****Dinesh D’Souza on black folk.......WTF???****

Mr. Met

So Amazin
BGOL Investor
dineshdsouza-full.jpg


Although I've heard of Dinesh, I never paid much attention to him because I never deemed him that important.

A rising star with conservatives, but so what? These people seem to come and go.

But gotdam, this brickheaded sand-nigga is considered a 'scholar'?

I never took the chance to read his book The End of Racism, but now I guess I should.

His ilk kills me. Like that asian slut Michelle Malkin, he thinks he's an expert on black urban affairs.


“The American slave was treated like property, which is to say, pretty well.” (from D’Souza’s book, The End of Racism)

“If America as a nation owes blacks as a group reparations for slavery, what do blacks as a group owe America for the abolition of slavery?” (from The End of Racism)

"Am I calling for the repeal of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Actually, yes."
(from The End of Racism)

“...within the United States, black males have (you may be surprised to discover) the highest self-esteem of any group. Yet on academic measures black males score the lowest. The reason is that self-esteem in these cases is generated by factors unrelated to studies, such as the ability to beat up other students or a high estimation of one’s sexual prowess.”
(from D’Souza’s book Letters to a Young Conservative)

"[f]or many whites the criminal and irresponsible black underclass represents a revival of barbarism in the midst of Western civilization." (from D’Souza’s book The End of Racism)

CLICK HERE 4 MORE
 
9X3inch said:
dineshdsouza-full.jpg

I never took the chance to read his book The End of Racism, but now I guess I should.
I started reading it a few years ago. But it was so presumptuous and brain dead that I didn't finish it. :hmm:
 
One day whites will wake up and see the jokes on them and when they do we can start taking back our country from corporations and think tanks that fund these race, religion, crime, and poverty pimping demogogues.
 
It's hilarious :lol: to me how ignorance is never able to identify it's ownself :smh:. Ignorance speaks more often than intelligence. That's why people generalize races. D'Souza is ignorance so that's all he can relate to. Intelligence can identify itself as well as ignorance,while having the ability to attribute characteristics to the individual, not a whole race. Peace
 
Conservative circles my ass, ALL white people love that dude. He gives white people an excuse to ignore there history.

-VG
 
I read up on him in '03. :smh: :smh: :smh: Couldn't finish the damn book, he was so lost. :cool: When I found out he wasn't white. :hmm: when I found out he used to date Ann Coulter
 
Re: ****Dinesh D’Souza on black folk.......WTF???****

This guy is something else. Wait until he realises that white people (really ) see him only marginally better than the black people he speaks badly about. I hope someone awakens him from his dream without too much of a shock.

I've noticed that this is a common situation with people who forget their colour.
 
VegasGuy said:
Conservative circles my ass, ALL white people love that dude. He gives white people an excuse to ignore there history.

-VG

I'm assuming he's indian...not surprising ....
THEY REALLY DO THINK THEY'RE BRITISH...
AND WHITE....
REALLY.
If we think we were brainwashed, wait til you meet one of them.
Note that I am speaking from personal experience.

neo
 
Let me tell you something, this motherfucker has real problems. He really wants to be white. That's all it is. Conservative minorities and immigrants like him and Michelle Malkin know that the surest way to be accepted by white people is to attack black people. They're one trick ponies, they won't write about economics or foreign affairs, nobody will buy it. They know what white people want to hear from them.
 
rude_dog said:
Let me tell you something, this motherfucker has real problems. He really wants to be white. That's all it is. Conservative minorities and immigrants like him and Michelle Malkin know that the surest way to be accepted by white people is to attack black people. They're one trick ponies, they won't write about economics or foreign affairs, nobody will buy it. They know what white people want to hear from them.



100 percent true, he is a self hating waste of skin with low self-esteem.
 
Last edited:
"Am I calling for the repeal of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Actually, yes."

http://www.bgol.us/board/showthread.php?t=142474

After looking at the enforcement of the Civil Rights Act, you can keep the law. No other U.S. law is structured like this for federal civil lawsuits between two private parties, violate the separation of power doctrine, and equal protection clause of the Constitution. The EEOC doesn't care about black people (Kanye). It is like the literacy test/poll tax people had to take before voting, it doesn't specifically target blacks but since the illiteracy rate was high coming off of slavery, guess who couldn't vote?

