Has the U.S. Gov't been Hijacked?

[Makeherhappy]

With all of the materials at our disposal, why hasn't it been brought up even more:

If not the:

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

or the:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/skull_and_bones_membership.html

or even the :

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a3b9b364f83.htm

These individuals aren't for the good of man. They also get alot of people confused in the truths and the lies.

It seems like it's only going to get worse before it get's any better.


Or,

Is everything just normal?

*I'm getting a little more information for that "Military Exercise" *

 

[Makkonnen]

Explain to me how you steal your own car.

 

[Makeherhappy]

Explain to me how you steal your own car.

Easily have someone do it for you.

 

[Spectrum]

Explain to me how you steal your own car.

Actually, that response had me rolling.

"Makeherhappy": Semantically speaking, I think he is saying you need to rephrase your question.

 

[Makeherhappy]

Actually, that response had me rolling.

"Makeherhappy": Semantically speaking, I think he is saying you need to rephrase your question.

I like the question, I'll leave that. But if hijack is an automatic association with cars then so be it.



Has the U.S. Gov't been hijacked by individuals who are not for the good of the people?

 

[Spectrum]

I understand what your question implied..it was just not worded correctly.Before I make any comments..what do you mean "good of the people"?. That means alot of different things to many different people. Elaborate.

 

[Makkonnen]

Easily have someone do it for you.

the definition of the word steal is to take something which does not belong to you
if the item belongs to you, you cannot by definition perform that act

or to say it straight out

rich white men created this "nation" and ruled this nation from its inception- nothing has changed

Who owns America? The same people who run it. Slaves assume this nation is theirs. You are tenants with inalienable rights until others see fit to remove those rights lol

grow up

 

[Makeherhappy]

I understand what your question implied..it was just not worded correctly.Before I make any comments..what do you mean "good of the people"?. That means alot of different things to many different people. Elaborate.

No problem. First are you an english/speech teacher?

Good of the people.

The average man(or woman). The individual who get's up every morning to bust his(or her) ass to survive. The teacher, police officer, etc..

I hope that sheds a little light on the subject.

 

[Makkonnen]

I like the question, I'll leave that. But if hijack is an automatic association with cars then so be it.



Has the U.S. Gov't been hijacked by individuals who are not for the good of the people?

Brief history summary

The country was hijacked starting 420 years ago by Europeans. Then parts of it were hijacked from France and Spain by England. Then it was hijacked from England 230 years ago. All of these hijackings were done by rich white people.

When was America run by someone non-white or non-rich?

no fuckin hijacking cept for someone hijacking your attention with mixnmatch conspiracy theories and investigational journalism.

The Bilderbergers etc? Guess what? Those are the same rich white people still running the same shit they own aka the world.
Own the world then maybe you can change shit.

 

[Makkonnen]

ps

hi·jack also high·jack ( P ) Pronunciation Key (hjk) Informal
tr.v. hi·jacked, hi·jack·ing, hi·jacks

To stop and rob (a vehicle in transit).
To steal (goods) from a vehicle in transit.
To seize control of (a moving vehicle) by use of force, especially in order to reach an alternate destination.

To steal from as if by hijacking.
To swindle or subject to extortion.

n.
The act or an instance of hijacking.

 

[Makeherhappy]

Brief history summary

The country was hijacked starting 420 years ago by Europeans. Then parts of it were hijacked from France and Spain by England. Then it was hijacked from England 230 years ago. All of these hijackings were done by rich white people.

Ok, what happened in 1585?
OK, what happened in 1775? D of I and Wealth of Nations in 1776

When was America run by someone non-white or non-rich?

Never

no fuckin hijacking cept for someone hijacking your attention with mixnmatch conspiracy theories and investigational journalism.

When you group theories with conspiracy, you get....

Conspire - to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or an act which becomes unlawful as a result of the secret agreement

Theory - the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another

Nuff said

The Bilderbergers etc? Guess what? Those are the same rich white people still running the same shit they own aka the world.
Own the world then maybe you can change shit.

love the attitude, I didn't say anything about changing shit(as you put it) I'm disappointed in you for stopping so low on the totem pole. I was thinking more along the Illumanati, York and Scottish Rite, etc.

Thanks for your repsonse.

 

[Spectrum]

No problem. First are you an english/speech teacher?

Good of the people.

The average man(or woman). The individual who get's up every morning to bust his(or her) ass to survive. The teacher, police officer, etc..

I hope that sheds a little light on the subject.

I'm not going to be an asshole. Let me be clearer because the sarcasm obviously went waaay over your head.

