Re: Dr. Truth..........could you wipe the piss off your torso and please explain this

CarryOn said:![]()
wth? what vid is this from




CarryOn said:![]()
wth? what vid is this from
smokedacane said:Where is the Boeing 757 that crashed into the Pentagon?????....
SuperGenius said:Funny how cats argue against fam, but yet can't produce any counter proof?
![]()
Very well done fam....
YinYangSoul said:I just answered them you dumb fuck. READ.
Listen closely: It hit a building and exploded. Parts were recovered but you don't actually expect to see a whole plane sticking out of the wall do you?![]()
Oh and before you say something like "No, it was a missile!", here's some information about eye witness accounts:
"The Pentagon is surrounded by Interstate 395 and Washington Boulevard, on the side where the impact occurred. Steve Riskus witnessed the plane crash into the Pentagon, as he was driving along Washington Boulevard and stopped to take photographs moments after the impact. Mary Lyman, who was on I-395, saw the airplane pass over at a "steep angle toward the ground and going fast" and then saw the cloud of smoke from the Pentagon. Jim Sutherland, also on I-395, witnessed the plane pass 50 feet overhead, heading in a straight line into the Pentagon. Mary Ann Owens, of Gannett News Service, was stuck in traffic near the Pentagon when she saw the airplane pass 50 to 75 feet overhead and crash into the Pentagon. Another witness, Daryl Donley, saw the crash as he was driving on Washington Boulevard. Among debris that was scattered as the plane crashed, he found a "scorched green oxygen tank marked 'Cabin air. Airline use'" on the road."
Yin said:Listen closely: It hit a building and exploded.
YinYangSoul said:Here's a picture just in case you decided not to listen to what I said (I get this weird feeling that that's probably what happened.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Flight_77_wreckage_at_Pentagon.jpg
smokedacane said:Log off my nig
Why Jamie McIntyre a CNN reporter who was at the scene state that their is no evidence of a large plane hitting the Pentagon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C02dE5VKeck
Why won't officials release any tapes that would confirm that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon?
Where is the footage from this camera located on the Pentagon???? Why won't they release it???
![]()
If the Plane "exploded" then why was a recovered turbine engine from the wreckage twice as small as a Boeing 757 engine?
![]()
LOOK HOW FUCKIN SMALL THAT IS COMPARED TO:
![]()
And if this engine was recovered it would totally contradict everything you said about the plane exploding and everything melting![]()
![]()
Maybe you should LOOOOOOK closely
In fact the engine that was recovered in the wreckage resembles a Global Hawk
![]()
![]()
More importantly where are the Wings to the Plane? Shouldn't there be large laceration marks arcoss the Pentagon walls where the wings went through?
![]()
There is absolutely no signs at all that wings even penetrated the Pentagon walls. Whatever hit the Pentagon was a vastly SMALLER plane. A Boeing 757 would of caused more damage than that little as scrap mark. The two planes that hit the towers left more significant embrassion on the building. The Boeing that hit the Pentagon left a scratch...........makes nooooooo sense.
The plane only penetrated the first ring of the Pentagon. A Boeing is huge if you didn't know that already, it would of penetrated the first ring and second.
![]()
why is there very little damage????????
YinYangSoul said:I just answered them you dumb fuck. READ.
Listen closely: It hit a building and exploded. Parts were recovered but you don't actually expect to see a whole plane sticking out of the wall do you?![]()
Oh and before you say something like "No, it was a missile!", here's some information about eye witness accounts:
"The Pentagon is surrounded by Interstate 395 and Washington Boulevard, on the side where the impact occurred. Steve Riskus witnessed the plane crash into the Pentagon, as he was driving along Washington Boulevard and stopped to take photographs moments after the impact. Mary Lyman, who was on I-395, saw the airplane pass over at a "steep angle toward the ground and going fast" and then saw the cloud of smoke from the Pentagon. Jim Sutherland, also on I-395, witnessed the plane pass 50 feet overhead, heading in a straight line into the Pentagon. Mary Ann Owens, of Gannett News Service, was stuck in traffic near the Pentagon when she saw the airplane pass 50 to 75 feet overhead and crash into the Pentagon. Another witness, Daryl Donley, saw the crash as he was driving on Washington Boulevard. Among debris that was scattered as the plane crashed, he found a "scorched green oxygen tank marked 'Cabin air. Airline use'" on the road."
