became fishermen and farmers. Over time, new people moved into the region from the south, so that Nubia’s population was often a diverse mix of African peoples.

Many Nubians lived along the Nile which curved northward through the desert. Farmers grew grains, peas, lentils, dates, and possibly melons. But especially important were their herds of cattle, a measure of wealth and social status. In the deserts, Nubians mined carnelian and gold, as well as other mineral resources. Bartering cattle, gold, carnelian, ivory, animal skins, hardwood, incense, and dates, Nubians traded with the Egyptians, their neighbors to the north, for grain, vegetable oils, wine, beer, linen, and other manufactured goods.

we talking five thousand years B to the muthafucin C

https://oi.uchicago.edu/museum-exhibits/history-ancient-nubia


tell them fools to shut the hell up and read a mrfreddygoodbud post and learn something...


Im still waiting for yall to comment on the Etruscan artwork which clearly shows they were carbon rich, aka melanin rich, aka "black" people...

the Etruscans another major cover up of euro cac history...
fuck what fools say...

Now while the nubians were doing their thing, five thousand years b.c..

show me what were the europeans doing in europe...???

besides pickin fleas out their asses in caves....

to hell what eurocentric history revisionist fools say!!!

I agree with you. Sub-saharan Africa had things going on. Cacs got stonehenge and they have unearthed ancient cities(posted links to that before). I don't get why either side has to deny any of that shit. That's why I can only laugh whenever someone talks about cavs or huts. It's obviously they only study agenda-driven history.
 
I agree with you. Sub-saharan Africa had things going on. Cacs got stonehenge and they have unearthed ancient cities(posted links to that before). I don't get why either side has to deny any of that shit. That's why I can only laugh whenever someone talks about cavs or huts. It's obviously they only study agenda-driven history.

cmon son..

413alR4fpyL._SY445_QL70_.jpg


Irish folk say black giants from Africa built
stone henge.....

sooooooooo you say what???

and they have stonehenge like structures in africa

that predate the one in england...

again..

you say what??
 
Back
Top