Charlie Kirk: “If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, ‘Boy, I hope he’s qualified.’”
- Thread starter MASTERBAKER
- Start date
Glad you found a better way to die, honkey motherfucker!
the way he bled out i was damn near sure that was an aorta
I always thought he was full of shit......he was, but also a lot of blood.
MeidasTouch
2h ·BREAKING: The alleged shooter of Charlie Kirk is Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old from Utah. He comes from a very pro-gun conservative family and proudly wore a Trump costume for Halloween a few years ago.
They’re not supposed to. Pharaohs just siphon a little extra grain to their tent every now and then. Understanding Pavlov, what happens when they know that they want the extra grain? Living in a Pavlovian Society is why we are here. What happens when Pavvy doesn’t have enough grains to pretend he finds all of this interesting?
The North Star with Shaun King
Trump's Hindu podcaster turned FBI Director says he'll see the Christian, Charlie Kirk, in Valhalla, the Viking heaven
I swear real life is stranger than fiction. Yes, I am making you watch this video of Kash Patel.
Shaun KingSep 12, 2025
The North Star with Shaun King is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Subscribe
YES, I am making you watch that video!
Enter - Kash Patel - the conspiracy theorist/podcaster that Trump made Director of the FBI. As he ended the press conference announcing that they believed they have arrested the killer of Charlie Kirk, he said what might be the strangest thing I’ve ever heard an FBI Director say before - and they’ve said some pretty strange things over the years…
Ummmmm……
Where do I begin? Should I even begin? Is this even worth my time? Are my pain meds speaking or is this really me right now?
First, my guess is that Kash Patel has been watching the show, Vikings, on Netflix and now thinks he’s a Viking. Is that a good guess?
Because Hindus don’t go to Valhalla. And neither do Christians.
In fact, Vikings regularly killed Christians.
I know Kash was raised Hindu, but maybe he’s no longer Hindu.
That’s it.
Kash Patel is now a viking.
I solved it.
But that doesn’t explain why he thinks he will see Charlie Kirk there.
Trump should literally fire this man for the embarrassment of it all.
Rockaway Primetime Reporting
Sanctuary · Scott Dugdale ·
BREAKING: Radio host Charlamagne Tha God enrages MAGA world by telling the blunt truth about the Charlie Kirk assassination, condemning it as horrific while also pointing out that the right-winger "understood the price" of his beliefs.
Before grabbing pitchforks, people need to listen to Kirk in his own words...
"Everybody is just assuming this is political violence and it quite possibly it is, matter fact I'm sure it is, but you know what else it is? Gun violence," Charlamagne said on "The Breakfast Club."
"Okay, these nutjobs who don't believe in freedom of speech clearly believe in their right to bear arms and because of the lax gun laws in America they are able to get firearms to carry out these violent acts," he continued.
"Now, let the record show that when I heard what happened to Charlie Kirk yesterday, I immediately felt fear. Okay? I was afraid. I'm a Black man in America, I think about getting shot every day," he went on. "But guess what? Every American should think about getting shot every day when you're out and about in a public place simply because it's been zero days since a mass shooting happened in this country."
Kirk, a hardcore pro-gun demagogue who made a living stoking racial and gender divisions, was shot and killed at a speaking even at Utah Valley University, seemingly with a high-powered long range rifle. The shooter is still at large thanks to the deeply incompetent MAGA hacks that now run the FBI.
"But my personal fear was also because I'm a media personality," Charlamagne said. "I don’t want to live in a country where media personalities are being shot and killed for their opinions or what they believe, but I also know that as much as we like to point to the First Amendment and say we all have freedom of speech, we are not free from the consequences of said speech."
“That’s why mindfulness of what we say is very important, because there is a cost to everything that comes out of our mouth. And unfortunately, we don’t get to set the price," he continued.
"And I must say, Charlie Kirk understood the price of our freedoms more than most,” said Charlamagne before playing a clip of Kirk that has gone viral in the wake of the tragic killing.
"You will never lived in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel," said Kirk. "But I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of unfortunately some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe."
If Republicans did not habitually block every attempt at sane gun violence out of a need to pander to gun nut voters and firearm manufacturers, Kirk might still be alive. His ideology has created an America that is awash in guns.
