Comedy: Larry David slammed on social media for SNL Holocaust, Harvey Weinstein jokes

So in this pussy ass sensitive climate that we are moving in a Jew can't make Jew jokes? Am I understanding this right?

I hear you

but I will say this

it aint NEVER that simple

just cause I aint out here trying to let Jason Whitlock Stephen A Smith or Barkley make no "black jokes"
 
So in this pussy ass sensitive climate that we are moving in a Jew can't make Jew jokes? Am I understanding this right?
their upset he pointed out the brutal honesty about jews being sexual predators they using the holocaust joke as a cop out.. the jew sex predator is the real story the holocaust joke is the fake outrage
 
I hear you

but I will say this

it aint NEVER that simple

just cause I aint out here trying to let Jason Whitlock Stephen A Smith or Barkley make no "black jokes"
Larry is not a Jew Coon though... home embodies the stereotypical image of a 100 per debt pure Jew so this outrage is bullshit!

their upset he pointed out the brutal honesty about jews being sexual predators they using the holocaust joke as a cop out.. the jew sex predator is the real story the holocaust joke is the fake outrage

Interesting but why are they mad...he should know about it more than anyone...he is a fucking jew
 
Larry is not a Jew Coon though... home embodies the stereotypical image of a 100 per debt pure Jew so this outrage is bullshit!



Interesting but why are they mad...he should know about it more than anyone...he is a fucking jew

I got you

but he MIXED it with the Weinstein stuff...

he should KNOW better

Chris Rock and Louis CK got caught up in this too.

even Chappelle for the give Trump time sh*t

as a PROFESSIONAL comedian you are supposed to KNOW your audience.

and something I ALWAYS say

if it WAS funny?

REALLY FUNNY?

Which is his JOB...

than we wouldn't be having this discussion, right?
 
Weinstein Loses Bid to Move Rape, Sexual-Assault Trial Out of Manhattan
By Victoria Bekiempis
03-weinstein.w330.h330.jpg

Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Harvey Weinstein’s request to move his sexual-assault trial out of Manhattan was shot down by a state appeals court on Thursday.

“Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion is denied in its entirety,” an Appellate Division, First Judicial Department panel said in its short decision.

Weinstein’s lawyers had previously claimed in court papers that he couldn’t get a fair trial here because of extensive media coverage and possible jurors’ liberal leanings. They wanted the case to go before a jury in Albany, Suffolk County, or elsewhere in the state.

LEARN MORE »
“An internet search of the New York Post’s Page Six, a mainstay of local New York City news, and the name Harvey Weinstein in 2019, yields over 11,000 hits,” one of Weinstein’s lawyers, Arthur Aidala, argued in court papers.

“Political, cultural and social organizations with headquarters in Manhattan (’MeToo’ and ‘Times Up’) were catapulted to prominence as a direct result of Harvey Weinstein’s arrest in this case and New York City is ground zero in their activism, with such activities as the so-called women’s march, and the rallying cry ‘believe all women,’ a position that is antithetical to due process,” Aidala had also claimed. “Polls show that this activism disproportionately impacts the opinions of democrats, the largest demographic group in New York City on central issues in this case.”

Prosecutors had disagreed with Weinstein, claiming in prior response papers that his team “contributed to the media coverage they now complain about by making extrajudicial statements about the case, portraying the defendant as a scapegoat who has been targeted by the ‘Me Too’ movement, thus employing the well-worn strategy of trying his case outside of the courtroom.”

Weinstein presently faces five counts in Manhattan Supreme Court, including two counts of predatory sexual assault, one count of a criminal Sexual Act in the first degree, one count of first-degree rape, and one count of third-degree rape. His trial, which has been repeatedly delayed, is scheduled to start on January 6, 2020.

Weinstein has maintained his innocence.
 
Harvey Weinstein Mourns Himself As ‘The Forgotten Man’ In New Interview
By Halle Kiefer@hallekiefer
Photo: David Dee Delgado/Getty Images

If Harvey Weinstein is hoping to drum up support ahead of his January criminal trial, he’s chosen an odd way to do it: lamenting his lost career to the New York Post. “I feel like the forgotten man,” the disgraced producer said Friday, while recovering from spine surgery at New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, having reportedly suffered a back injury in an August car accident. “I made more movies directed by women and about women than any filmmaker, and I’m talking about 30 years ago. I’m not talking about now when it’s vogue. I did it first! I pioneered it! It all got eviscerated because of what happened. My work has been forgotten.’’

Weinstein told the Post he wanted to give the interview in part to dispel rumors he had only recently started using a walker to garner sympathy. “I want this city to recognize who I was instead of what I’ve become,” he said. However, it would seem Weinstein couldn’t help but brag on his track record at least a little bit while he was at it.

“Gwyneth Paltrow in 2003 got $10 million to make a movie called View from the Top,” Weinstein said of the Miramax movie. “She was the highest-paid female actor in an independent film. Higher paid than all the men.” Paltrow has previously alleged that she, too, was the target of Weinstein’s sexual harassment when she was 22.

