GM's OnStar will soon be able to slowly stop moving vehicles

femmenoire

Modded Moderator Modding
BGOL Investor
GM’s OnStar could soon stop stolen cars
Starting with 2009 models service will be able to slowly stop stolen cars

The Associated Press
Updated: 11:23 a.m. ET Oct 9, 2007



DETROIT - Say some clown steals your car from the parking deck at work.
If it’s equipped with General Motors’ OnStar service, he could be in for a big surprise and you could get a little revenge — and even see your car again.
Starting with about 20 models for 2009, the service will be able to slowly halt a car that is reported stolen, and the radio may even speak up and tell the thief to pull over because police are watching.

OnStar already finds 700 to 800 cars per month using the global positioning system. With the new technology, which OnStar President Chet Huber said GM will apply to the rest of its lineup in future years, OnStar would call police and tell them a stolen car’s whereabouts.

Then, if officers see the car in motion and judge it can be stopped safely, they can tell OnStar operators, who will send the car a signal via cell phone to slow it to a halt.

“This technology will basically remove the control of the horsepower from the thief,” Huber said. “Everything else in the vehicle works. The steering works. The brakes work.”

GM is still exploring the possibility of having the car give a recorded verbal warning before it stops moving. A voice would tell the driver through the radio speakers that police will stop the car, Huber said, and the car’s emergency flashers would go on.

“If the thief does nothing else it will coast to a stop. But they can drive off to the side of the road,” Huber said.

With the current version of OnStar, drivers can call operators for emergency help, and OnStar operators will contact a car if its sensors detect a crash. The service has about 5 million subscribers.

Those who want OnStar but don’t like police having the ability to slow down their car can opt out of the service, Huber said. But he said their research shows that 95 percent of subscribers would like that feature.

OnStar, including the first year’s subscription fee, is standard on most of GM’s 2008 vehicles. After the first year, the subscription price is $16.95 a month or $199 annually for basic service, which is to include the stolen-vehicle slowdown feature when it’s available.

GM would be willing to sell the technology to other automakers in an effort to cut police chases, Huber said.

The new technology likely gives OnStar and GM a leg-up on competitors that market vehicle tracking devices aimed at retrieving stolen vehicles, said Jack Nerad, executive market analyst for Kelley Blue Book in Irvine, Calif. He predicted being able to stop a stolen car would appeal to consumers.

“Once they hear it can be done, I think it will get considerable play,” he said.
LoJack Corp., of Westwood, Mass., produces vehicle tracking devices that help authorities locate stolen vehicles but not communicate with them. And SPAL USA in Ankeny, Iowa, sells an anti-car-jacking system with a personal identification transmitter that prevents thieves from using the vehicle.

If it spreads, the technology could make dangerous police chases a thing of the past. Last year, 404 people were killed nationwide in crashes involving police pursuits, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

In California, for example, there were 7,633 police pursuits in 2006, leading to 27 deaths and 771 injuries, according to data from the California Highway Patrol. Those figures represented a decline from 2005, when California authorities were involved in 7,950 pursuits, which were linked to 32 deaths and 1,201 injuries.
Joe Farrow, deputy commissioner of the California Highway Patrol, said about 15 percent of the pursuits are at speeds of 90 miles per hour and greater. The OnStar system could help chases end safely, he said.

Farrow said his agency has sought public-private partnerships that could improve technologies used in police pursuits. The OnStar system was intriguing, he said.
“There are some high-speed chases that we have out here that we’d like to bring to a halt,” he said.

Farrow said CHP officers are trained on pursuits every three months and the agency has worked to improve its chase policies.

OnStar’s technology could evolve and perhaps make a stolen car impossible to start, Huber said.

“This isn’t the last announcement you’ll hear from us in this category,” he said.


© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21204665/
 
Femme you need to stop playing. Where is the set to that avatar I know you got more than 1. where is the side profile?


OH yeah! fuck onstar.
 
