Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd world

Makkonnen

The Quizatz Haderach
BGOL Investor
I had included this in the south america goin commie thread but it is something that should be a topic by itself
-----------------------------------



Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
Democracy Now – November 4, 2004

We speak with John Perkins, a former respected member of the international banking community. In his book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man he describes how as a highly paid professional, he helped the U.S. cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then take over their economies. [includes rush transcript]

John Perkins describes himself as a former economic hit man - a highly paid professional who cheated countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars.

20 years ago Perkins began writing a book with the working title, "Conscience of an Economic Hit Men."

Perkins writes, "The book was to be dedicated to the presidents of two countries, men who had been his clients whom I respected and thought of as kindred spirits - Jaime Roldós, president of Ecuador, and Omar Torrijos, president of Panama. Both had just died in fiery crashes. Their deaths were not accidental. They were assassinated because they opposed that fraternity of corporate, government, and banking heads whose goal is global empire. We Economic Hit Men failed to bring Roldós and Torrijos around, and the other type of hit men, the CIA-sanctioned jackals who were always right behind us, stepped in.

John Perkins goes on to write: "I was persuaded to stop writing that book. I started it four more times during the next twenty years. On each occasion, my decision to begin again was influenced by current world events: the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1980, the first Gulf War, Somalia, and the rise of Osama bin Laden. However, threats or bribes always convinced me to stop."

But now Perkins has finally published his story. The book is titled Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. John Perkins joins us now in our Firehouse studios.

· John Perkins, from 1971 to 1981 he worked for the international consulting firm of Chas T. Main where he was a self-described "economic hit man." He is the author of the new book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.

RUSH TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is available free of charge, however donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate - $25, $50, $100, more...

AMY GOODMAN: John Perkins joins us now in our firehouse studio. Welcome to Democracy Now!

JOHN PERKINS: Thank you, Amy. It’s great to be here.

AMY GOODMAN: It’s good to have you with us. Okay, explain this term, “economic hit man,” e.h.m., as you call it.

JOHN PERKINS: Basically what we were trained to do and what our job is to do is to build up the American empire. To bring -- to create situations where as many resources as possible flow into this country, to our corporations, and our government, and in fact we’ve been very successful. We’ve built the largest empire in the history of the world. It's been done over the last 50 years since World War II with very little military might, actually. It's only in rare instances like Iraq where the military comes in as a last resort. This empire, unlike any other in the history of the world, has been built primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people into our way of life, through the economic hit men. I was very much a part of that.

AMY GOODMAN: How did you become one? Who did you work for?

JOHN PERKINS: Well, I was initially recruited while I was in business school back in the late sixties by the National Security Agency, the nation's largest and least understood spy organization; but ultimately I worked for private corporations. The first real economic hit man was back in the early 1950's, Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of Teddy, who overthrew of government of Iran, a democratically elected government, Mossadegh’s government who was Time's magazine person of the year; and he was so successful at doing this without any bloodshed -- well, there was a little bloodshed, but no military intervention, just spending millions of dollars and replaced Mossadegh with the Shah of Iran. At that point, we understood that this idea of economic hit man was an extremely good one. We didn't have to worry about the threat of war with Russia when we did it this way. The problem with that was that Roosevelt was a C.I.A. agent. He was a government employee. Had he been caught, we would have been in a lot of trouble. It would have been very embarrassing. So, at that point, the decision was made to use organizations like the C.I.A. and the N.S.A. to recruit potential economic hit men like me and then send us to work for private consulting companies, engineering firms, construction companies, so that if we were caught, there would be no connection with the government.

AMY GOODMAN: Okay. Explain the company you worked for.

