Chris Dorner positively identified

a bunch of white guys surround a brother and burn the house he is in down, seems familiar. Whats sad is we all know they were never going to take him in alive yet nothing is done about these cops playing judge and jury. Dude is labeled as cop killer but what do we call the cop who shot up those two innocent people in the van?
 
Mr. Doner is a example of people of color getting tired of white privileged bullshit. I would not have cared if he had killed up a lot of cops like fucking Rambo the LAPD is one of the most corrupt police force in the country. So is the Chicago PD NYPD and any little fuck up law enforcement institution that prey on people of color for their screwed up agenda.
 
How do we know that he really killed that interracial couple or the first cop?
The people whom he kidnapped in the cabin did say that Dorner said to them that "He just wanted to clear his name!"
Clear his name for what?
When someone say's that "They want to clear their name" I'm under the impression that they were blamed for something that they did not do.
So could he have been set up by the LAPD for the murder of those people to punish him for being a whistle blower?
I'm just wondering.

Finally a logical assessment. There was never any evidence presented that he killed that innocent couple and now it won't really be necessary.
 
not to mention all the borders were surrounded..of course they wouldve lit him up and then some if he tried going thru the roadblocks

Regardless of all his training, It was a numbers game in the end. Sooner or later he would have gotten caught or killed rather. I don't think anyone thought that police were willing to apprehend him alive, they wanted him dead and everyone knows that.

Yours Truly.....Professor
 
After reading practically ALL there is about Dorner and his situation, especially how it ended,

Tell me this wasn't another "Ruby Ridge/WACO" moment?
Especially for Black Folks?
 
How do we know that he really killed that interracial couple or the first cop?
The people whom he kidnapped in the cabin did say that Dorner said to them that "He just wanted to clear his name!"
Clear his name for what?
When someone say's that "They want to clear their name" I'm under the impression that they were blamed for something that they did not do.
So could he have been set up by the LAPD for the murder of those people to punish him for being a whistle blower?
I'm just wondering.

Because he called the girls father and bragged to him about doing it... you asshole....its written in the police warrant for his arrest...


you stupid fucks need to get off all this hero worship of a damn killer
 
Because he called the girls father and bragged to him about doing it... you asshole....its written in the police warrant for his arrest...


you stupid fucks need to get off all this hero worship of a damn killer

Who filed the police warrant ?
 
kieth.jpg


RIP Keith Lawrence, Some people call your killer a "hero" I called those people confused.:(
 
kieth.jpg


RIP Keith Lawrence, Some people call your killer a "hero" I called those people confused.:(

Wow....he was a cutie pie!

Guess Dorner got him for sleeping with the enemy..the girl died because of the sins of her father, fucked up all around!
 
Because he called the girls father and bragged to him about doing it... you asshole....its written in the police warrant for his arrest...


you stupid fucks need to get off all this hero worship of a damn killer

What part of my post you've read that comes close to hero worship?
The government/military initially stated that former NFL player and army specialist Pat Tillman was killed by enemy fire when in fact it came out after further investigation that he was killed by friendly fire.
Some even speculate that it was murder.
But a sheep like would go with the initial report and be done with it.
Do you know how many black men in Chicago have been wrongly convicted and sent to prison for life and some on death row from falsefied police statements and warrants?
It's apparent that you're deficient at reading comprehension.
I was throwing out a hypothetical for rational responses and not a punk's tirade laced with insults and obsenities. but since you want to go there.
I could broadcast across the news and wire services that there's a written LAPD police warrant where it states that you suck dead moose dick and you're wanted for being a serial butt sniffer of unsuspecting senior citizens while in the act of farting.
Should I believe it?
 
Last edited:
How do we know that he really killed that interracial couple or the first cop?
The people whom he kidnapped in the cabin did say that Dorner said to them that "He just wanted to clear his name!"
Clear his name for what?
When someone say's that "They want to clear their name" I'm under the impression that they were blamed for something that they did not do.
So could he have been set up by the LAPD for the murder of those people to punish him for being a whistle blower?
I'm just wondering.

This is a thinking man..
 
Because he called the girls father and bragged to him about doing it... you asshole....its written in the police warrant for his arrest...


you stupid fucks need to get off all this hero worship of a damn killer

This....
 
Because he called the girls father and bragged to him about doing it... you asshole....its written in the police warrant for his arrest...


you stupid fucks need to get off all this hero worship of a damn killer

A lot of heros in this world are or were killers.
 