What is "good for the people"? Who is the collective? What philosophy should guide them as a collective? How should this philosophy be interpreted and administered into the legal system? What should the government do to support this system? What type of political/economy should exist? Again...what is "good for the people"? That is the vaguest statement in the world and could mean a million things.

 

[Makkonnen]

Ok, what happened in 1585?
OK, what happened in 1775? D of I and Wealth of Nations in 1776




Never



When you group theories with conspiracy, you get....

Conspire - to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or an act which becomes unlawful as a result of the secret agreement

Theory - the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another

Nuff said



love the attitude, I didn't say anything about changing shit(as you put it) I'm disappointed in you for stopping so low on the totem pole. I was thinking more along the Illumanati, York and Scottish Rite, etc.

Thanks for your repsonse.

why stop there? im disappointed in you for stopping so low on the totem pole. I was thinking more along the lines of Nimrod and who he served.

Hey Professor why mention dates when you admit that it has always been run by rich white people? Do you suggest that some of these rich white exploiters are better than other rich white exploiters?


I'd suggest you create other threads like "Have Apples been replaced by Apples?"
"Are Monkeys The New Monkeys?
"Is your clock a clock?
"Pain - Does it hurt?"


When you group ignorance with futility you get............

Ignorance - the lack of knowledge or education

Futility - uselessness as a consequence of having no practical result

Nuff said





I'm just fuckin with you because this thread is a fuckin abomination. I hope english is not your first language. You cannot even discuss this shit intelligently with people who know and believe some of things you are talking about.

Effective communication is the key. Nothing has been hijacked lately. Agendas have changed recently but those are different things. Alex Jones has problems with recent shit while people of color have had problems since GW put in his wooden teeth and stepped out his front door to survey his negro property.
Not that Jones aint shit but the "at its core America is...." argument doesn't address alot of shit.

good luck

 

[Makkonnen]

I'm not going to be an asshole. Let me be clearer because the sarcasm obviously went waaay over your head.

What is "good for the people"? Who is the collective? What philosophy should guide them as a collective? How should this philosophy be interpreted and administered into the legal system? What should the government do to support this system? What type of political/economy should exist? Again...what is "good for the people"? That is the vaguest statement in the world and could mean a million things.

eewwll means

who are the "people"?
what is "good"?

I was gonna write "it has not been hijacked by individuals who are for the good of the people" but that would have made this thread even worse lmao

 

[Makeherhappy]

I'm not going to be an asshole. Let me be clearer because the sarcasm obviously went waaay over your head.

Trust me it didn't, I just paid it no attention. And responded to what you typed. Now if you want to come out of the clouds, we can do that.

What is "good for the people"?

Who's to say, like you said it is very vague to open up for discussion, but everytime you don't dicuss you question. TO ME WHAT'S MORALLY RIGHT. Now if you want to get into a discussion of morals, that's another thread.

Who is the collective? What philosophy should guide them as a collective?

Collective, where did that come from........

How should this philosophy be interpreted and administered into the legal system?

What should the government do to support this system?
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, THEY'VE DONE ENOUGH

What type of political/economy should exist? Again...what is "good for the people"?

An open one

 

[Makeherhappy]

eewwll means

who are the "people"?
what is "good"?

I was gonna write "it has not been hijacked by individuals who are for the good of the people" but that would have made this thread even worse lmao

Not by myself.

 

[Spectrum]

Trust me it didn't, I just paid it no attention. And responded to what you typed. Now if you want to come out of the clouds, we can do that.


Who's to say, like you said it is very vague to open up for discussion, but everytime you don't dicuss you question. TO ME WHAT'S MORALLY RIGHT. Now if you want to get into a discussion of morals, that's another thread.


Collective, where did that come from........





An open one

1.If you would have really responded to my question, you would have elaborated instead of asking "do I speak english.

2. You said "good for the people" that is speaking of "collectives". You didn't say individual rights or freedoms..you said "good for the PEOPLE".

3. I've done more than my fair share of debating..but how can anyone expound if your initial question isn't clear?

4.Well, if you can't say "what's good for the people"..why did you start the thread...what's all this hijacking and "these people aren't for the "good of man"..etc if you aren't even saying what they are doing "wrong" and what the "good of the people is". Of course I'm going to ask question..because you are being extremely vague?

5. I ask you what type of government should we have and you say "Open".

what the hell does that mean?

 

[Makeherhappy]

1.If you would have really responded to my question, you would have elaborated instead of asking "do I speak english.