"I just wonder when people say things like that, do they think they may be one of those deaths?" said Charlamagne. "Is worth it when one of those casualties is you or someone you love to protect the rights given to us by the Constitution?”
“If they believe they too could be one of those deaths, and they’re cool with that, I respect it so I guess you honor Charlie Kirk by buying more guns — based on that logic yeah — but I don't know about y'all but that sounds kind of ridiculous to me," he added.
“See, even if Charlie Kirk had a gun yesterday, it wouldn’t have protected him,” he continued. "When somebody got the drop on you, they got you. Only thing that could have saved Charlie Kirk yesterday was keeping guns out of the hands of violent extremists like the person who killed him.”
"And the only way to do that is with common sense gun reform," the host concluded.
FOLLOW us
Rockaway Primetime Reporting RPR
Rockaway Primetime Reporting
Sanctuary · Scott Dugdale ·
BREAKING: Donald Trump's niece Mary Trump enrages MAGA world by sharing the cold hard truth that her uncle is responsible for the "political violence" that he is desperately trying to blame on Democrats.
We won't allow these fascists to gaslight us...
"Political violence and the rhetoric that drives it are almost entirely on the side of the Republican Party, and no person is more responsible for it than Donald Trump,” Mary wrote on her Substack.
"Facing that truth does not mean rejoicing in what happened to Charlie Kirk. Quite the opposite: It means coming to terms with what is driving the political violence in America today," she wrote.
President Trump exploited the assassination of right-wing demagogue Charlie Kirk earlier this week by calling him a "martyr" and blaming the "radical left" even though the identity of the shooter wasn't known at the time. Even now, it's the killer's motive and political beliefs are unknown. Trump doesn't care. He saw an opportunity to sow division and he seized it.
Mary pointed out that Democratic lawmakers rushed to condemn Kirk's shooting while Republicans have sought to turn it to their political advantage by blaming Democrats and journalists. Comparatively, when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his home, conservatives celebrated and mocked the horrifying incident, with Donald Trump himself even joining in. Republicans demand an endless supply of empathy from liberals but provide none themselves.
"Donald has almost single-handedly created the conditions in which his grievance, his vengeance, and his cruelty extend to anybody that supports him," Mary Trump continued. "Anybody who opposes him or stands up to him or simply doesn’t support him is his enemy and is therefore not worthy of protection. Worse, they are considered legitimate targets of abuse or revenge, cruelty or violence."
"He has incited violence against his perceived political enemies as well as against his own government and then pardoned those who committed it on his behalf," she went on. "This is not a 'both sides issue.' This is not a moment when we put aside our differences to come to some agreed upon notion about how to move beyond this. With Donald Trump and those who support, enable, and capitulate to him in power that would be impossible."
"We have arrived here in large part because this country has been purposefully and maliciously divided against itself because of the rhetoric coming from Donald Trump and the Republican Party," she added.
She went on to quote Kirk's own now-viral words. The MAGA demagogue said that the price of an "armed citizenry" is a certain number of guns deaths.
"But I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights," said Kirk. "That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.”
Mary Trump empathetically but forcefully addressed his words—
"Well, unfortunately, the universe we live in is a universe created by people who actually think that guns in our society are more important than the lives of the people living in it," she wrote. "Unfortunately, we live in a universe in which violence, political or otherwise, has been normalized by one party and one party only. The Democrats should condemn what happened today. Any decent right-thinking person should condemn what happened today."
"But we are missing the point, we are, indeed, missing an opportunity if we do not take the tragedy that unfolded today as permission to start a broader conversation about how we got here, who's responsible, and quite frankly what the hell we are going to do about it," she concluded.
This was nothing but Joe’s version of the Democratic fish fry. Sell your soul for some cook out
This is downright delusional.
Rockaway Primetime Reporting
Favorites ·1h ·
Sanctuary · Scott Dugdale ·
BREAKING: Radio host Charlamagne Tha God enrages MAGA world by telling the blunt truth about the Charlie Kirk assassination, condemning it as horrific while also pointing out that the right-winger "understood the price" of his beliefs.
