Fair/Foul: W. Kamau Bell tells Stephen Colbert that his replacement, Larry Wilmore, isn't funny

I don't think you can say someone is 'not funny', and bang the gavel like that's the law of the land.

I know as a huge fan of comedy, preferences can vary wildly from person to person. I know someone who feel Katt Williams was never funny. I also know someone who has watched Katt's standups so often, they've memorized his routines almost perfectly.

So, I don't want to say someone is not funny. Somebody thought they was funny enough to give them an opportunity that I'm sure thousands upon thousands of comedians wish they had.
 
harry Belafonte is also married to a white woman. sheit, two out of his three wives were white women. and anyone who knows anything about not only the civil rights era, but the current conditions in the black community will tell you that mr. Belafonte not only puts his money where his mouth is in trying to uplift the lives and consciousness of black folks in America, he does the same for black people in African countries.

sheit, how many brothers do u know that are married to black women and don't do sheit for brothers or sisters in the community? no volunteer work. no donating to organizations in the community that do job training for local residents. no interest in big brother/big sister mentoring programs for black youth. no nothin :smh:

fuk the color of the woman you wanna sex up in your bedroom. wtf are you doing in the community?
True true:yes:
 
harry Belafonte is also married to a white woman. sheit, two out of his three wives were white women. and anyone who knows anything about not only the civil rights era, but the current conditions in the black community will tell you that mr. Belafonte not only puts his money where his mouth is in trying to uplift the lives and consciousness of black folks in America, he does the same for black people in African countries.

sheit, how many brothers do u know that are married to black women and don't do sheit for brothers or sisters in the community? no volunteer work. no donating to organizations in the community that do job training for local residents. no interest in big brother/big sister mentoring programs for black youth. no nothin :smh:

fuk the color of the woman you wanna sex up in your bedroom. wtf are you doing in the community?

I stopped after the bolded since Mr Belafonte never took shots at another black man for the benefit of a white audience.
 
i like kamau and the show that got cancelled. he funny to me. larry whitmore funny to me. larry saying to Obama "barry, you did it my nigga" in a speech was funny as hell. Obama thought it was funny and gave him the handshake bro-hug. the media mitches are all in a hysteria.

i think kamau & larry are just talking shit and throwing insider shots at each other and are probably friends. larry cracked on plenty people in that speech. folks taking this shit way too seriously. why teardown two of only a handful of black comedians with shows. that kamau show was not properly supported and promoted by the network.



P.S. who gives a fuck who kamau's fucking & wife-ing. grow the fuck up.
 
He's a better writer than comedian

That's what it is... You can be funny but unable to deliver. Comedians are performers ...sometimes the personality of the person makes the joke work

Dave Chappelle for example can talk about cigarettes and be hilarious because he's a funny personality ...Larry can't
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSN
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/04/opinions/michael-phelps-flag-bearer-w-kamau-bell/

(CNN)Dear Michael Phelps,

Thank you! I really appreciate the fact that you have made -- or will make -- the right choice here. You haven't announced it yet, but I'm sure you will soon.
I know you have a big machine behind you. With The Olympics coming up, it must be extremely hectic around you right now. It has to be difficult to contact all your trainers, coaches, business managers, talent managers, Hollywood agents, sponsors, counsellors, associated charities, foundations, staff, assistants, friends, family, boys clubs, and girls clubs to let them know that you have turned down such anhonor.
Obviously, I am talking about what I hope will be your decision to decline the position as flag bearer in opening ceremonies of the Olympics in Rio De Janeiro on Friday. While you haven't said this yet, I'm sure this is what you are going to do, because you are not only an Olympic hero, you are -- by medal count -- the Olympic hero. And yes, being asked to carry the flag is a big deal. I'm betting that even a star of your magnitude is still feeling the glow of being voted to carry the flag by your Olympic peers. But I know that you must know that there is a better choice to carry the flag -- the athlete who came in second to you in the vote for flag bearer, fencer Ibtihaj Muhammad.
It shouldn't be a big deal for you to give up your spot. For one thing, according to the Los Angeles Times, the vote was close. So Muhammad must have lots of fans among the athletes. And also, let's be real here, Michael. It's not like you need the honor.
With 22 Olympic medals, you are already the most decorated athlete in Olympic history. You already know how America feels about you. We even forgave that youthful indiscretion of being photographed smoking from a water pipe of the type that is often used for smoking marijuana. And we have forgiven those other youthful indiscretions (even the one that happened two years ago when you weren't that youthful).


