Bump.
Wish he had been so outspoken from the gate. And you can't be against outside exploitation but ok with it from within.
isn't dame management?
You've never heard an artist say Dame jerked them on their contracts. His dealings with his artists were fair. Not like the bloodsucking that goes on by others in a management position. And to answer your question, if the management team created that persona then yes they deserve a percentage, but labels today only sign artists with an already established buzz. In that case, no they should not receive a percentage of the money that that artist makes off of anything outside of their recording contract.
Bump.
Wish he had been so outspoken from the gate. And you can't be against outside exploitation but ok with it from within.
You've never heard an artist say Dame jerked them on their contracts. His dealings with his artists were fair. Not like the bloodsucking that goes on by others in a management position. And to answer your question, if the management team created that persona then yes they deserve a percentage, but labels today only sign artists with an already established buzz. In that case, no they should not receive a percentage of the money that that artist makes off of anything outside of their recording contract.
Bump.
Wish he had been so outspoken from the gate. And you can't be against outside exploitation but ok with it from within.
something confuses me...dame rails against the 360 deal which is something that management invented...
isn't dame management?
devil's advocate for 360 deal: management develops an artist. They invest money and promote artist. Artist ets endorsement and merch money based on the image and celebrity management helped developed.
shouldn't management get a percentage of those endorsements and merch deals based on the fact that those deals are because of the persona both the artist and management developed?
Yeah me too, Now he just sounds like his butt hurt.
Cacs been doing what he saying for hundreds of years
Dame is smart and dumb at the same time. His problem is
that he needs to be a BEHIND the scenes guy cause his
presentation is way too confrontational, arrogant, angry &
hustle-ish. The sooner he realizes his weaknesses the sooner
he'll make it back on top
You've never heard an artist say Dame jerked them on their contracts. His dealings with his artists were fair. Not like the bloodsucking that goes on by others in a management position. And to answer your question, if the management team created that persona then yes they deserve a percentage, but labels today only sign artists with an already established buzz. In that case, no they should not receive a percentage of the money that that artist makes off of anything outside of their recording contract.
^^^^
he was making some damn good points....
he HAD to do at least one pause though.
i guess its just too hard for him to stop.
Dame isn't a saint, look up how he dealt with curren$y.
Dame isn't a saint, look up how he dealt with curren$y.
&
@ that pause.
This guy really needs to grow past that immature shit.
Yeah me too, Now he just sounds like his butt hurt.
Cacs been doing what he saying for hundreds of years
Dame is smart and dumb at the same time. His problem is
that he needs to be a BEHIND the scenes guy cause his
presentation is way too confrontational, arrogant, angry &
hustle-ish. The sooner he realizes his weaknesses the sooner
he'll make it back on top
^^^^
he was making some damn good points....
he HAD to do at least one pause though.
i guess its just too hard for him to stop.
Dame isn't a saint, look up how he dealt with curren$y.
The OP is DJ vlad
Stop spamming the board cac
something confuses me...dame rails against the 360 deal which is something that management invented...
isn't dame management?
devil's advocate for 360 deal: management develops an artist. They invest money and promote artist. Artist ets endorsement and merch money based on the image and celebrity management helped developed.
shouldn't management get a percentage of those endorsements and merch deals based on the fact that those deals are because of the persona both the artist and management developed?
Why can't you?The simple answer is no. If management brokers the deal like an agent would , then yes. You can't just sign up to get 10%of someone image and say I had an hand in this person's future deals no matter what. That broad stroke shit is insane and only the devil or his advocate would think that's OK.
you gotta give him some credit
(although his ex-lawyer would strongly advise against it)
he ALMOST held out till the very end.
pause
i dont think so...because most artist dont make money off of albums. only the record labelsomething confuses me...dame rails against the 360 deal which is something that management invented...
isn't dame management?
devil's advocate for 360 deal: management develops an artist. They invest money and promote artist. Artist ets endorsement and merch money based on the image and celebrity management helped developed.
shouldn't management get a percentage of those endorsements and merch deals based on the fact that those deals are because of the persona both the artist and management developed?