A lot of heros in this world are or were killers.

Dorner was a delusional disgruntled employee that took the cowardly way out...i.e. Murder and suicide.

The fact that he worked for the crooked ass LAPD and went against them is giving him his "hero" status.

Like he's going up against "the man" or some simple minded shit like that.

Victory attained by violence is tantamount to a defeat, for it is momentary.
--Mahatma Gandhi
 
wish he would of killed more of these crooked mutha fuckaz ...w every war there will b collateral damage ...but no1 speaks of this issue when the gov did it ..that is until obama got in office .....no1 has a prob w it when the cops kill 4 no reason or changes the future of a family over nonsense ... i dont feel bad for anyone ....fuck a cowrd nigga who isnt willing to go to war for the benefit of his/her people but would support everything the gov and media does and say
 
How do we know that he really killed that interracial couple or the first cop?
The people whom he kidnapped in the cabin did say that Dorner said to them that "He just wanted to clear his name!"
Clear his name for what?
When someone say's that "They want to clear their name" I'm under the impression that they were blamed for something that they did not do.
So could he have been set up by the LAPD for the murder of those people to punish him for being a whistle blower?
I'm just wondering.

especially after all the bullshit they've done since his alleged murders who's to say he did anything at all
 
People aren't riding for Dorner or making "him" a hero, its his ideas written in the manifesto and the disdain for the corrupt institution we know as the LAPD that got people hoping he would wage some type of war against them. As for the innocents killed, sorry for your loss but there are no innocents in war (personal war or global war)...if you are standing next to (related to) an enemy, you are with them (the enemy). Nobody speaks about how the LAPD does the same thing, shooting up trucks,and people (where he learned this type of warfare)... then they go scott free by saying "oops... well we are trying to kill a domestic terrorist with drones and shyt because he killed 4 people (really 2 cops)." Serial killers are not terrorist because usually they do not kill cops (which are the only lives that matter in this police state).

http://www.amazon.com/dp/0967513626/?tag=vp314-20
 
Although he was murdered by the police in a fucked up way, I still don't understand the support dude was given. You can't kill innocent people and be a hero in my book. If he just kept his war with the police and only the police, I could understand his "folk hero" status, but dude killed that couple. That was fucked up.....

Understand this...

Police officers are gears in a machine designed to destroy BLACK MEN. Many feel like anyone associated with them, benefits from them, or that contributes to them or their agenda DESERVES TO DIE.

That means their parents, spouses, or kids (i.e. sons have to pay for the sins of the father).
Even if they just have a desk job, still playing a part in that machine. :itsawrap:

As far as I'm concerned, no one he killed was innocent. :hmm:

Those kind of police are parasites that live off the tax dollars of the working man, essentially doing mostly NOTHING on a daily basis but maybe harassing some citizens (if it fancies them that day) and consuming resources.....all the while preying on the very people that they are paid ("handsomely") to "protect & serve.

FUCK 'EM!

YES THEY DESERVE TO DIE AND I HOPE THEY BURN IN HAYULL! :angry:
 
Understand this...

Police officers are gears in a machine designed to destroy BLACK MEN. Many feel like anyone associated with them, benefits from them, or that contributes to them or their agenda DESERVES TO DIE.

That means their parents, spouses, or kids (i.e. sons have to pay for the sins of the father).
Even if they just have a desk job, still playing a part in that machine. :itsawrap:

As far as I'm concerned, no one he killed was innocent. :hmm:

Those kind of police are parasites that live off the tax dollars of the working man, essentially doing mostly NOTHING on a daily basis but maybe harassing some citizens (if it fancies them that day) and consuming resources.....all the while preying on the very people that they are paid ("handsomely") to "protect & serve.

FUCK 'EM!

YES THEY DESERVE TO DIE AND I HOPE THEY BURN IN HAYULL! :angry:
I seriously doubt that if, God forbid, your son or daughter was killed under the same circumstances as the couple he shot, you'd be on some, "meh, they weren't innocent" shit.
 
this is new to me

what else did he say?

Found this explanation on the net. Who knows....

I think the "racist" label has to do with Ghandi's time in South Africa.

He apparently used the word "******" when discussing blacks in South Africa, and this has been interpreted by some as being a racist slur, but the term was not derogatory during Ghandi's life.

Some have misinterpreted some things he said because they misunderstood his use of the word.