What I'm trying to say is that as far as America is concerned, you are a golden boy ... literally. You getting the opportunity to carry the flag is like Michael Jordan getting a free pair of Nike sneakers. You are both the living embodiment of the "honor" you are getting. To put it another way, in the Make-Your-Own-Ice-Cream-Sundae-Bar of life, your sundae is lousy with hot fudge, butterscotch, strawberry sauce, whipped cream, nuts, sprinkles, extra scoops of ice cream, and so many Maraschino cherries that 5-year-old kids with mouthfuls of Maraschino cherries yell as you pass by, "THAT'S TOO MANY CHERRIES!"
And that's why I would be proud of you for giving up your position to Ibtihaj Muhammad.Muhammad carrying the flag would be much bigger than your one moment. It would be a symbol for our country in this moment when we are mostly known for one of the most contentious, controversial, scandal-ridden, hateful, xenophobic, jingoistic, and just generally unlikeable presidential elections in recent memory. This is at a time when we could use some more symbols of unity and togetherness.
Muhammad carrying the flag would be nearly a one-stop inclusion shop. Muhammad is an African-American, hijab-wearing Muslim woman who is also a world class fencer. Those are all groups that could always use some more love, acceptance, and respect from this country. (And yes, I'm including fencers in this group.)

If (when) Muhammad carries the flag, that moment (and Muhammad herself) would grow into legend. We're talking bigger than just the Olympics.

It will be cemented in history the same way Australian runner Peter Norman is cemented in Olympic history as the white guy standing stock still next to Tommie Smith and John Carlos in the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City. As Smith and Carlos stood with their fists in the air, Norman (very actively) didn't get in the way. And he even encouraged the moment by suggesting that Tommie Smith wear John Carlos' left glove when Carlos discovered that he had forgotten his gloves at the Olympic village. Thank you, Michael, for being the Peter Norman of this year's Olympics.
Also it certainly doesn't hurt that Ibtihaj Muhammad's last name is the same as the first name of one of this country's most celebrated Americans, the recently departed Muhammad Ali. Ali was an Olympic athlete, and he has his own history-making, opening-ceremony moment. The image of Muhammad lighting the torch in Atlanta in 1996 was, like this will be, another important symbol of American attempting to bury its hatred of "the other."
And while it didn't achieve that goal back then, that doesn't mean that we shouldn't keep trying. And if anybody knows about the importance of second chances, it's you, Michael.

Now obviously, it's not as easy as you just stepping down. Muhammad must also want to take the honor from you. Like you, she's a highly competitive athlete. She may not want the victory this way, which would, of course, would be understandable. But I hope that she accepts the honor from you. The Olympics are great, but they only truly mean something when the moments that come out of them are bigger than the individual sports.
Your stepping back will allow this moment to become something bigger than just another opening ceremony. No offense, but right now America has enough tall, successful, rich white guys hogging the spotlight trying to make America great ... again.
Again, thank you again for stepping aside for Ibtihaj Muhammad. During these Olympics, you can win more medals to add to your all-time winning number of medals. But no medal will compare to making room for this.
 
Colbert Just Did Something the Late Show Hasn’t Done in 25 Years
By Josef Adalian@tvmojoe
22-stephen-cobert.w330.h330.jpg

Photo: Scott Kowalchyk/CBS

Stephen Colbert’s Late Show is ending the 2018–19 TV season more dominant than ever. With the official Nielsen-ratings measurement period ending Wednesday, the CBS late-night series will expand its total viewer lead over chief competitor The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon and, for the first time in nearly 25 years, finish a season at number one in the all-important adults-under-50 demo. But there’s a warning light flashing for Colbert. After two years of growth, powered in no small part by an aggressive focus on President Trump’s travails, the Late Show gave back some of its recent gains this season, particularly among younger viewers. The good news for Colbert: His rivals suffered even steeper declines.

While final numbers won’t be out until next month, Nielsen data through last week has the Late Show averaging roughly 3.8 million viewers this season, about 1.4 million ahead of second-place Tonight (2.4 million) and nearly 1.8 million in front of third-place Jimmy Kimmel Live (2 million). Colbert ended the 2017–18 season with a 1.2-million-viewer lead over Fallon (and 1.6 million viewers ahead of Kimmel), so the Late Show’s margin of victory grew more impressive during the past nine months. Meanwhile, among adults under 50, the Late Show went from clearly losing the 2017–18 ratings period (a 0.59 rating vs. 0.65 for Tonight) to a narrow win (0.52 for Colbert, 0.51 for Fallon.) The Tonight camp can rightly note the weekly ratings race has tightened a bit during the last few months of the season, and that Fallon’s show outperforms the others in terms of social media and YouTube views. But the bottom line in the ratings war between Colbert and Fallon this season? More than ever, Colbert is the clear king of late night.