Whats funny is my homeboy saw the Onstar shit coming. He got a 2000 Bravada when we graduated and that Onstar shit first came out. He disconnected the antenna and all the equipment real quick! His pops told me they can still listen in on your conversation and track your car even if you dont subscribe to the service. Now its 07' and I aint laughing no more. FUCK ONSTAR.
 
Beware of the New World Order. Watch, they're eventually going to make this shit standard on all rides so the feds will have complete control over your vehicles. They are already working on remote control and autonomous vehicles now. Most cars made after 2000 have "black boxes" in them.
 
Femme you need to stop playing. Where is the set to that avatar I know you got more than 1. where is the side profile?


OH yeah! fuck onstar.

Word.


I knew the shit was bound to happen when they started putting black boxes n shit in all new cars after 1999 not necessarily a bad thing though especially if they can stop thieves from tearing your shit up or killing someone in a high speed chase.
 
I'd just go ahead and purchase that 1996 Infiniti I30T I was lookin at, fuck onstar. I called that shit a long time ago, the fuck I want with some cracka on the other end talkin some bullshit. NWO all in the name of convience I wish people would wake up and realize that shit :smh:
 
Lojack is better. And ANY CAR can have it installed not just new 2004 and up GM cars like onstar.
 
Beware of the New World Order. Watch, they're eventually going to make this shit standard on all rides so the feds will have complete control over your vehicles. They are already working on remote control and autonomous vehicles now. Most cars made after 2000 have "black boxes" in them.

You should have seen this pinkerds around here celebrating this shit and discussing it, like how safe it will make them feel, and your car can do so much now, you can practically live in it.

If you can't see the door swings both ways on knowing where your vehicle is at, including when it's NOT stolen, your just not worth a shit.

I swear the average American Caucasian has the IQ of frog sperm, all of them swimming in one direction to their own enslavement.
 
Onstar also helps Gm recover vehicles from people who are in repo mode. They can call you at anytime even if you dont subscribe to the service. Its just another way to disguise tapping into your life.
 
man this is some straight bull. They already listenin to your calls, tackin your vehicle now if you ever do anything they dont like they'll immobilize your ride? Why would you buy a car the police "allow" you to drive? you pay all that money and on a whim they could cut your shit off? or what if they type the wrong numbers in and they get your ride mixed up with somebody elses? yo SOL till they "investigate". all that ish would get ripped outta my ride quick, glad it doesnt have it.
 
I'm suprised by all the negativity when you all are using several devices that rat on you every day. Cell phone, Internet, Tivo, Email, Texting, Cable Boxes, Cordless Phones, Credit Cards, WIFI, Wireless Routers, Patriot Act, etc. etc. They got you now, you just accept that other stuff they doing to you but it's just as intrusive.
 
slowly but shurley big brother is controling us and we will be mindless pupets damn i dont like that
 
Does it lock the doors to turning the car into a jail ceil on wheels. Hell why not just drive them to the police department to.
 
I'm suprised by all the negativity when you all are using several devices that rat on you every day. Cell phone, Internet, Tivo, Email, Texting, Cable Boxes, Cordless Phones, Credit Cards, WIFI, Wireless Routers, Patriot Act, etc. etc. They got you now, you just accept that other stuff they doing to you but it's just as intrusive.

This from the cat with the mark of the beast in his name.

:rolleyes:



Does it lock the doors to turning the car into a jail ceil on wheels. Hell why not just drive them to the police department to.

gotojail.gif
 
Don't you guys want to be protected from crime from those poor inner-city, urban, minorities????

You want to feel safe, don't you???

If Onstar is bad, what about GPS?

Everytime you go to work, home, the strip joint, the weed house, or the other girl's house, they've got it on record.

It's just a matter of time before they start handing out tickets and arresting people based on information gathered from YOUR car.

Then, to top it all, they charge you this HUGE markup on a new car! You pay for your own surveillance.