JOHN PERKINS: Well, the company I worked for was a company named Chas. T. Main in Boston, Massachusetts. We were about 2,000 employees, and I became its chief economist. I ended up having fifty people working for me. But my real job was deal-making. It was giving loans to other countries, huge loans, much bigger than they could possibly repay. One of the conditions of the loan–let's say a $1 billion to a country like Indonesia or Ecuador–and this country would then have to give ninety percent of that loan back to a U.S. company, or U.S. companies, to build the infrastructure–a Halliburton or a Bechtel. These were big ones. Those companies would then go in and build an electrical system or ports or highways, and these would basically serve just a few of the very wealthiest families in those countries. The poor people in those countries would be stuck ultimately with this amazing debt that they couldn’t possibly repay. A country today like Ecuador owes over fifty percent of its national budget just to pay down its debt. And it really can’t do it. So, we literally have them over a barrel. So, when we want more oil, we go to Ecuador and say, “Look, you're not able to repay your debts, therefore give our oil companies your Amazon rain forest, which are filled with oil.” And today we're going in and destroying Amazonian rain forests, forcing Ecuador to give them to us because they’ve accumulated all this debt. So we make this big loan, most of it comes back to the United States, the country is left with the debt plus lots of interest, and they basically become our servants, our slaves. It's an empire. There's no two ways about it. It’s a huge empire. It's been extremely successful.

AMY GOODMAN: We're talking to John Perkins, author of <>Confessions of an Economic Hit Man<>. You say because of bribes and other reason you didn't write this book for a long time. What do you mean? Who tried to bribe you, or who -- what are the bribes you accepted?

JOHN PERKINS: Well, I accepted a half a million dollar bribe in the nineties not to write the book.

AMY GOODMAN: From?

JOHN PERKINS: From a major construction engineering company.

AMY GOODMAN: Which one?

JOHN PERKINS: Legally speaking, it wasn't -- Stoner-Webster. Legally speaking it wasn't a bribe, it was -- I was being paid as a consultant. This is all very legal. But I essentially did nothing. It was a very understood, as I explained in Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, that it was -- I was -- it was understood when I accepted this money as a consultant to them I wouldn't have to do much work, but I mustn't write any books about the subject, which they were aware that I was in the process of writing this book, which at the time I called “Conscience of an Economic Hit Man.” And I have to tell you, Amy, that, you know, it’s an extraordinary story from the standpoint of -- It's almost James Bondish, truly, and I mean—

AMY GOODMAN: Well that's certainly how the book reads.

JOHN PERKINS: Yeah, and it was, you know? And when the National Security Agency recruited me, they put me through a day of lie detector tests. They found out all my weaknesses and immediately seduced me. They used the strongest drugs in our culture, sex, power and money, to win me over. I come from a very old New England family, Calvinist, steeped in amazingly strong moral values. I think I, you know, I’m a good person overall, and I think my story really shows how this system and these powerful drugs of sex, money and power can seduce people, because I certainly was seduced. And if I hadn't lived this life as an economic hit man, I think I’d have a hard time believing that anybody does these things. And that's why I wrote the book, because our country really needs to understand, if people in this nation understood what our foreign policy is really about, what foreign aid is about, how our corporations work, where our tax money goes, I know we will demand change.

AMY GOODMAN: We're talking to John Perkins. In your book, you talk about how you helped to implement a secret scheme that funneled billions of dollars of Saudi Arabian petrol dollars back into the U.S. economy, and that further cemented the intimate relationship between the House of Saud and successive U.S. administrations. Explain.

JOHN PERKINS: Yes, it was a fascinating time. I remember well, you're probably too young to remember, but I remember well in the early seventies how OPEC exercised this power it had, and cut back on oil supplies. We had cars lined up at gas stations. The country was afraid that it was facing another 1929-type of crash–depression; and this was unacceptable. So, they -- the Treasury Department hired me and a few other economic hit men. We went to Saudi Arabia. We –

AMY GOODMAN: You're actually called economic hit men --e.h.m.’s?

JOHN PERKINS: Yeah, it was a tongue-in-cheek term that we called ourselves. Officially, I was a chief economist. We called ourselves e.h.m.'s. It was tongue-in-cheek. It was like, nobody will believe us if we say this, you know? And, so, we went to Saudi Arabia in the early seventies. We knew Saudi Arabia was the key to dropping our dependency, or to controlling the situation. And we worked out this deal whereby the Royal House of Saud agreed to send most of their petro-dollars back to the United States and invest them in U.S. government securities. The Treasury Department would use the interest from these securities to hire U.S. companies to build Saudi Arabia–new cities, new infrastructure–which we’ve done. And the House of Saud would agree to maintain the price of oil within acceptable limits to us, which they’ve done all of these years, and we would agree to keep the House of Saud in power as long as they did this, which we’ve done, which is one of the reasons we went to war with Iraq in the first place. And in Iraq we tried to implement the same policy that was so successful in Saudi Arabia, but Saddam Hussein didn't buy. When the economic hit men fail in this scenario, the next step is what we call the jackals. Jackals are C.I.A.-sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or revolution. If that doesn't work, they perform assassinations. or try to. In the case of Iraq, they weren't able to get through to Saddam Hussein. He had -- His bodyguards were too good. He had doubles. They couldn’t get through to him. So the third line of defense, if the economic hit men and the jackals fail, the next line of defense is our young men and women, who are sent in to die and kill, which is what we’ve obviously done in Iraq.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you explain how Torrijos died?

