Going Postal

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>
$238 billion loss for U.S. mail;
Saturday delivery may end</font size></center>



usps_winter_mail.gi.top.jpg

A letter carrier walks through snowdrifts to his mail truck Feb. 26, 2010, in
Maplewood, N.J., following a snowstorm that closed area schools and delayed
commuter trains.


c a b l e n e w s n e t w o r k
March 2, 2010


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Snail mail might soon get even slower.

The cash-strapped U.S. Postal Service announced Tuesday that it will incur about $238 billion in losses in the next 10 years if Congress doesn't permit it to revamp its outdated business model.

The agency is proposing an adjusted mail service schedule, which will likely cut Saturday delivery, and eliminating its prepaid retiree health benefits. That alone, it says, will cut $90 billion in costs over the next 10 years.

The challenges hurting USPS's bottom line reflect a "macro change in society," Postmaster General Jack Potter said at a press conference Monday previewing the proposed changes. "All posts around the world are challenged, just as we are, by the diversion of hard copy to electronic medium."

USPS unveiled a list of cost cutting measures, including closing some branches and raising its prices, two moves which would both require Congressional approval. The agency also said that it expects to save another $123 billion between now and 2020 by renegotiating transportation contracts, cutting work hours, and expanding use of self-service kiosks in grocery stores and other popular retail spots -- measures that don't require Congressional approval.
Postal Service to shed another 30,000 jobs

USPS is trying to curb steep losses. It posted a $3.8 billion loss in its 2009 fiscal year, the latest in a multiyear string of whopping losses. Mail volume was down 12.7% for the year, a trend the agency expects to continue over the next decade as more consumers opt for online bill payments and message delivery.

The Post Office was $10 billion in debt as of Sept. 30 -- not far off from its $15 billion debt limit, which the agency expects to hit in its 2011 fiscal year.

USPS spent $4.8 million on studies by outside consultants, Accenture, the Boston Consulting Group and McKinsey and Co. to forecast a 10-year outlook and present a plan that the agency calls both "ambitious and aggressive." Any changes to the government agency's business model would have to be reviewed by the Postal Regulatory Commission, presented in a series of public hearings and approved by Congress.

The Post Office, an independent government agency, does not receive taxpayer dollars and is funded entirely by its own revenue. However, the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 constrains the agency's operations. It prohibits USPS from closing small branches based solely on economic factors, and prevents the agency from expanding its services beyond postal delivery.

Post offices in some countries, including Italy and Japan, have boosted their sales by offering ancillary services, like banking. But unless Congress steps in, USPS cannot expand beyond the postal-mail realm.

Postmaster General Potter said relaxing some of the agency's stringent regulations could allow it to tap into its strengths as one of the largest retail networks in America, as well as "The Most Trusted Government Agency" -- a title USPS has won the last five years in a row.

With 32,000 post offices throughout the country, USPS has more retail locations than McDonald's (MCD, Fortune 500), Starbucks (SBUX, Fortune 500), Wal-Mart (WMT, Fortune 500) and Walgreens (WAG, Fortune 500) combined, Thomas Dohrmann, partner at McKinsey & Company, said in the presentation Monday. That said, the average foot traffic for a post office is about one tenth of that at Walgreens -- a mere 600 weekly customers.

USPS has already begun taking the axe to its budget. The agency made $6 billion in cuts last year, reducing its workforce by about 40,000 employees and chopping overtime hours, transportation costs and other expenses. Congress passed legislation allowing the organization to cut retiree health benefit payments by $4 billion.

Despite those measures, the agency still expects a net loss of $7.8 billion in fiscal 2010.

USPS employs about 600,000 workers and currently has a nationwide hiring freeze. Additionally, Chief Financial Officer Joseph Corbett says he expects to reduce its payrolls by the equivalent of 50,000 full-time employees in fiscal 2010 through natural attrition and by reducing overtime hours. The agency also wants to renegotiate its contracts with four unions in order to gain greater flexibility in scheduling part-time workers and moving employees across departments.

A significant postal price hike is also under consideration, although the price most consumers care about -- the rate for a first-class stamp -- is locked in at 44 cents for 2010.

