CNNSI Top 10 Boxers of the 2000's-Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?

TJervey

Star
Registered
2000s: Top 10 Boxers
By Richard O'Brien

1 Manny Pacquiao
Pacquiao opened the decade as a 21-year-old ex-WBC flyweight champion who owned a 27-2 record and had fought just three times outside his native Philippines, his final pre-2000s excursion resulting in a third-round knockout loss to Medgoen Sengsurat in Thailand in 1999. Today, Pacquiao (50-3-2 with 38 KOs overall; 23-1-2 with 20 KOs this decade) owns seven world titles in seven weight classes, and is quite possibly the finest fighter in the world pound-for-pound. With an improbable combination of speed and power, he's an electrifying presence in the ring, a relentless attacker and a master of distance who comes at opponents from surprising angles while still maintaining tremendous leverage and balance. He also fights with an urgency and a joy unseen since the young Roberto Duran. Best of all, Pacquiao, 31, may not even have peaked yet; under trainer Freddie Roach, he just keeps getting better.

2 Floyd Mayweather Jr.
The flash and hype -- the nicknames Pretty Boy and Money, the press-conference posturing, the WWE playacting -- can obscure the fact that Mayweather, 32, is probably the most technically proficient and complete fighter of his generation. Almost literally raised in the gym, he is also one of the hardest workers in the sport. He's witheringly fast, a crisp puncher with either hand, almost untouchable on defense and a master tactician. Undefeated in his 18 bouts in the 2000s, Mayweather (40-0, 25 KOs overall) amassed titles in five weight classes and dismantled a number of first-rate fighters, including Diego Corrales, Jose Luis Castillo, Oscar De La Hoya and Juan Manuel Marquez. The only flaw in Floyd? He didn't face as many of the best fighters as he might have (Shane Mosley and Miguel Cotto, among others) and thus has yet to have that career-defining showdown. That will change when he faces Pacquiao. But that's for another decade.

3 Bernard Hopkins
Hopkins, who turned pro in 1988, was one of the best fighters of the '90s. But he's been even better in the 2000s. A true throwback who would have been at home with the best of any decade, B-Hop went 14-3 this decade (and a case could be made that he won at least one of his two bouts with Jermaine Taylor), capping off a record run as middleweight champion before moving up to take the light heavyweight crown. And at 44, he's still not done. Hopkins (50-5-1, 32 KOs) may not be the most exciting performer, but he could do more in the ring than any fighter of his era: box, counterpunch, bang, break you down, rough you up and always outthink you.

4 Joe Calzaghe
Though he was undefeated and had held the WBO super middleweight title since 1997, the Pride of Wales went largely overlooked outside of, well, Wales, until 2006, when he tore apart overhyped American Jeff Lacy for the IBF belt. Suddenly, folks beyond the U.K. realized the rangy southpaw with the nonstop attack was a hell of a fighter. Calzaghe, 37, may not have been a huge puncher, but he made up for it with speed and an unreal work rate, in addition to a capacity for adapting in the ring. He tallied a 19-0 record this decade (46-0, 32 KOs overall), crowned by a narrow decision over Hopkins and, for his final victory, a first-class butt-kicking of Roy Jones Jr.

5 Shane Mosley
During the 1990s, Mosley went undefeated while establishing himself as one of the best lightweights ever. As he moved up in weight over the past 10 years, he lost a few bouts but, if anything, enhanced his status as one of the most compelling fighters of his generation. He was 13-5 with one No Contest this decade (46-5, 39 KOs overall), having defeated such stars as De La Hoya, Fernando Vargas and Antonio Margarito. A superb boxer with crackling speed of hand and foot, Sugar Shane can also punch and brawl when he wants. Now 38, Mosley closed out the decade in style with dominating knockouts of Ricardo Mayorga and Margarito.

6 Juan Manuel Marquez
Though he was overmatched in his last fight of the decade, against the naturally bigger Mayweather Jr., Dinamita, 36, had established himself as a Hall of Famer long before that. A brilliant technical boxer and a gifted counterpuncher, Marquez was 20-3-1 in the 2000s (50-5-1, 37 KOs overall) against the best competition in four weight classes (from featherweight to welterweight). He had big wins over Marco Antonio Barrera, Joel Casamayor and Juan Diaz, and he fought Pacquiao twice, coming away with a draw and a disputed loss by decision.

7 Marco Antonio Barrera
Barrera opened the decade with a narrow loss to fellow Mexican hero Erik Morales in the first bout of a spectacular trilogy that played out over three weight classes (from super bantam to junior lightweight). Barrera would go on to take the next two. The Baby-Faced Assassin, 35, a tremendously accurate puncher with a great jab and punishing body attack, went 16-5 this decade (65-7, 43 KOs overall). Even beyond his classics against Morales, Barrera deserves a medal for his encyclopedic schooling of the irritating popinjay Naseem Hamed in 2001.

8 Ronald Wright
Remember, this is a list of the best fighters of the decade, not the most exciting. So welcome, Winky! A southpaw with a hunt-and-pop jab, impeccable defensive skills and a constitutional aversion to mixing it up, Wright, 38, turning self defense into an art form and made many of the best welterweights and junior middleweights of the decade look silly. Many of the others simply refused to fight him. Wright went 12-2-1 this decade (51-5-1, 25 KOs overall), with wins over Felix Trinidad, Ike Quartey and Mosley. Granted, he had just one knockout these past 10 years, but what do you expect from a guy with the nickname Winky?

