Chavez - Venezuela - Baseball

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Ozzie Guillen row: Can Miami speak freely on Castro?


This thread was originally posted on this board as a frame by user MCP,
however, because what appears to be improper code, the thread could
not be replied to, quoted, or otherwise edited, hence, it was deleted and
this thread created in its place.



<IFRAME SRC="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17667775" WIDTH=760 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17667775">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Re: Ozzie Guillen row: Can Miami speak freely on Castro?


Before I deposit my 2 cents, when search for the url to re-post the thread started
above, I came across another article from the BBC that I thought was appropriate
and relevant to the question asked above and raises another interesting question:
Should Free Speech (especially political speech) Get You Fired ? ? ?

Here it is:



<IFRAME SRC="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17660865" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17660865">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Re: Ozzie Guillen row: Can Miami speak freely on Castro?



Can Miami speak freely on Castro?


Miami may be changing, but it is still the most anti-Castro place on the planet, outside of possibly locales somewhere, maybe, in Cuba itself. But, what I find interesting is that (1) Ozzie Guillen is Venezuelan; and (2) Venezeluela's Presidente, Hugo Chavez, is Castro's most ardent supporter. In fact, Chavez is receiving cancer treatments as a friend of Fidel.

What could the loud mouth Ozzie Guillen have been thinking ??? - that Freedom of Speech would protect him against the wrath of the Cuban Community in Miami -- where anti-Castroism is not only fashionable, but probably a religion in and of itself ??? Surely he jest.

I think the real question should be whether the Cuban Community in South Florida should dictate Cuban policy - - against what might be better policy for the good of the nation, as a whole ? ? ?

Unfortunately, this is an election year and reason cannot be allowed to trump passion.

 
Re: Ozzie Guillen row: Can Miami speak freely on Castro?

Everything that I heard about going on in Cuba; I have experienced or seen done in the United States. You do not possess that much more freedom than Cubans.

More is done to cover it up and hide it; issue human rights reports to deflect critical examination away.
 
Last edited:
Re: Ozzie Guillen row: Can Miami speak freely on Castro?

How about sticking to the subject, for once.
 
Re: Ozzie Guillen row: Can Miami speak freely on Castro?



Unfortunately, this is an election year and reason cannot be allowed to trump passion.


No sooner than I spoke:




Americas Meeting Ends With Discord Over Cuba



CARTAGENA, Colombia — A summit meeting of Western Hemisphere nations ended without a final statement of consensus on Sunday, after the United States and some Latin American nations remained sharply divided over whether to continue excluding Cuba from such gatherings.

The developments made for a decidedly mixed result for Mr. Obama this weekend. By refusing to sign a statement that would have called for the next summit meeting to include Cuba, Mr. Obama avoided antagonizing some Cuban-American voters in Florida, a crucial battleground state in this year’s presidential election. But he angered his political allies among American union leaders and liberal groups, who had urged him not to certify that Colombia had met its obligations on labor rights. They cited continued human rights violations and even killings of union organizers in Colombia.

“We regret that the administration has placed commercial interests above the interests of workers and their trade unions,” Richard S. Trumka, the president of the A.F.L.-C.I.O., said in a statement.

The issue of Cuba’s exclusion from events like the Summit of the Americas gathering has been a perennially divisive one, and increasingly so lately, more than 50 years after the United States imposed its embargo of the island nation after the military takeover by Fidel Castro in 1959. While the push to include Cuba was led by leftist governments in the region, including Venezuela and Bolivia, Mr. Santos also joined in the effort, calling the American position a cold war anachronism.

Mr. Obama himself alluded on Saturday to unspecified regional issues that seemed “caught in a time warp,” but at the news conference on Sunday he defended the United States’s stance on Cuba, which had support from Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada.

“Cuba, unlike the other countries that are participating, has not yet moved to democracy,” Mr. Obama said. And referring generally to other Latin American countries’ success in overcoming dictatorship and oppression in favor of democracy, Mr. Obama asked “why we would ignore that same principle here.”

Mr. Obama denied acting out of electoral concern over Florida, saying that his position on Cuba had been consistent through his political career. He cited steps that his administration had taken to broaden relations between the American and Cuban people, including allowing Cuban-Americans to send money more freely to relatives in Cuba and to travel there more easily.




http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/16/w...mericas-ends-without-consensus-statement.html



 
Re: Ozzie Guillen row: Can Miami speak freely on Castro?