SuperGenius said:Yinyang my homie, I'm going to help you support your argument that it WAS a Boieng 757........oh, sorry
. Now these videos are showing what
took place right before the plane (I mean alledge Boeing 757) crashed. Was it a Boeing 757?![]()
Video 1.....check at the 1:26 and 1:27 mark and tell me do you see a BIG BOEING 757?
[flash]http://www.youtube.com/v/P5FtRZP8dSI[/flash]
Video 2: The same footage from a different angle....check at the :26 second mark
[flash]http://www.youtube.com/v/XIpmCNSQ6-A[/flash]
What about Flight 93 you say?.....this is what was reported as to what really happend to that flight as opposed to it crashing down in Shanksville, PA.
[flash]http://www.youtube.com/v/sueAQB3fjqo[/flash]
[flash]http://www.youtube.com/v/PoWCIFmlSgg[/flash]
max-dawg said:i'll drop my $0.02 and then exit...
1. can ANYONE on here find footage of ANY building ANYWHERE in the world that has collapsed (pancaked) as the result of a fire? any building... any where, under ANY circumstances?
2. can someone please explain what happened to wtc 7? no other buildings in the area pancaked like that one... none of them.
3. WITHOUT 9-11 happening, can anyone explain how or why we'd end up in iraq fighting people who HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9-11? the facts remain:
saddam had NOTHING to do with 9-11.
there were no WMD's.
and if there were WMD's, we made a preeminent strike based on an eminent threat. saddam was NOT an eminent threat = fact = bush lied.
4. where are the black box recordings from the flights? surely, they are somewhere.
5. that video of a 757 flying THAT low to the ground at THOSE speeds into the pentagon are bogus. even the best trained pilots in the world can't fly a plane that big, that low, that fast and end-up with that horrible footage?
the only thing is...
1. if the planes that crashed into wtc 1 & 2 were indeed altered or cargo planes, then, where are the people that were on-board?
and for the record, "yes, i am an engineer." i'm NOT a civil or structural or materials engineer, but jet fuel can NOT PRODUCE a flame hot enough to alter construction grade steel.
aw fuck it... no one else cares about those no bid contracts in iraq... the open checkbook on the usa treasury, OR halliburton's construction contracts.
this shit was all about $$$ folks... and the money IS STILL being made. again, there are more CONTRACTORS in iraq than soldiers.
the_monsterous_monster said:but it's just another example that further strengthens my belief that the American populous, despite it's belief that it's the most sophisticated in the world, is actually composed of some of the dumbest human beings that mankind has ever seen....I put my money up that if Bush could run for office again, he'd win....he had low approval ratings before the last election, and still won in a landslide.....nothing in American way of thinking has changed since then to prevent him from winning again....fucking retards...
smokedacane said:And no one will be ever to find sources because it has NEVER HAPPENED. The Twin Towers are one of the most architecturally sound buildings in the world yet it collapsed after a hour of fire. The bitch was brought down by a demolition team, just like wtc 7. Wake the fuck up!
so what would the effects of a plane hitting a building that large be?max-dawg said:i'll drop my $0.02 and then exit...
and for the record, "yes, i am an engineer." i'm NOT a civil or structural or materials engineer, but jet fuel can NOT PRODUCE a flame hot enough to alter construction grade steel.
smokedacane said:Do believe that the plane was the sole reason for the collapse of the building???
The fuel buring within the towers were far lower than the melting point required to melt steel. And it would of taken way longer for the building to give out considering the twin towers were constructed to LAST.
EXAMPLE
in 2005, A 32-story building in Madrid Spain burned for more than 24 hours and guess what........it did not collapse. It does not collapse because buildings made of steel and concrete (Just like the Towers), despite what we are all led to believe, Skyscrapers do not typically fall to the ground because of fire, even a protracted fire as witnessed in Madrid.