The simple fact that you don't read, justifies no more responses to you.. I ASKED THE QUESTION, "ARE YOU A ENGLISH/SPEECH TEACHER?" DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT YOU SPEAKING ENGLISH....;.

2. You said "good for the people" that is speaking of "collectives". You didn't say individual rights or freedoms..you said "good for the PEOPLE".

I had to change answers on you.

Rights - choice, speech, press, vote...............need more

3. I've done more than my fair share of debating..but how can anyone expound if your initial question isn't clear?

The question was posed and the links were provided. Are those some of the main individuals or are there more involved.

4.Well, if you can't say "what's good for the people"..why did you start the thread...what's all this hijacking and "these people aren't for the "good of man"..etc if you aren't even saying what they are doing "wrong" and what the "good of the people is". Of course I'm going to ask question..because you are being extremely vague?

Open your eyes, if you don't see what they are doing wrong .........
What Walgreens world do you live in son?

5. I ask you what type of government should we have and you say

"Open".

I will say a government that isn't ran on secrecy. energy task force, plame investigation, etc. Not just this administration either, previous ones.

I don't know what island you live on, but it's in your face everyday. And if you don't see it, you need to have a quick reality check.

In closing, READ, i'll say it again, READ, one more time, READ.

 

[Spectrum]

The simple fact that you don't read, justifies no more responses to you.. I ASKED THE QUESTION, "ARE YOU A ENGLISH/SPEECH TEACHER?" DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT YOU SPEAKING ENGLISH....;.



REFER TO ANSWER 1



REFER TO ANSWER 1



REFER TO ANSWER 1

Exactly, you really have nothing to say even about your own topics. That's why no one it taking the time to respond.

***edit since you came back and edited your post"

I would like to explain to you that I have books in my home about the Rothchilds, Bilderberg Group, The Council of Foreign Relations, The New American Century,etc. I could probably teach you ALOT. Don't assume my position on any of this because I haven't stated it. I simply asked you what you meant by your questions. Don't get defensive because you were asked to be clear. Obviously if multiple people are making reference to your lack of clarity it must have been an issue.

 

[Makeherhappy]

Exactly, you really have nothing to say even about your own topics. That's why no one it taking the time to respond.

That was to easy of a way to ignore you, here you go if you didn't see

Quote:
Originally Posted by eewwll
1.If you would have really responded to my question, you would have elaborated instead of asking "do I speak english.



The simple fact that you don't read, justifies no more responses to you.. I ASKED THE QUESTION, "ARE YOU A ENGLISH/SPEECH TEACHER?" DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT YOU SPEAKING ENGLISH....;.


Quote:
Originally Posted by eewwll
2. You said "good for the people" that is speaking of "collectives". You didn't say individual rights or freedoms..you said "good for the PEOPLE".



I had to change answers on you.

Rights - choice, speech, press, vote...............need more


Quote:
Originally Posted by eewwll
3. I've done more than my fair share of debating..but how can anyone expound if your initial question isn't clear?



The question was posed and the links were provided. Are those some of the main individuals or are there more involved.


Quote:
Originally Posted by eewwll
4.Well, if you can't say "what's good for the people"..why did you start the thread...what's all this hijacking and "these people aren't for the "good of man"..etc if you aren't even saying what they are doing "wrong" and what the "good of the people is". Of course I'm going to ask question..because you are being extremely vague?



Open your eyes, if you don't see what they are doing wrong .........
What Walgreens world do you live in son?


Quote:
Originally Posted by eewwll
5. I ask you what type of government should we have and you say


"Open".

I will say a government that isn't ran on secrecy. energy task force, plame investigation, etc. Not just this administration either, previous ones.

I don't know what island you live on, but it's in your face everyday. And if you don't see it, you need to have a quick reality check.

In closing, READ, i'll say it again, READ, one more time, READ.

 

[Spectrum]

That was to easy of a way to ignore you, here you go if you didn't see

Quote:
Originally Posted by eewwll
1.If you would have really responded to my question, you would have elaborated instead of asking "do I speak english.



The simple fact that you don't read, justifies no more responses to you.. I ASKED THE QUESTION, "ARE YOU A ENGLISH/SPEECH TEACHER?" DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT YOU SPEAKING ENGLISH....;.


Quote:
Originally Posted by eewwll
2. You said "good for the people" that is speaking of "collectives". You didn't say individual rights or freedoms..you said "good for the PEOPLE".



I had to change answers on you.

Rights - choice, speech, press, vote...............need more


Quote:
Originally Posted by eewwll
3. I've done more than my fair share of debating..but how can anyone expound if your initial question isn't clear?



The question was posed and the links were provided. Are those some of the main individuals or are there more involved.


