FED RAISES RATES BY 25 BASIS POINTS, FIRST SINCE 2006

Mixd

Duppy Maker
BGOL Investor
FED RAISES RATES BY 25 BASIS POINTS, FIRST SINCE 2006

At long last, a rate hike for the history books.

After seven years of the most accommodative monetary policy in U.S. history, the Fed on Wednesday, as widely expected, approved a quarter-point increase in its target funds rate. The new target will go from 0 percent to 0.25 percent to 0.25 percent to 0.5 percent. Most members expect the new rate to coalesce around .375 percent before the next hike, according to a chart showing individual member expectations.

The decision, given the official stamp of approval from the Federal Open Market Committee, marks the first increase since the panel pushed the key rate to 5.25 percent on June 29, 2006. In a succession of moves necessitated by the financial crisis and the Great Recession that officially ended in mid-2009, the FOMC took the rate to zero exactly seven years ago, on Dec. 16, 2008.

"Given the economic outlook, and recognizing the time it takes for policy actions to affect future economic conditions, the committee decided to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to ¼ to ½ percent," the FOMC's post-meeting statement said. "The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative after this increase, thereby supporting further improvements in labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation."

There were no dissents, even though multiple FOMC members publicly over the past few months have expressed reservations about rate hikes. The committee also voted to raise the discount rate a quarter-point to 1 percent.

In addition to the usual documents released with the post-meeting statement, the Fed also put out a statement outlining the mechanics of how the new rate will come to pass. The program will be an ambitious one, involving $2 trillion of securities that will be used in overnight trading to push the rate into the desired range. However, the FOMC statement said it will be some time before the Fed starts unwinding its mammoth $4.5 trillion balance sheet.

Despite the history-making move, the road back to normalcy will be a long one. FOMC officials made it excessively clear in post-meeting documents that the pace of increases will be gradual and dependent on the quality of economic data. The projections and statement following the meeting reflected an effort to deliver the "dovish hike" many on Wall Street had been forecasting.

"The committee expects that economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate; the funds rate is likely to remain, for some time, below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run," the post-meeting statement said. "However, the actual path of the federal funds rate will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data."

The statement also added this sentence to ensure markets that the pace will be slow: "The committee currently expects that, with gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will continue to expand at a moderate pace and labor market indicators will continue to strengthen."

The statement said the economy expanded "at a moderate pace," just as previous statements have said. However, the statement was a bit more optimistic about labor conditions, saying slack "had diminished appreciably since early this year," with "appreciably" added from the October statement.

The closely watched "dot plot" that summarizes members' expectations for interest rates, showed only modest appetite for future hikes, with all but three members projecting the rate to be 1.5 percent or lower by the end of 2016. FOMC members now expect the funds rate to be just 2.4 percent in 2017, against a 2.6 percent projection in September. The expectation also declined for 2018, from 3.4 percent in September to 3.3 percent at this month's meeting.

In addition to raising the funds rate, the committee also pushed the interest paid on excess reserves to 0.5 percent and put the rate on overnight reverse repo operations to 0.25 percent, both in conjunction with the sale of securities that will be needed to push the rate higher.

The Fed had been holding the funds rate near zero despite a steady but unspectacular pattern of growth once the recession ended.

Both Fed chairs during the era, Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen, the current leader, insisted the zero rate was necessary to keep the recovery going. However, the low rates, coupled with $3.7 trillion in money printing known as quantitative easing, did more to boost financial markets than the economy, which has never eclipsed a 2.7 percent annualized gain throughout the period, the worst recovery since the Great Depression.

Despite feeling it was time to hike rates, the quarterly summary of economic projections showed Fed officials had not grown substantially more optimistic about economic growth. Forecasts for gross domestic product growth were essentially unchanged since the September meeting, with a modest improvement expected in 2016 from an initially projected 2.3 percent to 2.4 percent. Expectations for inflation actually edged lower, with the core personal consumption expenditures index projected to 1.6 percent growth in 2016, down one-tenth from the September forecast.

The stock market has boomed during the period of zero rates, rising 207 percent since the March 2009 low point.

Unemployment, which is one part of the Fed's dual mandate, has fallen to 5 percent. Inflation, the other part, has been less robust, registering just 1.3 percent growth most recently.

In raising rates, the FOMC signaled the first steps to policy normalization. The target is tied to a raft of key interest rates consumers pay, with expectations that an increase in the prime rate used for loans and credit cards could come as soon as Wednesday afternoon.

The increase comes as equity markets have hit something of a wall, commodity prices have declined sharply, and market participants have begun to worry about troubles in the junk bond market. Cheap interest rates have allowed companies with lower credit quality to borrow in record numbers at low cost. However, at least three junk funds have collapsed recently, and exchange-traded funds that track the high-yield sector have suffered sharp losses.