In fact before September 11th, 2001, no building constructed in the MODERN ERA has EVER collapsed as a result of fire alone........EVER. In past events, high-rise buildings burned for as long as six days before the fires were extinguished and yet remained standing.
Harbinger said:The pod pics are altered.
The BBC film does not show WTC 7 in the background.
When the WTC 1 collapsed from the TOP down, not the BOTTOM up the air in the building is initially forced downward, the air has to go somewhere, that would up and out. Thus the reported "updrafts".
But let's use some common sense. If these events were planned by the government, how is it, that something this large, which would literally require the cooperation of THOUSANDS of people, and not a single person has come forward, or leaked some memos...... SOMETHING, ANYTHING.
What happened to all those people that got on the airplanes?
Are you trying to tell me that the government could pull off a scheme of this magnitude, but couldn't make up/plant some WMD's in IRAQ?
But the biggest question is WHY? Why would you hit the WTC in first place, and the Pentagon? So you could invade Iraq? To get control of the oil fields? So companies could get no bid contracts? So a few hundred people at Haliburton, and the oil companies could get rich?
The chances of getting caught would be too great. This is a government that can't even hide it's emails.
Strange shit? Of course. But ya'll gotta be kidding' with this. Even if this is all about money, the risk/reward ratio is WAY too big.
dlow said:No building in history was ever made like the world trade center. Every building was made for the frame to be the strength of the building. However to make a building this tall to be square all the way from top to bottom the building had to be built different. Every structure of the building supported the other. If any failed the building would fall on itself. In 1993 a building expert reported on nightline that the only way to bring down the world trade center was from the top down. The fuel burning in the towers was gone in the first few minutes. The materiels that were in the building was a different story, along with the fact that unlike a regular building fire most of the floor was ignited at once. Also the kenetic energy of the plane itself caused a lot of damage when it weakened the floors that it stuck.
Now what else could cause a building, well demolition experts, but that would take weeks of predrilling frame work and explosions placed throughout the building. Something that would not go unnoticed in a secure building. Well what else, a missle? No nothing exist in our inventory that could do that outside of a fuel air bomb. That would have caused an immediate fall due to the pressure wave. Well what else. Well how about a jet full of aviation fuel at 500 miles an hour smaking a building and igniting a floor at once. This causing intense fires and weakening of the structure which like it was predicted back in 93 would cause the structure to fall.
I think this site has the best explanation. http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/sciam/
smokedacane said:There is no point in explaining it to you harbinger, you're unwilling to be objective when viewing the other side of the coin.
RoadRage said:The answer you are looking for is called collateral damage, taking an immediate loss for future gains!
What gains you ask?
1-Well you already mention the Oil fields but did you realize that it is one of the largest oil fields in the world?
2- A middle east military base right next to Iran!
3- Killing Saddam
4-Opening a market that has been virtually closed to the west!
5-Getting rid of a nation who decided to use the Euro as the currency to measure the barrels of oil, as opposed to the U.S. dollar!
6- Sending a message to the other nations thinking about going with the Euro also!
7- Getting rid of the Towers, building whom many deemed as being an I saw in lower Manhattan!
8- Scaring the citizen's enough to gladly give up their civil liberties!
Also, you should note that the scheme of this magnitude was needed, for the war to begin, as we now know not finding WMD didn't mean shit!
dlow said:No building in history was ever made like the world trade center. Every building was made for the frame to be the strength of the building. However to make a building this tall to be square all the way from top to bottom the building had to be built different. Every structure of the building supported the other. If any failed the building would fall on itself. In 1993 a building expert reported on nightline that the only way to bring down the world trade center was from the top down. The fuel burning in the towers was gone in the first few minutes. The materiels that were in the building was a different story, along with the fact that unlike a regular building fire most of the floor was ignited at once. Also the kenetic energy of the plane itself caused a lot of damage when it weakened the floors that it stuck.
Now what else could cause a building, well demolition experts, but that would take weeks of predrilling frame work and explosions placed throughout the building. Something that would not go unnoticed in a secure building. Well what else, a missle? No nothing exist in our inventory that could do that outside of a fuel air bomb. That would have caused an immediate fall due to the pressure wave. Well what else. Well how about a jet full of aviation fuel at 500 miles an hour smaking a building and igniting a floor at once. This causing intense fires and weakening of the structure which like it was predicted back in 93 would cause the structure to fall.
