<font size="5"><center>
Court restricts police use of
Tasers to immediate threats</font size></center>
<font size="3">Police who use stun guns must first believe their target represents an immediate threat, not simply acts erratically or refuses to obey orders, a federal court has ruled.
The San Francisco Chronicle says that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' 3-0 ruling "sets judicial standards for police and for people hit by a Taser who claim they were victims of excessive force."
<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">"The objective facts must indicate that the suspect poses an immediate threat to the officer or a member of the public,"</span> Judge Kim Wardlaw writes.</font size>
http://content.usatoday.com/communi...s-to-immediate-threats/1?loc=interstitialskip
Court restricts police use of
Tasers to immediate threats</font size></center>
<font size="3">Police who use stun guns must first believe their target represents an immediate threat, not simply acts erratically or refuses to obey orders, a federal court has ruled.
The San Francisco Chronicle says that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' 3-0 ruling "sets judicial standards for police and for people hit by a Taser who claim they were victims of excessive force."
<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">"The objective facts must indicate that the suspect poses an immediate threat to the officer or a member of the public,"</span> Judge Kim Wardlaw writes.</font size>
http://content.usatoday.com/communi...s-to-immediate-threats/1?loc=interstitialskip