JOHN PERKINS: Omar Torrijos, the President of Panama. Omar Torrijos had signed the Canal Treaty with Carter much -- and, you know, it passed our congress by only one vote. It was a highly contended issue. And Torrijos then also went ahead and negotiated with the Japanese to build a sea-level canal. The Japanese wanted to finance and construct a sea-level canal in Panama. Torrijos talked to them about this which very much upset Bechtel Corporation, whose president was George Schultz and senior council was Casper Weinberger. When Carter was thrown out (and that’s an interesting story–how that actually happened), when he lost the election, and Reagan came in and Schultz came in as Secretary of State from Bechtel, and Weinberger came from Bechtel to be Secretary of Defense, they were extremely angry at Torrijos -- tried to get him to renegotiate the Canal Treaty and not to talk to the Japanese. He adamantly refused. He was a very principled man. He had his problem, but he was a very principled man. He was an amazing man, Torrijos. And so, he died in a fiery airplane crash, which was connected to a tape recorder with explosives in it, which -- I was there. I had been working with him. I knew that we economic hit men had failed. I knew the jackals were closing in on him, and the next thing, his plane exploded with a tape recorder with a bomb in it. There's no question in my mind that it was C.I.A. sanctioned, and most -- many Latin American investigators have come to the same conclusion. Of course, we never heard about that in our country.

AMY GOODMAN: So, where -- when did your change your heart happen?

JOHN PERKINS: I felt guilty throughout the whole time, but I was seduced. The power of these drugs, sex, power, and money, was extremely strong for me. And, of course, I was doing things I was being patted on the back for. I was chief economist. I was doing things that Robert McNamara liked and so on.

AMY GOODMAN: How closely did you work with the World Bank?

JOHN PERKINS: Very, very closely with the World Bank. The World Bank provides most of the money that’s used by economic hit men, it and the I.M.F. But when 9/11 struck, I had a change of heart. I knew the story had to be told because what happened at 9/11 is a direct result of what the economic hit men are doing. And the only way that we're going to feel secure in this country again and that we're going to feel good about ourselves is if we use these systems we’ve put into place to create positive change around the world. I really believe we can do that. I believe the World Bank and other institutions can be turned around and do what they were originally intended to do, which is help reconstruct devastated parts of the world. Help -- genuinely help poor people. There are twenty-four thousand people starving to death every day. We can change that.

AMY GOODMAN: John Perkins, I want to thank you very much for being with us. John Perkins' book is called, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.

To purchase an audio or video copy of this entire program, click here for our new online ordering or call 1 (800) 881-2359.

Last updated 03/03/2005
 
Thanks Makk.

That's some good shit right there.

I took a class in 98 on international politics, and there was a chapter on Third World Countries. In that chapter it explained exactly this same thing. In order for those countries to compete, they have to succumb to the IMF and the World Bank. Those that don't are outsiders and are not given the same opportunities.

There was also a chapter on terrorism and what the consequences would be for any nation that decided to pursue a war against "terrorists". To put it simply, it's an unwinable war on many fronts it said.
 
[FRAME]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/the_economy/economy_reports/95218.stm[/FRAME]
 
After seeing that these countries can't pay these loans back they decided to let some off the hook.