You have to read the laws written and processes created with a fine tooth comb. That stupid grin is them getting on over you; fooling you into thinking your civil rights is respected. Ask the Indians how their treaties and laws worked out for them...

When white people become a minority and want to claim discrimination, watch the Civil Rights Act change magically.
 
Last edited:
VegasGuy said:
Conservative circles my ass, ALL white people love that dude. He gives white people an excuse to ignore there history.

-VG

For a person who listens to both liberal and conservative radio, this is the first time I've heard of this joker.

Come to think about it, Rush Limbaugh did laughed at this book a while back. *yes I do listen to Rush Limbaugh. Only because I wanted to see why people thought he was racist. After 8 months, I still don't see how he is a racist. Oh well...*
 
9X3inch said:
“The American slave was treated like property, which is to say, pretty well.” (from D’Souza’s book, The End of Racism)

“If America as a nation owes blacks as a group reparations for slavery, what do blacks as a group owe America for the abolition of slavery?” (from The End of Racism)

"Am I calling for the repeal of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Actually, yes."
(from The End of Racism)

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :smh: :smh: :smh:
 
I usually just read a lot of threads, but post to very few. However, after reading this one, i felt compelled to respond. I have had a personal run in with this guy many years ago while still on college. He has only built on what he was doing then. He believes in his own narrow view point that America has its own caste system, the way India has its own. To make a long story short, he is arrogant and convinced that black people in america is a subserviant class to whites. He has found an audience group of whites, who listen to him and fund his "research" concerning black people in the United States. However, this info, bottom line really spells out what he truly is: :lol:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16688755/ :dance: :lol: :D
 
Last edited:
<font size="4">Interesting excerpts from an article the National Review by Mona Charen:</font sizez>

- D’Souza believes that: It was American cultural decadence, American foul popular movies, music and pornograph that enraged traditional Muslims worldwide and moved the Muslim World to violence;

- The godfather of the radical movement that spawned Osama bin Laden was the Egyptian writer Sayyid Qutb, who formed his fanatical beliefs after living in the United States in the late 1940s. And, what did Qutb have to say:

Qutb was offended by everything about America, from its food to its delight in football and money, and particularly by what he saw as sexual libertinism. “Jazz is the American music,” Qutb wrote, “created by Negroes to satisfy their primitive instincts — their love of noise and their appetite for sexual arousal.” Attending a church social in (dry) Greeley, Colo., in 1949, Qutb was revolted by what he saw: “Dancing naked legs filled the hall, arms draped around the waists, chests met chests, lips met lips, and the atmosphere was full of love.”​

Makes one think not only of the mindset of D’Souza but of radical Islam, as well ?

QueEx

THE ARTICLE:
http://article.nationalreview.com/? q=YjNmMjdkZmExMDk1OGM0ZGNiNTFmNDE5NjI0ZjkzZTg=

`
 
What is this guy talking about. In the 1980's Bin Laden is publicly praising the U.S. for the help we gave in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union. The next minute he is trying to blow the World Trade Tower in 1993 and fly planes into the building in 2001. You will notice how 1993 is right after the Gulf War when we had our military running around Saudi Arabia, near Mecca pissing Muslims off.

John Perkins, Economic Hitman author, states that the US was building McDonalds and desalination facilities near Mecca. I don't know if this statement has validity but I know Walmart built a superstore in plainview of ancient ruins in Mexico. Therefore, I think this statment could be true because multinational corporation can be insensitive and exploitative of other people cultures.

Saudi Arabia and the United States turn down the help that Bin Laden offered to fight Saddam. We should have let him fight Saddam and lose than come in afterwards. What gets me is Saudia Arabia standing on the sidelines during all these conflicts doing nothing (offering money is not good enough). They are suppose to be an ally yet they have not offered any troops in Iraq or helped to maintain order in the country.

They have threatened to come when we leave but I think their primary motive is to form an alliance with the Sunni and control their oil. I don't see coming into the country now because there is no economic benefit to them. They would not be able to control the oil in the same way. Iran has the same motive to get their piece of the country and expand their domination of oil resources. Having oil and being destable is a condition for disaster.
 
Last edited:
mrjosecuervo said:
The problem is that Indians can not fit standard size condoms. They are too big for them.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

I heard that on the news, no wonder they don't want their women dating outside their race.
 
