Cheney supports gay marriage

:eek: told ya'll it wasn't no difference between the 2 parties

Sorry, but I have zero tolerance for this 'gay' sh*t
 

Cheney family 'delighted' as lesbian daughter marries partner



600

Mary Cheney, right, and Heather Poe at the 2004 GOP convention. (Damon Winter / Los Angeles Times)



Los Angeles Times
By Kim Geiger
June 22, 2012, 10:31 a.m.


WASHINGTON -- Mary Cheney, the openly gay daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney, has married her longtime partner, Heather Poe.
The couple, who live together in Virginia and have two children, were married Friday morning in Washington, according to the Daily Caller, a news site co-founded by Neil Patel, a former advisor to the former vice president.

"Mary and Heather have been in a committed relationship for many years, and we are delighted that they were able to take advantage of the opportunity to have that relationship recognized," the Cheney family said in a statement. "Mary and Heather and their children are very important and much loved members of our family and we wish them every happiness."

The Cheneys are perhaps the most prominent Republican family to embrace same-sex marriage.

Dick Cheney has said he has long believed that the question of legalizing same-sex marriage should be left to states, but he also supported an effort by the George W. Bush administration for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriages.

"He sets the policy for this administration, and I support the president," Cheney said during a 2004 vice presidential debate.

Since leaving office, Cheney has said he now opposes a federal ban.

250px-46_Dick_Cheney_3x4.jpg

"I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish," he said in 2009. "Any kind of arrangement they wish. The question of whether or not there ought to be a federal statute to protect this, I don't support."​


kim.geiger@latimes.com

SOURCE: http://www.latimes.com/news/politic...hter-marries-partner-20120622,0,4031072.story
 
Hmmm, is Chaney doing this for any votes?

Is Chaney running for president?

Can Chaney change any policy as we speak?

Is Chaney in charge of making policy at all?

Anyone can support gay marriage, it's when you change the core *I repeat* the CORE definition of marriage is where the problem lies. When I talk about gay marriage, I'm really talking about civil unions. Something both parties support. I do not support changing the definition of marriage because:

1. Marriage, on the most part, is better when the states handle it.

2. The effect this might have on things like the definition of motherhood, and fatherhood. For example, in theory, if gay marriage is the same as traditional marriage, you are basically saying that a man is the same as a woman. This could effect everything from custody battles, to something so farfetched as a military draft.
 
Hmmm, is Chaney doing this for any votes?

Is Chaney running for president?


I don't know what your gibberish has to do with the main topic, but he was then!


source: msnbc


updated<ABBR style="DISPLAY: inline" class="dtstamp updated" title=2004-08-25T14:51:00>8/25/2004 10:51:00 AM ET</ABBR> 2004-08-25T14:51:00

Cheney at odds with Bush on gay marriage


DAVENPORT, Iowa — Vice President Dick Cheney, whose daughter Mary is a lesbian, drew criticism from both proponents and foes of gay marriage Tuesday after he distanced himself from President Bush’s call for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage.

At a campaign rally in this Mississippi River town, Cheney spoke supportively about gay relationships, saying “freedom means freedom for everyone,” when asked about his stand on gay marriage.

“Lynne and I have a gay daughter, so it’s an issue our family is very familiar with,” Cheney told an audience that included his daughter. “With the respect to the question of relationships, my general view is freedom means freedom for everyone. ... People ought to be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to.

“The question that comes up with the issue of marriage is what kind of official sanction or approval is going to be granted by government? Historically, that’s been a relationship that has been handled by the states. The states have made that fundamental decision of what constitutes a marriage,” he said.

Bush backs a constitutional amendment prohibiting gay marriage, a move Cheney says was prompted by various judicial rulings, including the action in Massachusetts that made gay marriage legal.

“I think his perception was that the courts, in effect, were beginning to change, without allowing the people to be involved,” Cheney said. “The courts were making the judgment for the entire country.”

Addressing Bush’s position on the amendment, Cheney said: “At this point, say, my own preference is as I’ve stated, but the president makes policy for the administration. He’s made it clear that he does, in fact, support a constitutional amendment on this issue.”

Those comments drew criticism from the conservative Family Research Council, with President Tony Perkins saying: “I find it hard to believe the vice president would stray from the administration’s position on defense policy or tax policy. For many pro-family voters, protecting traditional marriage ranks ahead of the economy and job creation as a campaign issue.”

Perkins added that if Cheney sees a problem with activist judges, “then how can he not endorse the same solution the president and his pro-family allies have proposed? We urge Vice President Cheney to support President Bush and a constitutional amendment on marriage.”

Steven Fisher, spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, a gay and lesbian advocacy group, said Cheney’s remarks show a stark difference with Bush’s efforts “to put discrimination in the Constitution.”

“President Bush is feeling the heat. The administration has been using gay Americans to drive a wedge into the electorate. There are millions of American families who have gay family members and friends, who are offended by the president’s use of discrimination,” Fisher said.

Last month, Lynne Cheney said states should have the final say over the legal status of personal relationships, a comment that came just days before the Senate failed to back the ban.

Cheney said the amendment did not have the votes to pass, but he also said the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which President Clinton signed into law in 1996, may be enough.

“Most states have addressed this and there is on the books the federal statute, the Defense of Marriage Act, passed in 1996, and to date, it has not been successfully challenged in the courts and may be sufficient to resolve the issue,” the vice president said.

The Cheneys have two daughters, both of whom are working on the campaign. Mary Cheney is director of vice presidential operations for the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign. She held a public role as her father’s assistant in the 2000 campaign and helped the GOP recruit gay voters during the 2002 midterm elections.

During the 2000 campaign, vice presidential candidate Cheney took the position that states should decide legal issues about personal relationships and that people should be free to enter relationships of their choosing. Sens. John Kerry of Massachusetts and John Edwards of NorthCarolina, oppose the amendment. The Democratic candidates also oppose gay marriage, but defend a gay couple’s rights to the same legal protections as those conferred in marriage.
 
Hmmm, is Chaney doing this for any votes?

Is Chaney running for president?

Can Chaney change any policy as we speak?

Is Chaney in charge of making policy at all?

Anyone can support gay marriage, it's when you change the core *I repeat* the CORE definition of marriage is where the problem lies. When I talk about gay marriage, I'm really talking about civil unions. Something both parties support. I do not support changing the definition of marriage because:

1. Marriage, on the most part, is better when the states handle it.

2. The effect this might have on things like the definition of motherhood, and fatherhood. For example, in theory, if gay marriage is the same as traditional marriage, you are basically saying that a man is the same as a woman. This could effect everything from custody battles, to something so farfetched as a military draft.

:confused: :confused: :confused:

I merely updated an old thread. Why are you actin so paranoid, actin ? ? ?
 
Back
Top