[FRAME]http://newsimg.bbc.speedera.net/1/hi/business/4550778.stm[/FRAME]
 
[FRAME]http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/bwi-wto/imfind.htm[/FRAME]
 
[FRAME]http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/bwi-wto/bankind.htm[/FRAME]
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

<br><b>Corporatocracy</b>
<font face="arial black" size="6" color="#D90000">
Economic Hit Men</font><font face="arial" size="4" color="#0000FF"><b>
An interview with John Perkins</b>
<font face="trebuchet ms, microsoft sans serif, verdana" size="3" color="#000000">
<br>by Daniel McLeod

<br>Late last year a small publisher released an autobiography titled <font color="#0000FF"> Confessions of an Economic Hit Man </font> by John Perkins. Written in the style of a spy novel, Perkins recounted his years as chief economist for MAIN, an international consulting firm based in Boston. His job there was to produce inflated economic forecasts to be used by the World Bank to plan massive engineering and construction projects in Third World nations. Young and successful, his career afforded a charmed life through the 1970s, filled with travel, women, money, and professional prestige.&nbsp;
<br>Despite the outer trappings of mainstream success, Perkins was morally torn by his true role as an economic hit man (EHM). A tongue-in-cheek term for his profession, this moniker revealed more about his trade than any corporate title. “Economic hit men,” Perkins writes, “are highly paid professionals who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. Their tools include fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs, extortion, sex, and murder.” His explicit tasks as an EHM were to justify World Bank loans funneling money into the pockets of huge U.S. contractors (such as Bechtel and Halliburton) and to bankrupt those nations soon after the corporations were paid. Saddled with debt, these countries could easily be tapped for UN votes, military bases, or access to coveted natural resources by their creditors, namely the U.S. government.&nbsp;
<br>Perkins's resume as an EHM included Indonesia, Panama, Ecuador, Columbia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and other strategically important countries. The ultimate goal for EHMs was simple: to expand U.S. corporate empire.&nbsp;
<br>With little to no major media coverage, <font color="#0000FF">Confessions </font>sold 150,000 copies within months and appeared on over 20 bestseller lists, including those of the <font color="#0000FF">New York Times </font>, <font color="#0000FF">Washington Post </font>, <font color="#0000FF">San Francisco Chronicle </font>, and <font color="#0000FF">USA Today </font>. Penguin (a subsidiary of the British conglomerate, Pearson) published the paperback in December 2005.&nbsp;
<br><font color="#0000FF">DANIEL MCLEOD: You place economic hit men in a long line of imperial agents including Roman centurions, Spanish conquistadors, and 18th and 19th century colonial powers. All of these approaches relied on military force, but EHMs are different. Can you recount the origins of this strategy for empire building?&nbsp; </font>
<br><img height="261" src="http://www.zmag.org/ZMagSite/Images/1205mcl2.gif" width="288">

