D.N.C. CHAIR PURGES DISSENTERS IN SURPRISE SHAKE-UP

ballscout1

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Democratic Party
Sanders loyalists and Ellison supporters were among the officials ousted amid an ongoing intra-party feud.
BY
OCTOBER 19, 2017 1:55 PM


The Republican Party isn’t the only political establishment in shamblesfollowing the shock election of Donald Trump last fall. In a move that exacerbated the vast intra-party rift exposed during last year’s presidential primary between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez has stripped a number of longtime party officials of their “at-large” delegate status or leadership positions, while appointing a slate of 75 new members that include Clinton campaign veterans, lobbyists, and neophytes.

Perez revealed his picks this week, ahead of the D.N.C.’s first meeting since he was elected chairman. Upon perusing it, progressive party members were incensed to find that he had demoted a number of veteran delegates who’d backed either Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison in his bid for party chairman against Perez, or Sanders in 2016. (Ellison, who now serves as Perez’s deputy, was widely viewed as a proxy candidate for the more liberal, Sanders wing of the party.) Those ousted include Ray Buckley, James Zogby, Alice Germond, and Barbara Casbar Siperstein,NBC News reports. “I’m concerned about the optics, and I’m concerned about the impact,” Zogby said of the D.N.C. shake-up. “I want to heal the wound of 2016.”

Germond, too, noted that the move does not bode well for the party’s quest to unify its progressive and establishment wings. “It is quite unusual for a former party officer who has been serving on the D.N.C. for forever to just be left out in the cold without even a call from the chairman," she told NBC News. “So I assumed it had something to do with [my] support for Keith. . . . I understand that I fought very hard for Keith Ellison. And I understand that to the winners go the spoils.” In a statement to NBC News,Karthik Ganapathy, a spokesperson for Ellison, said, “Keith suggested names for D.N.C. at-large membership and committees. Some were selected and some were not. In the end, the selections are the prerogative of the chair.”

To add insult to injury, Perez also tapped several individuals who have lobbying or corporate-interest backgrounds—a move that has sparked criticism in the past. The pack of new delegates includes Joanne Dowdell, a registered lobbyist for Fox News parent company News Corp; Harold Ickes,a veteran of the Clinton White House; and Manuel Ortiz, a lobbyist for CITGO Petroleum Corp and Puerto Rican interests. At least 10 additional Perez-tapped superdelegates have previously been registered as lobbyists, Bloomberg reports.


D.N.C. spokesman Michael Tyler defended the chairman’s appointments. “This year's slate of at-large DNC member nominees reflects the unprecedented diversity of our party’s coalition,” he said in a statement to NBC News. “This slate doubles millennial and Native American at-large representation, provides unprecedented representation for our allies in the labor community, and increases the presence of Puerto Rican at-large members at a time when the Trump administration refuses to take responsibility for the millions of Americans who are still suffering through a major humanitarian crisis.”


https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/10/tom-perez-dnc-shake-up
 
The definition of insanity is ?

I told you when the establishment democrats smeared Ellison so they could fill the post with establishment Perez they would keep doing the same bullshit.

And since inauguration day instead of campaigning to take back congress all they been doing is riding obama,saying they aint trump,and promoting the hillary excuse tour.

Guess they think congress will just fall in their lap cause trump is a fuckup...

Congress been blocking the shit that would kill them like healthcare....

Dems have zero dog in them..they should be on constant attack mode and defining what they will do but they waiting for the GOP to define them
 
That article is biased as fuck! Lots of blanket generalizations and opinions being stated as absolute facts.:cmonson:
But then I researched Abigail Tracy's bylines and noticed quite a few similar "divide and conquer" type articles.
 
That article is biased as fuck! Lots of blanket generalizations and opinions being stated as absolute facts.:cmonson:
But then I researched Abigail Tracy's bylines and noticed quite a few similar "divide and conquer" type articles.

Is what was alleged true...

We're those that supported a progressive agenda replaced by establishment types ?

Or does the article lie ?
 
Is what was alleged true...

We're those that supported a progressive agenda replaced by establishment types ?

Or does the article lie ?
It is fair to say a majority of Sanders loyalists were primarily loyal to Sanders and not the DNC so it is no surprise that they jumped ship when they had no more use for the Democratic infrastructure and machinery in place to needed for Sanders to win the Presidency. That is not a criticism, just a fact.

Similarly, a majority of Democrats who might be primarily loyal to the overall DNC are being unfairly (IMO) labelled and dismissed as being nothing more than Hillary pawns. Just count how many times they mention her in this article versus for instance President Obama or Pelosi or Biden or ANY other top Democrat.