Before grabbing pitchforks, people need to listen to Kirk in his own words...
"Everybody is just assuming this is political violence and it quite possibly it is, matter fact I'm sure it is, but you know what else it is? Gun violence," Charlamagne said on "The Breakfast Club."
"Okay, these nutjobs who don't believe in freedom of speech clearly believe in their right to bear arms and because of the lax gun laws in America they are able to get firearms to carry out these violent acts," he continued.
"Now, let the record show that when I heard what happened to Charlie Kirk yesterday, I immediately felt fear. Okay? I was afraid. I'm a Black man in America, I think about getting shot every day," he went on. "But guess what? Every American should think about getting shot every day when you're out and about in a public place simply because it's been zero days since a mass shooting happened in this country."
Kirk, a hardcore pro-gun demagogue who made a living stoking racial and gender divisions, was shot and killed at a speaking even at Utah Valley University, seemingly with a high-powered long range rifle. The shooter is still at large thanks to the deeply incompetent MAGA hacks that now run the FBI.
"But my personal fear was also because I'm a media personality," Charlamagne said. "I don’t want to live in a country where media personalities are being shot and killed for their opinions or what they believe, but I also know that as much as we like to point to the First Amendment and say we all have freedom of speech, we are not free from the consequences of said speech."
“That’s why mindfulness of what we say is very important, because there is a cost to everything that comes out of our mouth. And unfortunately, we don’t get to set the price," he continued.
"And I must say, Charlie Kirk understood the price of our freedoms more than most,” said Charlamagne before playing a clip of Kirk that has gone viral in the wake of the tragic killing.
"You will never lived in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel," said Kirk. "But I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of unfortunately some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe."
If Republicans did not habitually block every attempt at sane gun violence out of a need to pander to gun nut voters and firearm manufacturers, Kirk might still be alive. His ideology has created an America that is awash in guns.
"I just wonder when people say things like that, do they think they may be one of those deaths?" said Charlamagne. "Is worth it when one of those casualties is you or someone you love to protect the rights given to us by the Constitution?”
“If they believe they too could be one of those deaths, and they’re cool with that, I respect it so I guess you honor Charlie Kirk by buying more guns — based on that logic yeah — but I don't know about y'all but that sounds kind of ridiculous to me," he added.
“See, even if Charlie Kirk had a gun yesterday, it wouldn’t have protected him,” he continued. "When somebody got the drop on you, they got you. Only thing that could have saved Charlie Kirk yesterday was keeping guns out of the hands of violent extremists like the person who killed him.”
"And the only way to do that is with common sense gun reform," the host concluded.
FOLLOW us
Rockaway Primetime Reporting RPR
What is the arguing technique that Charlie Kirk the radio talk show host uses? I saw some of his clips on YouTube, and it seems like he has a clever technique that is manipulative.
Easy. He never gets into properly moderated debates. He’s always the moderator and the debater. When you hold the mic it’s easy to use the usual bundle of demagogue’s tricks. Trump does the same only with less rapidfire delivery since he’s too far gone mentally to work that fast.
Ben Sharpiro does the same.
---------------------------
He had 1 technique. There was no other technique. I have no idea what these other people are saying.
Kirk framed the topic. That gave him an advantage because everyone else ended up immediately having to work against it.
However, if you aren’t a complete idiot, you would already know all his talking points and prepare your responses accordingly. They weren’t complex topics per se.
These dumb ass college kids went into the debates with him completely unprepared. They were too sure of their arguments only to realise they had no argument because their argument didn’t suit the framed topic.
---------------------------
Kirk uses a very cynical and biased version of the Socratic method of debate, by which he asks leading, unrelated, or flawed questions in an attempt to elicit a series of responses from the opponent so he could find some contradiction in the answers to use as proof that the entire argument is invalid.
Well, he used to do that. He doesn’t do anything any longer because he’s dead now (too bad, not sad).
The problem was that Kirk used spurious, misleading, and frequently flat out incorrect arguments and relied on logical fallacies - usually straw man, ad hominem, appeal to ignorance, and false equivalency among others.