He also made comments supporting Palestineans against the occupation by Israel, and some have considered those anti-Semetic, though Ghandi's long history of defense of Jews proves otherwise.

South Africa was early in his life, and helped shape his beliefs.

Apparently he was concerned about his own rights being abridged as an Indian, but was not as concerned about the rights of the black Africans.

I don't know all of GHandi's thoughts on Africans while he was in Africa, but I do know that the man he became, and the man he was beginning to become even then, would reject any view that one individual was superior to another based on a racial or religious grouping.

He was a very sophisticated thinker, a pragmatist, with a deep dislike for injustice. He might have somewhat neglected his family because of his involvement in the struggle for independence, but he was never a racist.
 
this is new to me

what else did he say?

He said whatever bullshit would help Indian people. Just like gays are for all types of marriage...except polygamous marriage. Just like the Quran is for peace and freedom but supports slavery. He was a hypocrite. He didn't like Africans and spoke freely about it. Despite the fact that Africans weren't the ones oppressing his people. So he wasn't against racism or oppression as long as it wasn't Indians being oppressed. He would have gladly assisted whites in their oppression of blacks as long as they let him be their lapdog at the least. Fuck'em. The sad state of human existence is that some people have to feel better than someone else to give meaning to their own sad life. Can't be spiritual and racist at the same time. Sorry ghandi, rest in piss.
 
Gandhi¡¯s desire for the Indians to be segregated from the blacks was so strong that he went to Johannesburg in late August of 1904 to protest the placing of blacks in the Indian section of the city: ¡°Why, of all places in Johannesburg, the Indian Location should be chosen for dumping down all the Kaffirs of the town passes my comprehension. ...Of course, under my suggestion, The Town Council must withdraw the Kaffirs from the Location. About this mixing of Kaffirs with the Indians, I must confess I feel most strongl

HTML:
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_23-3-2005_pg4_24

Now let us turn our attention to another and entirely unrepresented community-the Indian. He is in striking contrast with the native. While the native has been of little benefit to the State, it owes its prosperity largely to the Indians. While native loafers abound on every side, that species of humanity is almost unknown among Indians here.

HTML:
http://thenewblackmagazine.com/view.aspx?index=1260


During the `****** Wars' in South Africa he was a regular Gunga Din, who volunteered to organize a brigade of Indians to put down the Zulu uprising and was decorated himself for valor under fire.

Gandhi said on September 26, 1896 about the African people: "Ours is one continued struggle sought to be inflicted upon us by the Europeans, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw ******, whose occupation is hunting and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife, and then pass his life in indolence and nakedness."

One can understand the necessity of registration of Kaffirs who will not work, but why should registration be required for indentured Indians...?" Again on September 9, 1905, Gandhi wrote about the local Africans as: "in the majority of cases it compels the native to work for at least a few days a year" (meaning that the locals are lazy)

In the Indian Opinion of March 25, 1905, Gandhi wrote on a Bill regulating fire-arms: "In the instance of fire-arms, the Asiatic has been most improperly bracketed with the natives. The British Indian does not need any such restrictions as are imposed by the Bill on the natives regarding the carrying of fire-arms. The prominent race can remain so by preventing the native from arming himself. Is there the slightest vestige of justification for so preventing the British Indians?"
Gandhi always advised Indians not to align with other political groups in either colored or African communities. He was strongly opposed to the commingling of races.

In the Indian Opinion of September 24, 1903, Gandhi said: "We believe as much in the purity of races as we think they (the Whites) do... by advocating the purity of all races."

HTML:
http://www.raceandhistory.com/historicalviews/ghandi.htm
....
 
He said whatever bullshit would help Indian people. Just like gays are for all types of marriage...except polygamous marriage. Just like the Quran is for peace and freedom but supports slavery. He was a hypocrite. He didn't like Africans and spoke freely about it. Despite the fact that Africans weren't the ones oppressing his people. So he wasn't against racism or oppression as long as it wasn't Indians being oppressed. He would have gladly assisted whites in their oppression of blacks as long as they let him be their lapdog at the least. Fuck'em. The sad state of human existence is that some people have to feel better than someone else to give meaning to their own sad life. Can't be spiritual and racist at the same time. Sorry ghandi, rest in piss.


not would have family

he DID
 
We need to stop looking at these other races and fake religions through rose colored glasses. Most of their saints were never saintly towards us. I'm no Christian (fake religion) but quote Howard Thurman if you are trying to reference a true man of peace and introspection.
 
Back
Top