The former studio head also pointed to his work distributing films with a social-justice bent, including Paris Is Burning and Transamerica, as well as his efforts to raise money for 9/11 first responders. “I made a success out of myself. I had no money, and I built quite an empire with Miramax and decided to give back,” concluded Weinstein. “If you remember who I was then, you might want to question some of this.” Meanwhile, his upcoming predatory sexual assault trial is currently scheduled to begin on January 6. Weinstein has denied all wrongdoing.
 


Larry David really didn’t want to film this coronavirus video. It’s not the kind of thing he enjoys doing, obviously. He’d rather be plotting his next spite store. But he’s never one to pass up the opportunity to lambaste the decision-making of the American youth, especially if they keep ignoring the warnings of their states or criticizing the quality of his favorite scones. “I basically want to address the idiots out there, and you know who you are,” David explained. “You’re hurting old people like me. Well, not me, I have nothing to do with you, I’ll never see you. But other, let’s say, other old people who might be your relatives, who the hell knows?”

The next time you feel like socializing too close, David implores, realize that this “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to stay in the house, sit on the couch, and watch TV” won’t happen again. (Where you’ll be lauded a hero, anyway.) “I don’t know how you’re passing that up,” he added. “I guess you’re not that bright. Go home and watch TV, that’s my advice to you. If you’ve seen my show, nothing good ever happens going out of the house, you know that. It’s just trouble out there. It’s not a good place to be. Stay home and don’t see anyone.” Unless maybe if you have a plumbing emergency. You can let the plumber in, and then, you know, wipe everything down when he leaves.
 
Larry David Doesn’t Think Woody Allen ‘Did Anything Wrong’ After Reading His Memoir
By Devon Ivie@devonsaysrelax
Photo: Charles Eshelman/FilmMagic
4-david.w330.h330.jpg

Following a controversial rollout that included a publisher switch and criticism from his peers, Woody Allen’s new memoir, Apropos of Nothing, was released in late March. In the memoir, Allen addresses everything from his affair with Mia Farrow’s adopted daughter Soon-Yi Previn to his adopted daughter Dylan Farrow’s molestation accusation against him, and, perhaps most significantly, how he continues to maintain his “total” innocence. One of Allen’s past collaborators, Larry David, told the New York Times in a new quarantine profile that he’s been reading and thoroughly enjoying Apropos of Nothing at home. So much so, in fact, that it swayed him into believing Allen is an innocent man. “Yeah, it’s pretty great, it’s a fantastic book, so funny,” David, who starred in Allen’s 2009 film Whatever Works, explained. “You feel like you’re in the room with him and yeah, it’s just a great book and it’s hard to walk away after reading that book thinking that this guy did anything wrong.”
This is the first time David has commented on Allen, but he stopped short of saying if he would work with the director again. In recent years, numerous actors (such as Michael Caine, Hayley Atwell, and Kate Winslet) have publicly confirmed they will never again collaborate with Allen, although some other actors (such as Javier Bardem) don’t share the same sentiment. Allen was working on a new film about “a married American couple” with Christoph Waltz, Wallace Shawn, and Gina Gershon as recently as last year.

@tallblacknyc
 
Ironic how this shit works because they would have no issues with slavery jokes tho... Jews think they are above reproach.. props to Larry David
 
Larry David Doesn’t Think Woody Allen ‘Did Anything Wrong’ After Reading His Memoir
By Devon Ivie@devonsaysrelax
Photo: Charles Eshelman/FilmMagic
4-david.w330.h330.jpg

Following a controversial rollout that included a publisher switch and criticism from his peers, Woody Allen’s new memoir, Apropos of Nothing, was released in late March. In the memoir, Allen addresses everything from his affair with Mia Farrow’s adopted daughter Soon-Yi Previn to his adopted daughter Dylan Farrow’s molestation accusation against him, and, perhaps most significantly, how he continues to maintain his “total” innocence. One of Allen’s past collaborators, Larry David, told the New York Times in a new quarantine profile that he’s been reading and thoroughly enjoying Apropos of Nothing at home. So much so, in fact, that it swayed him into believing Allen is an innocent man. “Yeah, it’s pretty great, it’s a fantastic book, so funny,” David, who starred in Allen’s 2009 film Whatever Works, explained. “You feel like you’re in the room with him and yeah, it’s just a great book and it’s hard to walk away after reading that book thinking that this guy did anything wrong.”
This is the first time David has commented on Allen, but he stopped short of saying if he would work with the director again. In recent years, numerous actors (such as Michael Caine, Hayley Atwell, and Kate Winslet) have publicly confirmed they will never again collaborate with Allen, although some other actors (such as Javier Bardem) don’t share the same sentiment. Allen was working on a new film about “a married American couple” with Christoph Waltz, Wallace Shawn, and Gina Gershon as recently as last year.

@tallblacknyc
jews of a feather flock together

c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800.png
 
Back
Top