further proof we're living in a police state.....

PLASMA CANNON

BLAST OFF....
BGOL Investor
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...003402,00.html

Court 'closed at five', inmate executed


From correspondents in Washington
October 04, 2007 07:50am

A TEXAS death-row inmate was executed after a local court refused to stay open an extra 20 minutes to hear an appeal.

At 10am on September 25, the US Supreme Court announced it would review in early 2008 an appeal by two Kentucky death row inmates challenging the legality of the lethal injection.

The same day, Michael Richard, 48, was due to receive the deadly cocktail at 6pm in southern Texas for the rape and murder of a woman in 1986.

His attorneys said they rushed to draft an appeal to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's highest court for criminal cases.

At 4.50pm, the lawyers called the court to ask it to remain open 20 more minutes after they were stalled by a computer malfunction.

"We close at five,'' was the response from the court clerk, a quote widely reported by local media.

In a last-ditch effort, Richard's attorneys took their case to the Supreme Court, which remains open for executions.

The legal move delayed the execution by a few hours, but since the convict did not file his appeal with a local court first, his arguments were not accepted in Washington.

The execution went ahead that evening and Richard was declared dead at 8.23pm.

No other death row inmate has been executed since then.

The court's behaviour angered a leading Texas daily newspaper, the Dallas Morning News, which expressed outrage in an editorial entitled "We Closed at 5".

"Hastening the death of a man, even a bad one, because office personnel couldn't be bothered to bend bureaucratic procedure was a breathtakingly petty act and evinced a relish for death that makes the blood of decent people run cold,'' the newspaper said.

On Tuesday, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted a stay of execution to convicted murderer Heliberto Chi, 28, a sign that it might step back while the US Supreme Court weighs the constitutionality of lethal injection.

So far this year, 40 of the 41 people executed in the United States have been killed by lethal injection, with one choosing the electric chair.

Most of the executions have taken place in Texas, which has put to death more than 400 people since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the


CRAZY...THATS SOME BULLSHIT


I KNOW DUDE WAS BAD..BUT I DONT WANT A FUCKING..COURT CLERK HAVING THE LAST SAY IN SOMETHING THAT IMPORTANT:smh::smh:
 
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...003402,00.html

Court 'closed at five', inmate executed


From correspondents in Washington
October 04, 2007 07:50am

A TEXAS death-row inmate was executed after a local court refused to stay open an extra 20 minutes to hear an appeal.

At 10am on September 25, the US Supreme Court announced it would review in early 2008 an appeal by two Kentucky death row inmates challenging the legality of the lethal injection.

The same day, Michael Richard, 48, was due to receive the deadly cocktail at 6pm in southern Texas for the rape and murder of a woman in 1986.

His attorneys said they rushed to draft an appeal to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's highest court for criminal cases.

At 4.50pm, the lawyers called the court to ask it to remain open 20 more minutes after they were stalled by a computer malfunction.

"We close at five,'' was the response from the court clerk, a quote widely reported by local media.

In a last-ditch effort, Richard's attorneys took their case to the Supreme Court, which remains open for executions.

The legal move delayed the execution by a few hours, but since the convict did not file his appeal with a local court first, his arguments were not accepted in Washington.

The execution went ahead that evening and Richard was declared dead at 8.23pm.

No other death row inmate has been executed since then.

The court's behaviour angered a leading Texas daily newspaper, the Dallas Morning News, which expressed outrage in an editorial entitled "We Closed at 5".

"Hastening the death of a man, even a bad one, because office personnel couldn't be bothered to bend bureaucratic procedure was a breathtakingly petty act and evinced a relish for death that makes the blood of decent people run cold,'' the newspaper said.

On Tuesday, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted a stay of execution to convicted murderer Heliberto Chi, 28, a sign that it might step back while the US Supreme Court weighs the constitutionality of lethal injection.

So far this year, 40 of the 41 people executed in the United States have been killed by lethal injection, with one choosing the electric chair.

Most of the executions have taken place in Texas, which has put to death more than 400 people since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the


CRAZY...THATS SOME BULLSHIT


I KNOW DUDE WAS BAD..BUT I DONT WANT A FUCKING..COURT CLERK HAVING THE LAST SAY IN SOMETHING THAT IMPORTANT:smh::smh:

"At 10am on September 25, the US Supreme Court announced it would review in early 2008 an appeal by two Kentucky death row inmates challenging the legality of the lethal injection."



I'm confused here.... were they challenging the legality of using lethal injection...or were they challenging his guilt?

Besides, I can guarantee you the U.S. is far off from being a police state. Just be thankful we don't live by "sharia" law as the muslims do.... then you wouldn't even be able to look at porn.

 
If dude was guilty fuck him..did he give that female 20 more minutes to save her life before he killed her?
Only thing i have against the death penalty is they should let the family kill the convicted.
 
If dude was guilty fuck him..did he give that female 20 more minutes to save her life before he killed her?
Only thing i have against the death penalty is they should let the family kill the convicted.



YEA I HEAR WHAT UR SAYING BUT DO U REALLY WANT A COURT CLERK HAVING THE FINAL SAY SO IN A DEATH PENALTY CASE?... I MEAN SHE OR HE TELLS THE PERSON GO HOME THE COURT CLOSES AT 5..CAUSE THEY WANNA GET HOME 2 WATCH JEOPARDY OR SOME SHIT..HELL NALL
 
Sorry but the story is not convincing. What was the appeal for DNA evidence, Witness retraction, or another stall technique? The story comes from an Australian website, not the local newspaper which I am sure has a website. From corespondants in Washington was the source? A quick click on the website shows the story was taken down, another sign of a bad source. Unless you can provide a better source then this with more info I consider this a hoax and not BGOL newsworthy.
 
Back
Top