For example, in a “debate” about gender equity and women’s rights he asked whether a woman has a prostate. A question that has absolutely nothing at all to do with the question of gender equity, unless the presence of a prostate is somehow relevant. Well, he used to ask questions like that. He doesn’t any more because he’s dead (too bad, not sad).
Hucksters manipulate the Socratic method quite easily by employing shady tactics, volume, speaking over others, and then asking a barrage of logically flawed, unrelated, and irrelevant questions in rapid fire to overwhelm the other person with so much bullshit it’s impossible to respond to it all. This is what Kirk does. Well, this is what he did because he’s dead now (too bad, not sad). What begins as a debate about gender equity ends up being about trying to score points asking for a definition of “woman”.
Is that clever? Sure, I suppose. But only if one isn’t actually debating or willing to stick to a subject and present a good-faith position.
But then again, Kirk doesn’t want to engage in debate. It’s all propaganda and content he could monetize by owning the libs in a way that his followers mistake for intelligence, but which is actually a series of accusations relying on logical fallacy to support.
Well, he didn’t used to want to engage in debate. He’s dead now (too bad, not sad).
www.quora.com
Easy. He never gets into properly moderated debates. He’s always the moderator and the debater. When you hold the mic it’s easy to use the usual bundle of demagogue’s tricks. Trump does the same only with less rapidfire delivery since he’s too far gone mentally to work that fast.
Ben Sharpiro does the same.
---------------------------
He had 1 technique. There was no other technique. I have no idea what these other people are saying.
Kirk framed the topic. That gave him an advantage because everyone else ended up immediately having to work against it.
However, if you aren’t a complete idiot, you would already know all his talking points and prepare your responses accordingly. They weren’t complex topics per se.
These dumb ass college kids went into the debates with him completely unprepared. They were too sure of their arguments only to realise they had no argument because their argument didn’t suit the framed topic.
---------------------------
Kirk uses a very cynical and biased version of the Socratic method of debate, by which he asks leading, unrelated, or flawed questions in an attempt to elicit a series of responses from the opponent so he could find some contradiction in the answers to use as proof that the entire argument is invalid.
Well, he used to do that. He doesn’t do anything any longer because he’s dead now (too bad, not sad).
The problem was that Kirk used spurious, misleading, and frequently flat out incorrect arguments and relied on logical fallacies - usually straw man, ad hominem, appeal to ignorance, and false equivalency among others.
For example, in a “debate” about gender equity and women’s rights he asked whether a woman has a prostate. A question that has absolutely nothing at all to do with the question of gender equity, unless the presence of a prostate is somehow relevant. Well, he used to ask questions like that. He doesn’t any more because he’s dead (too bad, not sad).
Hucksters manipulate the Socratic method quite easily by employing shady tactics, volume, speaking over others, and then asking a barrage of logically flawed, unrelated, and irrelevant questions in rapid fire to overwhelm the other person with so much bullshit it’s impossible to respond to it all. This is what Kirk does. Well, this is what he did because he’s dead now (too bad, not sad). What begins as a debate about gender equity ends up being about trying to score points asking for a definition of “woman”.
Is that clever? Sure, I suppose. But only if one isn’t actually debating or willing to stick to a subject and present a good-faith position.
But then again, Kirk doesn’t want to engage in debate. It’s all propaganda and content he could monetize by owning the libs in a way that his followers mistake for intelligence, but which is actually a series of accusations relying on logical fallacy to support.
Well, he didn’t used to want to engage in debate. He’s dead now (too bad, not sad).
What is the arguing technique that Charlie Kirk the radio talk show host uses? I saw some of his clips on YouTube, and it seems like he h...
Answer (1 of 4): Kirk uses a very cynical and biased version of the Socratic method of debate, by which he asks leading, unrelated, or flawed questions in an attempt to elicit a series of responses from the opponent so he could find some contradiction in the answers to use as proof that the entir...
Black pilot being qualified? Well, that white gunman was qualified......
they all came from the same place ppl like crowder used 8yrs + ago , who I think was one of the first to do it in a "public debate' style but unbeknownst to his unprepared opponents "mostly college kids" he could weave his arguments to make it seem he won the debate . its unfortunately quite persuasive to the unassuming ear
The full context of the quote was as follows (beginning at 50:19):
Charlie Kirk: “If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, ‘Boy, I hope he’s qualified.’”