Quote:
Originally Posted by eewwll
4.Well, if you can't say "what's good for the people"..why did you start the thread...what's all this hijacking and "these people aren't for the "good of man"..etc if you aren't even saying what they are doing "wrong" and what the "good of the people is". Of course I'm going to ask question..because you are being extremely vague?



Open your eyes, if you don't see what they are doing wrong .........
What Walgreens world do you live in son?


Quote:
Originally Posted by eewwll
5. I ask you what type of government should we have and you say


"Open".

I will say a government that isn't ran on secrecy. energy task force, plame investigation, etc. Not just this administration either, previous ones.

I don't know what island you live on, but it's in your face everyday. And if you don't see it, you need to have a quick reality check.

In closing, READ, i'll say it again, READ, one more time, READ.

IGNORE? Did you forget the fact that you came back and edited your post AFTER my initial reply. Young man. With all respect, I'm happy that you are exploring the "invisible hand" that moves the government. I will assure you that I have well over a decades worths of books that I have purchased over the years to feed my own curiosity. I'm sorry that If people on here dont do cartwheels because you posted a couple of links, asked a vague question, and said "open your eyes". Good..you have nowentered the Matrix. Others have been here for years already and are well versed about "the invisible hand". If you had a more specific topic in mind, please expound. Otherwise, you really aren't asking anything.

 

[Makeherhappy]

IGNORE? Did you forget the fact that you came back and edited your post AFTER my initial reply. Young man. With all respect, I'm happy that you are exploring the "invisible hand" that moves the government. I will assure you that I have well over a decades worths of books that I have purchased over the years to feed my own curiosity. I'm sorry that If people on here dont do cartwheels because you posted a couple of links, asked a vague question, and said "open your eyes". Good..you have nowentered the Matrix. Others have been here for years already and are well versed about "the invisible hand". If you had a more specific topic in mind, please expound. Otherwise, you really aren't asking anything.

If you look at the time you responded the first time, it was the same time I edited. LET'S GET IT STRAIGHT, I EDITED BEFORE I KNEW YOUR BABBLE WAS BEING TYPED.

Oh I see you do have me confused.

Things I need you to understand.

1. I put the post up there to get a response from individuals. I see your assumptions you have made got you out there bad. No part of me is young, i do wish. Books, everyone has books. I have ebooks, documentaries, the list goes on and on. Information, I have closets(that's plural) of it.

2. Lil dude, I'M GLAD YOU BROUGHT UP THE MATRIX, I EXITED THE MATRIX A LONG TIME AGO. COME AND JOIN ME.

3. Your knocking up my post, so please keep on with your babble.

4. Wasn't looking for any cartwheels, the question was posed to get people's opinion.

5. Don't get my post count confused.

Now, do you have anything to contribute from your great books. If not the useless attacks can be directed, someone else you think are young.

DO YOU NEED A HUG, A RETTE, OR SOMETHING ELSE???

 

[Spectrum]

If you look at the time you responded the first time, it was the same time I edited. LET'S GET IT STRAIGHT, I EDITED BEFORE I KNEW YOUR BABBLE WAS BEING TYPED.

Oh I see you do have me confused.

Things I need you to understand.

1. I put the post up there to get a response from individuals. I see your assumptions you have made got you out there bad. No part of me is young, i do wish. Books, everyone has books. I have ebooks, documentaries, the list goes on and on. Information, I have closets(that's plural) of it.

2. Lil dude, I'M GLAD YOU BROUGHT UP THE MATRIX, I EXITED THE MATRIX A LONG TIME AGO. COME AND JOIN ME.

3. Your knocking up my post, so please keep on with your babble.

4. Wasn't looking for any cartwheels, the question was posed to get people's opinion.

5. Don't get my post count confused.

Now, do you have anything to contribute from your great books. If not the useless attacks can be directed, someone else you think are young.

DO YOU NEED A HUG, A RETTE, OR SOMETHING ELSE???

Maybe you still don't get it and this will be the last time I will reply. If you ask unclear questions, you wont' get any replies.

I certainly don't have you confused.

Ask a more concise question and you will get a concise response from people.

This topic has been covered multiple times before. I don't think anyone is going to respond because this has already been discussed. Maybe this would if you asked a specific question that covers this in a different way.

In regards to the other condescending, misplaced remarks....notice that I asked you nicely a couple of times to respond with some detail...I actually was waiting on you do add something;however, at this point..fuck your thread and your "closets" of books. I don't know why you are trying the "oneupsmanship"..who the funk has closets of books about conspiracy theories unless you teach it at a university of something.