SWEET! :lol:

Gotta love where the auto industry is headed.
 
Some you fucker amaze me with your comments and thinking styles<<<:lol:

First of if some lazy fuck steals your $20-$50 car and Onstar offers you the opportunity to recover it, where do u come up with the "no imma pass" or "fuck Onstar" attitudes

It's the same stupid privacy arguments people had about CT-TV in England. Now that it's cut the crime rate. I would like to see the shit in every city in the USA.

My point is that Onstar help more than it hurts.
If they can find my car I don't need no fucking kill switch or hood lock.

In fact if some1 was to carjack me,[knock on wood it never happens] imma let the fucker take my ride even give the fool extra gas money & save my life. Find a pay-phone call the cops or Onstar and return the "FUCK YOU FAVOR" to the thief.

If Onstar wants to listen to me singing off turn or cussing out motherfuckers that can't drive on the 5 frwy they welcome to it. They can even listen in to me letting my girl know just how much dick imma stab her with when i get home.
Thats better than me having to choke out some insurance guy over how much he finna give me to get a new ride.

But I don't think Onstar got the time or the money to waste just to sit an listen on your's or my convocations. Just cause it a lazy day at the call center.

Thats the NSA and FBI's job they got them deep federal pockets.

Onstar's operators jobs are to take a call and dish out the service and get off the phone and on to the next call as quick as possible. More time on the phone less money they keep from them service plans.

There is no incentives for spying on your customers in that type of business plan.

I want my privacy but I want my $45,000 fucking SUV also and if some crazy shit does go down. I know Onstar is there to help.:cool::cool:


PEACE SOUL AND LUV FREE OJ:lol::lol:
 
:hmm:

You wrote all this to say what. <--- No ?. I already know the answer.

The same thing YOU always say to topics that lend a certain way.

You respond the same way, in every thread, as such as you have.

No need to fully respond, you will feel as you do, others as they do. Myself included.

But, if history is a lesson, you might think a different way.

Shit will not be cute. Shit will not be all good. Things are not to be trusted. Life will soon change.

When the bad times that are coming, come.

YOU will not DIE free. But then again, you trust, you will not fight.

:(

Live and die in what manner you best beseech.


Some you fucker amaze me with your comments and thinking styles<<<:lol:

First of if some lazy fuck steals your $20-$50 car and Onstar offers you the opportunity to recover it, where do u come up with the "no imma pass" or "fuck Onstar" attitudes

It's the same stupid privacy arguments people had about CT-TV in England. Now that it's cut the crime rate. I would like to see the shit in every city in the USA.

My point is that Onstar help more than it hurts.
If they can find my car I don't need no fucking kill switch or hood lock.

In fact if some1 was to carjack me,[knock on wood it never happens] imma let the fucker take my ride even give the fool extra gas money & save my life. Find a pay-phone call the cops or Onstar and return the "FUCK YOU FAVOR" to the thief.

If Onstar wants to listen to me singing off turn or cussing out motherfuckers that can't drive on the 5 frwy they welcome to it. They can even listen in to me letting my girl know just how much dick imma stab her with when i get home.
Thats better than me having to choke out some insurance guy over how much he finna give me to get a new ride.

But I don't think Onstar got the time or the money to waste just to sit an listen on your's or my convocations. Just cause it a lazy day at the call center.

Thats the NSA and FBI's job they got them deep federal pockets.

Onstar's operators jobs are to take a call and dish out the service and get off the phone and on to the next call as quick as possible. More time on the phone less money they keep from them service plans.

There is no incentives for spying on your customers in that type of business plan.

I want my privacy but I want my $45,000 fucking SUV also and if some crazy shit does go down. I know Onstar is there to help.:cool::cool:


PEACE SOUL AND LUV FREE OJ:lol::lol:
 
If someone steals your car why would you want it back? Fuck I have Insurance let them keep it, i'll just get a new one.
 
Back
Top