“…That’s not who I am”— Charlie Kirk implied DEI policies give him racist thoughts
- J.D. Wolf
- 9 hours ago
Fresh off his attack on MLK, Charlie took took to attacking Black surgeons and pilots on his ThoughtCrime show. Kirk said that seeing a Black pilot makes him doubt the pilot is qualified:
Charlie Kirk and producer Blake Neff
Rumble
Charlie Kirk: “If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, ‘Boy, I hope he’s qualified.’”
Kirk tried to deflect his racist comment:
Trump with Charlie Kirk
Kirk’s producer, Blake Neff chimed in, blaming the left for Kirk’s racist outburst. Neff said it’s “the reality the left has created.” Kirk went on to essentially argue that DEI hiring policies give him racist thoughts.
More Videos
00:36
Next up in 10Marjorie Taylor Greene Stunned By Trump's Underperformance, Calls Nikki Haley's Votes 'Fake' and Insists She 'Doesn't Have This Much Support'
01:16
Nikki Haley Says she Had Black Friends
00:34
Trump Defames E. Jean Carroll Again - 'Totally Fabricated Story'
00:49
Trump Compares Himself to a Rogue Cop and Pedophile Priest in Rant Demanding Immunity for Crimes
04:32
Ron DeSantis Drops Out of Presidential Race
01:49
Blexit Director Pierre Wilson Implied MLK "Not a Hero," Came Out Against Black History Month
01:14
Elise Stefanik Calls E. Jean Carroll A Liar
0 seconds of 55 secondsVolume 0%
Earlier on the show, Kirk also took a shot at Black woman pilots stating he wants a “cookie-cutter” pilot, not “LaQueesha James.”
0 of 1 minute, 8 secondsVolume 0%
Pilots weren’t the only vocation addressed by Kirk. Kirk implied he wouldn’t want a Black lesbian to be his surgeon:
Tuskegee Airmen at the Aircraft Exchange ceremony July 26, 2023 where the PT-17 Stearman was inducted into the National Museum of the Air Force at Wright-Patterson AFB in Ohio
Wikimedia Commons
Kirk, who recently attacked MLK has yet to be called out by elected Republicans who attend his conferences.
He's a "Bad Guy"— Charlie Kirk Attacked Martin Luther King, Jr. in Preview of TPUSA's New Anti-MLK Platform
Read More
Kirk, who is CEO of Turning Point USA, has double down on his recent rhetoric. Kirk had his Blexit director in charge Black outreach go on his show and give him a pass for attacking MLK and saying whatever he wants to.
Kirk wearing a MAGA hat
While on his show, Blexit Director Pierre Wilson came out against Black History Month and compared Netflix’s Black movie category to segregated water fountains.
Charlie Kirk's Director of Black Outreach Approved MLK Attack And Came Out Against Black History Month
Read More
Kirk’s employees are giving him a pass. Republicans are giving him a pass. This is today’s Republican Party.
I've seen the video where this quote comes from and the broader context doesn’t change the misguided and biased views of Affirmative Action and DEI. The ironic part is that Kirk’s opinion is rooted in the belief that American society has always been fair to its minority citizens, and that Affirmative Action and DEI disrupted this supposed fairness.
Segregation and Jim Crow laws lasted nearly a century, yet the generational impact on Black communities is rarely discussed (especially since he referenced a Black pilot in his example). These laws enabled many mediocre and subpar white men to secure jobs, promotions, and careers simply because they were white and male, and this was legal for over 80 years.
The qualifications of white men are never questioned, no matter how incompetent they may be—that’s a privilege. Assuming that any Black person in a certain position doesn’t belong there isn’t due to Affirmative Action or DEI; it stems from Kirk’s own inherent bias against seeing Black people in spaces he and others like him don’t believe they should occupy.
This is the real reason behind the pushback against Affirmative Action and DEI. So, here’s a question: why was Affirmative Action created in the first place? The answers to this will reveal a lot about someone’s perspective.
Similar threads