Still, it takes nothing away from the Late Show’s win to also take note of a cooling in its Nielsen momentum. For much of the first two years of Trump’s administration, the Late Show’s trajectory was one of virtually uninterrupted growth, both in overall audience and among younger viewers. Colbert’s audience grew by nearly 20 percent between mid-2017 and mid-2018, jumping from around 3.2 million viewers at the end of May 2017 to nearly 3.9 million a year later. By contrast, the Late Show looks likely to lose about 100,000 viewers this season. That’s a very tiny dip — around 2 percent — and the sort of Nielsen stability almost unheard of these days in primetime, where almost every established program now suffers far more significant year-to-year audience erosion. And it’s also a much smaller drop than the other 11:35 P.M. shows: Tonight lost 9 percent of its viewership this season, and Kimmel’s declined by 10 percent.

Colbert’s declines are a tad steeper in the adults-under-50 demo: The Late Show is currently on track to lose about 12 percent of its young adult audience this season. But again, the other shows are doing worse. Kimmellooks to end down around 18 percent, while Tonight nosedived 22 percent this season (in part because last season’s numbers may have been inflated by the halo from NBC’s broadcast of both the Winter Olympics and the Super Bowl.) While the Late Show’s overall audience is still well ahead of where it was two or three years ago, its current demo average (0.52) is now below where it was at the end of the 2016–17 season (0.58).

Is this a sign younger audiences are growing tired of anti-Trump humor? Probably not. Fact is, younger viewers are fleeing network (and cable) TV at a far faster clip than audiences over 50, so it’s not surprising that Nielsen gravity has caught up to the Late Show. While it’s possible some percentage of younger viewers are watching Colbert less frequently since much of the mystery surrounding the Mueller report has faded, the basic stability in Colbert’s overall audience suggests he’s not suffering from his focus on Trump’s travails. A safer takeaway from the end-of-season numbers: Being the comedy face of the anti-Trump resistance is no longer enough to recruit new viewers to late night. Fortunately for Colbert, the 2020 election cycle is just months away from kicking into high gear.
 
Amber Ruffin and Larry Wilmore Will Be Peacock’s Debut Late-Night Hosts
By Megh Wright@megh_wright
Ruffin and Wilmore. Photo-Illustration: Vulture and Getty Images

d6abb24ecdfecaee3d043e943cea683ac5-amber-ruffin-larry-wilmore.rsquare.w330.jpg

NBC’s new streaming service, Peacock, is turning to two comedians with plenty of late-night experience to launch its own block of late-night programming. In a press release, Peacock announced today that “a new weekly topical late-night block” will launch in September with shows hosted by Late Night With Seth Meyers writer Amber Ruffin and former Nightly Show host Larry Wilmore.
Ruffin’s Peacock series, The Amber Ruffin Show, was first announced in September 2019. According to the release, the weekly series “will showcase Amber’s signature smart and silly take on the week’s news. No matter what’s happening in the world, Amber will respond to it with a charming mix of seriousness, nonsense, and evening gowns. The Amber Ruffin Show is a topical late-night show with just the good parts — the comedy.” Ruffin’s “Jokes Seth Can’t Tell” collaborators Seth Meyers and Jenny Hagel serve as executive producers in addition to Late Night producer Mike Shoemaker. “Having a late-night show on Peacock is so exciting!” Ruffin said in the release. “We can’t wait to write sketches, songs and jokes about this terrible time we call now!”
Wilmore, who hosted The Nightly Show With Larry Wilmore on Comedy Central from 2015 to 2016 and more recently served as a writer on Insecure, will join Ruffin on Peacock’s late-night block. In his show, currently called Untitled Larry Wilmore Show, Wilmore “will have real discussions with high profile people from all different backgrounds including sports, politics and entertainment. Each episode will not only cover the election but will also engage in the important conversations of the week. It will be funny, sometimes serious, potentially awkward and most definitely honest.” Wilmore will executive produce the show alongside Jo Miller, Tony Hernandez, Brooke Posch, David Miner, and Michael Rotenberg. “I’m honored to have the chance to not only be back on television but to partner with the great team at Peacock,” Wilmore said in the release. “Apparently there’s a lot going on in the world right now and a big election happening soon, so I’m happy to have a place in the conversation.”

Peacock has ordered nine episodes of Ruffin’s show and 11 episodes of Wilmore’s show. Both series will debut on the streaming service sometime in September; an exact premiere date has not yet been revealed.
 
Back
Top