JOHN PERKINS: I really think it came out of our supposed success in Iran in the early 1950s. The Iranians had democratically elected a president (Mossadegh) and he began to clamp down on the oil companies, insisting that they pay fair taxes so the people of Iran would be recompensed for the oil being taken out of their country. The British and the U.S. were involved there and our oil companies were very resentful of this so we decided to get rid of Mossadegh. We figured that we could not send in troops because Iran was bordering the Soviet Union, which had nuclear weapons.&nbsp;
<br>Rather than sending in troops, we sent a CIA agent, Kermit Roosevelt, Teddy Roosevelt's grandson. With a few million dollars, Kermit managed to overthrow the democratically elected Mossadegh and replace him with the Shah of Iran, who we all know was a despot—and a friend of the oil companies. This experience taught the people in charge—what I refer to as the corporatocracy—that creating empire by using agents like Roosevelt was a lot cheaper and safer than the old military model. The only problem was that Roosevelt was a CIA agent and had he been discovered, the U.S. government would have been very embarrassed, to say the least. Soon after that, the decision was made to employ people from private businesses—making it difficult to trace these activities back to Washington.
<br><font color="#0000FF">What happens when an EHM fails to persuade a leader of a country to sign on to the empire's agenda?&nbsp; </font>
<br>That's pretty rare. In a few short decades EHMs were successful a majority of the time. But there are occasions when they failed, as I failed with Panama's president, Omar Torrijos. At such times, what we call the jackals, CIA-sanctioned assassins, are sent in to overthrow governments or assassinate the leaders—as in Guatemala with Arbenz, Chile with Allende, and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. When I failed with Omar Torrijos—who refused to play the game—his private plane went down in a fiery crash. We all knew it was a CIA-supported assassination.&nbsp;
<br><font color="#0000FF">What was your relationship with Omar Torrijos?&nbsp; </font>
<br>I liked Omar Torrijos as a person. When I was sent to Panama to bring him around, he told me, “I realize that if I play your game I will become very wealthy, but that's really not my interest here. I want to help my poor people so you can either get out of the country or stay here and do it the way I want to do it.”&nbsp;
<br>I went back to Boston and relayed this message to my boss at MAIN. We decided to stay in Panama. After all, we could make some money and felt we still had a chance to bring Torrijos around. The thing was I knew he was probably in trouble because I knew the system was built on the assumption that leaders are corruptible and when a leader like Torrijos is not corruptible, it sets an example throughout the world. Torrijos had staked his reputation on convincing the U.S. to turn the canal over to Panama. So even though I really appreciated the firm stand he took, I feared the jackals would be called in.&nbsp;
<br><font color="#0000FF">In your book you recount your greatest accomplishment as an EHM. You refer to it as “the deal of the century, the deal that changed the course of world history, but never reached newspapers.” What was this deal and your role in brokering it?&nbsp; </font>
<br>In the early 1970s OPEC basically shut down the oil flow, resulting in long lines of cars at gas stations. We were afraid that we were going to have another depression comparable to the 1930s. As a result, the U.S. Treasury Department came to me and other EHMs and retained us to find a way to make sure the U.S. would never again be held hostage by OPEC. We knew the key was Saudi Arabia because it controlled more oil than anybody else in the world and we knew the House of Saud, the royal family, was corruptible. We worked out a deal whereby the House of Saud would reinvest petrol-dollars in U.S. treasury securities. The Treasury Department would use the interest earned on these investments to pay U.S. companies to westernize Saudi Arabia—to build power plants, industrial parks, and whole cities out of the desert.&nbsp;
<br>Over the past decades this has amounted to trillions of dollars paid to U.S. companies to build Saudi Arabia in the image of the West. Part of the agreement also was for Saudi Arabia to maintain the price of oil at a level acceptable to us and we would agree to keep the House of Saud in power. It was an amazing deal that worked incredibly well until today. It's now falling apart for a number of reasons. One is that the House of Saud is very unpopular in Saudi Arabia and throughout the Muslim world because they struck this deal and have surrounded Islam's most sacred sites with petrochemical plants, McDonalds, and other symbols of materialism. Another reason is that we are powerless, given our failure in Iraq, to control the Middle East and the rising tide of Muslim extremism.&nbsp;
<p><font color="#0000FF">I imagine a common response is that all this sounds like a ploy hatched by a few cigar-smoking capitalists in a dark room miles underground; that this is conspiracy theory.&nbsp; </font>
<br>It's certainly not a conspiracy. By definition a conspiracy is illegal. None of this is illegal. The way economic hit men work should be illegal, but because we write the international laws it isn't. Members of the corporatocracy get together on occasion and many of them spend a lot of time in Washington, DC, but they don't have to do it in dark rooms smoking cigars because they're not doing anything illegal. These people are constantly moving back and forth at the highest levels through an open door policy. One year a guy is president of the world's biggest oil company and the next he's vice president of the United States or holding a cabinet position. After serving his or her term, she or he goes back into the oil, chemical, or manufacturing company as CEO. It's a crazy system. It's tailor-made for corruption.&nbsp;
<p><font color="#0000FF">Are the corporatocracy agenda setters conscious that theirs is an imperial one at odds with the stated ideals of U.S. &nbsp;democracy?&nbsp; </font>
<br>The ones at the top are very aware of it. They know exactly what they're doing. They're empire builders. Now within these organizations—the World Bank, Bechtel, Halliburton, Monsanto, and all these other companies—there are hundreds of thousands who are not conscious of it. They are really the pawns. They should be conscious, but it's easy to be in denial. Our educational institutions and our systems of reward make it easy to convince yourself that what you're doing is really helping poor people. That's one of the reasons I wrote the book. I don't want anybody to be in the position where they can't clearly see what they're doing.&nbsp;
<br><font color="#0000FF">An intriguing aspect of your story is that you were very conscious of the role you were playing as an EHM. How were you able to justify your actions?&nbsp; </font>
<br>I had been a Peace Corps volunteer in Ecuador and that made me conscious of the broader picture. Nonetheless, once I ended up being an EHM, I had people like World Bank president Robert McNamara patting me on the back. I was lecturing at Harvard and many other institutions around the world. I was praised for what I did. I wrote papers that were published and it was all above ground. Based on my Boston University degree in macroeconomics, I could rationalize it by saying that what I was doing increased GNP. However, the problem is that increasing GNP often only helps those at the very top of the totem pole. It does not help the people living in cardboard shacks in Jakarta or Caracas. Even though I knew in my heart what I was doing was wrong, in my head I could justify it because it was right according to every institution I worked for and because of my education. I could turn a blind eye.&nbsp;
<br><font color="#0000FF">You wrote this book to help Americans recognize the true nature of our society and our agency within it. Are people being reached for the first time?&nbsp; </font>
<br>We've received a tremendous number of letters and emails. My publisher at one point had an intern go through these to come up with the most common theme and what she came up with was paraphrased like this: “I knew this was happening in my heart, but whenever I talked about it people called me paranoid or crazy so I stopped talking about it. Now I've read your book and my suspicions have been confirmed. Not only am I going to talk about it, but I'm also going to act upon it.” Hearing that is extremely gratifying—especially the part when they say they are not only going to talk about it, but are also determined to act on it. I'm not sure what people are actually doing, but I know that they are making an impact in just talking about what's going on.&nbsp;
<br><font color="#0000FF">After you quit the game, you wanted to write a book and come clean, but you received bribes and threats for over a decade. What made you break your silence?&nbsp; </font>
<br>Shortly after 9/11, I went to ground zero and as I stood there smelling the charred flesh and seeing the smoke still rising, I knew I had to write this book and take responsibility for my past. What happened that day was a direct result of the empire building my fellow EHMs and I participated in. It was an act of mass murder by a mass murderer, but it represented the anger that seethes around the world. Osama Bin Laden has unfortunately become a hero not just in the Middle East, but also in much of Latin America and many other places. He shouldn't be in this position and I realized that the American people needed to hear the real story. I had to come clean in a way that would help Americans wake up to the corporatocracy and understand why U.S. policies stoke so much hatred. Unless we change direction, the future is a bleak one for the younger generations and we'll only change when we come to understand what's going on.&nbsp;
<br><font color="#0000FF">With Katrina, the quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan, rising resistance in South America, a shaky House of Saud, and the embattled status of the U.S. dollar, do you believe the corporatocracy is at a breaking point?&nbsp; </font>
<br>History tells us that no empire survives. This one is no exception. The U.S. has 5 percent of the world's population and we're consuming more than 25 percent of the world's resources. That's not a model that can be replicated. What we are is a failure that is causing unheard of inequality and environmental damage on a global scale. Ours is an empire in the throes of collapse.