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/12/16/fed-raises-rates-for-first-time-since-2006.html
 
Now all the people who don't watch the news are going to complain and cry like everyone wasn't already expecting this to happen.
 
how long is it going to take for you to recoup all those refinance fees?
Because I have a VA loan, I don't pay what you all pay.

I ended up with less than $900 each time which they added back into the loan. No money out of my pocket but thanks for asking though :money:
 
Because I have a VA loan, I don't pay what you all pay.

I ended up with less than $900 each time which they added back into the loan. No money out of my pocket but thanks for asking though :money:
they probably added the the rest of the fees to the balance of your loan. VA loans aren't that great, sometimes its even better to get a conventional loan over a VA
 
As the children around the world bleat because their candy has been removed, and wonder immaturely why they can't have an unlimited supply of candy...., the grown ups breathe a sigh of relief that sense has finally prevailed.
 
they probably added the the rest of the fees to the balance of your loan. VA loans aren't that great, sometimes its even better to get a conventional loan over a VA
Nope! Not for mine. Can't speak for anyone else but my VA is excellent!!!

Thanks for your concern though.
 
so its not a good thing, its a rich thing...

generally yes. it will hurt the lower end more than the higher end.

the effect on the average homeowner is debateable.
it's bad because based on their fixed salary, they buy "less house" now.
it's good because they are taking out a smaller mortgage on that same "less house". they shouldn't been stretching themselves out in the first place.
 
The Rothschilds are angry that there is no war to make money on, so they are going to
get their pound of flesh from US tax payers. Why does a European owned private bank
have the power to print the money and direct the financial policy of the US? Why has
this Jewish owned and controlled organisation never been audited? Why is it above
the law?
 
In the time that the interest rates were Zero, the Federal Reserve, which
is by far the largest financier of the US government, has made a killing
though wars started by the Bush-Cheney clan and their neocons; and
thus driven the US debt to almost $20 billion, the vast majority owed to
the Fed which printed the money out of thin air. With Barack Obama
refusing to deploy a field army to the Middle East, at the exhorbitant
cost of such undertakings, the bankers are not minting debt at the usual
outrageous rate, so why continue doing the US a "favour" by keeping
interest rates low.................

Those of you who think that actions by the Fed and their owner private
banks are constituted for altruistic reasons have much to learn
 
Kayanation called his several months ago. I smirked when I saw it on Dateline last night.
 
when does this take effect, immediately? An is it saying whatever the % of financing you could've gotten previously has now been raised .25 or what? Paul you did a good job of putting it in laments terms, further explain please.
 
The Rothschilds are angry that there is no war to make money on, so they are going to
get their pound of flesh from US tax payers. Why does a European owned private bank
have the power to print the money and direct the financial policy of the US? Why has
this Jewish owned and controlled organisation never been audited? Why is it above
the law?
Context of racism/white supremacy. That's why...
 
In the time that the interest rates were Zero, the Federal Reserve, which
is by far the largest financier of the US government, has made a killing
though wars started by the Bush-Cheney clan and their neocons; and
thus driven the US debt to almost $20 billion, the vast majority owed to
the Fed which printed the money out of thin air. With Barack Obama
refusing to deploy a field army to the Middle East, at the exhorbitant
cost of such undertakings, the bankers are not minting debt at the usual
outrageous rate, so why continue doing the US a "favour" by keeping
interest rates low.................

Those of you who think that actions by the Fed and their owner private
banks are constituted for altruistic reasons have much to learn

Madam has skills (probably) but luck (China and Iran) is/are not on her side. She raises interest, China reduces interest and weakens RMB, Iran ramps up oil production. As China deflates, money leaving China will gather momentum. This may CRUSH - inflation and luck for Madam Fed.

Mining and commodities - down

Oil - down

Exports for Europe and China - down

Spare cash in public pockets - down

Government capacity to spend - down

Housing - up

Interest rate spread between AA and junk bonds - up - stratospheric

Cash reserves of investment funds - up and above 30%

Europe and Japan's stimulus will only delay the inevitable.

All signs pointing in the wrong direction. 2016!!!!!!!!!
 
I can't front this alil over my head

I take it back alot over my head but thx for the info I will learn from this
 
I can't front this alil over my head

I take it back alot over my head but thx for the info I will learn from this
The US does not collect enough money to cover the expenses of the government
including wars. To finance these undertakings, it borrows money from Federal
Reserve, which is a private bank. This money is borrowed at an interest rate that
is paid back by the taxes collected by the US treasury. As you can imagine, the
amounts involved are enormous. The most enormous amounts are borrowed during
times of war because no government can countenance loss of a war because of not
having enough money, or refusal to incur deabt. War is the most profitable time for the
Federal reserve, but since Obama will not deploy ground troops, who constitute
the single biggest cost of war, the bankers are not lending as much money to the
Federal government as they could
 
Back
Top