Right wing Cubans are running our foreign policy.
 
Why Major League Baseball Owners Will Cheer the Death of Hugo Chavez

source: The Nation

venezuela_baseball_cc_img.jpg

Kids playing baseball in Caracas, Venezuela

The death of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez will mean unseemly celebration on the right and unending debate on the left. Both reflect the towering legacy of Chavismo and how it challenged the global free market orthodoxy of the Washington consensus.

Less discussed will be that the passing of Hugo Chávez will also provoke unbridled joy in the corridors of power of Major League Baseball.

Historically, Venezuela has trailed only the Domincan Republic in the global race to provide a cheap source of Major League Baseball talent. In 2012, fifty-eight players on MLB rosters were born in Venezuela, second only to the DR’s sixty-four.

For decades, teams had set up unregulated “baseball academies” in both countries where children as young as 15 could be signed for a pittance, and then, for 97 percent of major league hopefuls, casually disposed without any future prospects. A Mother Jones article published this week exposed in excruciating detail the DR baseball “sweatshops” and the preventable death of young Washington Nationals teenage prospect Yewri Guillen. They describe the academies as a deadly breeding ground for tragedy defined by “corruption and youth exploitation.”

This is exactly what Chávez, a baseball fanatic himself, was aiming to challenge. Venezuela is the birthplace of towering talents such as the 2012 Triple Crown Winner Miguel Cabrera, “King” Félix Hernández and World Series MVP Pablo Sandoval. In the last twenty years, 200 Venezuelans have played in the Major Leagues, with more than 1,000 in the minors.

But the academies also left a wreckage of young lives behind, a status quo Chávez sought to challenge. He told MLB that they would have to institute employee and player benefits and job protections. He wanted education and job training, subsidized by MLB, to be a part of the academies. He also insisted that teams pay out 10 percent of players’ signing bonuses to the government. Chávez effectively wanted to tax MLB for the human capital they blithely take from the country.

As the CS Monitor put it, “The threat of expropriations and onerous foreign exchange controls make teams wary of doing business in Venezuela.”

Sure enough over the last decade, the number of teams with “academies” in Venezuela has dwindled from twenty-one to five. The threats of kidnapping and violence are often cited by teams as the primary reason for this move, but the facts say otherwise. As one major league executive said anonymously to the LA Times, “Teams have left Venezuela because of issues with the government and security that have made it more difficult to do business there. Absent those problems, there would be a lot more teams here using academies.”

Major League Baseball has never been shy in their rage that Chávez wasn’t “rolling out the red carpet” for them “like they do in the Dominican Republic.” Lou Meléndez, senior adviser to the MLB’s international relations department, said in 2007, “We don’t pay federations money for signing players anywhere in the world, and we don’t expect to do so. It’s certainly not a way to conduct business…. When you see certain industries that are being nationalized, you begin to wonder if they are going to nationalize the baseball industry in Venezuela.”

But despite the academy closures, baseball never stopped strip-mining Venezuela’s baseball hopefuls. Instead, they now sign Venezuelan children and whisk them off to the Dominican Republic to be trained, miles and an ocean apart from their families. Rather than be more humane in response to Chávez, MLB was just more brutal.

I spoke with Illinois history professor and author of Playing America’s Game, Adrian Burgos Jr. He said it in perfect, albeit wrenching, fashion:
The irony is palpable. On the same day Mother Jones publishes an article on Yewri Guillen’s death and the Washington Nationals’ lack of having a certified medical official on staff at its Dominican academy, Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez dies. Certainly, Chávez’s demise makes MLB officials excited at the prospect of re-establishing their own blueprint for a baseball academy system being put into place in Venezuela, an effort that Chávez had forestalled. I still wonder who is/are the Latino representative(s) within the Commissioner’s Office speaking for Latinos. Do we need any more teenagers [like] Yewri Guillen, MLB prospect, dying for a lack of access to proper medical care due to a lack of health insurance and funds in the DR or Venezuela—health care that ought to have been, would have been, provided for such a signed prospect in the US? Dead prospects and dead president—I am weary of the road ahead in Venezuela and on its baseball diamonds.
 
Back
Top