<font color="#0000FF"><strong><a name="author"></a>Daniel McLeod is a mental health counselor, freelance writer and member of the Western Massachusetts Committee on Corporations and Democracy. </strong></font></font>
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Download the John Perkins speech at the link in the page below or watch it on cspan2 at 9pm


[frame]http://209.144.51.202/feature/index.asp?segID=6634&schedID=397[/frame]
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Thanks for all this info, I stay lookin for this type shit
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Good info bro!
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Great read, Makk I need that reup. If you can, & when you get the chance....Good looking out, Peace.
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Makkonnen said:
good lookin out bruh!
when this dies I will reup for whoever wants it

I need a reup please, thank you sir.
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

startin it now - should be done in a few hours
 
Good exposure on these blood-sucking mufukrs.
'chaos, then order' is what they live n die by. they initiate chaos, n then bring order =$$$$$$$$$$ :angry:
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Hung Lo said:
Thanks Makk.

That's some good shit right there.

I took a class in 98 on international politics, and there was a chapter on Third World Countries. In that chapter it explained exactly this same thing. In order for those countries to compete, they have to succumb to the IMF and the World Bank. Those that don't are outsiders and are not given the same opportunities.

There was also a chapter on terrorism and what the consequences would be for any nation that decided to pursue a war against "terrorists". To put it simply, it's an unwinable war on many fronts it said.

This is well known. By well known I mean it is in textbooks. But the leaders of these countries are to be blamed NOT the US. You can never get too much money. But when they get the money it goes into pockets and not the country.
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Disanddat said:
This is well known. By well known I mean it is in textbooks. But the leaders of these countries are to be blamed NOT the US. You can never get too much money. But when they get the money it goes into pockets and not the country.
When leaders of those nations are murdered and overthrown for not complying with US demands via the IMF and World Bank then the US is to be blamed. The money goes into the pockets of US corporations like Bechtel and Haliburton who have to get the contracts according to the agreements.
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Dolemite said:
When leaders of those nations are murdered and overthrown for not complying with US demands via the IMF and World Bank then the US is to be blamed. The money goes into the pockets of US corporations like Bechtel and Haliburton who have to get the contracts according to the agreements.