"At the end of the day, I'm convinced that if we make the changes that are necessary, we can continue to provide universal service for America for decades to come," Potter said. "We can turn back from the red to the black, but there are some very significant changes that are going to have to be made." To top of page

http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/02/news/economy/usps/index.htm
 
<font size="4">
<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">Factoid</span>
</font size>



  • <font size="3">The U.S. Postal Service said on Tuesday that it would reduce its workforce by another 30,000 positions and slash overtime this year in an effort to reduce costs.</font size>

  • <font size="3">Staffing reductions will result in cost savings equivalent to eliminating 50,000 full-time positions, according to Chief Financial Officer Joseph Corbett.</font size>

  • <font size="3">The agency expects 30,000 employees to retire during fiscal year 2010, which ends Sept. 30, 2010. More positions will be eliminated as other employees resign and those positions are not filled.</font size>

  • <font size="3">The USPS, which is not permitted to lay off employees, ((Talk about Government Bail-out)) is currently under a nationwide hiring freeze. It has eliminated jobs in the past by offering early retirement packages and through attrition. It cut 40,000 positions this way in fiscal 2009 alone.</font size>

  • <font size="3">The USPS has shed more than 100,000 jobs in the last five years. It currently has about 600,000 full-time employees, down from about 705,000 full-time workers in fiscal year 2005.</font size>


http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/02/news/economy/postal_service_jobs/
 
CNN said:
<font size="4">

  • <font size="3">The USPS, which is not permitted to lay off employees, ((Talk about Government Bail-out)) is currently under a nationwide hiring freeze. It has eliminated jobs in the past by offering early retirement packages and through attrition. It cut 40,000 positions this way in fiscal 2009 alone.</font size>

<font size="6">S o c i a l i s m

</font size>
 
The solutions are simple but this is a classic example of politics and politicians getting in the way. End Saturday delivery, close offices, raise stamp prices again. Those would help immediately but pols continue to play games.
 
More fall out of the 8 years of Bush / republican policies. Think it's bad now? Wait until the commerical sector go toes up from the Bush butt fuckin the nation out it's wealth.

-VG
 
So people still believe in government solutions?

The easy answer is to let them compete like normal people do.

But, I guess government is "entitled" to its monopolies.
 
So people still believe in government solutions?

The easy answer is to let them compete like normal people do.

But, I guess government is "entitled" to its monopolies.


Actually they don't have a monopoly in this regard. You can ship your stuff through any number of companies.

But I do believe that government is a better equipped to handle some things.
 
The Governmetn can not even manage the post office and we except them to manage our Health Care :smh:

That's some bullshit they taught you in tea party class but like most of what they say, it's bullshit. The PO is a private company. They got hooks in the government because is it heavily regulated but the government doesn't run the PO.

-VG
 
The ironic thing is, I didn't become more conservative until I started working for the Postal Service.

Right now, I would say that my office is around 99% conservative. That's including black folks who talks the most about how bs everything is. It's to the point where most of our office wanted to join the Tea Party event last April.

The problem with the post office is that there's a lot of waste going on. Just like any government agency...
 
So what is the deal with Transitional employees? I just got a letter for an interview with them next week to be a transitional letter carrier.
 
That's some bullshit they taught you in tea party class but like most of what they say, it's bullshit. The PO is a private company. They got hooks in the government because is it heavily regulated but the government doesn't run the PO.

-VG

Bullshit being taught in the tea party class... is that how liberals now disparage conservatives, by associating them with a movement concerned with being taxed too much? The real question is can liberals debate an issue without attacking the person they disagree with?
 
The ironic thing is, I didn't become more conservative until I started working for the Postal Service.

Right now, I would say that my office is around 99% conservative. That's including black folks who talks the most about how bs everything is. It's to the point where most of our office wanted to join the Tea Party event last April.

The problem with the post office is that there's a lot of waste going on. Just like any government agency...

A government worker, claiming to be conservative, bad mouthing the government with a guaranteed job? This is too funny!!!!!

:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:

actinanass, with each post I say you cannot top yourself, but you manage to do so.

"Get your government hands off of my Medicare!"
 

Postal Service proposes cutting 120,000 jobs,
pulling out of health-care plan​


89624023_custom.jpg



<iframe frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" width="480px" height="270px" src="http://specials.washingtonpost.com/mv/embed/?title=Postal%20Service%20may%20close%20thousands%20of%20offices&stillURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Frf%2Fimage_606w%2F2010-2019%2FWashingtonPost%2F2011%2F07%2F26%2FNational-Enterprise%2FImages%2F119896438.jpg&flvURL=%2Fmedia%2F2011%2F07%2F26%2F07262011-81v.m4v&width=480&height=270&autoStart=0&clickThru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fbusiness%2Feconomy%2Fpostal-service-may-close-thousands-of-offices%2F2011%2F07%2F26%2FgIQA4LqebI_video.html"></iframe>
The money-strapped Postal Service is considering closing 3,653 post office
buildings and going back to the old ways. (July 26)(CBS News)


Washington Post
By Joe Davidson
August 11, 2011


SEATTLE — The financially strapped U.S. Postal Service is proposing to cut its workforce by 20 percent and to withdraw from the federal health and retirement plans because it believes it could provide benefits at a lower cost.

The layoffs would be achieved in part by <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">breaking labor agreements, a proposal that drew swift fire from postal unions</span>. The plan would require congressional approval but, if successful, could be precedent-setting, with possible ripple effects throughout government. It would also deliver a major blow to the nation’s labor movement.

In a notice informing employees of its proposals — with the headline “Financial crisis calls for significant actions” — the Postal Service said, “We will be <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">insolvent next month</span> due to significant declines in mail volume and retiree health benefit pre-funding costs imposed by Congress.”

During the past four years, the service lost $20 billion, including $8.5 billion in fiscal 2010. Over that period, mail volume dropped by 20 percent.

The USPS plan is described in two draft documents obtained by The Washington Post. A “Workforce Optimization” paper acknowledges its “extraordinary request” to break its labor contracts.

“However, exceptional circumstances require exceptional remedies,” the document says.

“The Postal Service is facing dire economic challenges that threaten its very existence. . . . If the Postal Service was a private sector business, it would have filed for bankruptcy and utilized the reorganization process to restructure its labor agreements to reflect the new financial reality,” the document continues.

In a white paper on health and retirement benefits, the USPS said it was imperative to rein in health benefit and pension costs, which are a third of its labor expenses.

For health insurance plans, the paper said, the Postal Service wanted to withdraw its 480,000 pensioners and 600,000 active employees from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program “and place them in a new, Postal Service administered” program.

Almost identical language is used for the Civil Service Retirement System and the Federal Employees Retirement System.

The USPS said the programs do not meet “the private sector comparability standard,” a statement that could be translated as meaning that government plans are too generous and too costly.

“FEHB may exceed what the private sector does in certain areas,” said Anthony J. Vegliante, USPS chief human resources officer and executive vice president. “It may not meet what the private sector does in other areas. So cost may be above the private sector, while value may be below the private sector.”

Bills that would rein in employee benefits or have workers pay more for the benefits have been introduced in Congress and met with vigorous opposition from federal employee organizations. Intentionally or not, the Postal Service’s proposal provides support for such legislative initiatives.

The proposals are the USPS’s latest money-saving effort in a series of moves, some as recent as a few weeks ago and others stretching over a decade.

The Postal Service has reduced its workforce by 212,000 positions in the past 10 years and recently announced it is considering the closing of 3,700 post offices. It also has asked Congress to allow it to deliver mail five days a week instead of six and to change a requirement that it pre-fund retiree health benefits.

The USPS said it needs to reduce its workforce by 120,000 career positions by 2015, from a total of about 563,400, on top of the 100,000 it expects by attrition. Some of the 120,000 could come through buyouts and other programs, but a significant number would probably result from layoffs if Congress allows the agency to circumvent union contracts.