Ellison lost, so of course the Progressive agenda is going to lose overall favor. But that does not automatically mean Hillary Clinton is still number one in charge of running shit in the DNC, which is the one dead horse this particular writer beats over and over. So YES, the article does lie.
 
It is fair to say a majority of Sanders loyalists were primarily loyal to Sanders and not the DNC so it is no surprise that they jumped ship when they had no more use for the Democratic infrastructure and machinery in place to needed for Sanders to win the Presidency. That is not a criticism, just a fact.

Similarly, a majority of Democrats who might be primarily loyal to the overall DNC are being unfairly (IMO) labelled and dismissed as being nothing more than Hillary pawns. Just count how many times they mention her in this article versus for instance President Obama or Pelosi or Biden or ANY other top Democrat.

Ellison lost, so of course the Progressive agenda is going to lose overall favor. But that does not automatically mean Hillary Clinton is still number one in charge of running shit in the DNC, which is the one dead horse this particular writer beats over and over. So YES, the article does lie.

Sanders loyalists came from the Democratic party except for new voters.Many were part of the small donor grassroots coalition that Obama put together...true enough the majority of sanders supporters think the Democrats have followed the Republicans to far right and abandoned the Democratic principals.

It doesn't say they abandoned ship it says they were replaced. .

Ellison was smeared by the DNC.He is progressive he is also Muslim and he wins in a predominately white area..he is also new blood which many think the DNC needs.

For such an important midterm the DNC is doing the same old shit and almost insuring the GOP holds congress

Wit the exception of Obama,they have been on quite the losing streak.

I have seen more Hillary apologist than I have democratic candidates and messaging. I have received more emails trying to explain clinton loss and asking for money naming obama than any message or strategy or even hyping candidates to take congress....

What I see in my mailbox and in media is the DNC with nothing new. No strategy and doing the same shit.

So again my question is,was the article inaccurate.

Were the ptogessives replaced as it states?

Are you aware of some up and comers challenging the GOP for some of those congressional seats being supported by the DNC ..
 
You all should have known by now 2018 will be a republican win.

In the Senate, moreover, Republicans hold a huge advantage benefit in the profile of seats up for election next November. Of 34 senators on the ballot, only nine are Republicans; of the seven considered most vulnerable, only two are Republicans.

Republicans stick with their party and vote republican regardless how bad the candidate is. That's why they control all of government. Democrats/Independants don't. Simple

Jesus could run as the democratic candidate in 2020 and will lose to Trump.


Maybe in 2024......

Gavin Newsom for President

o-GAVIN-NEWSOM-facebook.jpg
 
You all should have known by now 2018 will be a republican win.

In the Senate, moreover, Republicans hold a huge advantage benefit in the profile of seats up for election next November. Of 34 senators on the ballot, only nine are Republicans; of the seven considered most vulnerable, only two are Republicans.

Republicans stick with their party and vote republican regardless how bad the candidate is. That's why they control all of government. Democrats/Independants don't. Simple

Jesus could run as the democratic candidate in 2020 and will lose to Trump.


Maybe in 2024......

Gavin Newsom for President

o-GAVIN-NEWSOM-facebook.jpg





Is that picture Gavin ?

:roflmao::roflmao2::roflmao3:




Seriou7sly though, they need to get of them formulas and shit.

Yeah republicans stick together but democrats have greater numbers if they have the right person actually promoting a great message.

It might not be fair but it's real,if you want souls to the polls you have to excite the voters. Democrats had no problems with numbers with Bill Clinton and Barack Obama..Because they could sell a message and excite the voters.

Hell let Pelosi and Schumer stay senior leaders if they want but get some better speakers,more exciting speakers in front of the cameras. And have them in front of the cameras often making that point selling that message instead of the GOP bad Trump bad stratey.

Congressional disapproval has stayed at all times lows. Dont take for granted you don't have a chance, should be pressing hard all the time.Not just what republicans do or don't do, What the F are the dems going to do and how..Sell that shit, explain it so 5th graders can nderstand it.

Gotta stop playing defense and waiting for the Alt-Right to define the democrats and their programs.

I think taking this eleection off just trying to maintain is a mistake..Even if they don't win in the midterms they are now known for 2020..
 
Yeah republicans stick together but democrats have greater numbers if they have the right person actually promoting a great message.

It might not be fair but it's real,if you want souls to the polls you have to excite the voters. Democrats had no problems with numbers with Bill Clinton and Barack Obama..Because they could sell a message and excite the voters.

