His extent of talking of the Chinese, French, Russian, and even the American revolution were that it was bloody. We are not arguing war on ground, they are advising on guerrilla warfare, which is the tactic of those without numbers or force... this has nothing to do with the argument we are making... let me make it simple
Since they are in the throws of 'Revolution', why adopt the same ideals as your captors? Where is the disconnect? Where is the revolution? Why are they not attacking those which caused the problem instead of the area which has nothing to do with the problem? Why every fucking year they promote the same area damage, yet they cause no damage to the sources of their anguish or basically the ones which they are fighting against?
Are the buildings causing this issue? the windows? The cop car? any vehicles? Are they attacking police which are restraining them? Are they attacking anything worth while other than simply being destructive?
Guerrilla warfare has a point, it is meant for harassing and detrimental strikes and quick evacuation... do you see this here? This is not warfare, this is mob mentality, no more different that the KKK, Skinheads, or hell PETA. There is no organization, they attack bullshit targets and feel themselves afterwards.
I do, and history has as well. I'm not going to interfere with a revolution if I have no stake in it. This is mob mentality against an ideal and unorganized. This is not a revolution. I hate them... not the idiot protesters, but the ideal few manipulating many, but unless there is a real attack... this is bullshit actions and turned the cause to a bullshit one.
Fuck that suffering peacefully bullshit, but this here is mob mentality, there is no intelligence or rage in it, its opportunistic.
I have more respect for Timothy McVeigh than these motherfuckers. for they seen their enemy and attacked them directly. Malcolm was a direct attack type. hit for hit, blood for blood. My black skin doesn't make me better, we are equal across the boards, but I only go for what is mine, and those who are not need to do the same. The rest of my answer is in my sig.
Malcolm would curse and spit at the shopping comment
Because, you already lost with your stance. Money will and always be a part of society. Human nature in terms of greed will always horde finances as well as resources, history shows us this. Money and the pursuit of it enslaves you once greed hits your heart and mind. Until a system is developed and accepted on 'fair' trade, this argument will continue until extinction. At any time in history those with more sought to dominate those with less. Debt slavery has been around since the current use of money, that is not new.
You see, what is the stance of these revolutionaries which you are not currently with but support? What is the replacement strategy of which they are going to adopt... more of the same? These same fuckers when they get older will do the same thing as the baby boomers did, take the same stance as the baby boomers had, and their children will have their time in the sun... rinse repeat.
With these number of protests, years of protest, years of destruction, years of yelling, years of burning cars, years of so called anger... why haven't they made it past... anything? At this point they are only a budgetary concern. Do you think with this destruction that they made any headway to proving their point? After the cleanup and anger from it, do you believe they gained in numbers with this actions? Are they getting those around them involved?
You automatically have the idea that black people in the ghetto are unable to be educated, college graduates, and work to uplift their neighborhoods. Still trying to clean up the ills that the former hundreds of years of European thought has done to my people, and you want me to stand with the very same fucks who take the time to fall into mob mentality? No plan? No organization? No creed? No political stance? No power other than to break shit and yell pig and return to their lives? Oh wait... they are going to do the same thing if the G8 comes... brilliant strategy.
They are fighting against a realized ideal, and the only solution is the overthrow all governmental bodies as part of the summit to limit their power... how far are they on this? How far have they went to overthrowing their own governments to fit their ideals and ensure that these acts won't exist? The only revolutions which done this were the French and Russian, minor American and Indian, Chinese changed their hats.
I'm treating this part as a rant... because I heard that speech before... from the hippies, who done the same thing as their predecessors done. In fact.. they did it better, they understood that protesting of the issue, albeit good in its respects, don't work unless you take out the current leadership... so they did, and as the old, fucked up the planet worse then their fathers. Do you truly believe these fuckers which you praise so gallantly are doing any better morally? Have you learned a damn thing from the mistakes of others? This microwave non reading society who votes based more of feelings than stances? No...
I make no assumptions of you, but you believe you actually know me from disagreeing with you... which is funny as hell. But you are right.. I will stand.. on their dead ass bodies with their anarchy. They have no plan dawg, they are simply primates fighting because they are upset and have no answers to resolve it. Any one can shout and throw a fucking newspaper kiosk through a window... but once the window is replaced, its the same shit.
You worship all of that materialistic shit... keep me out of it. If you are not building something, you are destroying something. They are destroying something and building nothing, there is no balance to their actions. What you mentioned are the European ideals of success, not mine... you would know that if you paid attention to my posts, because if you think that of black people and not the other, there is no us. If you take even a 5th of your anger to what is done to your people and try to create, you can do something... instead you are angrier at my stance before even understanding why I made it... but I forgot, their stance trumps your people stance is that correct?