“Unfortunately, the collective bargaining agreements between the Postal Service and our unionized employees contain layoff restrictions that make it impossible to reduce the size of our workforce by the amount required by 2015,” according to the optimization document. “Therefore, a legislative change is needed to eliminate the layoff protections in our collective bargaining agreements.”

The layoff protection, however, does not apply to employees with fewer than six years of service, which presumably would include thousands of workers.

Postal union leaders quickly and sharply rejected the plans.

“The APWU will vehemently oppose any attempt to destroy the collective bargaining rights of postal employees or tamper with our recently negotiated contract — whether by postal management or members of Congress,” American Postal Workers Union President Cliff Guffey said.

“Our advisers are not encouraging us at all to even consider it,” said National Rural Letter Carriers’ Association President Don Cantriel.

“We are absolutely opposed” to the layoff proposal, he said. “We are opposed to pulling out of the Federal Employees Health Benefits plan.”

National Association of Letter Carriers President Fredric V. Rolando said: “The issues of lay-off protection and health benefits are specifically covered by our contract. . . . The Congress of the United States does not engage in contract negotiations with unions, and we do not believe they are about to do so.”

How Congress will respond to the proposals, however, remains to be seen. <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">Many Republicans, including those who have sponsored legislation that labor considers anti-union, may support the plan.</span> Some Democrats, for which organized labor is an ally, could back union opposition. But the Postal Service’s critical financial situation could make some Democrats have second thoughts.
Two members of Congress who have introduced separate postal reform bills were noncommittal on the USPS plan.

A spokeswoman for Sen. Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.) said, “He is particularly interested in learning whether these proposals would be fair to employees and effective in reducing the Postal Service’s costs.”

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said: “These new ideas from the Postal Service are worth exploring. Options for reform and cost savings that will protect taxpayers from paying for a bailout, now or in the future, need to be on the table.”




http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...-of-offices/2011/07/26/gIQA4LqebI_video.html#
 

Postal Service Facing Default​

Pleading to Congress for Help



September 05, 2011
FoxNews.com


The head of the U.S. Postal Service said in an interview that the organization will default -- perhaps as early as this winter -- unless Congress intervenes.

Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe's comments reflect a well-known reality that the Postal Service is in dire financial straits. The rise of email and online bill-paying has steadily eroded its profits over the years while labor costs soar. Donahoe is calling for a host of changes, including the elimination of Saturday delivery, to close a deficit projected to top $9 billion this year.

But he said Congress needs to step in to help keep the service alive.

"Our situation is extremely serious," he told The New York Times. "If Congress doesn't act, we will default."​

According to The New York Times, <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">the service will be unable to make a $5.5 billion retiree health care payment later this month and is expected to run out of money to pay workers and other expenses early next year.</span> This could force a shutdown in delivery.

Averting that outcome doesn't necessarily mean a bailout. One thing the service <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">wants from Congress is a law to effectively nullify a contract prohibition on layoffs</span> -- part of Donahoe's plan involves laying off 120,000 workers, but he needs Congress' help.

Some in Congress are also looking at letting the organization recover billions in supposedly overpaid pension payments.







http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...shut-down-without-congressional-intervention/



 
My Open Proposal for the USPS

I'm not going to make some flamboyant argument with a swollen paw, just drop some seeds (ideas) into the dirt (open minds).

I think our government should whore its postal services to third countries and beyond. Consider this: it's hell for immigrant families abroad to send items back to their homelands. Insanely difficult. Allow me to offer an example: if you travel to Africa, best on an African air carrier, most likely you will find the native born folks toting boxes into the carry on allowance allotment. Reason being items are not safe to mail normally. You might as well consider them mules just to send goods to their homeland.

A US military presence overseeing the mail can change that. And save taxpaper money in the process. Those reluctant countries need that kind of security overseas. The kind of security they would appreciate even. The revenue generated from us providing security into the international mail should spur the domestic system. Any thoughts?
 
Re: My Open Proposal for the USPS

The US mail can get the mail into 3rd world countries but they wont or shouldnt handle the local delivery. Therefore not so good but I understand the sentiment. They will only be able to deliver to major hubs.
 
Back
Top