I'm liberal on some issues and conservative on others. I'll check the book out. I listen to what Rush says and what Dems say. I like to hear both sides no matter how crazy it may sound.
 

For you young peeps D'Shitza - who sees himself as a "honorary white", has been a proud virulent RepubliKlan racist, for decades.
<blockquote>
October 1995
....Mr. D'Souza writes that in some African-American communities ``the streets are irrigated with alcohol, urine and blood.'' And this: ``If America as a nation owes blacks as a group reparations for slavery, what do blacks as a group owe America for the abolition of slavery?''......
</blockquote>

READ:

2 Black Conservatives Are Now Searching For a New Home







11091871634_8c15db88db_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
The problem is that Indians can not fit standard size condoms. They are too big for them.

Hey man, easy on that. My great grandfather's ancestors were from Gujarat State.


For you young peeps D'Shitza - who sees himself as a "honorary white", has been a proud virulent RepubliKlan racist, for decades.
<blockquote>
October 1995
....Mr. D'Souza writes that in some African-American communities ``the streets are irrigated with alcohol, urine and blood.'' And this: ``If America as a nation owes blacks as a group reparations for slavery, what do blacks as a group owe America for the abolition of slavery?''......
</blockquote>

READ:

2 Black Conservatives Are Now Searching For a New Home





This is a lengthy pice, but well worth the read about Dinesh D'Souza:
I heard him say virtually the same thing on television in the mid 1990s and made a mental note to watch this fucker.


The End of Racism: New Prospects for a Color-Blind Society
October 5, 1995
Dinesh D’Souza
http://www.independent.org/events/transcript.asp?id=60


"Now let me explain what I mean by culture. What I mean by culture is that groups can develop an oppositional culture that represents a sensible, intelligent adaptation to historical circumstances, and yet one that is in some ways today a liability.

I’ll give you an example from my own country. When my parents were growing up in India, the Indians developed a culture of protest, which can be summarized by the phrase, “Lie down on the railway tracks.” It was the heyday of British Colonialism, and in my parents generation what the Indians would do to send the British home was to lie down on the railway tracks. They knew that the British were not like Hitler; they wouldn’t keep the trains going, but they would stop the trains. This would stop the empire, and it did.

A generation later, the 1990s, when I go home to visit my family every two years or so, I go to the Bombay railway station and, sure enough, there are 10 guys lying on the railway tracks. So I say, “What are you doing?” They say, “Well, we work at this factory down the street, we want a 9 percent pay raise, but they only want to give us 4 percent; and so we’ve decided to express our discontent by putting on these Ghandian robes, and making our voices known.” And the police and the politicians are immobilized. No one will pick these guys off the railway tracks, because they are the true Ghandians.

My point is simply this: A cultural orientation that made sense a generation ago is dysfunctional today. Let me give a simple more specific to America. It has to do with attitudes toward the government. More than any other groups Africans Americans are sympathetic to the government. They look to the government as an important source for jobs, of rights, of education, and so on. Historically, many whites have viewed the government as the enemy of rights. If you look at the Founding Fathers’ debates, or the Bill of Rights, which says “Congress shall not do this; Congress shall no do that,” limitations on the government were regarded as the crucial way to protect the citizen’s freedom and security.

For blacks, historical experience proved the opposite. It was the Federal government that ended slavery; it was the federal government that ended segregation; it was the federal government that was an employer of last resort for many blacks in this century. So it’s not all that surprising that as a group blacks tend to see the government more sympathetically than most other groups.

All I’m trying to say is that this cultural orientation, which made a lot of sense at one time, is today a liability. Why is it a liability? Because the record of the government in solving problems has been mixed to abysmal; because the government no longer has the resources; because public confidence in our government is at an all time low. And yet we see a lot of guys marching on Washington all the time, the Million Man March, the anniversary of the Martin Luther King march. I’ve been to all these marches, and they say, “You know, we’ve got to go to Bill Clinton and ask for 300,000 new jobs.” Well, I worked in the White House, and Bill Clinton doesn’t have 300,000 new jobs; he has about 300 jobs and most of them are taken.

So the orientation that looks to government is today not that effective. Meanwhile other ethnic groups, and it’s not any in particular—for example, it’s the Cubans, the West Indians, the Koreans—are setting up in the inner city, are setting up rotating credit associations, and within a generation their daughters are valedictorians and they have moved to the suburbs."
 
Back
Top