I think this site has the best explanation. http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/sciam/
Harbinger said:I am being objective. There are opposing arguments for most everything you cite as evidence. But I always look at the bigger picture, and while most are burying themselves in the details, and trying to figure pi to 189 places, I always ask, what's the payoff, and is it worth the stretch. If the answer to both of those questions is yes, then I look at the possibility of making it work.
But like I said, just use common sense. Think about how the whole thing could work together, instead of just individual pieces and you can see that it's pretty much impossible.
Why do I feel, this shit is going way over half of these cats heads!smokedacane said:9-China along with other middle eastern countries (Iran and Iraq) are one of the few countries in the entire world that do not have banks within its country controlled by the Rockefellers, Rothchilds, and other private European bankers. It's safe to say that these private bankers will have banks in the middle east now.....all thanks to 9/11
RoadRage said:The answer you are looking for is called collateral damage, taking an immediate loss for future gains!
What gains you ask?
1-Well you already mention the Oil fields but did you realize that it is one of the largest oil fields in the world?
2- A middle east military base right next to Iran!
3- Killing Saddam
4-Opening a market that has been virtually closed to the west!
5-Getting rid of a nation who decided to use the Euro as the currency to measure the barrels of oil, as opposed to the U.S. dollar!
6- Sending a message to the other nations thinking about going with the Euro also!
7- Getting rid of the Towers, building whom many deemed as being an I saw in lower Manhattan!
8- Scaring the citizen's enough to gladly give up their civil liberties!
Also, you should note that the scheme of this magnitude was needed, for the war to begin, as we now know not finding WMD didn't mean shit!
RoadRage said:Why do I feel, this shit is going way over half of these cats heads!![]()
Thanx for #9 feel free to add more, I sure there is a lot more I left out!
Harbinger said:Not plausible, you're making this about oil.
2-There was no need for a military base next to Iran before we invaded Iraq. Iran actually used to like us. Desert Storm anyone?
3-This served no purpose. He wasn't a threat.
4-What good does it do to open other markets when our trade deficit contiues to widen? Again this makes no sense.
5-I don't think Iraq was accepting Euros for oil. Correct me if I'm wrong.
6-See number 5.
7-This is just silly. This defined NY as much as the Statue of Liberty.
8-This will only go so far. Don't believe the implanted RFID chip bullshit. And again, a goverment capable of pulling off such a complex plan, could SURELY come up with a WMD or two, dontcha think?
Now as far as you long term gain theory goes, the more we pay for oil increases the amount of $$$ and research that goes into alternative fuel sources. So this would really be a short term strategy, relatively speaking.
smokedacane said:I can't believe how easily you underestimate people with unlimited wealth and resources.![]()
RoadRage said:Why do I feel, this shit is going way over half of these cats heads!![]()
Thanx for #9 feel free to add more, I sure there is a lot more I left out!
Well lets start at 5, yes Iraq did convert to Eros, so did Venezuela by the way!Harbinger said:Not plausible, you're making this about oil.
2-There was no need for a military base next to Iran before we invaded Iraq. Iran actually used to like us. Desert Storm anyone?
3-This served no purpose. He wasn't a threat.
4-What good does it do to open other markets when our trade deficit contiues to widen? Again this makes no sense.
5-I don't think Iraq was accepting Euros for oil. Correct me if I'm wrong.
6-See number 5.
7-This is just silly. This defined NY as much as the Statue of Liberty.
8-This will only go so far. Don't believe the implanted RFID chip bullshit. And again, a goverment capable of pulling off such a complex plan, could SURELY come up with a WMD or two, dontcha think?
Now as far as you long term gain theory goes, the more we pay for oil increases the amount of $$$ and research that goes into alternative fuel sources. So this would really be a short term strategy, relatively speaking.
smokedacane said:They already have discovered a alternative fuel source. They have had it for over 50 years or so. The only reason most of the world doesn't know about it is because they can't monopolize it like oil.