Point taken.

I had Jamaica in mind when I said I blame leaders. I realize that for this thread that example is not relevant (with regard to world politics and economics).
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Makkonnen said:

Man, I'm so glad you bumped this up Dolemite, I knew the IMF and World Bank essentially put the 3rd world countries they were trying to help in more debt (at least the average person in the country) but I didn't realize it was actually consciously and intentially directed to perpetuate debt. If you still have it can you re-up that audio version of the book, I really wanna hear it. Thanks man
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Shadow77 said:
Man, I'm so glad you bumped this up Dolemite, I knew the IMF and World Bank essentially put the 3rd world countries they were trying to help in more debt (at least the average person in the country) but I didn't realize it was actually consciously and intentially directed to perpetuate debt. If you still have it can you re-up that audio version of the book, I really wanna hear it. Thanks man

Im reupping it. If you look you'll see the only nations breaking free from this bondage are countries making money off of high priced oil - Nigeria and Venezuela. Bolivia will break free in a few years, they just nationalized the oil fields
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

Dolemite said:
Im reupping it. If you look you'll see the only nations breaking free from this bondage are countries making money off of high priced oil - Nigeria and Venezuela. Bolivia will break free in a few years, they just nationalized the oil fields

That's true, understandably why. Every previous Latin American country that broke free of that bondage was coerced into receiving US exploitation-friendly regimes either through military might might or economic stranglehold. The only other country in Latin America or the Carribean that successfully broke free of that bondage was Cuba, and the military and economic pressure put on that country afterwards was amazing. That a 3rd world country was able to survive all that (especially after the collapse of the Soviet Union, which was their only military and economic ally) speaks volumes about why the US government hates Cuba so much. They feel really threatened by it because it sets a dangerous precedent from US imperialists standpoint. It gives an alternative path to the path that Capitalism is trying to force on underdeveloped nations through the IMF and World Bank. So despite some of the problems with Cuba, I support Cuba as the example other Latin American countries need to take, and support the alliance of Latin American leaders' stances in solidarity with Cuba.
 
Re: Confessions of an Economic Hitman-how the US, imf/worldbank & Corps run the 3rd w

bump
 
%7B4EAE12F9-C61C-4B2D-90EB-CF0A07EBB250%7DImg100.jpg

<font face="verdana" size="3" color="#000000">

This is the inside story of how America turned from a respected republic into a feared empire.

“Economic hit men,” John Perkins writes, “are highly paid professionals who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. Their tools include fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs, extortion, sex, and murder.”


Title: Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
Author: Perkins, John
Reader: Emerson, Brian
Format: Audio Download (Unabridged)
Running Time: 09:17
Publisher: Blackstone Audio Inc.


John Perkins should know—he was an economic hit man. His job was to convince countries that are strategically important to the U.S.—from Indonesia to Panama—to accept enormous loans for infrastructure development and to make sure that the lucrative projects were contracted to Halliburton, Bechtel, Brown and Root, and other United States engineering and construction companies. Saddled with huge debts, these countries came under the control of the United States government, World Bank, and other U.S.-dominated aid agencies that acted like loan sharks—dictating repayment terms and bullying foreign governments into submission.

This extraordinary real-life tale exposes international intrigue, corruption, and little-known government and corporate activities that have dire consequences for American democracy and the world.


<b>DOWNLOAD Unabridged Audio Book Complete

RAPIDSHARE: </b>

http://rapidshare.com/files/1635063...ns_of_an_Economic_Hitman_Audio_Book.part1.rar

http://rapidshare.com/files/1635188...ns_of_an_Economic_Hitman_Audio_Book.part2.rar

http://rapidshare.com/files/1635239...ns_of_an_Economic_Hitman_Audio_Book.part3.rar

<h2>OR</h2>

<b>SENDSPACE:</b>

http://www.sendspace.com/file/ewzp4s

<p>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="12"></hr><p>
 
Back
Top