Good luck with your thread.

 

[Makeherhappy]

Maybe you still don't get it and this will be the last time I will reply. If you ask unclear questions, you wont' get any replies.

I'm glad this is your last time. And again you didn't read

I certainly don't have you confused.

Trust me you do

Ask a more concise question and you will get a concise response from people.

Again you didn't read

This topic has been covered multiple times before. I don't think anyone is going to respond because this has already been discussed. Maybe this would if you asked a specific question that covers this in a different way.

Damnit dude, do you read? REREAD THE POST, TAKE YOUR GLASS OFF.

In regards to the other condescending, misplaced remarks....notice that I asked you nicely a couple of times to respond with some detail...I actually was waiting on you do add something;however, at this point..fuck your thread and your "closets" of books. I don't know why you are trying the "oneupsmanship"..who the funk has closets of books about conspiracy theories unless you teach it at a university of something.

LIL KID, YOU STILL HAVE A LOT TO LEARN. THE THREAD HAS BEEN FUCKED EVER SINCE YOU STEPPED IN. NO ONE IS TRYING TO ONUPSMANSHIP. YOU BROUGHT UP THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE BOOKS, EVERYONE HAS BOOKS. SO YOU STARTED THAT.

SON YOU DO HAVE A LOT TO LEARN.

Good luck with your thread.

 

[BigDaddyBuk]

y'all aren't even right for tearing this guy a new orifice like this.

shit IS funny though.

 

[Makkonnen]

Not by myself.

oh really? you had a whole team working on the creation of this thread? you should all promise to never meet again

 

[Makeherhappy]

oh really? you had a whole team working on the creation of this thread? you should all promise to never meet again

1. how was that quote going to make thing "worse?"

2. What whole team, I see 2 other people besides myself?

 

[Makkonnen]

y'all aren't even right for tearing this guy a new orifice like this.

shit IS funny though.

this dude needs to work on reading comprehension

i admit i have not read entire threads/posts and said shit or been up 30 somethin hours replyin to shit like an idiot but hey this dude doesnt have a clue

fucked up part is I read prison planet once or twice a month and many people here would agree with him if he could say some shit clearly that meant something meaningful

 

[Makkonnen]

1. how was that quote going to make thing "worse?"

2. What whole team, I see 2 other people besides myself?

look up sarcasm

may i ask how old you are, education level, if you are a native english speaker? I do not want to be unfair here.

 

[Spectrum]

I promised to stay out of this thread, but i missed something earlier that I now have to comment on this..then I'm staying the funk out of here:

"I'd suggest you create other threads like "Have Apples been replaced by Apples?"
"Are Monkeys The New Monkeys?
"Is your clock a clock?
"Pain - Does it hurt?""

Makkonnen..you are absolutely wrong for this right here. I damn near spit my drink up when I read this: Pain- Does it hure? lol..yall mofos on BGOL aint right.

 

[Spectrum]

I promised to stay out of this thread, but i missed something earlier that I now have to comment on this..then I'm staying the funk out of here:

"I'd suggest you create other threads like "Have Apples been replaced by Apples?"
"Are Monkeys The New Monkeys?
"Is your clock a clock?
"Pain - Does it hurt?""

Makkonnen..you are absolutely wrong for this right here. I damn near spit my drink up when I read this: Pain- Does it hurt? lol..yall mofos on BGOL aint right.

 

[Makeherhappy]

look up sarcasm

may i ask how old you are, education level, if you are a native english speaker? I do not want to be unfair here.

Hit me up in the PM, I want to keep with tradition.

 

[Makkonnen]

Hit me up in the PM, I want to keep with tradition.

uhh no, i wont, i want to keep with tradition

 

[Makeherhappy]

Has the U.S. Gov't been Hijacked? The remix

Going back to the previous thread. Let me elaborate some more, and so we can have somewhat of an intelligent discussion.

With all of the materials at the disposal of the masses, why hasn't it been brought up even more in the media.

I mean, people talk about it all the time and it might even make the news once and a while, but when the media labels it a "conspiracy theory" everyone starts to discredit the information. Instead of proving the "conspiracy theory" true, why not prove it false. If it can't be proven false, it would make it true.(Rule of Proof By Contradiction)

Even with these so called "left wing" hack jobs, why aren't they speaking up?

Let's do this again.

P.S. - With all of these different threads, why hasn't someone brought up the Grand Boule(sorry no accent mark) aka Sigma Pi Phi?

 

[Makeherhappy]

uhh no, i wont, i want to keep with tradition

I love tradition