9 Pongsaklek Wonjongkam
While Wonjongkam may be the smallest man on this list, he has the biggest record. A national hero in Thailand, the 32-year-old longtime flyweight champion went 43-1-1 in the 2000s, with an overall record of 74-3-1 with 39 KOs. A slick-boxing southpaw, Wonjongkam could also produce some surprising power. Since his professional debut in 1994, he has fought exclusively in the Far East.

10 Lennox Lewis
From the smallest to the biggest. (You could fit two Pacquiaos in his trunks and still have room for half the Wonjongkam family.) Though the bulk of his career took place in the 1990s, Lewis, 34, pretty much dwarfed the heavyweight division during the 2000s. Mature, in full command of a complete arsenal of skills and supremely confident, Lewis went 6-1 with five KOs, extending his career record to 41-2-1 with 32 KOs. He avenged his only loss, a shocking upset by Hasim Rahman, with a definitive knockout in the rematch nearly five months later. In watching him destroy an admittedly faded Mike Tyson in 2004, there was no reason to think Lewis wouldn't have done the same to a prime Iron Mike.


http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/magazine/specials/2000s/12/16/top.boxers/index.html?eref=sihp
 
What exactly were the criteria for this list? Yes, Manny is a much more exciting and active fighter than Floyd, but no way would I say that he is better pound-for-pound.
 
Swap 1 and 2....

And as much as I don't they are really that good...ya gotta have a Klitoris brother in there.Probably the one that didn't retire,Waldimar??....they have beaten eveyone in front of them.

So....goodbye Winky,hello Klit...
 
What exactly were the criteria for this list? Yes, Manny is a much more exciting and active fighter than Floyd, but no way would I say that he is better pound-for-pound.

I wouldn't even put Manny above B-Hop, Mosley, or even Calslappy...all were undisputed/unified world champions in one division (with one holding all 4 major belts) this decade. Plus, I still can't get over Manny having a win over Marquez...To top it off, I think Marquez has been more impressive beating Juan Diaz and Joel Casamayor...
 
I wouldn't even put Manny above B-Hop, Mosley, or even Calslappy...all were undisputed/unified world champions in one division (with one holding all 4 major belts) this decade. Plus, I still can't get over Manny having a win over Marquez...To top it off, I think Marquez has been more impressive beating Juan Diaz and Joel Casamayor...

I think Vitali deserves more appreciation. I always say if you are one of the best and you fight someone that isn't you better knock him out. Because that is what great fighters are supposed to do. And Vitali does. Manny on the other hand has beat more Hall of Famers in this decade than any other fighter. Period. He deserves to be number one. I love Hopkins, but his fights with Taylor are so hard for me to forgive. I think I put Joe over Hopkins only because he was more constent than Hopkins. Hopkins had one too many slip ups this decade. Joe had zero. Even so Hopkins started the decade as the toughest and best boxer and ended the decade the same way. Lennox derserves to be top ten also. He was the rock that made the title worth watching. He was a modern day Larry Holmes. And I would put in Chico cause that was my dude, RIP.
 
I think Vitali deserves more appreciation. I always say if you are one of the best and you fight someone that isn't you better knock him out. Because that is what great fighters are supposed to do. And Vitali does. Manny on the other hand has beat more Hall of Famers in this decade than any other fighter. Period. He deserves to be number one. I love Hopkins, but his fights with Taylor are so hard for me to forgive. I think I put Joe over Hopkins only because he was more constent than Hopkins. Hopkins had one too many slip ups this decade. Joe had zero. Even so Hopkins started the decade as the toughest and best boxer and ended the decade the same way. Lennox derserves to be top ten also. He was the rock that made the title worth watching. He was a modern day Larry Holmes. And I would put in Chico cause that was my dude, RIP.

I feel you on putting Vitali on that list...but on Hopkins, I can't count those Taylor fights because he made Jermain look like a rookie (especially in the first fight) and could have beaten Joe by a better margin (especially if he did the same thing he did against Pavlik)...

All Manny has for him is that he was able to fight those fighters that he did...It was planned from the start when he went against Morales, Barerra, and Marquez. I will never, EVER excuse him for fighting Morales twice after Erik should not have fought him the 2nd time, and other than his fights with Marquez, I have yet to see him fight anyone with a great defense/counterpunching plan in the ring...
 
Peace,

People love The Now. That's the only way I can explain putting a cat with three losses (Manny) above someone who's never been beaten (Floyd).
 
If it's in terms of accomplishments, I'd put Pac over Floyd. Floyd did take almost two years off in the decade. But, by that same criteria, Lennox Lewis probably shouldn't be on the list, since he retired in 2003, fought only 7 times after 1999 and lost of them.
 
The manny hate is absolutely insane. I give props to suger ray being the greatest fighter I ever saw. And my favorite was tommy. What does no loses mean if you dont fight the best? In boxing it is not your record that makes you great, it is not about if you lost. It is aboug who you fight and how you fight. A lose means nothing if it was against onr of the best. Nobody holds manny's defeats against him just like you dont fraizer's. What manny has done this decade is incredible. He deserves the number slot. Stack up mannys great fights against mayweather's. There is no comparison at all.
 
Back
Top