Come on Man!!!!

Gunner

Potential Star
Registered
http://www.washingtonpost.com/

Obama: D.C. schools don't measure up to his daughters' private school

Obama on D.C. public schools
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

By Nick Anderson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, September 27, 2010; 4:19 PM
President Obama said Monday that his daughters could not get the same level of education from D.C. public schools that they receive at the elite private school they attend.

THIS STORY
Obama blasts 'irresponsible' GOP policies
Obama: D.C. schools don't measure up to his daughters' private school
Obama looks to reenergize youth vote, get late Democratic surge for midterms
View All Items in This Story
Obama, following a path chosen by some of his predecessors in the White House, chose to enroll his daughters Malia and Sasha in the Sidwell Friends School soon after he won the 2008 presidential election.

In an appearance Monday morning on NBC's "Today" show, Obama was asked by a woman in a television audience whether a public school in his home city could measure up to the standards of his children's private school.

"I'll be blunt with you: The answer is no right now," the president replied. The D.C. public schools, he said "are struggling."

Obama added that the city's schools "have made some important strides over the last several years to move in the direction of reform. There are some terrific individual schools in the D.C. system."

Because he is the president, Obama said, if he wanted to get his daughters into one of those public schools, "we could probably maneuver to do it." But Obama said the "broader problem" is that parents without "a bunch of connections" don't have such options.

Obama was interviewed from the White House by NBC's Matt Lauer. The network is promoting education issues this week through a summit in New York City that it calls "Education Nation."

The back and forth over the merits of Sidwell and the D.C. public schools revived a topic much debated whenever a president has school-age children. President Bill Clinton sent his daughter, Chelsea, to Sidwell. Amy Carter, daughter of President Jimmy Carter, was the last White House student in modern times to attend a D.C. public school.



Tuition at Sidwell is more than $31,000 a year, according to the school's Web site.

Some of Obama's critics say it is hypocritical of him to spend that kind of money on private school while allowing a federal voucher program in the District to lapse . The D.C. voucher experiment provides funding for some low-income D.C. families to enroll their children in private school. The Democratic-led Congress and the Obama administration have rejected requests from voucher supporters to reauthorize the program.

Regarding vouchers, Obama administration officials have said the best federal policy is to support improvements for all schools.

Regarding the Obama daughters, some observers say that presidential children need to be shielded from public scrutiny and that enrolling in a private school like Sidwell is one of the most effective ways to do that.

The Obamas considered enrolling their daughters in D.C. schools in the fall of 2008, and discussed that option with city officials.

"We shared information on DCPS schools with them," Schools Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee wrote Monday in an e-mail, "but [we were] completely supportive of their decision to send their children elsewhere. In terms of the comment from the president, it is a fair assessment. We have indeed, seen good progress over the last few years, but we still have a long way to go before we can say we're providing all children with an excellent education."

In the NBC interview, Obama was asked for his view on the documentary "Waiting for Superman," which depicts some of the challenges of improving urban schools. Obama said it is "heartbreaking" that some parents have to rely on a lottery to get their children into a school that they believe will meet their needs.

The educational future of children "shouldn't depend on the bounce of a ball," Obama told Lauer, referring to a lottery method. "Our goal is to make all schools high-quality schools."

Critics of the documentary have said it offers a one-sided, anti-union point of view. Obama said that many teachers unions are making efforts to improve schools through innovation but that sometimes they favor the status quo.

Staff writer Bill Turque contributed to this report.
 
Obama is a millionaire, how many millionaire's kids go to public school?

For that matter how many ex-president's kids went to DC schools?
 
Maybe you missed the highlighted portion.

I'm aware of the obvious.


Some of Obama's critics say it is hypocritical of him to spend that kind of money on private school while allowing a federal voucher program in the District to lapse . The D.C. voucher experiment provides funding for some low-income D.C. families to enroll their children in private school. The Democratic-led Congress and the Obama administration have rejected requests from voucher supporters to reauthorize the program.
 
I don't have a problem with this because I'm against voucher systems, which do nothing to address the situation in problem school but take out the children (and their parents) that would be most involved and productive.
 
Maybe you missed the highlighted portion.

I'm aware of the obvious.


Some of Obama's critics say it is hypocritical of him to spend that kind of money on private school while allowing a federal voucher program in the District to lapse . The D.C. voucher experiment provides funding for some low-income D.C. families to enroll their children in private school. The Democratic-led Congress and the Obama administration have rejected requests from voucher supporters to reauthorize the program.

hypocritical

How dare you even mention the word!
 
I don't have a problem with this because I'm against voucher systems, which do nothing to address the situation in problem school but take out the children (and their parents) that would be most involved and productive.

In some cases, the schools/environment is the major issue.

It's like having a virgin in a whorehouse. Sooner, or later, the virgin will end up the product of their surroundings. Trust me, I've seen it so many times.

BTW, if some of the most involved leave, perhaps the rest would look at the mirror? Have you ever thought of that?
 
I don't have a problem with this because I'm against voucher systems, which do nothing to address the situation in problem school but take out the children (and their parents) that would be most involved and productive.

In DC, the vouchers were for low-income public school students. When there were more public school applicants than vouchers available, then there was a lottery. It does not as you say, typically take the already most involved and productive students out of the public schools and put them in private school. Even if it did, which again it does not, I don't see why they shouldn't be able to go to a better school instead of keeping them in a system that doesn't allow them to maximize their potential.

The money should follow the students and the parents so that it makes them the school's customer. As it stands, the federal government bureaucracy is the school's customer and as long as that continues, the majority of American children will not receive the quality of education that should and could receive. Education does not have to be administered by the government in order for children's access to education to be funded by the government.
 
Back
Top