There will never be a right person for all Democrats. Fantasy

Waiting for the next Bill or Obama is stupid.. The perfect candidate will never happen. Republicans understand that...

It's a white republican world and isn't going to change anytime soon.

That means that come 2017, they'll have total control of government in at least 25 states, and partial control in 20 states. According to population calculations by the conservative group Americans for Tax Reform, that translates to roughly 80 percent of the population living in a state either all or partially controlled by Republicans.


 
There will never be a right person for all Democrats. Fantasy

Waiting for the next Bill or Obama is stupid.. The perfect candidate will never happen. Republicans understand that...

It's a white republican world and isn't going to change anytime soon.

That means that come 2017, they'll have total control of government in at least 25 states, and partial control in 20 states. According to population calculations by the conservative group Americans for Tax Reform, that translates to roughly 80 percent of the population living in a state either all or partially controlled by Republicans.

Who said anything about a perfect candidate or waiting for a clinton or obama ?

And there are dynamic speakers in the party that arent being used.

It's not about a perfect candidate it's about a better strategy and creating the narrative of what democrats stand for instead of chasing the Republicans right and allowing them to define the narrative.

People get caught up with labels like progressive but that is where yhe party was and should be...Teddy Kennedy was progressive by today's standards..

It's 2017 and there is no democratic message.there is no democratic narrative.there is no effort to sell any message or to get people fired up to vote. ..

Btw clinton and obama are not the only dynamic speakers recently but the are the only ones who have won recently. ..and they did it by exciting those who would vote for them and got them to turnout.

With the exception of those two presidencies democrats aint won shit in 30 years...

Time to change strategy ,stop running to the right and promote and fight for Democratic ideals instead of being spineless. ..
 
Who said anything about a perfect candidate or waiting for a clinton or obama ?

And there are dynamic speakers in the party that arent being used.

It's not about a perfect candidate it's about a better strategy and creating the narrative of what democrats stand for instead of chasing the Republicans right and allowing them to define the narrative.

People get caught up with labels like progressive but that is where yhe party was and should be...Teddy Kennedy was progressive by today's standards..

It's 2017 and there is no democratic message.there is no democratic narrative.there is no effort to sell any message or to get people fired up to vote. ..

Btw clinton and obama are not the only dynamic speakers recently but the are the only ones who have won recently. ..and they did it by exciting those who would vote for them and got them to turnout.

With the exception of those two presidencies democrats aint won shit in 30 years...

Time to change strategy ,stop running to the right and promote and fight for Democratic ideals instead of being spineless. ..
If Democrats want to win they need to go farther to the right to get the white vote. The unfortunate truth is white people run the show. It's 2017 and they took over EVERYTHING. We have to protest Nazis, kkk, skinheads. Hows that for progress.

The white President attacks anyone and anything Black. Well on his way to wiping away anything tied to the first Black President in history. There should be blood in the streets.

Yet we still have Jay-Vill in this thread saying he will vote for the republican operative Jill Stein again.
 
a dude who married a hard right conservative. Cheated on her with his the WIFE of his campaign manager :smh:

no fucking way he ever goes national.

Kamala Harris and her white husband got next in 2020.

Harris should be one.of the faces speaking nationally presenting the democratic agenda and defining what the dem narrative is.

Along with Kennedy, Ellison ,Julian castro,murphy,reed, Patrick, and others
 
If Democrats want to win they need to go farther to the right to get the white vote. The unfortunate truth is white people run the show. It's 2017 and they took over EVERYTHING. We have to protest Nazis, kkk, skinheads. Hows that for progress.

The white President attacks anyone and anything Black. Well on his way to wiping away anything tied to the first Black President in history. There should be blood in the streets.

Yet we still have Jay-Vill in this thread saying he will vote for the republican operative Jill Stein again.

Further right?

Bullshit, they simply have to return to their ideals and stop sitting back aND letting Republicans define them and then trying to answer that definition.

Once Republicans define policies and stances it is hard to change that narrative.

These old ass establishment democrats are terrible at messaging

Furthere right and there really isn't a difference. Democrats are already 1980s Republicans.
 
You will see in 2024.

And here is an example of why democrats lose.

If this gain cat is being setup up as an up and Comer he should already be in front.of cameras natonally not waiting until 2024..

but if he is going to be pushed by the DNC I already have my doubts. .

Get these up and comers out speaking and see who gets a following nationally instead of trying to pick for us...stop trying to be king/queen makers and support the liberal progressive ideals.

Stop being reactive and running right abandoning democratic ideals..

Be proactive and fight for Democratic identity and stop trying to be republican light
 
Back
Top